Connect with us

Scrubbers

PGT: Important issues for owners to consider when buying a gas scrubber

Scrubber technology firm advises owners to consider the particular profile and route of a vessel when selecting scrubbers, despite obvious cost benefits accrued.

Admin

Published

on

5d5342cfa4b5e 1565737679

Scrubber technology firm Pacific Green Technologies (PGT) on Thursday (10 March) published an article analysing key considerations for VLCC owners to examine when selecting a gas scrubber:

Two months into 2020 and the commercial impacts of IMO 2020 are beginning to take shape.

As predicted by many, prices for marine gasoil (MGO) and new blended low-sulphur fuels (LSFO) have risen sharply. High-sulphur fuel (HSFO) prices have fallen. This trend is set to continue in the short to medium term.

In some ports, the price difference between HSFO and low-sulphur fuel has risen to $285-300 per tonne.

Shipowners who opted to fit their vessels with marine gas scrubbers, permitting them to continue burning HSFO, are seeing immediate returns on their capital outlay.

Furthermore, simple economics dictate that the more fuel a ship burns, the greater the financial benefit to the shipowner. Daily bunker consumption of a VLCC can be up to 100 tonnes, perhaps more, per day laden at full speed.

It is for this reason that marine gas scrubber-fitting VLCC owners are reaping maximum rewards post-IMO 2020, with payback times on their investment the shortest of all vessel types.

Though the cost benefits accrued through burning HSFO are of major value, VLCC owners need to consider the particular operational profile and route of each vessel when selecting their scrubbers.

1 . Route

The choice of scrubber type is affected by the vessel’s layout and engine configuration. Capital outlay and operating expenses also vary significantly.

But, the single biggest factor influencing a VLCC owner’s decision regarding scrubber type should be the vessel’s route.

Wet scrubbers, which are the industry-preferred choice over dry scrubbers, are available in three primary options: open loop, closed loop, and hybrid.

Open Loop

The most straightforward scrubbing method. Exhaust gas in the scrubber is treated with seawater, producing sulphuric acid as the sulphur oxide (SOx) in the gas reacts with water.

The natural alkalinity of seawater neutralizes the acid, eliminating the need for chemicals and caustic soda. The process produces wash water which is treated to conform to MEPC 184(59) criteria and then discharged into the sea with no risk of harm to the environment.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR VLCC OWNERS

  • Lowest capital investment requirement of the three scrubber types.
  • Lower operating costs; seawater eliminates the need for alkalizing chemicals and no shoreside disposal or treatment of washwater is necessary.
  • Onboard placement: the overboard discharge needs to be placed well away from sea chests.
  • The open loop system relies on high seawater alkalinity. This is not a problem in most of the world’s oceans, but where shipping routes traverse waters with more acidic pH – near coastlines, for example – this is an important consideration. Lower seawater alkalinity reduces scrubbing efficiency, probably requiring recirculation of washwater, which drives up pump power usage and operating costs.
  • Compared to the relatively consistent schedules of container liners, for example, VLCCs’ sailing routes are far more sensitive to market, supply and charter conditions. This means an open loop setup may not be the best choice for VLCCs focused on short course, coastal or variable routes.
  • Though their reasons for doing so remain a mystery ungrounded in science, a few international ports have banned the use of open loop scrubbers in their waters. These include Singapore, which handled the most international port calls of VLCCs and ULCCs in Q4 2019 (657) and Fujairah, which was the second-busiest port for giant tankers. Supertanker owners operating on these routes would be advised to consider closed loop or hybrid scrubbing arrangements.

Closed Loop

Closed loop systems do not use seawater, but instead, clean exhaust gasses using freshwater mixed with alkalizing chemicals such as caustic soda. The solution is recirculated in a closed loop, with wastewater disposed of in port through dedicated shoreside facilities. Only very small amounts are released into the ocean after being cleaned to IMO specifications.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR VLCC OWNERS

  • Washwater and residual waste are stored onboard for disposal in-port. Such systems consequently comply with all regional regulations governing discharge of wastewater into the ocean. This can, however, increase operating costs.
  • No dependence on seawater alkalinity, so the system is route agnostic. Offers total flexibility to VLCCs with changeable sailing routes, some of which may bring the ship closer to shore or require her to run near brackish water.
  • No territorial water restrictions; closed loop scrubbers are accepted in all international ports.
  • Potential logistical issues in securing supply of alkaline treatment chemicals and arranging for discharge of waste from the collection tank. Waste dispensing facilities vary from port to port, as do related costs. These need to be mapped out when planning the ship’s route.
  • Requires onboard space allocation for wastewater storage.
  • Higher CAPEX than open loop systems.

Hybrid

As the name suggests, a hybrid scrubber combines both systems and allows the operator to oscillate between the two modes depending on needs and conditions. The most versatile of the wet scrubbers.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR VLCC OWNERS

  • Delivers ultimate flexibility in managing operating costs according to environmental and regional conditions. In the open ocean, cost-efficiencies can be maximized by using seawater in open loop mode. In areas of low alkalinity or washwater-discharge restriction, closed loop mode can be activated.
  • Universal compliance with regional port regulations.
  • Requires onboard space allocation for wastewater storage.
  • The largest CAPEX per processing unit.

ENVI‑Marine™ systems are fully flexible and can be supplied as open loop, closed loop hybrid-ready, and hybrid systems capable of both open and closed mode operation.

2 . Efficiency

VLCC profit margins are always tight. Keeping operating expenses down is a constant struggle, and an unyielding imperative.

Though scrubbers currently offer VLCC owners excellent gains in the LSFO/HSFO price spread, this differential will likely eventually stabilize at a lower gap.

Fuel remains a VLCC’s heaviest operating cost and shipowners looking for a scrubber continue to be influenced by impact on fuel cost. The right scrubbing solution for vessels of such size delivers maximum fuel and operational efficiency.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR VLCC OWNERS

  • Scrubbers do not impact vessel speed. For many VLCC owners, slow steaming remains a key tactic in reducing fuel consumption and carbon emissions. Scrubbers do not hinder this approach in any way.
  • It is crucial that a supertanker’s power output is measured against the power requirements of any chosen scrubber system. This includes the power needed to counter the backpressure produced by the exhaust gas cleaning unit. The power consumption of operating a scrubber system is typically between 1-2% of main engine power.
  • Scrubbers require ongoing maintenance. Choosing the right scrubber reduces these costs drastically.
  • Exhaust gas cleaning technologies are not created equal. Though wet scrubbers all work on the same principles, execution differs radically from system to system. Intelligent engineering delivers a competitive advantage.
  • Scrubbers require an appropriate level of capital investment. After all, they convert exhaust fumes into breathable air. In order to guarantee ROI, owners need to be certain that the chosen system is efficient and effective enough to ensure regulatory compliance well into the future, not just the next couple of years.

Pacific Green Technologies’ ENVI‑Marine™ scrubbers employ advanced technology delivering incomparable efficiency.

These gains are obtained through the scrubber’s patented TurboHead™ structure.

The flue gases are first quenched, then cleaned, through a continuous spray of fresh seawater or another alkaline solution. As the downward spray meets the rising gas, PGMT’s TurboHead™ technology causes the gas and water to mix and create a turbulent ‘froth,’, or ‘foam’.

This froth is the key to optimally efficient resource utilization. By producing millions of tiny bubbles through high-energy agitation, the system maximizes surface area and positive contact.

Unlike other systems in which the flue gases are exposed to non-uniform spray coverage, the TurboHead™ requires all flue emissions to pass through this highly active foam, producing exceptional and predictable results with overall lower energy input.

No moving parts or media to replace in the scrubber also mean lower maintenance time and costs.

Technology of this grade dramatically lowers operational costs and reduces the payback time of the investment. ENVI-Marine™ far exceeds the emissions quality requirements set for ECAs and IMO 2020, whether operating in open or closed modes, while also offering industry-leading ROI.

3 . Installation and Support

The physical and logistical requirements of scrubber fitment can be intimidating, and without reliable support, scrubber systems can become liabilities.

It needn’t be this way, though.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR VLCC OWNERS

  • The common concern around installation expenses of scrubbers are elevated among VLCC and ULCC shipowners who risk high fees and major opportunity costs of non-trade while their vessels are on the blocks.
  • Size matters. Scrubbers take up a lot of space and must be carefully planned for in the ship design. This is also a trickier issue in retrofits than new builds.
  • Qualified technical assessment is key as alterations to mechanical areas such as funnels and the engine room may be necessary.
  • Technical guidance is also required to determine the best engine-scrubber configuration on a tanker. Options include separate scrubbers for each engine and boiler or one scrubbing unit for multiple engines and boilers. Separate units offer greater operational flexibility and encourage lower OPEX through higher efficiencies. With more equipment to install, however, CAPEX costs and space requirements are higher. Combined units save on space and capital investment, but operation is often less efficient, especially when not all engines and boilers are running.

GMT’s ENVI-Marine™ system is smaller, more efficient, cheaper to install and 20% cheaper to run than leading competitors’ offerings. Its compact, flexible rectangular shape creates the smallest possible footprint.

Multiple options satisfy the challenges of different engine/funnel configurations on VLCCs.

ENVI-Marine(N) is an external installation that fits adjacent to an existing exhaust stack.

ENVI-Marine(E) is an enclosed installation that fits within an existing exhaust stack.

It is critical that scrubber suppliers are able to mitigate risks, offer flexible installation, strip waiting times, and provide ongoing technical support.

Only large-scale providers like Pacific Green Technologies (PGT) are able to offer these types of assurances. Right now, PGT are producing one exhaust scrubber every 48 hours from their ten factories in China.

Large-scale production is supported by a global service network of engineers and specialists who are able to deliver consultation and support at ports across the world.

In the vast majority of fitment scenarios, owners also avoid losses of time and revenue by skipping dry docks.

PGT’s Global Service Team surveys the customer fleet, draft a plan and meet the vessels in a port of mutual convenience where the ENVI-Marine™ device is installed from a combination of prebuilt and custom-built components.

Conclusion

The tanker industry’s fortunes have always fluctuated, but in recent years companies have needed to be especially vigilant of operating expenses in order to survive.

Of all vessel classes, VLCCs and ULCCs stand to benefit the most from investment in a marine gas scrubber, even once the high fuel price differentials of early 2020 even out. In order to gain sustainable long-term returns, however, owners need to ensure they choose their scrubber supplier carefully.

Selecting a partner that can balance technological innovation and engineering capability with international reach and trustworthy support will not only be a good business decision – it will be a competitive advantage.


Source:
Pacific Green Technologies
Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 11 March, 2020

Continue Reading

ECA

VPS examines North-East Atlantic ECA on current bunker fuel mix and testing

Impact of this new ECA, will not only affect bunker fuel selection and testing, but it will also require a review of, voyage planning, bunker procurement and scrubber strategy, amongst others.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED VPS logo

Steve Bee, Group Marketing and Strategic Projects Director, and Emilian Buksak, Decarbonisation Advisor of marine fuels testing company VPS, on Wednesday (8 April) highlighted MEPC 84 approved a new emission control area (ECA) covering the North-East Atlantic Ocean, with agreements reached on adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI. 

The new ECA, which will become the world’s largest emission control area, will be implemented on 1st September 2027

In a recent article, VPS outlined how VPS testing, data, CEM systems and advisory services can support vessels in both their operational and compliance challenges associated with this new ECA:

The recent International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO), Maritime Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting in London, had its main focus on setting binding greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for the global shipping sector. In keeping with the Committee’s continuing drive to decarbonise shipping and reduce the pollutant emissions from the global fleet, one major outcome from the MEPC-84 meeting was the approval of a new emission control area (ECA) covering the North East Atlantic Ocean, with agreements reached on adopted amendments to MARPOL Annex VI.

This new ECA, which will become the world’s largest emission control area, will be implemented on 1st September 2027, with the ECA requirements taking effect on 1st September 2028. It will cover the territorial seas and exclusive economic zones of Greenland, Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Ireland, the United Kingdom, France, Spain and Portugal, extending up to 200 nautical miles from their baselines:

VPS examines North-East Atlantic ECA impact on current bunker fuel mix and testing

A key advantage of the new NE Atlantic ECA is that it will close the gap between the existing ECAs in the North and Baltic Sea, plus the Mediterranean, creating an almost continuous zone of reduced shipping emissions. It will also connect to the newly approved ECAs in the Canadian Arctic and Norwegian Sea, which are scheduled for implementation in 2026 and 2027 respectively. Together these ECAs will cover almost half of all Arctic coastal waters, improving air quality, by reducing SOx, NOx and Particulate Matter (PM), protecting  public health, and reducing the environmental impacts from shipping.

The sulphur limit for the marine fuels allowed to be burnt within this new ECA will reduce from the current 0.50% to 0.10%. This will force vessels to use either effective abatement technology (scrubbers), or alternatively burn marine distillates, ultra-low-sulphur fuels (ULSFOs), or biofuels with a sulphur content of less than 0.10%.

Without doubt this new ECA will cause a significant change to the current fuel mix, probably on an even greater scale than was witnessed with the introduction of the Mediterranean ECA back in May 2025.  The fuel mix in the Mediterranean Pre-ECA implementation was,  53% VLSFO, 28% HSFO, 16% MGO, 2% ULSFO and 1% Biofuels. But from the 1st May 2025, the fuel mix changed to, 30% VLSFO, 29% HSFO, 30% MGO, 8% ULSFO and 4% Biofuels.  

So, in terms of actual tonnage, the Mediterranean ECA witnessed a decrease in VLSFOs by 23%, whilst MGO usage increased by 107%. At the same time, ULSFO and biofuels supply increased 4-fold.

Regarding fuel quality within the Mediterranean post-ECA implementation, MGO off-specification rates increased to 4%. However, the most worrying off-specification rates were for ULSFOs which saw a 10-times increase from 2% to 20% from the start of the ECA, with the main off-specification parameters being pour point, sulphur, TSP, CCAI, water and viscosity.

Therefore, it is fair to assume we’ll witness a similar dramatic fuel mix change upon the implementation of the NE Atlantic ECA, with possibly similar fuel off-specification issues, highlighting the continuing need for proactive fuel testing to protect vessels, crew and the environment.

Whilst the focus on fuel quality is essential, the multi-pollutant nature of this new ECA, covering SOx, PM and NOx, also brings the role of continuous emissions monitoring increasingly to the fore. Therefore, a further consideration relating to the impact of this new ECA relates to vessel newbuilds and the stricter NOx Tier III requirements. For newbuilds subject to the stricter NOx Tier III requirements, compliance depends not only on engine certification at delivery, but on demonstrating that exhaust after-treatment systems, typically Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) or Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR), continue to perform as designed throughout the service life of the vessel.

For scrubber-equipped ships, real-time SO₂ measurement provides the operational evidence of equivalency that Port State Control inspections increasingly expect to see. Plus, for vessels operating under multiple overlapping regulatory regimes, including the new NE Atlantic ECA, EU MRV, EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime, continuous emissions monitoring via the VPS EMSYS CEM system delivers a single, verified source of emissions data that can be applied across all of them.

As noted by DNV in their MEPC 84 technical and regulatory update, the newly adopted IMO measurement guidelines can also be used for determining actual methane and nitrous oxide under the EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime, confirming the direct route from IMO-recognised measurement to EU compliance reporting.

At an operational level, the new ECA will introduce considerable complexity in the way fuel consumption is attributed across voyage segments, with VLSFOs burnt outside the zone and compliant fuels inside, all of which carry implications for consumption reporting, charterparty allocation and EU MRV alignment. VPS Maress can provide the underlying fuel and energy data into one auditable platform, helping crews manage the operational complexity that the new ECA introduces, including voyage segmentation, fuel changeover and emissions accounting, plus providing the consolidated data foundation that feeds existing EU MRV and IMO DCS reporting obligations. 

VPS PortStats via the VPS Verisphere eco-system, (VeriSphere | VPS), further supports bunker procurement planning with port-by-port intelligence on compliant fuel availability and price spreads. Such intelligence and insights, will prove particularly valuable in the months immediately following 1st September 2028, when the supply pressure on 0.10% sulphur fuels is likely to peak.

Regarding the more strategic decisions ahead, including Tier III engine selection for newbuilds, retrofit feasibility for existing tonnage, and charterparty clauses allocating the ECA fuel cost premium between owners and charterers, VPS Advisory Services can provide the integrated commercial and technical perspective needed to navigate this transition with confidence.

Therefore, its clear the impact of this new ECA, will not only affect the choice of fuel to be burnt onboard and its subsequent quality testing, but it will also require a review of, voyage planning, bunker procurement, scrubber strategy, engine certification, compliance documentation and charterparty exposure.

Related: DNV on IMO MEPC 84: Revisiting Net‑Zero Framework

 

Photo credit: VPS
Published: 14 May, 2026

Continue Reading

Scrubbers

No open-loop EGCS with HSFO bunker fuel allowed in Saudi Arabian ports

Use of HSFO with an Open-Loop Exhaust Gas Cleaning System at 0.5% or 0.1% sulphur mode setting is prohibited until further notice for the ships entering Saudi Arabian ports, says GAC.

Admin

Published

on

By

Aramco: Ras Tanura Port, Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, on the Arabian Gulf.

The use of High Sulphur Fuel Oil (HSFO) with an Open-Loop Exhaust Gas Cleaning System (EGCS) at 0.5% or 0.1% sulphur mode setting is prohibited until further notice for the ships entering Saudi Arabian ports, according to GAC Hot Port News on Wednesday (3 December). 

All ships entering Aramco ports shall comply with one of the following options:

  • Use compliant fuel oil (≤ 0.50% m/m Sulphur, or ≤ 0.10% when operating in ECAs, if applicable).
  • Operate the EGCS in Closed-Loop mode (or Hybrid system in Closed mode), with strict prohibition on the discharge of wash water into the sea.

 

Photo credit: Aramco
Published: 8 December, 2025

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel

Equatorial navigates through sanctions and green transition amid shifting bunkering landscape

Shipowners’ demand for ‘cheapest compliant fuel’ suggests a potentially more competitive and shrinking market for LSFO, forecasts Choong Sheen Mao, COO at Equatorial.

Admin

Published

on

By

Equatorial navigates through sanctions and green transition amid shifting bunkering landscape

Singapore-based physical bunker supplier Equatorial Marine Fuel Management Services Pte Ltd (Equatorial) is adapting to a dynamic global bunker market shaped by regulatory shifts, geopolitical tensions, and the push for decarbonisation, states its Chief Operating Officer.

Choong Sheen Mao was amongst panellists of the Bunker Sellers Panel at IBIA Annual Convention 2025 in Hong Kong on Tuesday (18 November) when he shared a significant trend of shipowners increasingly opting for high sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) paired with scrubbers, driven by the pursuit of the “cheapest compliant fuel”.

Despite a narrowing spread between high and low sulphur fuels – from approximately USD 125 to USD 80, and occasionally below USD 70 – shipowners continue to see long-term investment returns from scrubbers. This shift suggests a potentially more competitive and shrinking market for low sulphur fuel oil (LSFO).

“Geopolitical instabilities, particularly armed conflicts, sanctions and trade wars, are creating considerable market distortions. These instabilities lead to supply disruptions, cargo rerouting, and impact bunker prices,” added Choong.

“Compliance has become a paramount concern, with recent substantial fines underscoring the risks involved. The current economic slowdown, compounded by sanctions and self-sanctioning, presents a ‘double pain’ for the market.

“The market’s daily volatility is also heavily influenced by global politics, making it challenging to assess without a deep understanding of geopolitical events.”

To ensure marine fuel quality, Equatorial emphasises managing its own supply chain and operating its own fleet of bunkering vessels, allowing for direct control from delivery to the customer, he stated.

This approach prioritises transparency and security, fostering long-term relationships where quality issues can be collaboratively addressed. Knowledge sharing, especially concerning parameters from new bunker fuel testing methods such as Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), is also deemed crucial.

Supporting the transition to alternative marine fuels, while acknowledging the uncertainty surrounding the dominant future fuel, Equatorial has strategically invested in IMO Type 2 chemical tankers capable of handling methanol, biofuel, and conventional bunker fuels.

“Biofuel is identified as the most effective short-term solution, offering favourable pricing and operational costs compared to other green alternatives,” explained Choong.

“However, challenges include feedstock availability and potential export quotas from key producing nations like China.

“The adoption of alternative marine fuels necessitates a closer, more collaborative relationship between buyers and sellers.

“This involves detailed discussions on specific fuel specifications beyond standard ISO requirements, extensive lab sampling, and long-term commitments from both parties, particularly given the absence of a liquid hedging market for biofuels.

“Collaboration across safety, quality, and commercial aspects is essential for the successful implementation of bio bunker fuels to the future maritime market.”

 

Photo credit: International Bunker Industry Association
Published: 1 December, 2025

Continue Reading

Trending