A meeting to pass special resolutions for Singapore-based An Hui Shipping Pte Ltd (Reg. No. 201207031N) and Nan Yi Maritime (Pte.) Ltd (Reg. no. 200814293G) was held on 23 August, according to a Monday (30 August) notice on the Government Gazette.
The resolutions are as follows:
The latest development follows a decision to appoint Grant Thornton Singapore as provisional liquidators of both firms.
Related: Singapore: Provisional liquidators appointed for An Hui Shipping, Nan Yi Maritime
Related: Singapore: Xihe Group affiliated “Ocean Pegasus” sold for USD 17 million
Related: Singapore: Creditors to file debt claims for Xin Bo Shipping by 14 June
Related: Singapore: Provisional liquidators appointed for Hua Xin Shipping, Hua Guang Shipping
Related: Provisional liquidators appointed for Xihe subsidiaries, call for creditor’s meeting
Related: JMs of An Guang Shipping and other Xihe subsidiaries call for creditors meeting
Related: Grant Thornton Singapore appointed interim judicial managers for Xihe subsidiaries
Related: Xihe Holdings supervisor to place seven tankers for sale in an attempt to repay creditors
Additional topics of bunker contamination and OCM services discussed at VPS’ Fuel Management Challenges – The Year of 2021 & Beyond webinar on 23 September; Manifold Times summarises the session.
‘The JMs have failed to discharge their duties by blindly helping the Banks mount a false case against the Defendant,’ wrote defence lawyers representing former IPP Director Dr Goh Jian Hian in court statement.
Lead prosecutor Andreas Myllerup Laursen aims for a fine and a prison sentence in the so-called Syria case scheduled to commence in Odense, Denmark on 26 October, writes the Danish publication.
In a modern re-telling of the story of David versus Goliath, local bunker barge owners/charterers successfully resisted claims brought in the Singapore courts by Phillips 66 for misdelivery of bunkers.
Bunker barge owners and operators; traders and suppliers; banks, including players in other countries, will have to re-examine respective operations, advises Helmsman Associate Director Jonathan Tan.
Vopak BL was a non-essential document with no contractual force and had no effect as a contract of carriage or as a document of title, states written Judgement issued by Singapore Court of Appeal.