Connect with us

Legal

BIMCO: Is your charter party ready for 2020?

Plans to supplement existing suite of bunker clauses with new clause for 2020 global sulphur cap.

Admin

Published

on

5bab29af62a60 1537943983

The following article from the September issue of BIMCO magazine ‘Bulletin’ talks on the development of a new BIMCO clause dealing specifically with the 2020 global sulphur cap:

As the deadline for the IMO’s global low-sulphur fuel requirements fast approaches, it is necessary to carefully check the bunker clauses in the charter parties. The time to start thinking about what is in the charter party is not 1 January 2020. There will be an important transitional period in the run up to this date, during which owners and charterers need to prepare and plan for the switch to compliant fuels.

Many older forms of standard time charter parties do not contain the detailed and comprehensive provisions required to deal with modern bunkering issues. The industry needs to start thinking now about the implications of low-sulphur fuel requirements on long-term contracts of affreightment (COAs) and time charters that may begin before 2020, to avoid contractual disputes.

It is vital that charter parties and COAs make it very clear that the specifications of the fuel supplied to the ship by the charterers must be compliant. Many older standard forms do not have any provisions concerning fuel types, specifications, sampling and testing – but all these aspects need to be addressed.

BIMCO plans to supplement its existing suite of bunker clauses with a new clause dealing specifically with the 2020 global sulphur cap. Work on this high-priority new clause begins in September.

Who picks up the fine if the fuel is not compliant?
From 2020, it will be the shipowners’ responsibility to make sure the ship is compliant with the new low-sulphur fuel regulations – so the shipowner will be the one who is fined if the ship is caught without the right fuel on board. That makes the owner very dependent on the time charterer to provide the right type of fuel, and if the charter party is vague – or does not deal with the issue – there will be disputes.

The industry needs a clause stating that, if the charterer does not deliver the right type of fuel, he will protect the owner from any consequences or fines if he gets caught by port state control. Such a clause also needs to deal with the potential complications of the many ways of formulating low-sulphur fuels. BIMCO’s head of contracts and clauses, Grant Hunter, says the industry does not yet fully understand what the effect might be on engines, even if the same type of fuel is mixed, but from different batches.
“If there is a delay or a problem with the engine because the fuel has been mixed – even if that fuel is compliant – who will pick up the cost for the delay? These types of questions are becoming urgent as we go through the transitional period,” Hunter adds.

“You cannot wait until 1 January 2020 to switch to these new fuels; you might be halfway across the Pacific, and you need the right type of fuel on board before finding yourself there. You will need to start before you are legally obliged to.”

Scrubbers – should the bill be shared?
Another area that BIMCO will be examining is the use of scrubbers. Some owners may decide to fit a scrubber on the vessel and, so, continue to use heavy fuel oil instead of buying the compliant, but more expensive, low-sulphur fuel. If a scrubber is installed during a long-term time charter contract, should the time charterer contribute to the cost of the scrubber?

“If the ship has a scrubber system, the charterer will benefit in the short term because they can continue to buy and use heavy fuel oil – which, initially, will be much cheaper than 0.5% low-sulphur fuel. The shipowner may then ask if that is fair, or if the parties ought to share the cost of fitting a scrubber on the vessel,” Hunter says, adding that such a cost-sharing agreement must be specified in the contract.

For these and many other reasons, BIMCO has gathered together an expert team of representatives – from shipowners, charterers, technical experts, and lawyers – with P&I Clubs to look after the insurance aspect. The group will start working on the new clause in September, with the aim of producing the clause as quickly as possible to help minimise the number of disputes as the 2020 sulphur cap deadline closes in on the industry.

Note: Readers interested in browsing through the entire September issue of BIMCO magazine ‘Bulletin’ can find it here.

Photo credit: BIMCO
Published: 26 September, 2018

 

Continue Reading

Winding up

Singapore: High Court to hear Norvic Shipping Asia winding up application on 31 July

Application for the winding up of Norvic Shipping Asia Pte Ltd was filed by Netherlands-registered Mur Shipping BV on 8 April, according to Government Gazette notice.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED singapore high court

An application for the winding up of Norvic Shipping Asia Pte Ltd was filed by Netherlands-registered Mur Shipping BV on 8 April, according to a Tuesday (21 July) notice on the Government Gazette.

It noted the winding up application is directed to be heard before the Judge sitting in the General Division of the High Court at 10am on 31 July.

Any creditor or contributory of the company desiring to support or oppose the making of an order on the winding up application may appear at the time of hearing by himself or his counsel for that purpose.

A copy of the winding up application will be furnished to any creditor or contributory of the company requiring the copy of the winding up application by the solicitors of the applicant’s, Oon & Bazul LLC, on payment of the regulated charge for the same.

The Applicant’s address is Hiridostraat 5, Gebouw Prismatrium, 1101CW Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

The Applicant’s solicitors are Oon & Bazul LLC of 103 Penang Rd, #04-04/05/06 Singapore 238467. 

Queries on the winding up application may be directed to the following email addresses: [email protected] and [email protected].

 

Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Legal

Singapore withdraws remaining 127 charges against Hin Leong founder OK Lim

Lim Oon Kuin, also known as OK Lim, was issued a stern warning and a district court granted him a discharge amounting to an acquittal for these charges on 17 July.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Sora Shimazaki on Pexels

Founder of collapsed oil trader Hin Leong Trading, Lim Oon Kuin, also known as OK Lim, has had the remaining 127 charges against him withdrawn, according to The Straits Times on Monday (20 July). 

OK Lim was issued a stern warning and a district court granted him a discharge amounting to an acquittal for these charges, including those for cheating, on 17 July. The discharge means Lim cannot be prosecuted again for the same offences.

Lim, 84, is currently serving a 13½-year prison sentence after the High Court reduced his original 17½-year jail term in March 2026. He was convicted in 2024 on two cheating charges and one count of abetting forgery in a case prosecutors described as one of Singapore’s most serious trade finance frauds.

Lim was convicted in May 2024 of two charges of cheating the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) and one count of abetting forgery that proceeded to trial out of a total of 130 criminal charges.

He was first charged in court on 14 August 2020, and was subsequently handed further charges in court on 25 September 2020, 30 April 2021 and 24 June 2021 for his role in perpetuating fraud on various financial institutions. 

A total of 130 charges were eventually brought against him for cheating and forgery-related offences.

Related: Singapore: Hin Leong Founder OK Lim gets jail term slashed to 13.5 years

 

Photo credit: Sora Shimazaki
Published: 21 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Winding up

Singapore: Coastal Logistics Pte Ltd to be wound up voluntarily

Coastal Logistics was reportedly affiliated with troubled Singapore bunker player Coastal Oil (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Drew Beamer

Several resolutions for Coastal Logistics Pte Ltd were made during an extraordinary general meeting held on 14 July, according to a notice in the Government Gazette on Friday (4 July).

The following resolutions were duly passed during the meeting:

As Special Resolution

  • That it has been proved to the satisfaction of the meeting that the Company cannot by reason of its liabilities continue its business and accordingly the Company be wound up voluntarily pursuant to Section 160(1)(b) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (No. 40 of 2018);

As Ordinary Resolutions

  • that Mr. Wong Pheng Cheong Martin and Ms. Koay May Yee, both care of FTI Consulting (Singapore) Pte Ltd, One Raffles Quay, #27-10 South Tower, Singapore 048583 be appointed as the joint and several Liquidators of the Company for the purpose of such winding up; and
  • that the Liquidators be at liberty to open, maintain and operate any bank account(s) or account(s) for monies received by them as Liquidators with such bank(s) as they deem fit; and
  • that a Committee of Inspection will not be formed.

Manifold Times previously reported Nicholas James Gronow, director of Heng Tong Fuels & Shipping and Coastal Logistics, filed statutory declarations for both companies stating the firms cannot continue their businesses due to liabilities.

Both companies were reportedly affiliated with troubled Singapore bunker player Coastal Oil (Singapore) Pte Ltd. 

In 2019, several vessels owned by both firms entered the sale & purchase (S&P) market in Singapore.

Related: Singapore: Director declares Heng Tong Fuels & Shipping’s inability to continue business
Related: Heng Tong Fuels & Shipping in court over DBS Bank bunker tanker loan
Related: Singapore: Bunker tanker “Coastal Neptune” arrested
Related: Heng Tong Fuels & Shipping, Coastal Logistics tankers enter S&P market

 

Photo credit: Drew Beamer
Published: 21 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending