The following is a letter written by Nik Delmeire, Secretary General at the European Shippers’ Council, sent to various members of the European Commission including Violeta Bulc, Commissioner for Transport; Henrik Hololei, Director-General for Mobility and Transport; Hubert de Broca, Head of Unit: Antitrust, Post and Other Services, DG Competition to investigate if recent Emergency Bunker Surcharges of shipping companies have violated any principles of fair competition:
The European Shippers’ Council (ESC) has been informed by its members that most of the largest container liner companies have increased their freight rates as of June 1st, 2018, by adding an emergency bunker surcharge to the normal freight rate.
Under the present circumstances, the use of such instrument is unjustified. Oil prices had indeed been rising during the last month, but the latest hike cannot be assimilated to an emergency. Oil price fluctuations, up or down, had been frequently happening in the past years and no negative surcharge was applied when the barrel of oil went down to 40 US$ some time ago.
The application of any emergency surcharge should be reserved for events that cannot be foreseen (such as a crisis influencing the availability of oil). In those situations, it would be unreasonable to have the carrier bear alone the impact on the price of bunker fuel.
On the contrary, under the present circumstances, the carrier can use a specific clause which exists in many contracts, except for all-in rates type of contracts or spot contracts, to revise the freight rates accordingly. Including such a clause in the contract is part of the negotiating process between the parties. If such a clause is not provided for in the contract in force, the price should remain the same until the contract is completed.
The fact that the container liners, who announced that they would apply such a surcharge, have been doing it almost simultaneously is, from ESC point of view, tantamount to price signaling, and therefore, is in contradiction with the spirit of the “GRI commitment” which liners agreed upon with the European Commission 2 years ago. At that moment, fourteen container liner shipping companies committed to increase price transparency for customers and to reduce the likelihood of coordinating prices by ending the practice of publishing and communicating General Rate Increase (GRI) announcements, i.e. changes to prices expressed solely as an amount or percentage of the change, along with several other measures to improve price transparency. This commitment was given legal force by a Commission Decision on 7 July 2016.
The current potential sign of restricted competition is also given at a time when the European Commission is starting the process of assessing the existing Consortia Block Exemption Regulation.
With this letter, we would like to make you aware of the present state of facts and urge the European Commission to act accordingly if any principles of fair competition are broken. ESC remains at your disposal for any further clarification you may require.
Related: ONE joins shipping bunker surcharge trend
Related: Maersk, CMA CGM introduce bunker surcharges
Related: MSC issues temporary emergency bunker surcharge
Related: GSF: Emergency bunker surcharges ‘unwelcomed’
Published: 18 June, 2018
Port Klang-registered vessel detained over unauthorised anchoring in the waters of East Johor, says MMEA.
Industry will have to commit to investing around USD 40 billion annually by 2030 for SZEF bunkering and production; current orders for SZEF-ready ships should increase further, says report. Industry will have to commit to investing around USD 40 billion annually by 2030 for scalable zero emission fuels bunkering and
Net Zero Marine Services will install the first charging point at West India Pier and another set to follow in central London, supported by a Port of London Authority loan.
Surge due to unexpected higher costs and instability of VLSFO aggravated by unexpected black carbon emission issues.
Hybrid tugboats are a perfect vessel for green ports, as they perform as well as diesel-powered equivalents while drastically reducing emissions, it states.
‘Making major alteration to the engines is not simple liking decide to change the paint color scheme of the ship,’ says Captain Saleem Alavi.
“In TotalEnergies, we already have projects along the e-Fuel value chain, from green electricity and green / blue hydrogen to e-Fuel production that will be integrated along the marine fuels value chain in time to come,” shares Louise Tricoire.
Buyers can nominate deliveries on platform and plan operations together with suppliers following ‘one single truth’ concept with all players aware of what has been agreed when and by whom, says DNV spokesman.
Rotterdam’s intention to mandate the usage of MFMs goes down well with licensed bunker supplier VT Group; MFM providers supportive of move but stressed continuous monitoring is needed for optimum performance.
Cost of alternative bunker fuels, bunker operations and technology advancement are some considerations to be examined by the maritime industry, says Neo, director of SDE International Pte Ltd.
Kim Hyung Joon and Han Donghoon were planning to join the Singapore entities of Hartree Group - either Hartree Partners Singapore Pte Ltd or Hartree Marine Fuels - in October, discovered management.
‘When you think of Helmsman on the next occasion, think of us as lawyers with expertise in various fields. Come to us before a problem develops. It’s the process that matters,’ says Tang Chong Jun, Executive Director.
