Lloyd’s Register Fuel Oil Bunkering Analysis and Advisory Service (FOBAS) on Tuesday (26 January) published a bulletin alerting the maritime industry to VLSFO bunker fuel that had Total Sediment Potential test results exceeding the ISO8217 specification limit in the ARA region, Houston and Istanbul:
In recent weeks, FOBAS has tested several samples from ARA (Antwerp, Rotterdam, Amsterdam), Houston and Istanbul, which had tested Total Sediment Potential (TSP) results exceeding the ISO8217 specification limit of 0.10% m/m.
The ARA region samples were all VSLFO fuels and TSP results ranged from 0.16% m/m to 0.56% m/m. Extended analysis indicated these results were mainly due to precipitated asphaltenic material.
The Houston samples were all VSLFO fuels and TSP results ranged from 0.21% m/m to 0.33% m/m. Extended analysis indicated these results were mainly due to extraneous dirt content
The Istanbul samples were all VSLFO fuels and TSP results ranged from 0.17% m/m to 0.45% m/m. Extended analysis indicated these results were mainly due to extraneous dirt content.
Fuels with high sediments can result in excessive sludge deposition in tanks and throughout the handling and treatment/fuel injection systems. Furthermore, in certain cases the attempted use of such fuels may result in highly compromised combustion leading to engine and turbocharger damage.
In view of the above, if your ships are planning to bunker in these ports, we recommend that suppliers are advised of your concerns regarding the stability of the fuel in the area, and that they provide you with additional reassurance that they will adhere to the ISO 8217 requirements for the grade ordered.
Additional attention should be given to the collection of bunker samples. It should be ensured that all parties have witnessed the sampling process and have signed witness forms accordingly, and that the supporting documentation includes records of all the samples considered representative of the fuel as loaded.
Related: FOBAS Alert: Low Flash Point Distillate Marine Fuels in Falmouth
Photo credit: Hans-Reniers
Published: 27 January, 2021
GCMS techniques show fuel samples all contained significant levels of chlorinated hydrocarbon compounds.
A carbon free maritime sector by 2050 may seem a very long way from here, but big liner operators are already starting to make plans well in advance.
Viscosity issues were the main cause of off-specs at Singapore, Koh Si Chang Transhipment Area, and Ust Luga port.
Bunker supplier suggested to provide CoQ of Aluminium + Silicon concentration during bunkering.
Historic evidence of causing problems due to sludging, particularly during purification and around filters.
IBIA seeks to debunk myths spread around the IMO regulations and the 2020 global sulphur cap.
Significant uptick in the number of quality claims being alleged by ship owners has also been seen since the implementation of contactless bunkering operations, notes Partner at Rajah & Tann.
‘The launch of our company website signifies the readiness of Singfar to engage with relevant stakeholders to achieve our mission of enabling sustainable trade,’ Managing Director tells Manifold Times.
Associate Director at Helmsman highlights the need to stay up-to-date with latest protocols / measures introduced by MPA, with continuous education of Master and crew of the visiting vessel.
BunkerPlanner Lite is an attempt to educate professionals engaged in bunker decisions about the use of advanced technology in the decision process, explains BunkerMetric CEO Christian Plum.
Senior Associate at Clyde & Co offers guidance to protect shipowners and bunker tanker operators in the event opposing counterparty breaches Covid-19 protocols, resulting in Covid-19 transmission.
Having a surveyor’s watchful eye to detect illegal activities also sends a strong signal to barge and vessel crew not to undertake any intended non-compliance, states VPS Senior Sales Manager.
