Connect with us

Legal

BIMCO 2020 Sulphur Clauses: A fair allocation of responsibilities and liabilities?

‘Operators would be well advised not to simply insert the new provisions into their charters,’ recommends Ince & Co.

Admin

Published

on

5c25930bad8ee 1545966347

Rory Macfarlane, Partner and Geraldine Koon, Senior Associate at international commercial law firm Ince & Co. in December published an article ‘BIMCO 2020 Sulphur Clauses: A fair allocation of responsibilities and liabilities?’ providing a critical analysis of the recently released sulphur clauses:

The implementation date for the MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 14 sulphur cap is fast approaching.

There are two key dates to keep firmly in mind:

  • On 1 January 2020, the limit for the sulphur content of fuel used on board a vessel operating outside one of the 4 Emission Control Areas (“ECA”) decreases from 3.5% mm to 0.5% mm.  

In addition, from this date vessels will be required to produce a bunker delivery note stating the sulphur content of any fuel oil stemmed, to carry an IAPP Certificate, to have on board a written procedure for fuel oil change over when entering/leaving an Emission Control Area, and to maintain a log (as prescribed by their flag state) recording adherence to the change over procedure.

  • Second, from 1 March 2020, the carriage of non-compliant fuel for combustion or propulsion purposes will be prohibited unless scrubbers are fitted on the vessel.

To assist owners and charterers to address the legal issues arising under any time charterparties, which will span the 1 January 2020 implementation date (or end shortly before), BIMCO has published two bunker clauses (accessible on the BIMCO website):

  • The 2020 Marine Fuel Sulphur Content Clause for Time Charter Parties, which replaces the BIMCO Fuel Sulphur Content Clause 2005. This requires charterers to provide fuel that complies with the applicable sulphur cap; and
  • The 2020 Fuel Transition Clause for Time Charter Parties, which deals with the one-off event of removing, if necessary, all non-complaint fuel from the vessel.

A third clause dealing with scrubbers is expected to be published by BIMCO early next year. This is likely to propose a regime under which the costs of installing scrubbers are allocated between owners and charterers.

The clauses are to be welcomed by the market as they provide a very helpful starting point for owners and charterers in amending their charterparties to address the different issues arising out of the sulphur cap. However, the BIMCO clauses have generally been drafted with a view to providing what the BIMCO drafting committee consider to be a “fair allocation of responsibilities and liabilities” in line with existing default charterparty contracting positions. Whether individual owners or charterers consider them to be fair, or even want them to be fair, when considering their own operational arrangements is a different matter.  

Operators would be well advised not to simply insert the new provisions into their charters. It is probable that they will want to amend the standard wording depending on how they wish to allocate risk and cost. Moreover, owners and charterers must ensure that the new clauses complement, rather than contradict, the other terms of the charter in question. Changes will almost certainly be needed to existing charterparty clauses to avoid disputes arising. For example, the clauses dealing with delay or deviation may need amending to address the risk of shortages in low sulphur fuel in particular ports or regions, force majeure events may need re-defining and the responsibility for payment of any penalties or fines imposed by flag and coastal states for breach of the regulations must be clarified.

There will undoubtedly be a period of operational disruption and freight/hire rate volatility in the early part of 2020, as the market gets to grips with the new provisions.  We recommend that owners set an ‘internal’ soft deadline in advance of 1/1/2020 for the amendment of their charters and the implementation of the protocols and procedures necessary to comply with the new cap. This pro-active approach should help iron out any teething problems and place owners in the prime position to take those opportunities that will inevitably arise in times of uncertainty, disruption and market volatility. 

We are currently working with clients on drafting bespoke provisions to suit their particular needs. If you would like any assistance in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact Rory Macfarlane or Geraldine Koon at Ince & Co in London, or your usual contact.

Source: Ince & Co.
Published: 28 December, 2018

 

Continue Reading

Legal

Singapore withdraws remaining 127 charges against Hin Leong founder OK Lim

Lim Oon Kuin, also known as OK Lim, was issued a stern warning and a district court granted him a discharge amounting to an acquittal for these charges on 17 July.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Sora Shimazaki on Pexels

Founder of collapsed oil trader Hin Leong Trading, Lim Oon Kuin, also known as OK Lim, has had the remaining 127 charges against him withdrawn, according to The Straits Times on Monday (20 July). 

OK Lim was issued a stern warning and a district court granted him a discharge amounting to an acquittal for these charges, including those for cheating, on 17 July. The discharge means Lim cannot be prosecuted again for the same offences.

Lim, 84, is currently serving a 13½-year prison sentence after the High Court reduced his original 17½-year jail term in March 2026. He was convicted in 2024 on two cheating charges and one count of abetting forgery in a case prosecutors described as one of Singapore’s most serious trade finance frauds.

Lim was convicted in May 2024 of two charges of cheating the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) and one count of abetting forgery that proceeded to trial out of a total of 130 criminal charges.

He was first charged in court on 14 August 2020, and was subsequently handed further charges in court on 25 September 2020, 30 April 2021 and 24 June 2021 for his role in perpetuating fraud on various financial institutions. 

A total of 130 charges were eventually brought against him for cheating and forgery-related offences.

Related: Singapore: Hin Leong Founder OK Lim gets jail term slashed to 13.5 years

 

Photo credit: Sora Shimazaki
Published: 21 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Winding up

Singapore: Coastal Logistics Pte Ltd to be wound up voluntarily

Coastal Logistics was reportedly affiliated with troubled Singapore bunker player Coastal Oil (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Drew Beamer

Several resolutions for Coastal Logistics Pte Ltd were made during an extraordinary general meeting held on 14 July, according to a notice in the Government Gazette on Friday (4 July).

The following resolutions were duly passed during the meeting:

As Special Resolution

  • That it has been proved to the satisfaction of the meeting that the Company cannot by reason of its liabilities continue its business and accordingly the Company be wound up voluntarily pursuant to Section 160(1)(b) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (No. 40 of 2018);

As Ordinary Resolutions

  • that Mr. Wong Pheng Cheong Martin and Ms. Koay May Yee, both care of FTI Consulting (Singapore) Pte Ltd, One Raffles Quay, #27-10 South Tower, Singapore 048583 be appointed as the joint and several Liquidators of the Company for the purpose of such winding up; and
  • that the Liquidators be at liberty to open, maintain and operate any bank account(s) or account(s) for monies received by them as Liquidators with such bank(s) as they deem fit; and
  • that a Committee of Inspection will not be formed.

Manifold Times previously reported Nicholas James Gronow, director of Heng Tong Fuels & Shipping and Coastal Logistics, filed statutory declarations for both companies stating the firms cannot continue their businesses due to liabilities.

Both companies were reportedly affiliated with troubled Singapore bunker player Coastal Oil (Singapore) Pte Ltd. 

In 2019, several vessels owned by both firms entered the sale & purchase (S&P) market in Singapore.

Related: Singapore: Director declares Heng Tong Fuels & Shipping’s inability to continue business
Related: Heng Tong Fuels & Shipping in court over DBS Bank bunker tanker loan
Related: Singapore: Bunker tanker “Coastal Neptune” arrested
Related: Heng Tong Fuels & Shipping, Coastal Logistics tankers enter S&P market

 

Photo credit: Drew Beamer
Published: 21 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Winding up

Singapore: Liquidator of Nan Shan Maritime Pte Ltd issues notice of dividend

Third interim dividend to admitted unsecured claims of Nan Shan Maritime is payable from 15 July, according to Government Gazette notice.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Drew Beamer

A notice of dividend for Nan Shan Maritime Pte Ltd, which is currently in creditors’ voluntary liquidation, was published on the Government Gazette on Wednesday (15 July). 

The following are the details of the notice:

Name of Company : Nan Shan Maritime (Pte.) Ltd.(In Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation)
Unique Entity No. / Registration No. : 201701967H
Address of Registered Office : 10 Anson Road, #10-10, International Plaza, Singapore 079903
Amount per centum : 5.00 Per Centum of all admitted unsecured, claims
First and Final or Otherwise : Third Interim
When Payable : 15 July 2026
Where Payable : Entitlements will be made by way of cheque.

 

Photo credit: Drew Beamer
Published: 16 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending