Connect with us

IMO 2020

FOBAS service update: S2020 – 12 Months to go!

Discusses latest IMO 2020 preparations from regulatory, fuel availability, ISO and technical groups.

Admin

Published

on

5c19ac86bf83e 1545186438

Lloyd’s Register FOBAS on Tuesday issued the following reminder to all shipowners and operators:

This bulletin is an update to our previous bulletin addressing key questions related to the implementation of MARPOL Annex VI regulation 14.1.3 coming into force on 1st January 2020. From client interactions, we observe that many ship operators are moving from planning to preparatory stage as we are rolling into 2019. On regulatory side, some important decisions from IMO are shaping the discussions and impacting the decisions being made by various stakeholders. Supply industry is also gearing themselves up for this change by announcing the availability of 0.50% S fuels in various ports around the world.

Regulatory update

To facilitate the consistent implementation, MEPC 73 (22-26 October 2018) agreed a carriage ban of high sulphur (>0.50%) fuels on ships not fitted with Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems (EGCS) from 1st March 2020. MEPC 73 also approved an MEPC circular on Guidance on the development of ship implementation plan. An IMO sub-committee on Pollution Prevention and Response (PPR 6 – February 2019) is scheduled to take up some important implementation aspects such as approval of MEPC circular on best practice for member States/Coastal States, discussions on proposed HFO ban in the arctic, amendments to the Sulphur verification procedure to include on-board samples and a revised approach for testing MAPROL samples in MARPOL Annex VI Appendix VI.

Outside IMO, Singapore MPA recently issued a guide for ships calling to port of Singapore. One of the important aspect of the document is the prohibition of open loop EGCS from 1st January 2020 with only zero-discharge EGCS operations allowed within Singapore port limits. Other member States may also follow Singapore’s approach and implement similar limitation on open loop EGCS operations however critics have raised concerns and highlighted that decisions such as these have not been taken based on a detailed scientific review by evaluating the potential benefits to the local marine environment.

Similarly, from 1st January 2019, there are significant changes in the Chinese emission control areas which are detailed in this bulletin.

An update on fuel availability

There are number of major fuel suppliers who have indicated that they will be making 0.50% S fuels available in selected ports from second half of 2019. Moreover, IMO during MEPC 73 encouraged member States to submit information to IMO on fuel availability status which would result in MEPC circular to help smooth implementation of the regulation. It is expected that this critical information would also help fuel buyers in their 2020 planning.

Since the decision made by IMO regarding MARPOL Annex VI regulation 14.1.3 in 2016, one of the main questions from the bunker supply chain has been about the number of ships which will have installed EGCS and their corresponding demand for high sulphur fuel oil from 1st January 2020. Latest data from Clarksons indicate that there are around two thousand ships with EGCS (on order + existing). This number is still low compared to initial IMO led study estimation of 3800 EGCS ready ships by 2020. Nevertheless, in recent months, there has been an increased demand of EGCS to be fitted on both new and existing ships and so 2019 is expected to be a busy year for ship yards and EGCS manufacturers.

It is expected that major bunkering hubs around the world would be able to offer full spectrum of fuel choices to the visiting ships i.e. 0.10% ULSFO, 0.50% VLSFO, HSFO (>0.50%) and even LNG (selected ports only) however it is the smaller ports, due to capacity and storage facility limitations would offer limited choices (0.10% & 0.50% S fuels) and likely to follow simple ‘demand and supply’ principle. Just like the ship operators, who need to prepare for the change and consider flushing fuel pipes, storage tanks and system components before the deadline, the bunker supply industry also needs to take similar preparatory actions. In view of this, it is important that buyers start dialogue with the suppliers about their 0.50% VLSFO requirements about the time (when) and quantity (how much) giving suppliers ample time to ready their systems.

An update from ISO and other technical groups

ISO TC28/SC4/WG6 is mainly working on the development of ISO/AWI PAS 23263 (Consideration for fuel suppliers and users regarding marine fuel quality in view of the implementation of maximum 0.50% S in 2020). It is expected that PAS 23263 would be available in mid-2019. There are various operational concerns regarding the 0.50% S fuels however stability and compatibility with other fuels have been highlighted as major challenges. To address these issues and provide guidance to the industry, an ISO sub-group is specifically undertaking practical work of analyses and developing the guidelines which will be part of PAS 23263.

CIMAC WG7 ‘Fuels’ are working in parallel with the ISO WG6 to help industry with the guidance documents on various aspects of 0.50% S fuel challenge. CIMAC sub-group is developing the guidance ‘How to order fuels’ with 0.50% fuels in mind. OCIMF and IPIECA have also formed a joint group to provide ‘guidance on potential safety and operational issues related to the supply and use of 0.50% max. sulphur fuels’ expected out mid next year too.

FOBAS can help

We are actively participating in the S2020 discussions at various forums to contribute to the discussions and address concerns and provide guidance and technical input representing our ship operators. FOBAS will continue to monitor and update our clients to help smooth the implementation of the regulation. Apart from fuel oil testing which will be increasingly important moving forwards, our experts are here to help ship operators in their S2020 implementation planning. We would appreciate any feedback in the form of questions, concerns or comments on these critical issues.

Related: FOBAS service update: S2020 – 18 Months to go!
Related: LR FOBAS issues reminder on Chinese domestic ECAs and Taiwan

Published: 19 December, 2018
 

Continue Reading

Ammonia

AM Green plans to build green ammonia plant at Indian port

Initiative also includes development of green ammonia handling, storage and bunkering infrastructure, pilot bunkering operations, safety procedures and training programmes, says VOC Port Authority.

Admin

Published

on

By

india flag

VO Chidambaranar (VOC) Port Authority on Friday (29 May) said it has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with India’s ammonia producer AM Green Ammonia to collaborate in the development of a green ammonia production plant.

The plant will have a capacity of one million tonnes per annum (MTPA) at Tuticorin.

The initiative also includes development of green ammonia handling, storage and bunkering infrastructure, pilot bunkering operations, safety procedures and training programmes. 

The project is expected to support the development of green fuel corridors connecting VOC Port with major ports in Europe and Asia, thereby strengthening India’s position in the global green fuels value chain.

VOC Port also signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Bureau Veritas (India) Pvt. Ltd., to collaborate on Green Port certification, emissions accounting, ESG reporting, safety validation, development of green bunkering practices, and establishment of a Centre of Excellence for green fuels and sustainability.

The port also plans for an upcoming 750 m³ green methanol bunkering facility.

 

Photo credit: Naveed Ahmed on Unsplash
Published: 3 June, 2026

Continue Reading

Port & Regulatory

Study: Major drop in ship sulphur emissions confirmed following IMO regulations

National Centre for Atmospheric Science study found that the average sulphur content in ship fuel dropped nearly tenfold in open ocean areas following IMO’s 2020 regulation.

Admin

Published

on

By

shraga kopstein on Unsplash

Recent global regulations have significantly reduced sulphur emissions from ships, helping to improve air quality in coastal regions – confirmed by a recent international study led by researchers at the National Centre for Atmospheric Science. 

The research, published in Environmental Science: Atmospheres, used aircraft and ground-based instruments to measure sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides emitted by ships in the North-East Atlantic and European coastal waters between 2019 and 2023.

The team found that the average sulphur content in ship fuel dropped nearly tenfold in open ocean areas following the International Maritime Organization’s 2020 regulation, which capped sulphur content in marine fuel at 0.5%. 

Before the change, many ships exceeded the previous 3.5% limit. After 2020, only a small number of ships were found to breach the new standard.

In European sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs), such as the English Channel and the Port of Tyne, sulphur levels were even lower – well below the stricter 0.1% limit. Interestingly, ports outside these zones, like Valencia in Spain, also showed low sulphur levels, likely due to EU rules requiring cleaner fuel when ships are docked for extended periods.

This is the first study to use aircraft-based measurements and predictions from the Ship Traffic Emission Assessment Model (STEAM3) to assess ship emissions outside of sulphur control zones since the 2020 regulation came into effect. The findings support the widely held view that ships now emit around seven times less sulphur than before the rule change – an important step toward cleaner air and healthier coastal environments.

Note: The research, titled ‘SO2 and NOx emissions from ships in North-East Atlantic waters: in situ measurements and comparison with an emission model’ can be found here. 

 

Photo credit: shraga kopstein on Unsplash
Published: 8 December, 2025

Continue Reading

Interview

IBIA Annual Convention 2025: ‘Exciting times’ for post IMO 2020 bunker suppliers, states Equatorial

Choong Sheen Mao, Chief Operating Officer, Equatorial, describes to Manifold Times the pre/post IMO 2020 challenges and evolution of bunker suppliers.

Admin

Published

on

By

Sheen Mao MT

The International Bunkering Industry Association (IBIA) will be hosting its flagship Annual Convention in Hong Kong at the Hong Kong Convention Exhibition & Convention Centre between 18 to 20 November 2025, as part of Hong Kong Maritime Week.

Choong Sheen Mao, Chief Operating Officer, Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services (Equatorial), speaks to bunkering publication Manifold Times about the challenges of a post IMO 2020 bunker supplier.

MT: How does Equatorial continue to offer customer assurance and maintenance of marine fuel quality to ISO8217 standards despite increasing complexity of bunker fuel blends?

We maintain our focus to provide compliant, quality and competitively priced products to our customers. There is no shortcut. We source our products from a wide range of cargo producers and suppliers. We continue to be strict and vigilant with our testing programme for our products before delivering them to our customers. Equatorial has deepened our engagement with the wider industry to have a better and up-to-date understanding of the existing and new marine fuels.

MT: Can you share the evolution of commercial marine fuel procurement, blending and trading strategies on the back of increasing fuel types (pre/post IMO 2020)?

Pre IMO 2020, the main types of marine fuel procured and consumed by vessels were high-sulphur fuel oil, marine diesel oil and marine gas oil. Trading strategies were therefore closely linked to that within the oil industry.

However, many of the new fuel types are from other industries. For example, biofuels, methanol and ammonia are mainly products from the chemical and agriculture industries. There are marked differences between these industries and the energy industry (in particular, the marine fuels industry). LNG is from the gas industry which is distinct from the oil industry.

Without an existing liquid paper market for many of these commodities (especially as a marine fuel), the price risk management is less straightforward. Furthermore, commodity prices are no longer the sole consideration for price itself. The price of compliance must be considered. This could range from guaranteeing the origin of the marine fuel, its sulphur properties as well as its carbon intensity. The list goes on.

MT: Operational wise, what are the changing role and responsibilities of a bunker supplier to date, compared to before IMO 2020?

The role and responsibility of a bunker supplier have evolved. Fundamentally, it has been about providing quality marine fuels at competitive prices. Quantity assurance has been a critical concern which led to the mandatory implementation of the mass flow meter system for bunkering in the Port of Singapore. Interestingly, due to the nature of credit terms in the bunker industry, bunker suppliers also performed the role of “bankers” by extending favourable credit terms to shipowners and charterers.

These days, post IMO 2020, things have become even more complicated. Today, a bunker supplier retains the abovementioned roles and responsibilities, and much more – it has to ensure compliance with a plethora of rules and regulations. Compliance not only with sulphur cap requirements, but with international and regional sanctions and restrictions unrelated to the quality of the marine fuel itself. In fact, especially with alternative low- and zero-carbon marine fuels, this means compliance with standards, rules and regulations on sustainability such as the European Renewable Energy Directive and/or International Sustainability and Carbon Certification. There is also the need to comply with increasingly stringent safety regulations on both conventional and alternative marine fuels.

In addition to the above, a post IMO 2020 bunker supplier is still expected to supply compliant and quality fuel at competitive prices.

MT: Equatorial is Singapore’s largest local-born supplier; what is the next big thing for the company?

Equatorial continues to adapt and improve with the times, while maintaining its core values – Integrity, Teamwork, Commitment, Proficiency and Quality, and Safety and Environment. The bunker industry is a highly competitive one, and it is our intention to keep our competitive edge and remain relevant. This means that we have had to step out of our comfort zone and embrace the two mega trends of our time – digitalisation and decarbonisation.

We have been early adopters and developers of the electronic bunkering note as part of our own digital bunkering efforts. We have diversified our product offering to include low carbon marine fuels and are proud to be one of the pioneers for bunkering B100 biofuels earlier this year. This was made possible by the arrival of our IMO Type II chemical and oil bunker tankers. These same bunker tankers are also capable for carrying and delivering methanol. Equatorial has invested in an LNG bunkering vessel (LBV) newbuilding that is set to be delivered in Q3 2027. We are also involved in a study to develop low- or zero-carbon ammonia bunkering in Singapore.

These are exciting times.

Note: Choong Sheen Mao is amongst panellists featured in ‘Session Three: Bunker Sellers Panel’ at the IBIA Annual Convention 2025.

Join the Conversation

With over 300 delegates expected, the IBIA Annual Convention 2025 is set to be a defining moment for the marine fuels industry. Registration is now open via the IBIA Annual Convention website.

 

Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 31 October 2025

Continue Reading

Trending