Bunker Fuel
Integr8 Fuels: Upcoming OPEC+ meeting and possible impact on bunker market
Research Contributor Steve Christy elaborates on big questions for OPEC+ meeting, taking place on 1 June, surrounding member countries’ production cutbacks and how it could impact the bunker market.
By Steve Christy, Research Contributor, Integr8 Fuels
[email protected]
22 May 2024
Bunker prices are at their lowest for three months
Although VLSFO has been in a relatively narrow price range, prices are now at their lowest for more than 3 months. The sharp drop in oil prices at the start of this month has meant Singapore and Fujairah VLSFO prices are down by $20/mt since end April, with Rotterdam VLSFO down by $30/mt.
General concerns about future economic growth, a perceived greater chance of a truce in the Israel/Gaza conflict, weaker oil demand (especially in Europe) and rising oil stock levels have all contributed to this bearish sentiment and led prices down.
Source: Integr8 Fuels
Lower crude prices mean OPEC+ has tough decisions to take
The drop in crude prices has meant Brent has fallen from $90+ levels, back down to the low $80s, and is why OPEC+ is facing a significant dilemma at their upcoming June 1st meeting.
Source: Integr8 Fuels
The big questions for OPEC+ surround their production cutbacks, where there are three key aspects:
- First, the main cutbacks from all OPEC+ countries that amount to around 3.7 million b/d. These have been extended a number of times and are now scheduled to run until the end of this year, and so perhaps will not be a primary focus just yet.
- The main issue now surrounds a limited number of OPEC+ countries that have made additional voluntary cutbacks totalling 2.2 million b/d. These were implemented in July 2023 and have been extended through to the end of the second quarter this year.
- Finally, the extent of continued over-production by some countries. In April, the main ‘over-producers’ were Iraq (at 0.24 million b/d), UAE (0.24 million b/d), Kazakhstan (0.13 million b/d) and Russia (0.20 million b/d)
The immediate dilemma for OPEC+ is: what do those countries making the additional voluntary cutbacks do? The quote from OPEC in early March was that from end June “these voluntary cuts will be returned gradually subject to market conditions”. Will they do this?
Which countries are we talking about?
Of the eight countries involved in the additional 2.2 million b/d cutbacks, Saudi Arabia is by far the biggest, and most likely to drive the decision to extend or unwind this part of the agreement.
On paper, Russia also has a significant role, but this is ‘clouded’ by the fact that the crude cutbacks are split between production for the domestic market and those for export. It is only the export volumes that matter to the fundamentals and sentiment in international oil markets.
Source: Integr8 Fuels
Not all eight countries will have an impact
Outside of Saudi Arabia, and possibly Russia, there may be little impact from the unwinding this ‘additional’ agreement. Even if it does go ahead, it is possible that there will be very little (if any) change in production from six of the eight member countries involved.
The reasoning here is that in the broader OPEC+ agreement covering all countries, the four members that are producing substantially more than their allocation (Iraq, UAE, Kazakhstan, and Russia) are also included in the eight members that make up this additional 2.2 million b/d cutback.
The graph below illustrates the extent of over-production versus the agreed additional cutbacks made by each of the eight countries involved.
Source: Integr8 Fuels
For instance, Iraq is currently producing around 0.19 million b/d more than its 4.00 million b/d allocation. If the additional cutbacks are removed, then Iraq’s new allocation will rise to 4.22 million b/d. This is virtually in-line with their current production. So, for Iraq, it could be that they just maintain current production levels as the additional cutbacks are unwound. This would mean they automatically fall into line as a ‘good’ member, adhering to their new, higher allocation; AND there will be no increases in world oil supply!
It is exactly the same for UAE and Kazakhstan; their output levels can just continue at current levels, and they will also ‘fall into line’ with their new allocation as the additional cutbacks are unwound.
After this, Algeria and Oman are relatively small players in volume terms, and so will have limited impact. It does mean that Saudi Arabia and Russia will be the main protagonists.
So, what will happen if the additional cutbacks are unwound in Q3?
Based on the scenario above, which is credible, if the additional cuts are removed then Saudi Arabia is highly likely to ramp up production by 1 million b/d, and Kuwait potentially by 0.1 million b/d.
That then leaves Russia, which is highly uncertain given it may not have capacity to raise output, and if it has, whether this would go to their domestic market, or into the international market.
The table below indicates what the agreed additional cutbacks are, compared with the latest levels of over-production. Assuming the agreement is unwound and each country abides by its new production allocation, the final column shows the potential gain in oil supply.
Source: Integr8 Fuels
Either way, it looks like a removal of the additional OPEC+ cuts would result in an extra 1.0-1.2 million b/d to world oil supply (outside of Russia), and not the full 2.2 million b/d headline figure.
What signal would an ‘unwinding’ send to the market?
The IEA and the US EIA put the call on OPEC+ remaining more-or less flat through the rest of this year, and also flat to a potential slight decline next year (highlighted in our report April 24th). This implies any unwinding of the OPEC+ additional cuts would be a bearish signal to the market this year (and even in 2025!).
However, market analysis by OPEC contradicts this, and shows a much stronger growth in oil demand for 2024 and 2025 than other organisations. In their latest report, OPEC indicates the call on OPEC+ increasing by around 0.8 million b/d over the remainder of this year, and another 0.9 million b/d between end 2024 and end 2025. On their basis there is room for OPEC+ to start unwinding the additional cutbacks from end June and there would be only a small material change to the fundamental oil balance.
It is likely to come down to Saudi policy
Although an announcement could be made at any time, the market focus will be on the run-up to the June 1st OPEC+ meeting.
If the group decides to extend the additional cuts again, then this is more likely to be seen ‘price neutral’.
For most, an unwinding is likely to be seen as a bearish signal. In this case, bunker prices would fall. There are also further implications for us in bunkers, as almost all the crude supply gains would be heavy/sour grades from the Middle East, and so have a potential impact on the VLSFO/HSFO spread.
Is there a ‘curved ball’, where OPEC+ make more cuts? We can only keep an eye on OPEC+ and Saudi Arabia ahead of the June meeting (and for the rest of this year and next!).
Photo credit: Integr8 Fuels
Published: 28 May 2024
Alternative Fuels
Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean
Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.
Alternative Fuels
LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels
Both secured AiP for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.
Alternative Fuels
DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024
LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity while the strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year.
Latest data from classification society DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight (AFI) platform alternative-fuelled vessel ordering was strong in August, with 52 new vessels added to the platform.
This is the highest monthly total since October 2024 and follows another active month in July, when 47 vessels were added to the database.
LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity, with 46 orders recorded. The container segment led the way with 30 orders, while the car carrier segment contributed a further 12 LNG-fuelled vessels. In addition, four ethanol-fuelled bulk carriers and two hydrogen-powered bulk carriers were added during the month, as well as one LNG bunker vessel.
The strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year. In total, 242 alternative-fuelled vessel orders have been placed in the first eight months of 2026, representing a 27% increase compared with the same period in 2025.
LNG remains the dominant fuel choice, accounting for 63% of all alternative-fuelled vessel orders registered so far this year. Container vessels represent the largest share of these LNG orders (59%), followed by car carriers (30%).
Jason Stefanatos, Global Decarbonization Director at DNV Maritime, said: “The past two months have been particularly strong for alternative-fuelled vessel ordering, with August recording the highest monthly total we’ve seen since October 2024. This has helped lift year-to-date orders to a level well above the same period last year.
“LNG remains the leading fuel choice, driven largely by activity in the container and car carrier segments. These sectors have been among the earliest adopters of alternative fuels, supported by predictable liner operations and increasing demand from cargo owners to reduce emissions across supply chains.
“For many owners, LNG offers a combination of emissions reductions, fuel availability and future flexibility while the longer-term fuel landscape continues to evolve.
“At the same time, the latest figures include orders for ethanol- and hydrogen-fuelled vessels, highlighting that owners continue to explore a range of decarbonization pathways. Different segments are making different fuel choices, but the overall level of activity demonstrates continued investment in lower-emission shipping.”
Photo credit: DNV
Published: 4 September, 2026
OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS
Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean
LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels
DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024
TFG Marine advances global MFM rollout with two US Gulf bunker barges
GENA Solutions: Total renewable and low-carbon methanol project pipeline increases from 61.8 to 62.2 Mt by 2032
Baltic Exchange: Bunker Report (3 September 2026)
ENGINE: Americas Fuel Availability Outlook (3 September 2026)
Singapore-flagged tugboat “Kim Heng 3203” placed under Sheriff’s arrest
US targets five bunker companies in latest sanctions campaign against Iran
Singapore bunkering community supports Living Hope Evangelism’s 7th anniversary outreach for residents in need
China’s bunker market reshaped by tax rebates, trade flows and refining changes, says economist
Hengli Petrochemical’s ex-Singapore trading arm faces winding up application
Report: GCMD outlines practical approach to quantity assurance in marine biofuel supply chains
Singapore: Notices of intended dividend issued for Ocean Bunkering Services, Hin Leong Marine
-
Vessel Arrest1 week agoSingapore-flagged tugboat “Kim Heng 3203” placed under Sheriff’s arrest
-
Sanctions1 week agoUS targets five bunker companies in latest sanctions campaign against Iran
-
Events2 weeks agoSingapore bunkering community supports Living Hope Evangelism’s 7th anniversary outreach for residents in need
-
Interview1 week agoChina’s bunker market reshaped by tax rebates, trade flows and refining changes, says economist
-
Winding up1 week agoHengli Petrochemical’s ex-Singapore trading arm faces winding up application
-
Biofuel1 week agoReport: GCMD outlines practical approach to quantity assurance in marine biofuel supply chains
-
Winding up2 weeks agoSingapore: Notices of intended dividend issued for Ocean Bunkering Services, Hin Leong Marine
-
Bunker Claim3 days agoRajah & Tann: Bunker disputes are won in the first 48 hours