Connect with us

Incident

Gard on Israel-Gaza conflict: Impact on shipping

Gard recommends ship operators and their masters trading to Israeli ports to carefully assess the risks involved in all port calls on a case-by-case basis.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED Chris Pagan

Maritime protection and indemnity (P&I) club Gard on Monday (16 July) published an alert on the status of ports in Israel following the ongoing conflict with Gaza:

The situation in Israel remains volatile and we recommend assessing all port calls in the country on a case-by-case basis. Appropriate measures should be incorporated into ship contingency plans.

Following Hamas’ large scale military offensive against Israel on the morning of 7 October 2023, the longstanding Israel-Gaza conflict has escalated considerably.  

At the time of writing, the majority of the fighting is reported to take place in the southern part of Israel. 

According to our local correspondents, Ashkelon port is in principle closed, but permission to berth or discharge cargo while moored at the port’s anchorage may be granted on a case-by-case basis. Ashdod port is still in operation but applies strict entry procedures for vessels carrying hazardous materials. Other Israeli ports, including Haifa, Hadera and Eliat, are currently reported to be unaffected and operating as before the conflict escalated. However, as the situation continues to evolve, the status of Israeli ports can also change.

Advice is likely to evolve quickly

The situation in Israel remains volatile and we recommend ship operators and their masters trading to Israeli ports to carefully assess the risks involved in all port calls on a case-by-case basis and:

  • make frequent checks with local sources of information, e.g. vessel agents, local authorities, and/or Gard’s correspondent, to obtain the most up-to-date and reliable security information available at any given time,
  • follow advice received from their flag administrations and port authorities regarding applicable ISPS security levels, and
  • review their relevant security and contingency plans and apply them accordingly. 

As an example, on 13 October 2023 the Liberia Maritime Authority raised the security level to MARSEC 2 for all Liberian flagged vessels calling at ports in Israel.

Owners and managers should also ensure that seafarers on vessels heading towards Israel are aware of any imminent security threats in the region.Decision on crew shore leave should always be taken with the prevailing local security situation in mind.

As Israel is already included in the Joint War Committee’s (JWC) Listed Areas for Hull War, Piracy, Terrorism and Related Perils, we also recommend conferring with the vessel’s war insurer well in advance of arrival at any Israeli port.

Photo credit: Chris Pagan on Unsplash
Published: 17 October, 2023

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel Quality

Bunker Flash: Presence of chemical compounds in Malta VLSFO bunker fuel

CTI-Maritec says VLSFO samples from vessels that took up fuel/bunkered in Malta were found to contain high concentrations of chemical compounds that can potentially prove harmful for vessel health.

Admin

Published

on

By

Louis Reed from Unsplash

Bunker fuel testing and marine surveying business Maritec Pte Ltd (CTI-Maritec) on Friday (6 September) said it recently tested VLSFO samples from vessels that took up fuel/bunkered in Malta, and found high concentrations of chemical compounds, that can potentially prove harmful for vessel health:

Findings & Insights:

In the last few weeks CTI-Maritec has tested multiple fuel oil bunker samples from vessels that have taken fuel/bunkered in MALTA and reported operational issues and/or tested to have the presence of high levels of chemical compounds.

Extended Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) testing by ASTM D7845 was conducted for two Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (VLSFO) samples, which showed the presence of high concentrations of acetophenone, phenolic compounds (4-cumylphenol, phenol and others), styrene glycol and phenethyl alcohols. Furthermore, testing by Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) GC-MS technique indicated low levels of bisphenol isomers, fatty acids, long chain fatty acids and dehydroabietic acid. All mentioned compounds are non-hydrocarbons. Our GC-MS analysis also indicated the presence of reactive hydrocarbons like DCPD, Dihydro-DCPD, Styrene and Indene.

The common problems encountered, as reported by the vessels, were sludging, filter clogging and in some instances, fuel pump issues associated with phenolic compounds and phenethyl alcohols.

Due to the high levels of these chemical compounds, the fuels do not meet the general requirement and is considered as off-spec fuel as per clause 5 of ISO8217 and MARPOL Annex VI regulation 18 which states:

“The fuels shall be homogeneous blends of hydrocarbons derived from petroleum refining. This shall not preclude the incorporation of small amounts of additives intended to improve some aspects of performance.”

The fuels shall be free from inorganic acids and from used lubricating oils. The fuel should not include any added substance or chemical waste which,

  1. a) jeopardizes the safety of ships or adversely affects the performance of the machinery; or
  2. b) is harmful to personnel; or
  3. c) contributes overall to additional air pollution.”

CTI-Maritec Recommendations:

CTI-Maritec recommends to:

  • Closely observe the vessel fuel system/s for signs of filter clogging and purifier sludging and additionally, increase vigilance on the centrifuges to monitor overloading.
  • Increase frequency of their de-sludging cycle depending on the accumulated sludge.
  • Possibly reduce the Mean Time between bowl cleaning of the purifier and fuel system filters.
  • Avoid blending with other fuels, in particular marine diesel and gas oil and also other fuel oil as such mixing may well increase the sediment problem.

Furthermore, at these levels of concentration of chemical compounds present in fuel oil, there is an increased risk of excessive wear to the vessel’s fuel pump plunger and barrel assembly. Therefore, it is advised to monitor the fuel pump index closely to check for deteriorating performance. As a back-up, ensure there are sufficient spare seals and plunger barrel assembly to replace damaged units if necessary.

In addition, as a precaution, it is advised to closely monitor the performance of the engines while using this fuel to detect any deterioration of the fuel injection equipment performance and the sealing effect of the piston rings.

This document, however, does not reflect on the overall quality of fuel being supplied in Malta. If you intend to bunker in this region, please request for a Certificate of Quality prior to loading.

 

Photo credit: Louis Reed from Unsplash
Published: 9 September, 2024

Continue Reading

Environment

Singapore oil spill: Clean up completed ahead of schedule, says minister

Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu said 800 cleaning personnel and 2,300 volunteers were involved in a clean-up effort following a bunker spill involving “Marine Honour”.

Admin

Published

on

By

Singapore oil spill: Clean up completed ahead of schedule, says minister

The clean-up operations from the effects of the 14 June bunker spill in Singapore have been completed ahead of schedule, said Singapore’s Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu. 

The oil spill took place after Netherlands-registered dredger Vox Maxima hit stationary bunker vessel Marine Honour, causing fuel from the bunker vessel’s cargo tank to spill into Singapore waters. 

She said 800 cleaning personnel and 2,300 volunteers were involved in the clean-up effort while 3,750 tonnes of debris were removed. 

“Swimming and primary contact activities have resumed at some beaches. The National Environment Agency (NEA) will continue to conduct water quality tests at remaining affected beaches,” she said in a social media post.

“We hope that water quality will return to safe levels so that swimming and primary contact activities can resume at all beaches soon.”

Singapore oil spill: Clean up completed ahead of schedule, says minister

Manifold Times previously reported Singapore bunker supplier Straits Bunkering and QBE Insurance (Singapore), which uses the brand name British Marine, has taken a step closer in securing liability limitation from the bunker spill.

PSA Corporation will not be contesting the right for Straits Bunkering, owner of bunker tanker Marine Honour, and British Marine to limit their liability, showed documents obtained from the court by Manifold Times.

The latest development paves way for Straits Bunkering and British Marine to limit their liability, whereby a ceiling of 4,510,000 Special Drawing Rights (SDR) valued at approximately SGD 8 million will be deposited by QBE Insurance into a local bank account.

Claims exceeding the liability limitation of Straits Bunkering, owner of bunker tanker Marine Honour, will meanwhile be made against International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund 1992 which has a much higher limit of SGD 362 million.

Note: Latest updates on beach water quality can be found here.

Related: Singapore: Straits Bunkering a step closer in securing SGD 8 million bunker spill liability ceiling
Related: Thirteen deficiencies flagged during inspection for dredger involved in Singapore oil spill
Related: Singapore oil spill: Minister refutes claim that contractor was slow in preventing further spillage
Related: MPA: Claims exceeding liability of “Marine Honour” owner will be made against international fund
Related: MPA: Owner of bunker tanker involved in Singapore oil spill is liable for pollution damage
Related: Malaysia to look into demands of Johor fisherman affected by oil spill from Singapore
Related: Singapore oil spill: Clean-up enters next phase of cleaning rock bunds
Related: MPA: Clean-up ops continue following oil spill in Singapore, affected beaches closed
Related: Singapore: Oil spill cleanup after allision between dredger “Vox Maxima” and bunker tanker “Marine Honour”

 

Photo credit: Facebook/Grace Fu
Published: 4 September, 2024

Continue Reading

Environment

Burning oil tanker “MV Sounion” unsafe to be towed, says EU mission

Private companies responsible for salvage operation of the Greek-flagged oil tanker, which was due to be towed, have concluded that it was not safe to proceed, says EUNAVFOR ASPIDES.

Admin

Published

on

By

Burning oil tanker “MV Sounion” unsafe to be towed, says EU mission

Private companies responsible for the salvage operation of Greek-flagged oil tanker MV Sounion, which was due to be towed, have concluded that it was not safe to proceed, said EUNAVFOR ASPIDES, an EU military operation in the Red Sea on Wednesday (3 September).

Tanker Sounion has been on fire since 23 August after it was reportedly attacked by Houthis.

EUNAVFOR ASPIDES said due to the large amount of crude oil it carries, Sounion presents a significant environmental threat.

Upon the request of the companies, EUNAVFOR ASPIDES have been protecting the tugs involved in the SOUNION salvage operation since 1 September, aiming to facilitate the prevention of an unprecedented environmental disaster in the region.

“The private companies responsible for the salvage operation have concluded that the conditions were not met to conduct the towing operation and that it was not safe to proceed. Alternative solutions are now being explored by the private companies,” it said in a social media post. 

“EUNAVFOR ASPIDES remains concentrated on its original mandate, acting as a credible EU maritime security provider, aiming to contribute to the freedom of navigation of merchant vessels in its Area of Operation.”

In an earlier post, it said currently, several fires continue to burn on the vessel’s main deck.

“The vessel remains anchored without drifting, and there are no visible signs of an oil spill,” it said.

In an urgent notice from Greece to IMO dated 29 August, a potential spill of about 2.2 nautical miles length was detected through a satellite image obtained in the evening hours of 29 August. 

“Greece urges all nations and all actors involved to assist in preventing the environmental hazard and resolving the solution the soonest possible.” 

Manifold Times previously reported that the US Department of State stating the Houthis’ continued attacks threaten to spill a million barrels of oil into the Red Sea, an amount four times the size of the Exxon Valdez disaster.

The Exxon Valdez oil spill was a man made disaster that occurred when oil tanker Exxon Valdez, owned by the Exxon Shipping Company, spilled 11 million gallons of crude oil into Alaska’s Prince William Sound on 24 March, 1989.

Related: US: Oil spill calamity four times “Exxon Valdez” disaster waiting to happen

 

Photo credit: EUNAVFOR ASPIDES
Published: 4 September, 2024

Continue Reading
Advertisement
  • SBF2
  • Aderco advert 400x330 1
  • v4Helmsman Gif Banner 01
  • RE 05 Lighthouse GIF
  • EMF banner 400x330 slogan
  • Consort advertisement v2

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS

  • 102Meth Logo GIF copy
  • SEAOIL 3+5 GIF
  • HL 2022 adv v1
  • Singfar advertisement final
  • Triton Bunkering advertisement v2


  • Uni Fuels logo advertisement white background
  • Auramarine 01
  • Synergy Asia Bunkering logo MT
  • PSP Marine logo
  • E Marine logo
  • Kenoil
  • Central Star logo
  • MFA logo v2
  • metcore
  • Trillion Energy
  • VPS 2021 advertisement
  • Advert Shipping Manifold resized1
  • 400x330 v2 copy
  • Headway Manifold

Trending