The Port of Rotterdam is targeting to become a zero emission port by 2050 through the help of shore power technology, it says.
The ambition is in support of the European Green Deal, where the European Commission aims to become the first climate neutral continent by 2050.
Together with the Municipality of Rotterdam, the port authority has embarked on an ambitious strategy to realise 8 to 10 new shore power installations in the next five years to learn from them and then speed up the uptake of shore power in the second part of this decade.
This approach is a consequence of the fact that, despite the positive results of shore power, fundamental uncertainties for market parties still exist and the technical potential of shore power for the shipping industry is still being developed.
“To reduce the emissions of the entire maritime transport chain, we stimulate investments in sustainable fuel production across the entire value chain, provide incentives for ships that use cleaner fuels and develop new safety frameworks and standards for bunkering clean and low carbon fuels and set up these new bunkering facilities in the port,” it said in a statement.
“CO2-emissions at sea represent 87% of all emissions of logistics chains via Rotterdam. Hinterland transport is 11% and the emissions of berthed ships just 2%.”
The port aims to supply 90% of the ships visiting public quays in the urban area with shore power by 2030. Furthermore, it is planning to focus on areas and segments where the port can take large steps forward.
“For Roll-on/Roll-off, ferries, offshore vessels and cruise we want to supply 90% of the visits with shore power by 2030,” it says.
“For large container vessels (ULCS: >10,000 TEU nominal capacity) the aim is set at 50%.
“For more complex shipping segments such as liquid and dry bulk and areas where the technical facilities are not yet available, we provide active support in the field of innovation and standardisation.”
In order to realise the ambitions, the port notes it needs direct project subsidies to cover the non-profitable top of promising shore power projects.
“Putting a price on shipping emissions would considerably improve the business case for shore power while also boosting usage rates,” it explains.
“Whereas a permanent tax exemption for shore power and zero emission fuels is needed to create a level playing field with tax exempted fossil fuels.
“By fulfilling these conditions, European policymakers can help us to deliver zero emission ports, which in turn can help Europe to achieve climate neutrality in 2050.”
Photo credit: Port of Rotterdam Authority
Published: 11 January, 2021
The top three positive movers in the 2020 bunker supplier list are Hong Lam Fuels Pte Ltd (+13); Chevron Singapore Pte Ltd (+12); and SK Energy International (+8), according to MPA list.
‘We will operate in the Singapore bunkering market from the Tokyo, with support from local staff at Sumitomo Corporation Singapore,’ source tells Manifold Times.
Changes include abolishing advance declaration of bunkers as dangerous cargo, reducing pilotage fees on vessels receiving bunkers, and a ‘whitelist’ system for bunker tankers.
Claim relates to deliveries of MGO to the vessels Pacific Diligence, Pacific Valkyrie, Pacific Defiance, Crest Alpha 1, and Pacific Warlock between March 2020 to April 2020.
3,490 mt of LSFO from Itochu Enex was lifted at Universal Terminal; the same bunker stem was bought by Global Marine Logistics and delivered by bunker tanker Juma to receiving vessel Kirana Nawa.
Representatives of Veritas Petroleum Services, Maersk, INTERTANKO, ElbOil Singapore, and SDE International provide insight from their respective fields of expertise on what lies ahead.