Connect with us

Bunker Fuel Quality

Singapore: Marine fuel quality testing agencies applaud move for mandatory enhanced bunker fuel tests

Representatives from Maritec, VPS, Intertek, FOBAS and Eurofins Mechem offer Manifold Times their perspective on the development.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED SG bunker tanker

A move by Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) to introduce mandatory enhanced checks for marine fuel delivered at Singapore port effective 1 June 2024 has received largely positive feedback from several local bunker fuel testing agencies, learns Manifold Times.

MPA has stated all residual and bio-residual bunker marine fuel supplied in the Port of Singapore, bunker suppliers must ensure that they do not contain Chlorinated Organic Compounds (COCs) above 50mg/kg, and must be free from inorganic acids. Specifically,

  • COC must be tested for using the EN 14077 accredited test method (concentration of total organic chlorine must not exceed 50mg/kg) and shall be reported in the “Certificate of Quality” (COQ) provided to receiving vessels;
  • Inorganic acids must be tested for using ASTM D664 accredited test method as prescribed in ISO 8217 and the Strong Acid Number (SAN) (in addition to the Total Acid Number (TAN)) shall be reported in the COQ (i.e. SAN = 0) provided to receiving vessels;

Maritec

“The issue of chemical contamination had plagued the bunkering industry for years, and the risk of receiving contaminated bunker fuels is likely to persist,” Dr Jagannath Panda, Technical Manager, Maritec, told the bunkering publication.

“This is mostly due to the complex bunker supply chain which consists of a network of different stakeholders including refineries, traders, and physical suppliers operating their own barges, with some performing their own fuel blending operation.

“Standard industry practice requires bunker oil being to marine vessels must fulfil ISO 8217 requirements. However, ISO 8217 has another criterion which states that it should not contain chemical waste, waste lubricants or any other contaminants which would impair the efficiency of the purification or engine system on vessel.”

According to Dr Jagannath, the International Council on Combustion Engines (CIMAC) working group had assessed the situation around the organic chloride contamination cases in Singapore and recommended de-minimis levels of COC concentration not exceeding 50 ppm in marine fuels.

ISO8217:2023, which is currently in the draft stage, states in Annex B that ‘A fuel should be considered to be free from organic chlorides (COC) when the total organic halogen content as chlorine is not exceeding 50 ppm when tested in accordance with EN14077’.

“In dispute cases both CIMAC and ISO2024 recommend EN14077 test method to quantify total organic chlorides in marine fuel. It was also pointed out that presence of COCs can also be evaluated by other techniques like GCMS with required test precision data,” he shared.

“However, EN14077 test method is time consuming and expensive. It can be considered in case of dispute cases once organic chloride is detected by other technique.

“As such, CTI Maritec has adopted a modified ASTM D7845 test method for a quick screening and finding of COCs in marine fuel. The test was accredited by SAC SINGLASS and listed nine (9) COCs in basic GCMS package list. Maritec strongly recommends carrying out a GCMS test for all bunker fuels. Individual COC also can be quantified by using modified ASTM D7845 method.”

Dr Jagannath, meanwhile, agreed that strong acid in bunker fuel can be detected as Strong Acid Number (SAN) by the ASTM D664 test method which should not be greater than zero.

“Presence of strong acid also lower down pH which represents the highest potentiometric hydrogen ion concentration. The pH scale is logarithmic. Water has a pH of 7. A pH of 4 is ten times more acidic than a pH of 5 and 100 times more acidic than a pH of 6,” he said.

“SAN which represents presence of strong acids covered in ISO 8217:2005, ISO 8217:2012 and ISO 8217:2017 para 5.1 states that the “fuels shall be free from Inorganic acids...".

“Maritec recommends testing SAN along with Total Acid Number (TAN) via ASTM D664 method for all bunker fuels.”

VPS

Capt. Rahul Choudhuri, President Strategic Partnerships of VPS, felt the move is certainly a positive step to improve the level of confidence for shipowners receiving bunkers at Singapore port.

“MPA formed the Industry Expert Group (IEG) in 2022 right after preliminary investigations on the chemical contamination case that rocked the industry - and sought advice from local marine fuel testing agencies on implementing additional fuel quality checks that would screen for unacceptable chemicals,” he said.

Capt. Choudhuri noted VPS was in fact the first testing company to detect chemical contaminants at Singapore port using its proprietary GCMS Headspace Screening method, and later supported MPA in extensive sampling and fingerprinting of the contaminated fuels.

“The port authority has shown it has taken bunker quality assurance seriously and will not hesitate to take necessary actions against relevant parties. This is a testament to Singapore’s drive as the premier bunkering port of choice,” he continued.

“This case also shows that marine fuel quality complexity cannot rely on ISO 8217 standards alone, and additional quality checks are needed for the betterment of the industry in general & shipowners in particular.”

Intertek

Ang Chee Teck, Regional Managing Director, Intertek Caleb Brett SEAsia and Japan, believed the new implementation will provide additional assurance to bunker oil end users.

“For this mandatory implementation to be possible, we would expect more extensively stringent verification which would imply the need to increase the quantity of testing parameters on the bunker oil,” he noted.

“We welcome MPA’s measure in introducing more stringent standards on local bunker fuel supply, which is aligned with Singapore drive in driving quality standard.

“Apart from that, it will be instrumental in the reduction of pollution to environment and vessel sailing disruption due to engine damages.

“Currently, fuel oil from most suppliers are able to meet the enhance testing measurement. The key is the priority balancing between quality and profit.”

FOBAS

Partha Das, Global Technical Manager at FOBAS, felt the move to prevent chemical contamination in bunker fuel delivered at Singapore port was a “very good initiative by MPA”.

“In 2022, we saw about 200 ships effected by contamination of Organic Chloride in the bunker. Organic Chlorides are highly corrosive, which can cause increase wear of fuel pumps,” he explained.

“Also, the solvent nature of these chemicals can affect the lubrication surface of the fuel pumps which can cause seizure and excessive sludge which can block the filters/purifier.

“Please note, bunkers are purchased as per ISO8217 specification. So as per the specification, there is an important clause, which states that the fuel shall not contain any additive at the concentration used in the fuel; or any added substance or chemical waste that jeopardizes the safety of the ship or adversely affects the performance of the machinery; or is harmful to personnel; or contributes overall to additional air pollution.”

Eurofins Mechem

Dr Cai Qiantao, Technical & PIP Director at Eurofins Mechem, said the company has been taking steps to ensure full compliance.

“With over 95% of our analyses already accredited in the required list, we are working tirelessly to complete the remaining accreditations before the deadline,” he stated.

“Our dedication to compliance is rooted in the Asian ethos of adaptability and resilience. We understand the importance of staying ahead of the curve and are committed to being ready for any changes. Our team has been working hard to update our testing methodologies, incorporating the latest innovations to meet the MPA's standards. Even the analyses that have not yet been accredited maintain the highest quality, reflecting our commitment to excellence.

“Our blend of tradition and modernization mirrors Singapore's journey towards progress and tradition, where we respect our heritage while embracing the future. Our focus is on achieving full accreditation with diligence and determination, just like the Singaporean spirit.

“Rest assured that our commitment to excellence and reliability remains unwavering. Our dedication to compliance reflects the very essence of Singapore's success story.”

Related: Singapore: MPA tightens testing parameters to reduce contaminated bunker fuels
Related: MPA: Glencore and PetroChina supplied contaminated bunkers to about 200 ships in the Port of Singapore

 

Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 13 March 2024

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel Quality

Bureau Veritas: VeriFuel Fuel Quality Testing Annual Report 2024

Approximately 35% of fuels classified as RMG380 in ISO 8217:2010/2012/2017 would not meet the ISO 8217:2024 RMG380 grade limits due to minimum viscosity requirements.

Admin

Published

on

By

Bureau Veritas: VeriFuel Fuel Quality Testing Annual Report 2024

French testing, inspection and certification firm Bureau Veritas recently provided Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times a copy of its VeriFuel Fuel Quality Testing Annual Report 2024 which provides an overview of marine fuel quality, emerging trends, and compliance levels based on all tested bunker samples across its laboratories. The following is a summary of the report:

Quality Trends and Comparisons:

2024 vs. Previous Years

This section provides a year-over-year comparison of fuel quality, trends, and compliance.

Residual Fuels

The proportion of HSFO samples has increased over the last four years, driven by the growing number of scrubber-fitted vessels. In 2024, almost 1 out of 5 tested samples were HSFO [Figure 1].

Screenshot 2025 03 12 at 12.50.12 PM

Comparison to specification

  • ULSFO out-of-spec samples have been decreasing since 2021, mainly due to sulphur and water content improvements.
  • The number of VLSFO samples being out-of-spec has slightly decreased over the years.
  • HSFO out-of-spec samples increased by approximately 0.5% in 2024, mainly due to water content.

Screenshot 2025 03 12 at 2.51.24 PM

VLSFO

Although the portion of VLSFO out-of-spec samples has steadily decreased since 2021, a slight increase in the samples within the 95% confidence limit was observed in 2024 compared to 2023 [Figure 3].

Screenshot 2025 03 12 at 2.51.36 PM

Viscosity trends

Since their introduction to the market in 2020, the VLSFOs have experienced a shift towards higher average viscosity @ 50 °C [Figure 4].

Screenshot 2025 03 12 at 2.51.51 PM

One of the major changes in ISO 8217:2024 is the introduction of minimum viscosity. As a result, approximately 35% of fuels classified as RMG380 in ISO 8217:2010/2012/2017 would not meet the ISO 8217:2024 RMG380 grade limits due to the minimum viscosity requirements [Figure 5].

Screenshot 2025 03 12 at 3.01.28 PM

There are notable regional differences when it comes to how well fuels supplied today would meet the ISO 8217:2024 limits [Figure 6]. In some major bunker ports such as Houston, Santos, Busan, as many as 75% would fail the ISO 8217:2024 RMG380 grade while in Algeciras, Zona Comun and Las Palmas most fuels would comply.

Screenshot 2025 03 12 at 2.52.35 PM

ULSFO

The portion of ULSFO out-of-spec samples has steadily decreased since 2021. A slight increase in the samples within the 95% confidence limit was observed in 2024 compared to 2023 [Figure 7].

Screenshot 2025 03 12 at 2.52.54 PM

HSFO

The portion of HSFO out-of-spec samples increased in 2024 compared to 2023, while the samples within the 95% confidence limit remained at a similar level.

Screenshot 2025 03 12 at 2.53.10 PM

Distillate fuel (DMA 0.10% sulphur)

The portion of out-of-spec DMA samples steadily increased, exceeding 3% in 2024. Samples within the 95% confidence limit follow the same trend with an increase in 2024 compared to previous years [Figure 9].

Screenshot 2025 03 12 at 2.53.32 PM

 

Photo credit: Bureau Veritas
Published: 12 March, 2025

Continue Reading

Biofuel

New FOBAS report flags ‘significant concern’ over off-spec bunker fuel issues

Almost 2.5% of tested VLSFO samples, particularly ISO8217 RMG380 grade, recorded sulphur levels between 0.50% mass and 0.53% mass while a further 0.8% of VLSFO samples exceeded 0.53% mass.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Hans Reniers on Unsplash

Lloyd’s Register’s Fuel Oil Bunkering Analysis and Advisory Service (FOBAS) on Thursday (27 February) highlighted rising biofuel uptake, ongoing issues with off-specification fuels and the impact of new regulatory measures in its latest report. 

Mirroring trends from the first half of 2024, the FOBAS Fuel Quality Report H2 2024 identified off-specification sulphur content results as a significant concern.  

Almost 2.5% of tested Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (VLSFO) samples, particularly ISO8217 RMG380 grade, recorded sulphur levels between 0.50% mass and 0.53% mass. 

“Although these fuels technically comply with MARPOL Annex VI regulations when accounting for test precision allowances, they continue to create uncertainty for ship operators,” it said. 

A further 0.8% of VLSFO samples exceeded 0.53% mass, placing vessels at risk of non-compliance. 

“The data shows some improvement from 2023, but suppliers are urged to aim for stricter adherence to the 0.50% limit to avoid compliance disputes,” it added.

The report also highlighted that total sediment remained a major issue, with 2024 seeing a rise after previous improvements. Asphaltene instability in fuel blends is a common cause, with Houston and Antwerp identified as high-risk areas in this respect.  

Distillate fuels, while generally of higher quality, also presented issues, particularly in cold flow properties and compliance with the SOLAS flash point requirement of minimum 60oC. The number of marine gas oil (MGO) samples with flash points below 60oC increased in 2024, a trend that poses both statutory compliance and safety risks. This can partly be attributed to unintentional or intentional mixing with automotive diesel in some countries which has a lower flash point limit.  

Looking ahead, the report anticipated that the Mediterranean SOx (Sulphur Oxides) Emission Control Area (SECA), may alter bunkering patterns and fuel quality in specific ports. Ships operating in the Mediterranean will need to use fuels with a sulphur content of 0.10% mass or lower, unless using approved SOx abatement technology. This regulatory shift may drive changes in fuel availability and pricing across key Mediterranean ports, requiring careful planning by ship operators.

The latest analysis from FOBAS also highlighted a significant increase in biofuel usage, primarily driven by EU and IMO regulations, including the Mediterranean SECA coming into effect on 1 May 2025. 

Biofuels continue their rise in the marine fuel mix, driven by regulatory incentives and industry decarbonisation commitments. 

The report noted the increasing use of Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) residual blends (RF grade), particularly in Singapore, Algeciras, and the ARA region. 

“While many vessels have successfully adopted biofuels without reported issues, concerns remain regarding transparency in composition and the potential risk of unknown quality biofuel stocks entering the supply chain,” it said.

 Usman Muhammad, FOBAS Product Manager, said: “Fuel quality continues to be a key operational concern for the maritime industry. While we see some improvements in certain areas, the recurrence of high sediment levels, sulphur compliance issues, and emerging challenges with biofuels underline the need for rigorous fuel testing, reassessment of onboard fuel management and supply chain transparency.”

“As the regulatory landscapes evolve and alternative fuels gain traction, ship operators must remain proactive in assessing fuel quality to ensure compliance and maintain high operational efficiency.”

Note: The latest FOBAS Fuel Quality Report can be found here

 

Photo credit: Hans Reniers on Unsplash
Published: 28 February, 2025

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel

VPS analysis: 2024 highlights importance of bunker fuel quality testing

VPS says over 50 cases of major operational issues were reported, covering main and auxiliary engine cases plus, fuel delivery system related problems, due to factors such as fuel stability and chemical contamination.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED VPS logo

Steve Bee, Commercial Director of marine fuels testing company VPS, on Tuesday (18 February) elaborated on key trends and insights in a 2024 Marine Bunker Fuels Review. 

The following are excerpts of the analysis:

Introduction

2024 saw the continuing evolution and widening of available maritime fuel types and grades, as the global shipping industry continues to gather decarbonisation momentum to reduce its emissions to meet current and future legislation targets. Existing CII and EEXI requirements, plus EU ETS legislation, saw increasing demand for additional testing, lower-carbon fuels, data and digitalisation solutions across the shipping sectors.

As the leading maritime decarbonisation testing and advisory services provider, VPS continued to be at the forefront of marine fuels and lubricants analysis, utilising our experience, expertise and innovative approach, to support the drive for a more sustainable shipping fleet.  

Throughout the year, VPS witnessed further fuel quality issues with VLSFOs in terms of, sulphur compliance, cold-flow properties, water and cat-fines. In addition, MGO suffered from cold-flow, flash point and FAME off-specifications.

Biofuels usage saw a continuing increase in demand from the market, leading to increasing queries regarding their fuel management and their “fit-for-purpose” as a drop-in marine fuel. This in turn called upon VPS to provide answers and solutions to customers, utilising our extensive knowledge and understanding of biofuels and their associated test parameters.

The launch of the new revision of the international marine fuel quality standard ISO8217:2024 was very much welcomed by the industry. This new revision saw the specification tables increase from two to four, with the inclusion of a <0.50% Sulphur specification and also biofuels in the form of FAME, HVO, GTL and/or, BTL.

2024 witnessed very strong newbuild contracting (2,765 ships of 124.2m GT), the highest in tonnage terms since 2007 (173.4m GT). With 820 of these vessels being “alternative fuel capable”, showing the fuelling transition is still very much in focus.

The Marine Fuel Mix

Across 2024, the fuel mix with respect to samples received for testing in VPS laboratories, equated to more than 65 million MT, which averages at 5.4 million MT of marine fuels per month. VLSFO was the most popular marine fuel with 52% of the fuels used, followed by 32% HSFO, 14% MGO, 1% ULSFO and 1% Biofuels. Regarding biofuels usage, the samples tested by VPS equated to an increase from 558,000 MT in 2023 to 800,000MT in 2024.

VPS Bunker Alerts

Bunker Alerts highlight short term quality fuel quality issues identified by VPS, for a specific test parameter of a specific fuel grade/type in a specific port. The service provides valuable information to customers, to assist in avoiding potentially problematic fuel types in a highlighted port or region, to further protect the customer’s asset and crew.

In 2024, VPS issued 27 Bunker Alerts, one less than in 2023. The 2024 Bunker Alerts included the major fuel grades, i.e. VLSFO, HSFO and MGO, 8 different test parameters and 13 ports.

46% of the 2024 Bunker Alerts were for VLSFO fuels, followed by 32% for HSFO fuels and 21% for MGO. The most common problematic parameter was Sodium (9), accounting for 33% of the Bunker Alerts, followed by Flash Point (8) accounting for 30% of the Bunker Alerts.

Singapore (30%) and ARA (26%) were the regions/ports most frequently requiring a Bunker Alert to be issued. But as these are the two busiest bunkering regions, it is not too surprising.

VLSFO Fuel Quality

As the most used marine fuel type, VLSFO accounts for more than half of the fuels tested by VPS. In terms of quality, VLSFO had an off-specification rate of 5.4% in 2024. Of the 5.4% VLSFO off-specifications, Europe provided the highest level of off-specification VLSFOs in both 2024 (11.9%) and 2023 (7.9%). North America provided the next highest level of off-specification VLSFO with 7% of fuels tested exhibiting at least one off-specification parameter in 2024 and 4.4% in 2023. South America had the third highest VLSFO off-specification rate with 5.9% off-specs versus 3.8% in 2023.

Sulphur is the most common off-specification parameter of VLSFOs, accounting for 44% of VLSFO off-specs in 2024 and 28% in 2023. When it comes to looking at all VLSFOs tested, 0.5% had a sulphur content >0.53%, whilst 1.9% of samples tested were between 0.50%-0.53% sulphur and the remaining 97.6% had a sulphur content of <0.50%.

Pour Point was also a common off-specification parameter for VLSFOs with 13% of VLSFOs off-specs relating to this parameter, a decrease against the 16% level witnessed in 2023.

The importance of the additional cold-flow test of Wax Appearance Temperature (WAT) and Wax Disappearance Temperature (WDT), was further highlighted in 2024 with 57% of VLSFOs exhibiting WAT of 31-40ºC and 11% having WAT between 41-50ºC. 54% of VLSFO samples had a WDT of 41-50ºC, with 20% having a WDT of >50ºC. VLSFOs cold-flow properties are a definite concern with wax precipitating from the fuel at temperatures way in excess of 10ºC above the pour point, potentially causing numerous operational problems such as filter and pipework blockages.

2024 saw a very similar distribution of cat-fines results across all VLSFOs tested compared to 2023, with only 0.6% of samples showing cat-fine levels of greater than 60ppm and hence off-specification. 19% of all VLSFOs showed a cat-fine level greater than 40ppm. Frequent checking of purifier efficiency via VPS’ Fuel System Checks (FSC) service is a highly recommended proactive safeguard in respect to increased cat-fines within VLSFOs.

HSFO Fuel Quality

HSFO represents almost 32% of all bunker samples received by VPS for testing, indicating a relatively high level of scrubber usage onboard vessels today. 10.4% of HSFOs tested in 2024 were off-specification for at least one test parameter. In terms of regional HSFO off-specifications, South America accounted for 29% of off-specs, compared to 30.5% in 2023. Second highest off-spec region was Europe, with 21% in 2024 compared to 21.4% in 2023 and North America was third with 11.5% of HSFO off-specs in 2023, compared to 9.5% in 2023.

As usual, viscosity and density were the two most common HSFO off-spec parameters in 2024, with 54% of the off-spec attributed to viscosity and 21% to density, compared to 43% and 33% respectively in 2023. Water was the third most frequent HSFO off-specification parameter in 2024, with 13% off-spec level compared to 10.5% in 2023. 

Whilst cat-fines accounted for 3% of HSFO off-specs in 2024, this was lower than the 2023 level of 4%. Again, like VLSFOs it highlights the importance of Fuel System Checks (FSC) to protect the engine from potential damage from this corrosive contaminant, by improving purifier efficiency. 20% of HSFOs had a cat-fine level of >40ppm in 2024.

Summary

With over 50 reported cases of major operational issues, covering main and auxiliary engine cases plus, fuel delivery system related problems, due to fuel stability, sludging, cat-fines, cold flow properties and chemical contamination, 2024 once again highlighted the importance of bunker fuel quality testing, as a proactive means to protect vessels, their crew and the environment. With additional tests, currently not included within ISO8217, providing further vital information in achieving heightened levels of protection.

Biofuels usage continued to increase in demand and importance, as ship owners and operators look to achieve improvements through CII, EEXI, as well as looking to counter the financial impact of the EU ETS scheme.

The revision of ISO8217 released on 30th May 2024, was a welcomed improvement on previous revisions, but still not a fully comprehensive solution in vessel, crew and environmental protection. Therefore, additional tests continue to hold an important role in fuel management.

Methanol demand and usage will also grow, with a rapidly growing order book for methanol-powered vessels. Yet, methanol also comes with a host of fuel management challenges, with testing playing a major role in ensuring quality and fit-for-purpose considerations.

So, 2025, suggests another year of widening marine fuel types and grades coming to market, coupled with their growing fuel management considerations.

Note: The full copy of VPS’ 2024 Marine Bunker Fuels Review can be viewed here

 

Photo credit: VPS
Published: 19 February, 2025

Continue Reading
Advertisement
  • Aderco Manifold Website Advert EN
  • Consort advertisement v2
  • EMF banner 400x330 slogan
  • v4Helmsman Gif Banner 01
  • RE 05 Lighthouse GIF
  • SBF2
  • Sea Trader & Sea Splendor
  • Zhoushan Bunker

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS

  • HL 2022 adv v1
  • Singfar advertisement final
  • Triton Bunkering advertisement v2
  • MFT 25 01 E Marine Logo Animation
  • SEAOIL 3+5 GIF


  • Synergy Asia Bunkering logo MT
  • Mokara Final
  • Energe Logo
  • Auramarine 01
  • Central Star logo
  • NW Logo advertisement
  • PSP Marine logo
  • Golden Island logo square
  • Innospec logo v6
  • Uni Fuels oct 2024 ad
  • Advert Shipping Manifold resized1
  • VPS 2021 advertisement
  • LabTechnic

Trending