Connect with us
DNV Decarbonization Insight Series August 2026 - What maritime professionals should know about AI Training

Bunker Fuel

JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (February 2026)

China sold about 1.52 million mt of bonded bunker fuel in February, with the daily sales at 54,446 mt, down by 7.07% month on month, JLC’s data shows.

Admin

Published

on

JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (February 2026)

Beijing-based commodity market information provider JLC Network Technology Co. recently shared its JLC China Bunker monthly report for February 2026 with Manifold Times through an exclusive arrangement:

Bunker Fuel Demand

China’s bonded bunker fuel sales decline in February

China sold about 1.52 million mt of bonded bunker fuel in February, with the daily sales at 54,446 mt, down by 7.07% month on month, JLC’s data shows. Cargo transportation and customs clearance slowed down during the Chinese New Year holiday in mid-February, leading to a decline in the country’s sales. Meanwhile, buying interest was somewhat depressed by strong winds at certain Chinese ports, with most deals made for rigid demand.

Regarding the sales by supplier, the sales by Chimbusco, Sinopec (Zhoushan), SinoBunker, and China Changjiang Bunker (Sinopec) respectively settled at 400,000 mt, 520,000 mt, 60,000 mt, and 20,000 mt in the month, while those by suppliers with regional bunkering licenses settled at 524,500 mt.

On a year-on-year comparison, however, China’s bonded bunker fuel sales inched up by 0.17% in February.

China’s daily LSFO output continues to rise in February

China’s daily LSFO output continued to rise in February, mainly as a result of CNOOC’s boost in its production.

The country’s LSFO output settled at 783,000 mt in February, with the daily output at 27,964 mt, a rise of 5.08% from January, JLC’s data shows.

CNOOC’s Zhoushan Petrochemical originally planned to produce 80,000 mt of LSFO in January, but no production was actually carried out in the month due to equipment failure. As a result, the refinery postponed the production to February, and the production of 40,000 mt for February will be postponed to March. In addition, Taizhou Petrochemical and Huizhou Petrochemical ramped up their daily production.

On the contrary, Sinopec’s LSFO output dropped in February, because of low production margins and relatively tepid bunkering demand. Most refineries lowered their daily output, but Shengli Oilfield and Qingdao Petrochemical boosted their production moderately.

PetroChina’s LSFO output also fell, with several refineries, including Dalian WEPEC, Jinzhou Petrochemical, Jinxi Petrochemical, and Dagang Petrochemical, decelerating production.

ZPC did not produce any LSFO in February.

Sinochem restarted its units in late January after maintenance, but it did not resume LSFO production in February. The company plans to resume production and export of LSFO in March.

On a year-on-year comparison, China’s LSFO output slumped by 31.91% in February, the data indicates. The slump was ascribed to poor margins.

Screenshot 2026 03 12 at 12.45.06 PM

Screenshot 2026 03 12 at 12.45.16 PM

Domestic-trade heavy bunker fuel demand weakens in February

Domestic-trade heavy bunker fuel demand settled at 290,000 mt in February, with the daily demand at 10,357 mt, down by 10.81% month on month, JLC’s data shows.

Trade in the shipping market was relatively weak during the Chinese New Year holiday, and most shipowners gave priority to consuming their stockpiles after the holiday. In addition, bunkering demand in North China was hit hard, as cargo transportation and port operations in the region were suspended temporarily due to the annual sessions of the National People’s Congress and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, which would be held in March.

By contrast, domestic-trade light bunker fuel demand stood at 140,000 mt in February, with the daily demand at 5,000 mt, up by 3.33% month on month, the data shows.

Bunker Fuel Supply

China’s bonded bunker fuel imports hit 12-month high in Dec 2025

China’s bonded bunker fuel imports hit a 12-month high in December 2025, mainly due to tightening supply of LSFO in the country.

Chinese bunker suppliers imported 848,300 mt of bonded bunker fuel in the month, rising by 5.25% month on month, JLC’s calculations show, based on the GACC data. The imports reached the highest level since December 2024.

Bonded distributors boosted their LSFO imports to meet bunkering demand when domestic production plunged rapidly amid export quota tightness. Meanwhile, their imports of MGO increased slightly. In addition, the arrivals of HSFO stayed relatively high in the month, as HSFO bunkering still had economic benefits.

Regarding the imports by source, Singapore ranked first among all suppliers with 301,800 mt, accounting for 35.58% of China’s total imports. Malaysia came second with 195,900 mt, accounting for 23.09%, while South Korea ranked third with 170,400 mt, taking 20.09%. Russia ranked fourth with 164,500 mt, occupying 19.39%, followed by Japan, with 15,700 mt, accounting for 1.85%.

On a year-on-year comparison, however, China’s bonded bunker fuel imports tumbled by 22.49% in December 2025, calculations show. The imports exceeded 1 million mt and hit a 4-year high in December 2024.

China’s bonded bunker fuel imports totaled 7.05 million mt in 2025, soaring by 16.76% from the prior year, calculations also indicate.

(Note: The GACC has not released the breakdown export and import data for January 2026, and JLC will follow up.)

Screenshot 2026 03 12 at 12.45.38 PM

Domestic-trade bunker fuel supply tightens in February

Chinese blenders supplied 300,000 mt of domestic-trade heavy bunker fuel in February, with the daily supply at 10,714 mt, a cut of 7.74% from a month earlier, JLC’s data shows.

Blenders reduced their bunker fuel supply as the availability of low-sulfur residual oil decreased amid the Chinese New Year holiday. These blenders just based their production on sales when downstream buying interest was relatively low.

Domestic-trade MGO supply settled at 160,000 mt in February, with the daily supply at 5,714 mt, down by 1.59% month on month, the data shows. Refineries maintained relatively low diesel inventories, and cargo delivery was not smooth during the holiday.

Screenshot 2026 03 12 at 12.46.01 PM

Bunker Prices, Profits

Screenshot 2026 03 12 at 12.46.22 PM

Screenshot 2026 03 12 at 12.46.31 PM

Editor
Yvette Luo
+86-020-38834382
[email protected]

Sales (Beijing)
Tony Tang
+86-10-84428863
[email protected]

Sales (Singapore)
Ginny Teo
+65-31571254
[email protected]
[email protected]

JLC Network Technology Co., Ltd is recognised as the leading information provider in China. We specialise in providing the transparent, high-value, authoritative market intelligence and professional analysis in commodity market. Our expertise covers oil, gas, coal, chemical, plastic, rubber, fertilizer and metal industry, etc.

JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report is published by JLC Network Technology Co., Ltd every month on China bunker market, demand, supply, margin, freight index, forecast and so on. The report provides full-scale & concise insight into China bunker oil market.

All rights reserved. No portion of this publication may be photocopied, reproduced, retransmitted, put into a computer system or otherwise redistributed without prior authorization from JLC.

Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (December 2025)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (November 2025)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (October 2025)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (September 2025)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (July 2025)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (June 2025)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (May 2025)
Related: [Updated 15 May] JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (April 2025)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (February 2025)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (January 2025)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (December 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (November 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (October 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (September 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (August 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (July 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (June 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (May 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (April 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (March 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Fuel Market Monthly Report (February 2024)
Related: JLC China Bunker Market Monthly Report (January 2024)

Note: China-based commodity market information provider JLC Technology has been providing Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times China bunker volume data since 2020. Data from earlier periods are available here.

 

Photo credit: JLC Network Technology
Published: 12 March, 2026

Continue Reading

Methanol

Wallenius Wilhelmsen, EUKOR secure green methanol bunker fuel supply from EcoMethanol

Under a MoU, Hyundai Corporation will buy the methanol produced in Taebaek and sell it on to the two carriers, which will burn it as fuel in their own fleets.

Admin

Published

on

By

Wallenius Wilhelmsen, EUKOR secure green methanol bunker fuel supply from EcoMethanol

South Korean firm EcoMethanol on Wednesday (26 August) signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on the supply of green methanol with Taebaek City, Hyundai Corporation, Wallenius Wilhelmsen Ocean AS of Norway and EUKOR Car Carriers. 

The signing took place at EUKOR’s head office in Seoul.

EcoMethanol is the special purpose company set up by South Korean clean energy firm Plagen to build a green methanol plant in Taebaek, Gangwon State. 

Under the MoU, Hyundai Corporation will buy the methanol produced in Taebaek and sell it on to the two carriers, which will burn it as fuel in their own fleets. Taebaek City takes part as an equity co-investor and will provide administrative and policy support. Production, trading and end use are tied together in a single chain, the first such arrangement in Korea.

Manifold Times previously reported Taebaek City and Plagen signing an investment agreement for a new green methanol production plant in the South Korean city that will be supplied as bunker fuel.

Wallenius Wilhelmsen, EUKOR secure green methanol bunker fuel supply from EcoMethanol

The plant will produce 15,000 metric tonnes (mt) a year from forestry residues, using dual fluidized bed (DFB) gasification, a process already proven in commercial operation. Total investment is KRW 120 billion.

EcoMethanol holds Korea’s integrated environmental permit, has secured its site in the Dongjeom Industrial Complex and has completed basic design. Construction is due to start in December 2026 and commercial production in January 2029. The plant will employ 36 people locally.

Taebaek’s role as a production hub is written into both national and provincial plans. The Taebaek Jangseong Colliery Economic Revitalization Project cleared preliminary feasibility review in 2025 with a green methanol facility included in its scope, and Gangwon State lists a green methanol cluster in its mid- to long-term investment plan for former coal-mining regions. Dongjeom will be the first of these facilities to be built, because its industrial site is already developed.

Carbon regulation in shipping is no longer a prospect. The EU Emissions Trading System now covers maritime transport, the FuelEU Maritime regulation on greenhouse gas intensity is in force, and the International Maritime Organization is moving toward adoption of its Net-Zero Framework.

Korean carriers are already buying green methanol. HMM’s methanol-fueled container ships HMM Green and HMM Forest took on 2,900 mt and 3,110 mt at Yangshan Port in Shanghai in March and May 2025. 

The car carrier Arctic Tern, operated by EUKOR, loaded about 2,800 mt in Shanghai in July 2026 before starting commercial service on the Asia-Europe route. All of that fuel was made in China.

Korea produces none of its own. Ulsan Port was the first port anywhere to bunker green methanol for a ship, in 2023, but the fuel had been imported. 

Korea consumes roughly 2 million mt of methanol a year, most of it imported and made from fossil feedstock.

The Taebaek plant would be the country’s first domestic source of clean marine fuel.

Related: Korea: Taebaek City and PLAGEN to build green methanol bunker fuel plant

 

Photo credit: EcoMethanol
Published: 28 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV report: Regulatory uncertainty demands fleet strategies built for multiple futures

Report examines four regulatory scenarios, ranging from adoption of IMO NZF in its current form to its outright rejection, energy efficiency uptake, and long-term bunker fuel and technology strategies.

Admin

Published

on

By

DNV report: Regulatory uncertainty demands fleet strategies built for multiple futures

Regulatory uncertainty is increasing pressure on shipowners to make investment decisions that remain viable across multiple future scenarios, said classification society DNV on Thursday (27 August). 

According to DNV’s 10th Maritime Forecast to 2050, stronger global regulatory signals could accelerate the uptake of energy-efficiency measures, enabling the global fleet to consume up to 25% less energy by 2050 compared to a scenario where regulation is driven by regions.

The report examines four regulatory scenarios, ranging from adoption of the IMO Net-Zero Framework (NZF) in its current form to its outright rejection, which could lead to a period of prolonged regulatory gridlock, and explores the implications of these outcomes for fuel demand, energy efficiency uptake, and long-term fleet fuel and technology strategies.

Cristina Saenz de Santa Maria, CEO Maritime, DNV, said: “Ships ordered today will operate well beyond 2050, but many of the factors shaping their future performance remain uncertain. Regulatory requirements are advancing faster than the fuel, infrastructure, and technological systems needed to support them, making long-term investment decisions increasingly complex. The industry therefore needs greater clarity and alignment among all stakeholders to provide the confidence required for long-term investment. In the meantime, shipowners need strategies that deliver benefits today while remaining resilient across a range of regulatory and market outcomes.”

Energy efficiency is one of the most immediate and practical levers available to shipowners, delivering value across regulatory outcomes whether implemented at the newbuild stage or as a retrofit. A case study of a hydrodynamic measures retrofit on a 5,000 TEU container vessel showed potential annual fuel savings of 16%, with a payback time of around one to four years depending on future fuel prices. Retrofits can add similar value across many ship types and with sufficient planning can typically be completed during a standard class-renewal dry docking.

The development of the marine low-GHG fuel market remains a key challenge. While significant progress has been made in expanding alternative-fuel capabilities of vessels, scaling fuel production depends on confidence that demand will materialize. DNV projects shipping demand for low-GHG fuels to range from 4 to 22 Mtoe by 2030 and 33 to 185 Mtoe by 2050, depending on regulatory outcomes, with uptake also shaped by future uptake of shore power, plug-in hybridization, nuclear power, and onboard carbon capture systems.

Current project pipelines indicate a maximum global supply of 270 Mtoe by 2030, although actual volumes are likely to be lower due to project delays and other uncertainties, and shipping will need to compete with other industries for its share. However, the cost of reducing emissions varies significantly between fuel pathways, with abatement costs ranging from about 180 to 1,290 USD per tonne of CO₂ avoided, highlighting the importance of regulation and market incentives in enabling low-GHG fuel markets to develop.

Øyvind Sekkesæter, lead author of Maritime Forecast to 2050, said: “Scenarios explored in this year’s report show how different regulatory futures can lead to very different outcomes in energy efficiency uptake, fuel demand, and consequently, GHG emissions. By testing fuel and technology choices across multiple scenarios, shipowners can identify strategies that create value today while preserving flexibility as regulation, fuel availability, prices, and technologies evolve. Strategies that each owner chooses will also be dependent on their fleet type and operating context.”

Key findings from the report: 

  • Several regulatory futures remain possible as the IMO continues negotiations on the Net-Zero Framework, with these outcomes shaping investment decisions, low-GHG fuel uptake, and energy-efficiency deployment across the global fleet.
  • With global regulatory incentives in place, the world-fleet could consume 25% less energy by 2050 than under a scenario limited to regional regulations.
  • Energy efficiency can pay off regardless of regulatory outcome – 5,000 TEU container ship case study shows 16% annual fuel savings from hydrodynamic measures retrofit.
  • Shipping demand for low-GHG fuels could range from 4 to 22 Mtoe by 2030, and 33 to 185 Mtoe by 2050, depending on regulatory outcomes and the availability of these fuels in a competitive global market.
  • Current project pipelines indicate that a maximum of 270 Mtoe of supply could be available by 2030, though actual volumes are likely to be lower due to project delays and other uncertainties, and shipping will need to compete with other industries for its share.
  • Testing fuel and technology strategies across different scenarios can help shipowners identify robust choices for an uncertain transition. Testing, piloting, and verifying technologies can provide the trusted performance data needed to make investment decisions with greater confidence.

Note: DNV’s 10th Maritime Forecast to 2050 can be found here. 

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 28 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

Green fuel bunkering part of Australia’s maritime emissions plan

Government will encourage and support investment in storage and bunkering facilities for low carbon fuels, shore power infrastructure and expansion of port energy capabilities.

Admin

Published

on

By

Sydney, Dan Freeman on Unsplash

The Australian Government on Wednesday (26 August) released the Maritime Emissions Reduction National Action Plan (MERNAP), outlining practical actions government and industry can take to continue decarbonisation of the maritime sector.

One of the actions highlighted in the plan include that the Australian Government will further promote and support the use of low carbon fuels in shipping to reduce the carbon footprint of transporting Australia’s green energy exports and the acceleration of the low carbon liquid fuels (LCLF) industry under programmes such as the Future Made in Australia Innovation Fund.

Through a stocktake of programmes, the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sports and the Arts, will flag the requirements of the maritime industry with relevant programmes. 

“This work will feed into the development of a bunkering strategy to help guide investment in green fuels,” it said. 

Announced in Budget 2026-27, the Australian Government is investing $4 million to develop a green fuel bunkering strategy, to prepare Australian ports to diversify the maritime fuel mix, supported by targeted industry trials and studies. It will help secure long-term resilience for the industry that carries more than 99% of Australia’s trade by volume.

The Government will also encourage and support investment in storage and bunkering facilities for low carbon fuels, shore power infrastructure and expansion of port energy capabilities.

The actions in the MERNAP have been deliberately developed to take account of the significant Australian Government investments in maritime and energy decarbonisation initiatives, including $4 million to develop a green fuel bunkering strategy. 

Stretching across ports, shipping, energy, domestic commercial vessels and skills and training, the MERNAP identifies key priority actions to support decarbonisation while recognising Australian shipping must remain competitive and prosperous in the international market

The MERNAP complements existing Australian Government incentives and policies including the $1.1 billion Cleaner Fuels Programme, the Green Fuel Bunkering Strategy, the $30 million Australia-Singapore Low-Emissions Technologies Initiative for Maritime and Port Operations, the $55 million Transport Resilience And Capacity Kickstart programme and the $13.8 million Maritime Skills and Training Initiative.

It also complements the country’s $100 million investment in a new Clean Energy Precinct at the Port of Newcastle, which is expected to facilitate production, storage, distribution and export of clean-energy products including hydrogen and ammonia.

Australia’s Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government Catherine King, said: “The recent conflict in the Middle East has demonstrated to us how critical it is to build resilience and sustainability within our maritime industry.

“In a nation where our maritime sector is responsible for 99 per cent of our international trade, the MERNAP is a vital piece of our journey toward a sustainable future.

“It also presents an unparalleled opportunity to be a low and zero-carbon energy exporter of choice internationally, while creating new jobs and industry within the sustainable maritime sector locally.”

Note: The Australian Government’s Maritime Emissions Reduction National Action Plan can be read here

 

Photo credit: Dan Freeman on Unsplash
Published: 28 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending