Connect with us

Bunker Fuel Quality

Gard: IMO updates fuel oil sampling guidelines

‘MARPOL delivered sample’ size has increased from 400ml to 600ml and must now also be available for checking the flashpoint requirements under SOLAS Regulation II-2/4.2.1, says Gard.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED william william on Unsplash

Maritime protection and indemnity (P&I) club Gard on Thursday (31 November) published an insight on changes to the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) guidelines for fuel oil sampling:

Safety of ships relating to the use of fuel oil

The minimum 60 degrees Celsius (°C) flashpoint limit in SOLAS Regulation II-2/4.2.1.1 is not new, but the regulations designed to prevent the supply of oil fuel in breach of this limit are. 

In November 2022, the IMO MSC 106 adopted amendments to SOLAS requiring bunker suppliers to provide ships with a declaration prior to bunkering, stating that the flashpoint of the actual oil fuel batch is in conformity with the flashpoint requirements of SOLAS. 

They also clarify that the required information “may be included in the Bunker Delivery Note (BDN) according to MARPOL Annex VI/18”. These SOLAS amendments will enter into force on 1 January 2026.

Information to be included in the BDN

Even though the SOLAS amendments have yet to take effect, the new flashpoint documentation requirements for suppliers became effective on 1 May 2024 in an amendment to MARPOL Annex VI. Hence, Appendix V of MARPOL Annex VI already requires the BDN to include information about the fuel oil’s flashpoint, which can be either the flashpoint value measured in °C or a general statement confirming that flashpoint has been measured at or above 70°C. 

New sampling guidelines

To support the regulatory changes, and to account for situations in which oil fuel with a flashpoint of less than 60°C has been delivered, the IMO has published a circular, MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.18, updating its fuel oil sampling guidelines. The new circular revokes the previous MEPC Resolution 182(59), the 2009 Guidelines for the safe taking of the ‘MARPOL delivered sample’, and extend the use of this sample to include testing of the SOLAS flashpoint requirements.

While the main objectives of the new guidelines and their basic requirements on sampling locations, arrangements, and procedures for taking, labelling and storing the sample, have not changed, it is important to be aware of the following changes:

Sampling methods: Section 4 explicitly requires personnel responsible for primary sampling and preparing the samples for storage to be familiar with equipment and guidelines. Also, representatives of both the ship and supplier should witness the sampling operation.

Sampling and sampling integrity: Section 5 warns against using low-flashpoint solvents to clean samplers and containers prior to use, as this can contaminate samples. 

Retained sample handling: Section 7 requires a minimum sample size of 600ml, up from 400ml previously. 

Retained sample storage: Section 9 transfers responsibility for tracking retained samples from the ship’s Master to the Company. 

Procedures and documentation following testing of retained sample: New Section 10 describes the procedures and documentation requirements for situations requiring a fuel oil’s flashpoint to be checked. The sulphur verification procedures detailed in Appendix VI of MARPOL Annex VI remain unchanged.

Furthermore, keep in mind that the retained ‘MARPOL delivered sample’ should only be used to test for compliance with the convention requirements and not to resolve commercial quality disputes. 

 

Photo credit: william william on Unsplash
Published: 5 November, 2024

Continue Reading

Methanol

VPS examines methanol as a marine fuel for decarbonisation

Steve Bee of VPS explores methanol’s potential as a bunker fuel, the challenges ahead, industry standards to support its usage and VPS’s role in supporting this transition.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED VPS logo

Steve Bee, Commercial Director of marine fuels testing company VPS, on Tuesday (3 December) explored methanol's potential as a marine fuel, the challenges ahead, industry standards to support its usage and VPS's role in supporting this transition: 

Introduction

It’s very apparent, global shipping’s drive to decarbonise is well underway. The ship-building profile is changing dramatically, highlighted by the 2023 order book showing 539 new builds capable of running on low-to-zero carbon fuels, being ordered. This equates to 45% of all orders in terms of gross tonnage. LNG dual-fuel vessels are currently the most popular vessels of choice, but Methanol-capable vessels have gained traction. Looking at Jan-Sept 2024, 49% of the gross tonnage on order was for vessels configured to be alternative fuels ready, with this specific order book growing by 24% year on year. It’s obvious that shipping is keeping its options very much open and looking for as much flexibility as possible, when it comes to the fuel choices for its ships.

The industry currently bunkers 230 Million mt of fuel per year. Burning this fuel equates to emissions of 716M mt of CO2-equivalent, as the majority of the fuel burnt continues to be traditional fossil fuels. However, the list of environmental legislation and directives to reduce emissions from shipping is ever-increasing in order to reduce SOx, NOx, Particulate Matter, CO2, Methane and other Green House Gases.  It is this regulatory demand which is driving the developments of numerous alternative low-to-zero carbon fuels for marine use.

VPS has been and continues to be, at the forefront of fuels research & development and continues to pioneer and develop test methods for such fuels.

Methanol bunkers and bunkering facilities are growing with 13 ports now offering methanol. But this methanol is predominantly grey, and Tank-to-Wake emissions from grey methanol are similar to conventional fossil fuels. The maritime sector must look to use the sustainable “green” methanol options of e-methanol, bio-methanol, or blue methanol:

VPS examines methanol as a marine fuel for decarbonisation

IRENA forecast e-methanol will reach a production level of 250M mt and bio-methanol will reach 135M mt by 2050. 

Currently we see 39 methanol-powered ships on our sees, but a further 262 are on order.

As with all fuels, there are numerous pro’s and con’s to using methanol as a marine fuel: 

Methanol fuel handling and management is certainly easier than that for LNG, with retrofit costs being less expensive and easier. Plus, green methanol sources offer almost near-zero GHG emissions.

In terms of ECA compliance Methanol conforms to SOx, NOx and PM content. It is biodegradable, miscible with water and a liquid at atmospheric pressure, all of which are positive factors in terms of fuel management and handling.

As demand grows, methanol should become more cost competitive, with increasing number of ports providing methanol.

However, methanol has half the energy of maritime’s current fossil fuels and a Flash Point of only 12ºC. Current availability of green methanol, is still an issue, yet this year industry news has highlighted that some green methanol projects have been cancelled, eg one in Antwerp (Orsted) and Flagship-One in Sweden.

Over the past 2 years, VPS have made significant investments in CAPEX for new laboratory equipment, plus the training of laboratory staff, technical advisors and bunker quantity surveyors, in order to survey, sample and test methanol bunkers.

The summer of 2023 saw VPS act the partner of choice to Maersk and undertook work during the maiden voyage of the Laura Maersk. We surveyed, sampled and tested, the methanol loadings in Singapore, Port Said and Rotterdam. As part of the requirements, changes to bunkering practices and procedures included heightened H&S processes, increased levels of tank cleaning, the use of closed-sampling devices and the use of biofuel as the pilot fuel, which also required testing. Testing was under the International Methanol Producers and Consumers Association (IMPCA) specification, with the results all on specification from all three loadings.

Since then, VPS has also worked with OCI covering similar work on the ECO Maestro.

In October 2024, it was announced at SIBCON-24, that Singapore will release a new technical reference standard for Methanol before year end, which covers fuel transfer, quality and quantity measurements as well operational and safety instructions as well as crew training. VPS has been closely involved in the development of this new Methanol Standard by being part of the Working Group.

This same group will also release a similar standard for Ammonia in 2025.

The announcement from Singapore was followed by a further notification from the International Standards Organisation (ISO) in November 2024. The ISO announcement highlighted the release of the publication of the first edition of their international standard for methanol as marine fuel, ISO 6583:2024.  This standard sets the requirements and limits for three methanol grades for marine: MMA, MMB and MMC. It uses the IMPCA specifications as a starting point, with some properties less critical for marine and other fuel related aspects not covered. Grade MMC allows for wider tolerances in certain characteristics compared to MMB, while MMA includes additional requirements for lubricity and cleanliness. The new Singapore Methanol Standard will make reference to the ISO 6583 for quality requirements under its custody transfer section.

Summary

As decarbonisation and legislation drives the development of low-to-zero carbon fuels, demand for methanol will grow as it provides an excellent way to achieve immediate reductions of emissions compared to fossil fuels.

VPS are experienced in providing methanol surveying, sampling and testing work and capable of offering key technical support to our customers.

All of this is evidence that the global shipping industry is well on its way and intent on delivering upon its decarbonisation goals, but with many challenges still to overcome.

Related: SIBCON 2024: Singapore launches two new bunkering standards, revises third benchmark
Related: ISO publishes international standard for methanol as a marine fuel

 

Photo credit: VPS
Published: 4 December, 2024

Continue Reading

Business

Shenzhen-based CTI Group acquires and integrates Greece-based NAIAS Labs

Following the acquisition of Singapore-based Maritec four years ago, CTI Group has acquired Greek-based NAIAS Labs to further strengthen organisation’s Marine Energy Transition solutions.

Admin

Published

on

By

Shenzhen-based CTI Group acquires and integrates Greece-based NAIAS Labs

Shenzhen-listed Centre Testing International Group Co Ltd (CTI Group) on Monday (2 December) said it successfully completed the full acquisition of the Greek company Naias Scientific Analytical Laboratories Societe Anonyme (NAIAS Labs).

The Group has commenced the integration of NAIAS Labs into CTI Group’s Singapore-based marine arm, Maritec’s (CTI-Maritec) network. 

The move comes following CTI Group’s acquisition of Maritec four years ago. 

The integration comes to fruit as a result of the focused drive to expand the company’s global network in the Marine Energy Transition and Environmental Compliance & Risk sectors and strategically bring even greater value to clients worldwide.  

Richard Shentu, President of CTI, said: “This M&A was driven by our shared commitment to excellence and innovation. It will strengthen our position as a global leader in marine environmental and fuel services, the upcoming SAF aviation fuels testing and further extend our capabilities in helping our clients navigate smoothly along the decarbonisation, environmental compliance and energy transition route.”

“By synergising NAIAS' local footprint in European markets and its potentiality with CTI’s robust global networks, we are poised to deliver even greater value to our clients worldwide.”

Dr. Marios Tsezos, on behalf of NAIAS Labs, said: “Through synergy of the two entities’ robust capabilities and their global networks, both CTI-Maritec and NAIAS Labs customers will benefit largely from the greater accessibility to the wide-range of services & solutions offered, across the EU, Asia, Asia-Pacific and Americas regions, with faster turn-around-times, and state-of-the-art know-how and technologies.”

Andreas Lougridis, EUA General Manager of CTI-Maritec, said: “Together, joining hands with the team of NAIAS Labs, we are very excited to further elevate, for our clients, our services of Fuel Testing & Solutions (including Biofuel & Alternative Fuels), Lube Oil Analysis, Discharge Water Compliance Services, Inventory of Hazardous Material (IHM) & IHM Maintenance Services, Responsible Ship Recycling (RSR) Supervision, Asbestos Management Solutions, NDT & UTM Services, Bunker Quantity Survey, Cargo Inspection and ISCC Certification & Energy Consultancy, among others.”

CTI is a third-party agency specialising in testing, calibration, inspection, certification, and technical services, for Chinese and global companies.

Founded in 2003 and headquartered in Shenzhen, CTI operates over 260 offices in over 90 cities worldwide, and about 160 laboratories globally, serving over 100,000 customers. 

On October 30, 2009, CTI was successfully listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SHE: 300012).

Related: Shenzhen-based Centre Testing International Group completes Maritec acquisition

 

Photo credit: Centre Testing International Group
Published: 3 December, 2024

Continue Reading

Biofuel

Singapore: GCMD introduces new technique for FAME bio bunker fuel fingerprinting

Fingerprinting identifies feedstock origins of FAME-based biofuels used in shipping industry; can be used as a potential tool to detect fraud in marine fuel supply chains and ensure biofuel authenticity.

Admin

Published

on

By

Singapore: GCMD introduces new technique for FAME bio bunker fuel fingerprinting

The Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) on Monday (2 December) released its latest report, presenting a new technique that creates a fingerprint for Fatty Acid Methyl Esters(FAME) bio bunker fuels.

This fingerprint identifies the feedstock origins of the FAME-based biofuels used in the shipping industry.

GCMD said FAME fingerprinting is needed as the shipping sector is increasingly using biofuels, such as FAME, to reduce its GHG emissions. With that, concerns have arisen regarding the legitimacy of biofuels and whether they are truly sustainable. 

Industry bodies are seeing a rising number of cases mislabelling biofuels purported to be made from recycled oils and fats, while suspicions persist that they might be produced from cheaper and less sustainable virgin oils.

“To address these concerns, FAME fingerprinting can be used as a potential tool to detect fraud in marine fuel supply chains and ensure biofuel authenticity. By providing a physical validation method that complements existing certification schemes, FAME fingerprinting can help justify the green premium with genuine environmental benefits and safeguard the integrity of marine fuels supply chain,” GCMD said. 

FAME fingerprinting is based on the principle that the fatty acid profile of FAME is unique to its feedstock and can be preserved during feedstock transesterification to produce FAME. The "fingerprint" can then be compared against a database of known fatty acid profiles to identify the feedstock origin. 

GCMD worked with VPS who modified existing fuel testing methods to carry out sample analyses using a gas chromatograph with flame-ionisation detection, an instrument commonly found in fuel test laboratories. 

The analysis takes about an hour, comparable to the turnaround time for current marine fuel quality testing in the supply chain. 

“We have tested this method on a variety of FAME samples from different suppliers, including virgin oils, used cooking oils, palm oil mill effluent, beef tallow and food waste and were able to identify the feedstock origins for each sample,” GCMD added.

Manifold Times previously reported Captain Rahul Choudhuri, President, Strategic Partnerships at marine fuels testing company VPS, forecasting the use of finger printing technology today will likely establish a blueprint of how future alternative bunker fuels’ feedstocks are authenticated.

Captain Choudhuri said this when he gave an update of VPS’ biofuels finger printing trials with GCMD.

Note: The full report, titled ‘Rapid forensic analysis of FAME-based biofuels: Potential use of its fingerprint as a fraud detection tool’, can be downloaded here

Related: Marine Fuels 360: Fingerprinting to play key role in proving biofuel feedstock authenticity and beyond, says VPS
Related: GCMD-led consortium completes trials of sustainable biofuel bunker supply chains
Related: Dr. Nicholas Clague shares VPS’ experience with alternative bunker fuels
Related: Dubai: Shipowners and peers discuss realities of biofuel adoption at VPS Biofuels Seminar
Related: Singapore: VPS panel discussion presents a masterclass in shipping’s biofuel bunker adoption issues to the deck

 

Photo credit: Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation
Published: 2 December, 2024

Continue Reading
Advertisement
  • SBF2
  • Consort advertisement v2
  • Aderco advert 400x330 1
  • EMF banner 400x330 slogan
  • v4Helmsman Gif Banner 01
  • RE 05 Lighthouse GIF

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS

  • SEAOIL 3+5 GIF
  • Singfar advertisement final
  • 102Meth Logo GIF copy
  • HL 2022 adv v1
  • Triton Bunkering advertisement v2


  • PSP Marine logo
  • Golden Island logo square
  • Auramarine 01
  • Innospec logo v6
  • Mokara Final
  • Synergy Asia Bunkering logo MT
  • MFA logo v2
  • E Marine logo
  • Kenoil
  • Uni Fuels oct 2024 ad
  • Advert Shipping Manifold resized1
  • Headway Manifold
  • 400x330 v2 copy
  • VPS 2021 advertisement

Trending