Connect with us

IMO 2020

Argus Media viewpoint: New fuels coming for European marine use

Shipowners eager to gain operational experience with new 0.5% sulphur limit bunker fuels in H1 2019.

Admin

Published

on

5c28f0c24d277 1546186946

Global energy and commodity price reporting agency Argus Media on Friday (28 December) provided an industry update on marine fuel related issues: 

New fuels compatible with the International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) 0.5pc marine fuel sulphur cap should become more prevalent in the first half of 2019, with shipowners eager to gain operational experience.

The IMO regulation will cap sulphur content in bunker fuel to 0.5pc starting on 1 January 2020, down from 3.5pc today. Shipowners are still seeking insurances regarding fuel compatibility between different 0.5pc blends, and with marine gasoil (MGO).

The efficiency, stability and safety of the fuels remain a concern, although refiners — including Shell, Total and Italy's Eni — have started to offer 0.5pc fuels for testing. Total and container liner CMA CGM have struck a deal for the supply of marine fuels including 0.5pc grade, and tests have begun.

Some shipowners are reluctant to pay the premium to high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) asked by suppliers before the 2020 deadline. Some also fear that testing new fuels could damage vessels. And the fact that owners who have already tried some of the fuels cannot report the results because of non-disclosure agreements keeps the market in a fog. This is likely to mean that smaller owners will use MGO until the new fuels' specifications become clearer, although the middle distillate could carry a $100-150/t premium over 0.5pc fuels in 2020.

While shipowners are largely in the dark about availability and specifications of 0.5pc blends, major bunker suppliers still do not know what refineries are going to produce, making it difficult to plan storage space. A wider range of new 0.5pc fuels should become available in the next six months, but this leaves little time before the sulphur cap comes into force.

Scrubber-ready fleets are the most prepared for 2020, as HSFO is a familiar bunker fuel. But owners will also need assurances of supply.

Scrubbers remove sulphur from exhaust fumes and allow ships to continue burning HSFO. Ships with scrubbers are likely to stick to routes between major ports, where high-sulphur fuels will be readily available.

A range of marine fuel products — high-sulphur 380cst, high-sulphur 180cst, MGO and 0.5pc blends — will be available at the world's biggest bunkering hubs, including Rotterdam, Fujairah and Singapore. It is not clear what the availability will be at smaller ports.

Ships with scrubbers can take more expensive distillate fuels in emergencies, but repeated use of these grades will affect payback time for the technology. Large ships, with the highest consumption levels, need payback time of 12-18 months to justify the investment.

Scrubber demand has picked up drastically over the past six months as buyers rushed to the market ahead of the 2020 deadline. The capacity to manufacture and install the systems is limited in Europe — most manufacturers have filled their order books for pre-2020 fitting — but facilities in the Asia-Pacific region are likely to grow and provide the equipment at a lower cost.

Demand for scrubbers after 2020 is limited because the price differential between high-sulphur and 0.5pc fuels is likely to narrow, meaning a longer payback time on the investment.

And the outlook for scrubber uptake has suffered a blow recently. Singapore, the world's largest bunkering port, said it will ban ships that have installed open-loop scrubbers from discharging wash water in the port from 1 January 2020. About 70-80pc of scrubber demand is for open-loop systems. Open-loop scrubbers discharge waste sulphur directly into the sea.

The Singapore ban adds to similar moves in Germany, Belgium, Ireland and many US ports. The coming six months may see further port authorities follow suit. Tighter legislation is likely, especially in Emission Control Areas (ECAs). Further regulatory limits on the use of scrubbers may arise, but the IMO is unlikely to change regulations until the sulphur cap has been in place for a significant amount of time. Scrubbers could be fitted on around 4-5pc of the global fleet by 2020.

Most ships fitting the technology will be taking on contracts with marine fuel suppliers in order to secure supply, as availability of HSFO will decrease.

Source: Argus Media
Published: 31 December, 2018

 

Continue Reading

Ammonia

AM Green plans to build green ammonia plant at Indian port

Initiative also includes development of green ammonia handling, storage and bunkering infrastructure, pilot bunkering operations, safety procedures and training programmes, says VOC Port Authority.

Admin

Published

on

By

india flag

VO Chidambaranar (VOC) Port Authority on Friday (29 May) said it has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with India’s ammonia producer AM Green Ammonia to collaborate in the development of a green ammonia production plant.

The plant will have a capacity of one million tonnes per annum (MTPA) at Tuticorin.

The initiative also includes development of green ammonia handling, storage and bunkering infrastructure, pilot bunkering operations, safety procedures and training programmes. 

The project is expected to support the development of green fuel corridors connecting VOC Port with major ports in Europe and Asia, thereby strengthening India’s position in the global green fuels value chain.

VOC Port also signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Bureau Veritas (India) Pvt. Ltd., to collaborate on Green Port certification, emissions accounting, ESG reporting, safety validation, development of green bunkering practices, and establishment of a Centre of Excellence for green fuels and sustainability.

The port also plans for an upcoming 750 m³ green methanol bunkering facility.

 

Photo credit: Naveed Ahmed on Unsplash
Published: 3 June, 2026

Continue Reading

Port & Regulatory

Study: Major drop in ship sulphur emissions confirmed following IMO regulations

National Centre for Atmospheric Science study found that the average sulphur content in ship fuel dropped nearly tenfold in open ocean areas following IMO’s 2020 regulation.

Admin

Published

on

By

shraga kopstein on Unsplash

Recent global regulations have significantly reduced sulphur emissions from ships, helping to improve air quality in coastal regions – confirmed by a recent international study led by researchers at the National Centre for Atmospheric Science. 

The research, published in Environmental Science: Atmospheres, used aircraft and ground-based instruments to measure sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emitted by ships in the North-East Atlantic and European coastal waters between 2019 and 2023.

The team found that the average sulphur content in ship fuel dropped nearly tenfold in open ocean areas following the International Maritime Organization’s 2020 regulation, which capped sulphur content in marine fuel at 0.5%. 

Before the change, many ships exceeded the previous 3.5% limit. After 2020, only a small number of ships were found to breach the new standard.

In European sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs), such as the English Channel and the Port of Tyne, sulphur levels were even lower – well below the stricter 0.1% limit. Interestingly, ports outside these zones, like Valencia in Spain, also showed low sulphur levels, likely due to EU rules requiring cleaner fuel when ships are docked for extended periods.

This is the first study to use aircraft-based measurements and predictions from the Ship Traffic Emission Assessment Model (STEAM3) to assess ship emissions outside of sulphur control zones since the 2020 regulation came into effect. The findings support the widely held view that ships now emit around seven times less sulphur than before the rule change – an important step toward cleaner air and healthier coastal environments.

Note: The research, titled ‘SO2 and NOx emissions from ships in North-East Atlantic waters: in situ measurements and comparison with an emission model’ can be found here. 

 

Photo credit: shraga kopstein on Unsplash
Published: 8 December, 2025

Continue Reading

Interview

IBIA Annual Convention 2025: ‘Exciting times’ for post IMO 2020 bunker suppliers, states Equatorial

Choong Sheen Mao, Chief Operating Officer, Equatorial, describes to Manifold Times the pre/post IMO 2020 challenges and evolution of bunker suppliers.

Admin

Published

on

By

Sheen Mao MT

The International Bunkering Industry Association (IBIA) will be hosting its flagship Annual Convention in Hong Kong at the Hong Kong Convention Exhibition & Convention Centre between 18 to 20 November 2025, as part of Hong Kong Maritime Week.

Choong Sheen Mao, Chief Operating Officer, Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services (Equatorial), speaks to bunkering publication Manifold Times about the challenges of a post IMO 2020 bunker supplier.

MT: How does Equatorial continue to offer customer assurance and maintenance of marine fuel quality to ISO8217 standards despite increasing complexity of bunker fuel blends?

We maintain our focus to provide compliant, quality and competitively priced products to our customers. There is no shortcut. We source our products from a wide range of cargo producers and suppliers. We continue to be strict and vigilant with our testing programme for our products before delivering them to our customers. Equatorial has deepened our engagement with the wider industry to have a better and up-to-date understanding of the existing and new marine fuels.

MT: Can you share the evolution of commercial marine fuel procurement, blending and trading strategies on the back of increasing fuel types (pre/post IMO 2020)?

Pre IMO 2020, the main types of marine fuel procured and consumed by vessels were high-sulphur fuel oil, marine diesel oil and marine gas oil. Trading strategies were therefore closely linked to that within the oil industry.

However, many of the new fuel types are from other industries. For example, biofuels, methanol and ammonia are mainly products from the chemical and agriculture industries. There are marked differences between these industries and the energy industry (in particular, the marine fuels industry). LNG is from the gas industry which is distinct from the oil industry.

Without an existing liquid paper market for many of these commodities (especially as a marine fuel), the price risk management is less straightforward. Furthermore, commodity prices are no longer the sole consideration for price itself. The price of compliance must be considered. This could range from guaranteeing the origin of the marine fuel, its sulphur properties as well as its carbon intensity. The list goes on.

MT: Operational wise, what are the changing role and responsibilities of a bunker supplier to date, compared to before IMO 2020?

The role and responsibility of a bunker supplier have evolved. Fundamentally, it has been about providing quality marine fuels at competitive prices. Quantity assurance has been a critical concern which led to the mandatory implementation of the mass flow meter system for bunkering in the Port of Singapore. Interestingly, due to the nature of credit terms in the bunker industry, bunker suppliers also performed the role of “bankers” by extending favourable credit terms to shipowners and charterers.

These days, post IMO 2020, things have become even more complicated. Today, a bunker supplier retains the abovementioned roles and responsibilities, and much more – it has to ensure compliance with a plethora of rules and regulations. Compliance not only with sulphur cap requirements, but with international and regional sanctions and restrictions unrelated to the quality of the marine fuel itself. In fact, especially with alternative low- and zero-carbon marine fuels, this means compliance with standards, rules and regulations on sustainability such as the European Renewable Energy Directive and/or International Sustainability and Carbon Certification. There is also the need to comply with increasingly stringent safety regulations on both conventional and alternative marine fuels.

In addition to the above, a post IMO 2020 bunker supplier is still expected to supply compliant and quality fuel at competitive prices.

MT: Equatorial is Singapore’s largest local-born supplier; what is the next big thing for the company?

Equatorial continues to adapt and improve with the times, while maintaining its core values – Integrity, Teamwork, Commitment, Proficiency and Quality, and Safety and Environment. The bunker industry is a highly competitive one, and it is our intention to keep our competitive edge and remain relevant. This means that we have had to step out of our comfort zone and embrace the two mega trends of our time – digitalisation and decarbonisation.

We have been early adopters and developers of the electronic bunkering note as part of our own digital bunkering efforts. We have diversified our product offering to include low carbon marine fuels and are proud to be one of the pioneers for bunkering B100 biofuels earlier this year. This was made possible by the arrival of our IMO Type II chemical and oil bunker tankers. These same bunker tankers are also capable for carrying and delivering methanol. Equatorial has invested in an LNG bunkering vessel (LBV) newbuilding that is set to be delivered in Q3 2027. We are also involved in a study to develop low- or zero-carbon ammonia bunkering in Singapore.

These are exciting times.

Note: Choong Sheen Mao is amongst panellists featured in ‘Session Three: Bunker Sellers Panel’ at the IBIA Annual Convention 2025.

Join the Conversation

With over 300 delegates expected, the IBIA Annual Convention 2025 is set to be a defining moment for the marine fuels industry. Registration is now open via the IBIA Annual Convention website.

 

Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 31 October 2025

Continue Reading

Trending