UK-based maritime security firm Protection Vessels International (PVI) has provided its analysis of a recent piracy incident involving a total of 16 individuals robbing bunker tanker MT Lee Bo off the coast of Malaysia.
The robbers armed with knives boarded and attempted to steal cargo from the Mongolia-flagged bunker tanker anchored 34 nautical miles East of Mersing, Johor state; they robbed the crew and injured two members when they discovered the tanker was not loaded
Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency forces apprehended all assailants armed with knives and machetes.
“Hijacking vessels to steal oil and marine fuel was common between 2014-2015, with many major attacks reported off Malaysia’s southeast coast,” says PVI.
“Attacks continue to be sporadically reported in the region although incidents have declined significantly since 2016.
“The incident on 31 May underscores the continued threat to vessels by criminal groups in the area, particularly when in the more vulnerable position of being anchored further out at sea.”
Photo credit: MarineTraffic / Sergei Skriabin
Published: 25 June, 2018
Additional topics of bunker contamination and OCM services discussed at VPS’ Fuel Management Challenges – The Year of 2021 & Beyond webinar on 23 September; Manifold Times summarises the session.
‘The JMs have failed to discharge their duties by blindly helping the Banks mount a false case against the Defendant,’ wrote defence lawyers representing former IPP Director Dr Goh Jian Hian in court statement.
Lead prosecutor Andreas Myllerup Laursen aims for a fine and a prison sentence in the so-called Syria case scheduled to commence in Odense, Denmark on 26 October, writes the Danish publication.
In a modern re-telling of the story of David versus Goliath, local bunker barge owners/charterers successfully resisted claims brought in the Singapore courts by Phillips 66 for misdelivery of bunkers.
Bunker barge owners and operators; traders and suppliers; banks, including players in other countries, will have to re-examine respective operations, advises Helmsman Associate Director Jonathan Tan.
Vopak BL was a non-essential document with no contractual force and had no effect as a contract of carriage or as a document of title, states written Judgement issued by Singapore Court of Appeal.