Clean Arctic Alliance highlights loophole in HFO draft regulation as ‘outrageous’
Clean Arctic Alliance, a coalition made of non-profit organisations (NGO), on Friday (21 February) responded to a draft regulation on heavy fuel oil (HFO) use and carriage in the Arctic as agreed by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and its Member States.
NGOs and Indigenous groups cautiously acknowledged progress on the draft regulation on HFO use and carriage in the Arctic, it said In its official statement.
However the coalition denounced the inclusion of loopholes in the text resulting in the ban not come into effect until 2029, leaving the Arctic exposed to the growing threat of HFO spills for close to another decade.
The draft new regulation for HFO use and carriage was agreed during last week’s meeting of the IMO’s Sub-Committee on Pollution Prevention and Response (PPR7) – dubbed the IMO Arctic Summit.
The draft will be forwarded for approval to a meeting of the Marine Environment Protection Committee in October 2020 (MEPC 76).
“While the IMO has made some progress this week on controlling heavy fuel oil use and carriage as fuel in the Arctic, it is outrageous that Member States are prepared to accept another decade of threats from HFO spills to Arctic communities, the environment and wildlife,” said Clean Arctic Alliance Lead Advisor Dr Sian Prior.
“With the climate crisis already having significant impacts across the Arctic region and routes opening up to increased ship traffic, IMO Member States must take a more ambitious stance later this year, by agreeing to rid the Arctic of HFO in 2024.”
The draft HFO regulation proposes that there will be no change in the use and carriage of HFO in the Arctic before the middle of 2024 when the regulation takes effect.
This means that the Arctic will not be rid of HFO until July 2029; in the meantime a loophole in the text will allow Arctic countries to permit continued use of HFO by their vessels.
A second loophole means that ships with double hulls or protected fuel tanks will also be able to carry and use HFO as fuel until 2029.
In addition, there was further delay on an action to reduce black carbon emissions from shipping that will affect the Arctic, despite the IMO and its Members working on this issue for nine years.
An initial examination of the draft regulation by the Clean Arctic Alliance suggests, based on current Arctic shipping levels, the loopholes mean over three-quarters of the HFO used in the Arctic could be exempt or delayed from implementing the regulation, which equates to more than two-thirds of the HFO carried on board vessels as fuel.
Of further concern is that these loopholes will cause an increase in HFO use and carriage in the Arctic. HFO use is already increasing – between 2015 and 2017 there was a 30% increase in the numbers of ships operating on HFO – and this is likely to carry on rising – and the loopholes will mean that as older ships (covered by the regulation) are replaced with new ships with double-hulls or protected fuel tanks (not covered by the regulation until 2029), so the amount of HFO used and carried in the Arctic will increase.
The Clean Arctic Alliance is calling on IMO Member States to invest further effort to strengthen the implementation timelines and tighten or better still, remove the loopholes which delay the implementation of the draft regulation for double-hull and vessels with protected fuel tanks and which allow waivers.
“IMO Member States must now step up to their obligations to pursue additional safeguards; if HFO continues to be burned in the Arctic until June 2029, Arctic coastal communities will be subjected to the risk of HFO spills and higher levels of air pollution – so it is in the best interest of Arctic States to be expedient in phasing out HFO in both domestic and international Arctic waters sooner,” added Prior.
Dr Prior said that in the coming months, the IMO and its member states will be considering measures requiring ships to switch away from HFO and move to distillate or other cleaner fuels.
“Inuit Circumpolar Council Canada wishes to express our encouragement that a text toward restrictions on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oils in Arctic waters has been formulated,” said Inuit Circumpolar Council Canada Vice-President Lisa Koperqualuk.
“However, we remain deeply concerned about the potential negative impacts that exemptions will continue to put our communities and ways of life at risk.
“We will continue advocating for a full ban to protect our Indigenous communities and our environment.”
“There are concerns about the timeline for introducing the heavy fuel oil ban, and the importance of protecting and connecting our holistic life and our marine environment, which includes our land, air, sea and most importantly ice,” said Bering Sea Elders Group Executive Director Mellisa Johnson.
Melissa Johnson added that based on the consistent guidance of our Elders and for our future generations we are going to continue to advocate for the heavy fuel oil ban as our indigenous Arctic people have been resilient in this area since time immemorial.
“I am very concerned about the consequences and potential impacts of continued use of HFO in the Arctic and what it will mean for my family on St. Lawrence Island in the Bering Strait,” said Friends of the Earth US Senior Oceans Campaigner Verner Wilson III; a Siberian Yup’ik Inuit.
“Even if the United States strictly applies the provisions of the regulation, my community and our way of life could be unfairly damaged as a result of the actions of other Arctic States exempting their ships for a whole decade from now.”
Clean Arctic Alliance concluded that IMO has a further opportunity to agree action to reduce black carbon emissions that have an impact in the Arctic, by switching from HFO to distillate or cleaner fuels, at MEPC 75 in late March 2020.
Related: Clean Arctic Alliance welcomes Canada’s backing of heavy fuel oil ban
Related: Stand.earth highlights debate on ship scrubbers in this week’s ‘IMO Arctic Summit’
Related: IMO PPR committee to finalise verification guidelines for fuel oil carriage ban
Related: Clean Arctic Alliance: Will London shipping summit act to protect Arctic from spills and emissions?
Related: Argus Media: Open-loop scrubber ban ‘unlikely in 2020’, says IMO
Related: IBIA: Facts and fears in the open loop scrubber debate
Photo credit: NOAA
Published: 25 February, 2020
Taiwan applies for tougher restrictions on bunker, aviation, and land-based fuels
0.5% sulphur cap will apply for Taiwanese international and domestic vessels by 1 July 2020, even though it is not a member of the IMO, states government.
Taiwan’s efforts to apply 0.5% sulphur cap at commercial ports prove effective
Taiwan first started implementing the sulphur cap in 2018 and even offered a subsidy to those who wish to switch to compliant fuel; SOx emissions have since reduced by 40%.
EU transport ministers back lower emissions for shipping sector
Declaration targeting a ‘carbon-neutral and zero pollution’ maritime sector was signed in an informal meeting; draft to be presented at next full council meeting.
Cargill and partners launch maritime decarbonisation program in Singapore
With ten other industry leaders, it aims to unite startups and industry players to test transformational technologies that reduce CO2 emissions.
IBIA: Call for IMO database on local and regional EGCS discharge restrictions
‘The database would presumably be managed by the IMO,requiring all members to report on specific restrictions in ports and waters under their jurisdiction,’ says IBIA Director.
IBIA statement on EGCS discussion at IMO’s PPR meeting: Avoid confirmation bias
IBIA urges IMO to avoid implementing a ‘one size fits all’ policy for EGCS emission guidelines by requiring relevant evaluations and scientific backings from specific areas.
Wärtsilä: Long live the internal combustion engine
‘What strikes us is that the combustion engine is extremely fuel flexible and only minor changes are needed to adapt it to new fuels,’ says Wärtsilä manager.
Geospock: Mapping maritime’s journey to zero-carbon with big data
‘Maritime has the opportunity to tackle sustainability by embracing data and developing a hub for maritime intelligence,’ says Maritime Business Development Manager.
EU funding boosts vessel fuel efficiency mission of SeaTech consortium
Developing ultra-high energy conversion and renewable energy propulsion to lower emissions and bunker costs.
ICS reminder: Ships can be detained under IMO 2020 rule from 1 March
Major port state regimes have already made clear they will rigorously enforce sulphur requirements, says ICS.
IBIA: Update on IMO Arctic HFO usage and carriage ban
IMO’s PPR Sub Committee to amend July 2024 usage and carriage ban, with caveat to extend usage for domestic shipping.
IMO: Strategies to meet GHG strategy discussed at Sweden meeting
Expert workshop held at World Maritime University, jointly organised with International Transport Forum and Nordic Energy Research.
IMO calls for ‘urgent need’ to reduce GHG emissions from shipping
GHG reduction requires ‘new zero-carbon marine fuels or propulsion technologies,’ says Kitack Lim.
BIMCO joins Japan on proposal to regulate carbon intensity of existing ships
Package of amendments to environmental guidelines has been submitted to the working group on GHG reductions.
ECSA publishes position paper in response to EU Green Deal
Welcomes EU climate change ambition by outlining eight points where it can work with the shipping industry.
Clean Arctic Alliance welcomes Canada’s backing of heavy fuel oil ban
IMO must ‘not entertain any arguments calling for a delay or exemptions’ in implementation of Arctic HFO ban, says Dr Sian Prior.
Rotterdam in partnership to build battery/hydrogen fuel infrastructure
Forms agreement with E.ON and DeltaPort to implement battery container or hydrogen refuelling services in pilot project at Wesel.
IMO PPR committee to finalise verification guidelines for fuel oil carriage ban
Sub-committee will also revise 2015 Guidelines for scrubbers; develop measures to protect the arctic environment; and more.
Clean Arctic Alliance: Will London shipping summit act to protect Arctic from spills and emissions?
Clean Arctic Alliance reiterates its request for the IMO to urgently require all ships operating in the Arctic to switch to distillate fuels, in order to significantly reduce black carbon emissions.
DNV GL on HSFO carriage ban: Compliance is the only option
HSFO carriage ban effective from 1 March is an attempt to ensure transparency and that ships are not unjustly penalised.
Pacific Green Technologies highlights LSFO as ‘GHG timebomb’
Points to several studies showing producing and burning LSFO increases carbon emissions, whereas gas scrubbers save money and the environment.
Clean Arctic Alliance urges industry to reduce black carbon emissions
Dr. Prior names several other platforms for debate, but highlights main issue is the urgent need for IMO members to increase efforts to reduce black carbon emissions.
ABS and ClassNK grant AiP to Kawasaki Heavy Industries for LPG marine fuel design
‘LNG as fuel is attracting widespread attention as an environmentally friendly option, but LPG as fuel has advantages over LNG,’ says ABS spokesman.
IBIA replies to Clean Arctic Alliance in open letter on black carbon emissions
Suggests upcoming IMO Pollution Prevention and Response Sub-Committee to be ‘the most effective forum’ to progress Dr Prior’s debate.
Ammonia as carbon neutral fuel has high commercialising probability, says Korean Register
KR issues ‘Forecasting the alternative marine fuel: Ammonia’ technical information; comparing different types of carbon-neutral alternative fuels.
ICCT analysis points to ‘damning climate indictment of LNG as marine fuel’, says Stand.earth
ICCT report indicates the predominantly-methane-based LNG marine fuel traps 86 times more heat in the atmosphere than the same amount of CO2 over a 20-year time period.
Clean Arctic Alliance urges IMO to prohibit ‘super pollutant’ VLSFO and LSHFO
VLSFO and LSHFO usage will contribute to a massive increase of Black Carbon emissions which represent 7% to 21% of shipping’s overall GHG equivalent impact on the climate.
IMO 2020 regulation could have negative health and climate impacts, says research author
Dr Daniel Lack says cost-cutting group of oil refiners using residual fuel blends could send ship-source black carbon emissions soaring overnight.
China MSA publishes Guidance for Supervision and Management of Air Emissions from Ships
The Standard Club provides a summary of key points for IMO 2020 enforcement in Chinese waters by local port state authorities.
Global Maritime Forum: Approximately USD 1-1.4 trillion needed to achieve IMO 2050
Significant investments needed to decarbonise shipping can only be expected to happen if there is a long term commercially viable business case.
Safe Bulkers extends scrubber partnership with Alfa Laval through service agreement
‘The Alfa Laval Service Agreement will help us safeguard long-term performance, for example by using data analysis to keep systems performing at their peak,’ says Dr. Loukas Barmparis.
ABB presents recommendation for zero-emission marine technology to US Congress
‘ABB encourages the Subcommittee to set an ambitious, long-term national plan to achieve zero emissions for all vessels under its operation,’ says Peter Bryn.
BIMCO ‘concerned’ by EC intent to include international shipping in ETS
Very practical reasons for not taxing marine fuels as ships would simply bunker outside the EU, it says.
T&E analysis of MSC shipping GHG emissions in EU is inaccurate, it says
MSC clarifies only 40-45% of the 11 million mt of emissions were actually in the EU, unlike what T&E stated.
Debunkering of marine fuel from wrecked “Golden Ray” completed
More than 320,000 gallons of oil and water mixture removed from 26 fuel tanks inside the car carrier.
Environment group adds MSC to list of top 10 EU GHG emitters in 2018
The maritime sector is exempt under EU law from paying tax on its fuel, a subsidy worth €24 billion a year.
Port of Qinhuangdao issues incentives to vessels using low sulphur fuels
Priority given to the ships using 0.1% sulphur limit fuel oil to load and unload, and depart from the port.
Thai space agency detects 20,000 litre bunker spill from sunken tanker
Golden Bridge 2 had about 104,000 litres of bunkers onboard when it sank at Chao Phraya River on Tuesday.
Singapore Green Ship Programme, Green Port Programme extended
Singapore programmes to benefit environmentally friendly ocean-going and domestic commercial vessels.
ECSA rectifies Clean Shipping Coalition statement on ‘slow’ IMO talks
‘IMO Intersessional Working Group was good and fruitful preparatory work,’ it states in response to CSC.
IMO talks in ‘slow lane’ over speed reduction measures, says T&E
Proposed measure to certify ships that limit engine power ‘unambitious, opaque, and susceptible to cheating’.
IMO makes ‘positive progress’ in goal-based emissions reduction approach
There was no appetite for a prescriptive speed reduction regulation, says the UK Chamber of Shipping.
IMO pushes forward with work to meet ship emission reduction targets
IMO shares summary of Intersessional Working Group on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships meeting.
BP Singapore bunker trial nears end as legal reps present summary submissions
Lawyers of the ex-Regional Marine Manager of BP Singapore, the Executive Director of Pacific Prime Trading, and Deputy Public Prosecutors were present at the State Courts on Wednesday.
Vitol Group acquires Sinanju Tankers Holdings; gains foothold in Singapore bunker ops
The Singapore Bunkering license holding entity has been renamed Vitol Bunkers (S) Pte Ltd and from 1 April 2020 all bunker deliveries will be carried out by Vitol Bunkers (S) Pte Ltd.
PMI Trading responds to Nustar Energy over alleged off-spec bunker fuel supply at Houston
Seeks to enforce either arbitration clause under contract or to dismiss NuStar and TPP respective liability claims, according to documents obtained by Manifold Times.
‘Minimal disruption’ to Singapore bunkering operations despite COVID-19, confirms MPA
‘We are closely monitoring the rapidly developing COVID-2019 situation while remaining committed to working with the bunkering industry to ensure minimal disruption to bunkering operations and services.’
Photo Essay: “Marine Vicky” in multi-agency emergency preparedness exercise at Singapore port
The emergency preparedness exercise involving SCDF, PCG, MPA, and Sinanju was carried out on the LNG dual-fuel bunker tanker at Raffles Anchorage on 17 March, learned Manifold Times.
Singapore bunker players continue Business Continuity Plans in response to COVID-19
Manifold Times checks along the bunker supply chain on how various companies are managing operations after the republic entered DORSCON Orange in response to COVID-19.