Maersk Oil Trading Panama S.A. and Maersk A/S (collectively, Maersk) on Friday (5 February) filed a legal suit against Glencore Ltd. (Glencore) seeking to claim an approximate USD 6.1 million (exact: $6,096,276.73) in total damages suffered by two vessels, according to court documents obtained by Manifold Times.
Via a swap deal with Glencore, Maersk received approximately 24,000 barrels of RMK 700 grade marine fuel from the PetroAmerica Terminal S.A. (PATSA) tank facility at the Panama Canal on 8 February 2018.
The cargo of marine fuel was loaded from the PATSA terminal to the Maersk chartered bunker barge Kollum, which later delivered the product as bunkers to the Maersk Aras and Sofie Maersk.
Damages suffered by Maersk Aras
The 4,664 TEU capacity containership Maersk Aras began burning the fuel on 15 February and suffered a complete engine failure on 17 February. The vessel had to divert to Manzanillo, Mexico, where she was required to take on an additional 1,100 bbls of replacement fuel in order to continue to trade.
The vessel suffered damages totalling approximately USD 1.90 million (exact: $1,899,552.01). Broken down, the costs translate to $617,153.34 (repair costs), $1,282,398.67 (additional losses and expenses), and $1,459,600.31 (Maersk’s own losses).
Damages suffered by Sofie Maersk
The 9,578 TEU capacity containership Sofie Maersk started consuming the fuel on 1 March and encountered fuel pump issues on 2 March; it experienced main engine failure on 4 March 4 while in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and had to be towed as a dead ship to Honolulu, Hawaii for repair and provision of 2,100 mt of replacement fuel oil.
Total damage suffered by the vessel was approximately USD 4.20 million (exact: $4,196,724.72). Broken down, the costs translate to $2,829,414.17 (repair costs, towage), and $1,367,310.55 (additional losses and expenses).
Veritas Petroleum Services (VPS) tests show presence of contaminants
Following the engine failures experienced on Maersk Aras and Sofie Maersk, Maersk sent bunker samples taken during the bunkering operation between bunker barge Kollum and receiving vessels Maersk Aras and Sofie Maersk, including a dock manifold line displacement sample, to VPS’ fuel testing laboratories in Houston, Singapore, and the United Kingdom for testing.
VPS tests confirmed the presence of numerous contaminants including plastic, fibres, black gum, paraffins, fatty acids, and other components present in the bunker fuel samples.
Maersk seeks total $6.1 million claim from Glencore
The damages suffered by Maersk Aras ($1,899,552.01) and Sofie Maersk ($4,196,724.72) has now led to Maersk seeking a total $6.1 million (exact: $6,096,276.73) in damages from Glencore due to alleged breach of contract, products liability in tort, and negligence, stated Maersk’s lawyers.
The legal team is aware of Glencore filing a declaratory judgment action at the New York Supreme Court during 2019; the aim was to seek a declaration that it is not liable to Maersk (either MOT Panama or Maersk Line A/S) under the contract, in tort or otherwise regarding the current legal case.
“Despite the fact that the claims asserted by Maersk herein are effectively the mirror image of the declaratory judgment claims brought by Glencore in the state court action, Glencore stated that it would oppose a motion by Maersk to amend its answer to assert affirmative counterclaims in that case,” they state.
“Maersk disagrees with Glencore’s position and filed a motion for leave to amend on January 29, 2021.”
Photo credit: MarineTraffic / Kim Bridges
Published: 9 February, 2021
“It was my mistake but I was instructed by my boss to place the magnet. About the risk, I am not aware. I did not receive any money from him,” said suspect.
Recommends drip sampling when bunkering and to consume bunkers after viewing test results.
Achieving the long-term target of decarbonisation requires new bunker fuel types and a systemic and regulatory change within the industry, says bp.
Anapo has committed its Mersey Spirit and Rimorchiatori LazialI its Magic Duba to the fleet, while Bunker Energy is in charge of sales for the venture.
NBF mulls use of blockchain-based registry of trade finance transactions as secure central database for the banking industry to streamline documentation processes and resolve transparency issues.
‘China, with ample MGO supply, is well positioned to attract shippers,’ says Wood Mackenzie.
‘The MOU will foster innovation in smart and autonomous ship technologies, and support the use of green ammonia as a sustainable fuel to help decarbonise global shipping,’ says the Chief Executive of MPA.
PetroSeraya appoints YTL PowerSeraya veteran See Yoong Hwee to drive its fuel tank leasing operations; together with Rafe Liam as Commercial Manager, they will spearhead the company’s initiatives.
‘This biofuel bunker delivery represents a new chapter for Eng Hua as we are now moving with the times towards the era of decarbonisation,’ Mike Sin, Director at Eng Hua, tells bunkering publication Manifold Times.
MPA has also asked Glencore to improve its internal procedures to ensure that prompt action is taken in future when it becomes aware of, or reasonably suspects, any irregularity in fuel quality, it states.
Dynamic Asset Investments Limited and Goldsland Holdings Co Ltd helped Vermont UM Bunkering maintain a “Cash Float” of about SGD 100,000 to facilitate “buyback” bunker transactions at Singapore port.
Senior Cargo Officer gained SGD 48,800 worth of commission from “buyback” bunker transactions and illegally obtained SGD 410,712.257 by cheating Vermont, a Singapore court heard on Thursday (21 July).
