Business
SCMA: Bunker players gain most when adopting SBC Terms 2022 in marine fuel supply contracts
SCMA elaborates on Singapore Bunker Claims Procedure (SBC Terms), key changes made to its
terms, its positive impact in resolving bunker disputes and how it is in the financial interest of
bunker players to adopt SBC Terms 2022.

Published
7 months agoon
By
Admin
In an exclusive interview with Singapore-based bunkering publication Manifold Times, Ms Corina Song, Vice-chairperson of Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration, recently shared more about Singapore Bunker Claims Procedure (SBC Terms) that came into force in September 2022 including:
- the key changes made to its terms,
- its impact in resolving bunker disputes,
- how it has been designed by SCMA to specifically benefit the bunker industry and
- the importance of bunker players adopting SBC Terms
MT: Tell us about the Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration’s Singapore Bunker Claims Procedure (SBC Terms).
The Singapore Bunker Claims Procedure SBC Terms is a set of arbitral rules for the resolution of disputes arising out of or in connection with the sale and supply of bunker by arbitration. This includes, amongst others, disagreements over quality and/or quantity of bunker; and/or non-payment or non-delivery of bunker.
The quantum of claims in bunker disputes can sometimes be modest when compared to other shipping and international trade disputes. Moreover, the issues of fact and law are relatively simple. The SBC Terms were designed by the Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration (SCMA) with these features in mind. Besides the general SCMA Rules (4th Edition, 1 January 2022) (the SCMA Rules) that is applied to all types of disputes, the bunkering industry is uniquely offered the additional option of applying the SBC Terms for an even faster and less costly process to resolve bunker disputes.
MT: When was SBC Terms 2022 launched? What’s the difference between the old SBC terms and the latest SBC Terms?
The SBC Terms 2022 is found in the Singapore Standards 600 of 2022, the Code of Practice for Bunkering for Bunker Tankers Using Tank Gauging (SS 600:2022). It came into force in September 2022 when SS 600:2022 was launched.
The previous iteration of the SBC Terms is the SBC Terms 2014, found in SS 600:2014.
The key changes made to the SBC Terms are set out below:
No requirement to send Notice of Protest or Complaint to Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA)
Where there is a dispute over the quantity of the bunker, the Notice of Protest only needs to be sent to the Singapore Shipping Association (SSA). Similarly, where there is a dispute over the quality of the bunker, the complaint only needs to be sent to SSA. There is no longer any need to send either the Notice of Protest or complaint to MPA.
Additional information required in the Notice of Arbitration
The Notice of Arbitration (NOA) now requires that the Claimant (i) specify whether the dispute concerns the quality or quantity of bunker, failure to deliver the bunker, non-payment for the bunker, or any other dispute arising from the supply of bunker; and (ii) include a formal request for arbitration as well as reference to the arbitration agreement or a reproduction of the arbitration agreement.
Expedited Arbitration and Summary Procedure
- An arbitration conducted under the SBC Terms may proceed in two (2) ways. There is a default process, and a faster process known as ‘Summary Procedure’. SS 600:2022 now refers to the default process as ‘Expedited Arbitration’ to avoid confusion with the ‘Expedited Procedure’ in the SCMA Rules.
- When the Summary Procedure applies, pursuant to SBC Terms 2022,
- the hearing will be fixed within 21 days from the day the SCMA Registrar receives the request for Summary Procedure. This gives parties more time to prepare their cases. By comparison, the SBC Terms 2014 fixes a hearing within 14 days;
- supporting documents and written submissions must be filed no later than 5 days before the date of the hearing. Previously, parties could file their supporting documents and written submissions 2 days before the hearing. This change gives the SCMA Registrar or Tribunal more time to review the facts and arguments.
-
Adducing oral evidence
Oral evidence could not be adduced in any circumstances under the SBC Terms 2014. However, under SBC Terms 2022, oral evidence can be presented at the request of the SCMA Registrar or Tribunal having conduct of the hearing. This strikes a better balance between having a fair hearing, with a better understanding of the evidence, and resolving a dispute expeditiously.
No mandatory physical hearings
Hearings under the SBC Terms 2022 can now be conducted virtually. This adopts the change in work practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is no longer mandatory that hearings be held at a physical venue.
Written awards for all disputes
Under SBC Terms 2014, a written award only needs to be rendered where the claim or counterclaim exceeds SGD50,000. The SBC Terms 2022 has changed the practice, requiring the SCMA Registrar or Tribunal having conduct of the arbitration to issue a written award for all disputes.
No need for security of the claim to be lodged with SSA
The SBC Terms 2022 no longer provides that security for the claim may be lodged with SSA. This simplifies proceedings and reduces costs. In addition, respondents would not be out-of-pocket before the merits of the claim are even decided. Should such security be required, the claimant could make an application to the SCMA Registrar or Tribunal, seeking such security.
The SCMA is grateful for the help of the organisations involved in the revision of the SBC Terms. We would like to thank MPA, SSA, Singapore Standards, and the Singapore Chemical Industry Council.
MT: What are the differences between SBC Terms 2022 and the rest of arbitration terms out there?
A distinguishing feature of the SBC Terms 2022 (as is also the case under the SCMA Rules) is the non-administered model of arbitration upon which it was crafted. Unlike institutions that adopt an administered arbitration model, parties are given full control of managing their own arbitration process. The SBC Terms 2022 and the SCMA Rules provide parties with the tools and procedural flexibility to maximise efficiency and decrease costs. There are no fees payable for administration of the arbitration since this is not performed by the SCMA. There is also no need to pay a filing fee before commencing the arbitration or placing a deposit. The upfront costs are significantly reduced. However, should parties require specific services, such as the appointment of the sole arbitrator when parties cannot agree, this can be provided by the SCMA Secretariat at a modest fixed fee.
It is due to these cost-saving measures that the shipping and international trade industries have long favoured non-administered arbitration. For this reason, the SCMA was re-constituted in 2009 as an independent body to provide a framework for maritime arbitration specifically tailored to the needs of the maritime community.
When the SBC Terms 2022 are compared to SCMA Rules, some examples would illustrate how the former has been designed by SCMA to specifically benefit the bunker industry.
- Where a bunker claim is valued at SGD100,000, the earliest it can be resolved under the SCMA Rules’ Expedited Procedure is an estimated period of three (3) months. By contrast, the same claim could, when applying the Summary Procedure of the SBC Terms 2022, be determined in or around less than two (2) months.
- The arbitrator’s fees and legal costs for proceedings under SBC Terms 2022 are capped at a lower ceiling than that for the SCMA Rules’ Expedited Procedure.
MT: Why should bunker players adopt SBC Terms 2022 in their contracts?
For the reasons earlier shared, it is clearly in the financial interests of bunker players to adopt the SBC Terms 2022. The cost savings do not, in any way compromise due process to achieve a fair and just outcome.
Should a bunker player wish to use the SBC Terms 2022 in its sale and/or supply contracts, the model arbitration clause is available for incorporation on the SCMA website.
MT: How can SBC Terms 2022 help the maritime sector as it moves towards the adoption of clean fuels in preparation for IMO 2030/2050?
The IMO has implemented the Carbon Intensity Indicate Rating Scheme that measures, amongst other indicia, carbon emissions of ships. One key way to reduce carbon emissions is to use low-carbon or cleaner fuels.
The utility and benefits of the SBC Terms 2022 remain unchanged, regardless of the composition of the fuel. Quality and quantity assurance will persist as perennial concerns. Similarly, the possibility of parties refusing to make full and timely payment continues to exist, as does non-delivery of low-carbon fuels. These are all causes of disputes arising out of or in connection with the sale and/or supply of low-carbon bunker.
Ms Corina Song is also a Partner in the international arbitration, litigation, and maritime and aviation practice groups at Allen & Gledhill LLP. Ms Song is a Senior Accredited Specialist in Maritime and Shipping Law by the Singapore Academy of Law, a statutory board.
Photo credit: Singapore Chamber of Maritime Arbitration
Published: 8 May, 2023
Vessel Arrest
Malaysia: MMEA detains tanker for illegal anchoring in East Johor waters
Panama-registered vessel was operated by 17 crew members, aged between 21 to 58 years, from Pakistan, India and Bangladesh.

Published
4 hours agoon
November 29, 2023By
Admin
The Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) on Tuesday (28 November) said a Panama-registered tanker has been detained for illegally anchoring in East Johor waters on 27 November.
MMEA Tanjung Sedili Zone acting director Maritime Cmdr Mohd Najib Sam said the tanker was detained by a patrol boat at 11am at 15.8 nautical miles northeast of Tanjung Penawar.
The captain of the vessel failed to produce any documents that permission had been obtained to anchor in Malaysian waters.

The vessel was operated by 17 crew members, aged between 21 to 58 years, from Pakistan, India and Bangladesh.
The case will be investigated under Section 491B(1)(L) of the Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1952 for anchoring without permission. If found guilty, individuals may be fined not exceeding MYR 100,000 or face an imprisonment term of not more than two years, or both.
Manifold Times previously reported law firm Oon & Bazul LLP sharing on steps shipowners should keep in mind before anchoring and conducting STS operations in Malaysian waters to avoid detention.
Related: Oon & Bazul to shipowners: Measures to take before anchoring, conducting STS ops in Malaysian waters
Photo credit: Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency
Published: 29 November, 2023
Alternative Fuels
DNV paper outlines bunkering of alternative marine fuels for boxships
Third edition of its paper series focuses on LNG, methanol and ammonia as alternative bunker fuel options for containerships; explores bunkering aspects for LNG and methanol.

Published
4 hours agoon
November 29, 2023By
Admin
Classification society DNV recently released the third edition of its paper series Alternative fuels for containerships, focused on LNG, methanol and ammonia as alternative bunker fuel options for containerships.
In its updated paper series, DNV examined the different alternative marine fuel options and provided an overview of the most important technical and commercial considerations for the containership sector.
It explored the bunkering technology for LNG, bunkering infrastructure for methanol, and availability and infrastructure of ammonia.
Building on the foundation laid in the second edition, which focused on the most important aspects of methanol as a fuel, this latest third edition delves deeper – exploring the technical intricacies and commercial considerations associated with adopting methanol as an alternative fuel for containerships.
Furthermore, it provides an overview of crucial aspects related to ammonia and discusses its potential as an alternative fuel for containerships.
Amongst others, the new edition of the paper looks at the following aspects:
- Technical design considerations for methanol
- Commercial implications of adopting methanol as an alternative fuel
- Ammonia's potential as an alternative fuel
- Availability, infrastructure and ship fuel technology for ammonia
- Major updates based on the latest IMO GHG strategy decisions at the MEPC 80 meeting
Note: The third edition of DNV’s full paper titled Alternative Fuels for Containerships can be found here.
Related: DNV paper outlines bunkering infrastructure of alternative fuels for boxships
Photo credit: DNV
Published: 29 November, 2023
Alternative Fuels
EDF, LR and Arup launch tool scoring ports’ potential to produce and bunker electrofuels
Tool is also applied to three different port scenarios, including ports exploring fuel production and bunkering, ports exploring fuel exports, and ports exploring fuel imports and bunkering.

Published
4 hours agoon
November 29, 2023By
Admin
Lloyd’s Register (LR) Maritime Decarbonisation Hub and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), in collaboration with Arup, on Tuesday (28 November) introduced the Sustainable First Movers Initiative Identification Tool, a system to help shipping stakeholders align investment decisions that support the maritime energy transition away from fossil fuels.
The tool, which is presented in a preliminary findings report – The Potential of Ports in Developing Sustainable First Movers Initiatives – scores a port’s potential to produce and bunker electrofuels while delivering local environmental and community benefits in alignment with the global temperature target of 1.5 degrees Celsius set by the Paris Agreement.
“Ports can play an important role in kickstarting shipping’s decarbonisation process even before global policies are established,” said Marie Cabbia Hubatova, Director, Global Shipping at Environmental Defense Fund.
“By considering the impact sustainable first mover initiatives can have on port-side communities, climate, environment and economies, resources can be better directed to locations where these initiatives will make the biggest difference.”
With close to two billion people living near coastal zones globally, the role of, and impacts on local port communities must be intentionally considered as the sector decarbonises globally. Ports can play a crucial role in ensuring shipping decarbonisation efforts are done in a way that has positive impacts on port communities.
The preliminary phase of the Sustainable First Movers Initiative Identification Tool analyses 108 ports in the Indo-Pacific region according to five criteria including land suitability, air quality, renewable energy surplus, economic resilience and ship traffic.
It is also applied to three different port scenarios, including ports exploring fuel production and bunkering, ports exploring fuel exports, and ports exploring fuel imports and bunkering. The combined criteria and scenario evaluation determines which ports have the greatest potential (high potential) for sustainable first mover initiatives to lead to significant emissions reductions and positive impacts in nearby communities, such as improved air quality and economic resilience.
“The transition to clean energy supply for shipping can be achieved only if stakeholders act together. Identifying potential port locations is the first step in this process,” said Dr Carlo Raucci, Consultant at Lloyd’s Register Maritime Decarbonisation Hub. “This approach sets the base for a regional sustainable transition that considers the impacts on port-side communities and the need to avoid regions in the Global South lagging behind.”
Regions in the Global South are fundamental in driving the decarbonisation of shipping. To make this transition effective, the rate at which different countries adopt and scale up electrofuels must be proportional to the difference in capital resources globally to avoid additional costs being passed on to local communities. Sustainable first mover initiatives can play an important role in making this happen by ensuring the sector’s decarbonisation is inclusive of all regions and by engaging all shipping stakeholders, including port-side communities.
“There’s a huge opportunity for early adopter shipping decarbonisation initiatives to unlock benefits for people and planet – shaping the way for a more equitable transition in the 2030s,” said Mark Button, Associate, Arup. “Our collective approach shows that taking a holistic view of shipping traffic, fuel production potential and port communities could help prioritise action at ports with the greatest near-term potential.”
The tool can be customised according to stakeholders’ needs and goals and is dependent on scenario desirability. The next phase of this work will include the selection and detailed assessment of 10 ports to help better understand local needs and maximise the value offered by sustainable first mover initiatives.
LR and EDF carried out a joint study on ammonia as shipping fuel, and LR and Arup have collaborated on The Resilience Shift study focused on fuel demand for early adopters in green corridors, ports, and energy systems, amongst many other projects.
Photo credit: Lloyd’s Register
Published: 29 November, 2023

Malaysia: MMEA detains tanker for illegal anchoring in East Johor waters

DNV paper outlines bunkering of alternative marine fuels for boxships

EDF, LR and Arup launch tool scoring ports’ potential to produce and bunker electrofuels

Wärtsilä signs agreement for first zero-emission high speed ferries in US

Norwegian Hydrogen will soon supply green hydrogen to world’s first hydrogen-powered fishing vessel

Fincantieri launches LNG dual-fuel cruise ship “Mein Schiff Relax”

East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (28 November 2023)

Photo essay: e-BDN trial of “One Truth” at Singapore port

Endress+Hauser unveils its new LNG bunker metering solution

Singapore: Equatorial Marine Fuel builds four “new generation” methanol-ready bunker tankers

Panama-flagged crude oil tanker “Inherit” arrested in Singapore

Singapore: Golden Island switching to 100% e-BDN operations from 1 December

PS Energy wins runner-up position in Singapore E50 awards, shares bunker expansion plans

EPS orders up to seven ammonia dual fuel bulkers from CSSC Qingdao Beihai Shipbuilding
Trending
-
Technology2 weeks ago
Photo essay: e-BDN trial of “One Truth” at Singapore port
-
Mass Flowmeter2 weeks ago
Endress+Hauser unveils its new LNG bunker metering solution
-
Newbuilding1 week ago
Singapore: Equatorial Marine Fuel builds four “new generation” methanol-ready bunker tankers
-
Vessel Arrest2 weeks ago
Panama-flagged crude oil tanker “Inherit” arrested in Singapore
-
Technology2 days ago
Singapore: Golden Island switching to 100% e-BDN operations from 1 December
-
Business6 days ago
PS Energy wins runner-up position in Singapore E50 awards, shares bunker expansion plans
-
Ammonia2 weeks ago
EPS orders up to seven ammonia dual fuel bulkers from CSSC Qingdao Beihai Shipbuilding
-
Methanol2 weeks ago
Methanol Institute publishes first comprehensive guide to methanol as bunker fuel