Jerome Leprince-Ringuet, Managing Director of Total Marine Fuels Global Solutions, at the Singapore International Bunkering Conference and Exhibition (SIBCON) 2020 shared some insights on the post IMO 2020 capacity of the liquified natural gas (LNG) bunker fuel market – which he believes is strengthened by the baptism of fire that is the Covid-19 related oil market crash.
“TOTAL’s LNG trades are expected to grow to 50 million tonnes per year by 2025, increasing by 10 million tonnes per year from 2020, and Total is projected to have more than 20 LNG carriers at that time,” said Leprince-Ringuet.
“Right now, LNG is probably the best fuel of choice to balance the shipping energy dynamics until a stable zero carbon fuel can be implemented because LNG allows for much adaptability.
“An LNG powered vessel will be able to bunker bio gas and e-methane in the future, and those are probably competitive options compared to other zero carbon fuels.
“Shipowners will also be able to retrofit their vessels later on to handle low flashpoint fuels, and there may be the option of installing carbon capture and storage to further reduce the impact of any carbon emissions.
LNG bunkering post COVID
While Covid-19 related problems have impacted the prices of both conventional fuels and LNG, data shows that the price of conventional fuels is more volatile than gas, says Leprince-Ringuet.
Through the volatility of Covid-19 market conditions, LNG as a bunker fuel has proven itself to be maturing and an economically viable solution as the price spread between LNG and conventional bunker fuel has generally remained consistent compared to 2017.
Changing LNG economics and how this will help shipping
An unexpected development in the energy market is that more LNG trades are being made on a short-term basis (spot trading), according to Leprince-Ringuet.
Traditionally, contracts in the gas trading industry are structured in the form of very long-term contracts (decades). However, 34% of trades last year were short term trades, signaling that globally the energy market is evolving towards spot trading which is more suited to the bunkering industry.
Leprince-Ringuet’s top tips for LNG bunkering to become a viable option moving forward:
“LNG bunkering requires different skills and organisations compared to conventional bunkering. Therefore, there is space and opportunity for stakeholders to serve the market’s growing needs and bunkering expectations,” concludes Leprince-Ringuet.
Photo credit: SIBCON 2020
Published: 13 October, 2020
Hong Kong-based bunker supplier records decrease in local volume due to market developments at China.
‘Participation in the work of an authoritative international community will allow us to unite efforts to develop infrastructure LNG projects in Russia and abroad,’ said CEO.
A carbon free maritime sector by 2050 may seem a very long way from here, but big liner operators are already starting to make plans well in advance.
Southernpec (Singapore) Pte Ltd used a magnet to tamper with MFM of Southernpec 7 during a bunker craft license bunkering operation, MPA tells Manifold Times.
‘Despite the global crisis, we must continue to promote the sustainability of our shipping. That is why we continue to campaign consistently for the use of LNG,’ it said.
MOL to operate LNG-fuelled tug boat, establish LNG bunker fuel supply system with Osaka Gas.
Program introduces periodic assessments, mass flow metering data analysis, and regular training for relevant key personnel to better handle the MFMS to ensure a high level of continuous operational competency.
U.S. Claims Register Summary recorded a total USD 833 million claim from a total 180 creditors against O.W. Bunker USA, according to the creditor list seen by Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times.
Glencore purchased fuel through Straits Pinnacle which contracted supply from Unicious Energy. Contaminated HSFO was loaded at Khor Fakkan port and shipped to a FSU in Tanjong Pelepas, Malaysia to be further blended.
Individuals were employees of surveying companies engaged by Shell to inspect the volume of oil loaded onto the vessels which Shell supplied oil to; they allegedly accepted bribes totalling at least USD 213,000.
MPA preliminary investigations revealed that the affected marine fuel was supplied by Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd who later sold part of the same cargo to PetroChina International (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
‘MPA had immediately contacted the relevant bunker suppliers to take necessary steps to ensure that the relevant batch of fuel was no longer supplied. Further investigations are currently on-going,’ it informs.
