Connect with us
DNV Decarbonization Insight Series August 2026 - What maritime professionals should know about AI Training

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (30 June 2026)

VLSFO availability tight in Singapore; availability good across several Sri Lankan ports; bunker demand picks up in Fujairah.

Admin

Published

on

ENGINE East of Suez 1

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • VLSFO availability tight in Singapore
  • Availability good across several Sri Lankan ports
  • Bunker demand picks up in Fujairah

Singapore and Malaysia

VLSFO availability in Singapore remains under strain, with recommended lead times continuing to vary widely across suppliers. While some suppliers can deliver in around nine days, others are quoting lead times of more than four weeks. Although the lower end of the range is unchanged, the upper end has extended further from around three weeks previously.

Recommended lead times for HSFO have narrowed to 7–11 days, compared with 5–13 days last week. For LSMGO, suppliers are advising lead times of 3–8 days, versus 6–10 days a week ago.

The port’s residual fuel oil inventories have averaged 18% lower so far in June than across May, according to the latest data from Enterprise Singapore. Stocks have fallen below 17 million bbls amid a sharp 37% drop in Singapore’s net fuel oil imports so far this month. Imports declined by 849,000 bbls, while exports increased by a modest 127,000 bbls.

Singapore’s middle distillate inventories have also continued to decline, averaging 7.89 million bbls so far this month. Stocks are 14% below previous levels, leaving inventories at multi-year lows.

Bunker fuel availability in Malaysia’s Port Klang remains mixed. VLSFO supply is generally sufficient, particularly for smaller prompt stems. However, LSMGO availability remains constrained, while HSFO continues to face supply pressure, leaving both grades relatively tight.

East Asia

Despite subdued bunker demand, VLSFO availability in Zhoushan remains under pressure. Recommended lead times have lengthened from 7–10 days last week to 7–12 days, contributing to the recent increase in the benchmark price. Lead times for both LSMGO and HSFO have extended to 5–7 days, up from just three days previously.

Bunker fuel supply across northern China presents a mixed picture. Suppliers in Dalian and Qingdao have ample stocks of VLSFO and LSMGO, although HSFO availability in Qingdao remains limited. In Tianjin, all major bunker grades continue to face supply constraints, while VLSFO and HSFO availability is tight in Shanghai. LSMGO supply in Shanghai, however, remains relatively stable.

Supply tightness also persists across several ports in southern China. Both VLSFO and LSMGO remain constrained in Fuzhou. Xiamen has adequate VLSFO availability but tighter LSMGO supply, while both grades remain constrained in Yangpu and Guangzhou.

Hong Kong’s bunker market remains stable, with recommended lead times for all major bunker grades holding at around seven days, broadly unchanged in recent weeks.

Meanwhile, bunker fuel availability remains steady across Taiwan’s key ports of Hualien, Keelung, Taichung and Kaohsiung. Recommended lead times for both VLSFO and LSMGO remain at around two days across all four ports, largely unchanged from last week.

Demand in South Korea’s bunker market has softened recently, according to a local trader. Across the country’s southern ports – including Busan, Ulsan, Masan, Onsan, Yeosu and Kwangyang – recommended lead times for VLSFO and LSMGO have narrowed to 4–6 days, from 4–9 days last week. HSFO lead times have also shortened to 4–6 days, compared with 4–9 days a week earlier.

Supply conditions have also improved at western ports, including Incheon, Daesan, Dangjin, Pyeongtaek and Taean. Recommended lead times for VLSFO and LSMGO have narrowed to 4–6 days, down from 4–9 days last week. HSFO availability remains stable, with lead times reduced to 4–6 days from 4–9 days previously.

Weather-related disruptions remain a concern across South Korea. Delays are forecast at Busan, Ulsan and Yeosu on 1 and 5 July, and at Daesan on 4 July.

In Japan, bunker demand has strengthened as expected, supported by some of the most competitive bunker prices in Asia. Enquiries have risen sharply, according to a Japan-based trader. VLSFO availability remains extremely tight, with limited supply capacity for July, while MGO availability has tightened suddenly and significantly.

The trader advised buyers to secure spot requirements immediately due to the severe supply squeeze and limited July allocations, with Japanese refineries expected to prioritise domestic energy demand.

At major Japanese ports including Tokyo, Chiba, Kawasaki, Kashima, Nagoya, Yokkaichi and Oita, VLSFO and LSMGO remain in short supply, with only a limited number of suppliers able to offer these grades. HSFO is comparatively more available, with recommended lead times of around 7–10 days.

VLSFO and LSMGO availability remains tight in Osaka, Kobe and Mizushima. Recommended lead times for these grades are around 7–10 days, while HSFO requires around 5–7 days.

Indonesia’s bunker market, by contrast, remains well supplied. VLSFO availability is stable across Jakarta, Surabaya, Balikpapan and Cigading, where suppliers are generally quoting lead times of around 2–3 days.

Oceania

A temporary fuel excise cut introduced to help shield Australians from the impact of the oil crisis is set to expire on 30 June. From 1 July, fuel excise rates will increase. However, the change will affect only vessels operating domestically, as international vessels remain fully exempt from fuel excise and GST, according to an Australia-based trader.

In Western Australia, VLSFO availability remains steady at Kwinana and Fremantle, where suppliers are generally recommending lead times of around seven days. Bunker operations at both ports continue to be supported by a single supplier, with deliveries carried out exclusively by barge.

Supply conditions along Australia’s east coast differ by port. In New South Wales, Port Kembla can facilitate VLSFO deliveries by either truck or pipeline, while suppliers in Sydney have adequate stocks of both VLSFO and LSMGO. HSFO supply remains comparatively tighter in Sydney, with suppliers typically requesting around seven days of advance notice.

In Queensland, VLSFO and LSMGO remain readily available in Brisbane and Gladstone, with recommended lead times of around seven days.

Further south, suppliers in Melbourne and Geelong continue to hold healthy VLSFO inventories. However, bunker operations at both ports rely on a single barge, resulting in lead times of approximately one week.

HSFO availability is becoming increasingly constrained in both Melbourne and Brisbane.

One supplier is currently offering all bunker grades in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne with lead times of around five days. In Dampier, bunker deliveries continue to rely on truck-assisted pipeline operations, making advance scheduling and berth confirmation particularly important, according to a market source.

Across the Tasman Sea, bunker fuel availability in New Zealand remains broadly stable. VLSFO is readily available in Tauranga and Auckland, where suppliers are recommending lead times of about four days. At Marsden Point, both VLSFO and LSMGO can be delivered directly to vessels via pipeline infrastructure.

Weather continues to pose an operational risk across New Zealand. Bunker deliveries are particularly vulnerable to disruption in Wellington and ports across the South Island, where adverse weather conditions can periodically affect supply operations.

South Asia

The onset of the monsoon is expected to disrupt bunker operations at several Indian ports in the coming days, with weather-related delays likely to affect delivery schedules. Disruptions are forecast at Kandla and Sikka between 1–4 July, while rough sea conditions could hamper bunker operations at Mumbai, Cochin and Visakhapatnam from 30 June to 4 July.

In Sri Lanka, bunker market conditions remain stable, with sufficient inventories of all major bunker fuel grades in Colombo and Hambantota. At least one supplier is recommending lead times of around six days.

Rough weather conditions may intermittently disrupt bunker operations at Colombo and Trincomalee between 1–4 July, potentially affecting bunker delivery schedules.

Middle East

Bunker fuel availability has improved across all major grades in Fujairah, with several suppliers now able to accommodate prompt delivery requests. The improvement follows the signing of a memorandum of understanding between Iran and the US that includes the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.

Before the agreement, suppliers were grappling with tight cargo availability as lower imports restricted replenishment volumes for bunker barges. The supply situation has since eased following the arrival of a small batch of cargoes in recent days, with additional deliveries expected shortly, according to a Middle East-based source.

Bunker demand in Fujairah has also picked up, the source added.

Most suppliers in Fujairah are currently able to offer prompt VLSFO stems, while a smaller number have LSMGO available. HSFO remains comparatively tight, although some suppliers continue to offer the grade.

Supply conditions have also improved at the neighbouring UAE bunker hub of Khor Fakkan, where both VLSFO and HSFO availability has strengthened.

Elsewhere in the UAE, port operations at Jebel Ali, Hamriyah, Dibba and Sharjah are continuing without disruption, according to Inchcape Shipping. Ports in Ras Al Khaimah are also operating normally, although the RAK Ports Authority has continued to impose a marine risk surcharge on vessels calling at its ports, harbours and anchorages since March.

In Kuwait, operations at the ports of Shuaiba and Shuwaikh continue uninterrupted.

No official operational advisories have been issued by Saudi Arabian ports. In Jeddah, VLSFO and LSMGO availability remains relatively stable. However, adverse weather conditions could disrupt bunker operations in Jeddah on 1 July and in Yanbu between 1–3 July.

In Qatar, all ports remain operational, according to Inchcape Shipping. However, VLSFO and LSMGO continue to be in tight supply at Ras Laffan.

“Regional ports remain operational with no major port closures reported. Shipping activity through the Strait of Hormuz is gradually recovering following the recent de-escalation; however, some owners and operators remain cautious, and occasional schedule adjustments may still occur,” an Oman-based trader said.

Oman continues to offer strong prompt availability of LSMGO. One supplier is recommending lead times of just 2–3 days at the major ports of Duqm, Muscat, Sohar and Salalah. However, high wave activity forecast in Salalah between 30 June and 4 July could temporarily disrupt bunkering operations, according to a source.

In Egypt, port operations remain normal. At Port Suez, HSFO inventories are tight, while VLSFO stocks are close to depletion.

Further south, both VLSFO and LSMGO remain difficult to secure in Djibouti. Meanwhile, port and bunker operations across Jordan, Iraq, Cyprus, Pakistan and Lebanon continue to run normally, according to shipping agency Inchcape Shipping.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 1 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Legal

Singapore police arrest eight over alleged illegal MGO transaction off Tuas

SPF says preliminary investigations found that crew members of a Singapore-registered tugboat misappropriated MGO worth about SGD 10,570 without their company’s knowledge and sold it illegally.

Admin

Published

on

By

Singapore police arrest eight over alleged illegal MGO transaction off Tuas

The Singapore Police Force (SPF) on Thursday (13 August) said it has arrested eight men, aged between 25 and 54, for their suspected involvement in an illegal transaction of Marine Gas Oil (MGO).

On 13 August 2026 at about 1.05am, officers from the Police Coast Guard (PCG) conducted a check on a Singapore-registered tugboat in the waters off Tuas and discovered that eight crew members were possibly involved in the illegal transaction of MGO. 

“Preliminary investigations revealed that the crew members of the tugboats misappropriated MGO valued at about SGD 10,570 (USD 8,258), without their company’s knowledge,” SPF said in a statement.

“The MGO was sold illegally for their personal financial gain.”

The eight crew members will be charged in court on 14 August 2026 with the offence of theft by servant of property in possession of master under Section 381 of the Penal Code 1871 If convicted, they shall be punished with an imprisonment term that may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.

“The Police take a serious view of illegal transaction of MGO in Singapore Territorial Waters and will continue to conduct enforcement and security checks to prevent, deter and detect such illicit activities in Singapore waters,” SPF added. 

 

Photo credit: Singapore Police Force
Published: 14 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Port & Regulatory

Gard: Sulphur-related bunker claims rise amid tighter China MSA enforcement

Claims involving excessive sulphur content in marine fuels have been rising, while stricter inspections by the China MSA have heightened the focus on sulphur compliance, particularly in the Bohai Sea.

Admin

Published

on

By

shraga kopstein on Unsplash

Maritime protection and indemnity (P&I) club Gard on Wednesday (12 August) highlighted that claims involving excessive sulphur content in marine fuels have been rising, while stricter inspections by the China MSA have heightened the focus on sulphur compliance, particularly in the Bohai Sea:

Rise in off-spec sulphur claims

Recent claims experience indicates that bunker quality continues to pose a significant operational risk for shipowners. In our earlier review of bunker-related claims during the first five months of 2026, we highlighted a rise in off-specification bunker incidents amid increased pressure on global fuel supply chains following the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. 

Specifically for Sulphur compliance, between January and June 2026, the number of sulphur-related cases increased by more than threefold compared with the same period in 2025. Notably, the number of cases recorded in the first six months of this year has already exceeded the total number reported during the whole of last year by approximately 40%. 

While each case is fact-specific, the increase is notable because excessive sulphur content constitutes a MARPOL compliance issue. Unlike many other bunker quality problems, sulphur non-compliance identified through port state inspections can result in vessel delays, enforcement action, and substantial costs associated with debunkering and fuel disposal. 

The map below illustrates the geographical distribution of sulphur-related claims recorded during the first six months of 2026, based on the location where the bunkers were stemmed.

Distribution of sulphur related claims

China MSA steps up sulphur compliance enforcement

According to our correspondent, Huatai, on 5 June 2026, the maritime authorities of Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning and Shandong jointly launched a special campaign on ship pollution prevention and control in the Bohai Sea region. The campaign involves coordinated supervision by local MSA branches across the region and is expected to last nearly five months. It covers major ports and surrounding port areas in the Bohai Sea region, including Tianjin, Tangshan, Qinhuangdao, Huanghua, Jinzhou, Yingkou and Longkou. 

While the initiative is broader than bunker sulphur compliance alone, its scope includes inspections relating to air pollution prevention, SOx emissions, fuel compliance and other high-pollution-risk operations. Enforcement measures are expected to comprise onboard inspections, cross-regional enforcement activities, unannounced spot checks and remote monitoring. These efforts will be supported by a combination of UAV patrols, maritime patrol vessels, shore-based monitoring systems and rapid on-site fuel testing. 

As a result, vessels trading in the Bohai Sea region may experience increased scrutiny of fuel compliance documentation, fuel sampling records, onboard fuel management procedures, and the handling or disposal of suspected non-compliant fuel.

Documents typically requested by China MSA

Based on our recent experience, including the case discussed above, and subject to the specific requirements of the local MSA office, owners and operators may be requested to provide supporting documentation such as: 

  • Bunker documentation – Bunker Delivery Notes (BDNs), MARPOL fuel sample records, fuel test reports, and relevant fuel quality certificates. 
  • Statutory certificates – including the International Air Pollution Prevention (IAPP) Certificate and International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) Certificate. 
  • Operational records – engine logbooks, deck and navigation logbooks, Oil Record Book entries, and records relating to fuel transfers, storage and consumption. 
  • Sampling documentation – the Master’s statement and any records demonstrating how fuel samples were drawn, sealed, labelled, handled and retained. 
  • Correspondence records – communications with the authorities, bunker suppliers, charterers and other relevant stakeholders. 
  • Fuel disposal records – approved disposal plans, debunkering documentation, receipts and evidence of final disposal, where applicable. 

The exact documentation required will depend on the nature of the investigation, the findings of the inspection, and the requirements of the local enforcement authority. 

Possible regulatory consequences in China

Under the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People’s Republic of China, ocean-going vessels are required to use fuel oil meeting atmospheric pollutant control requirements after berthing. Vessels operating within designated emission control areas must also comply with applicable emission standards. Article 106 provides that where vessel fuel oil fails to meet applicable standards or requirements, the competent maritime authorities may impose fines ranging from RMB 10,000 to RMB 100,000. Liability may extend to shipowners, ship operators and ship managers depending upon the circumstances of the case. 

Recommendation

Sulphur compliance should be treated as both a fuel quality and regulatory risk. Owners and operators are encouraged to take preventive steps before bunkering, act promptly if non-compliant fuel is suspected, and preserve evidence carefully if an inspection or claim arises. Under amended 

Resolution A.1206(34), Appendix 18, 2.1.5, if the BDN shows compliant fuel, but the master has independent test results of the fuel oil sample taken by the ship during the bunkering which indicates non-compliance, the master may document this by notifying the ship’s flag Administration, with copies to: 

  • the competent authority of the relevant port of destination, 
  • the Administration under whose jurisdiction the bunker deliverer is located, 
  • and to the bunker deliverer.

 

Photo credit: shraga kopstein on Unsplash / Gard
Published: 14 August, 2026

Continue Reading

LNG Bunkering

Shell expands LNG bunkering footprint in Spain with Valencia

As one of the region’s key maritime hubs, the company said Valencia expands the options available to shipowners seeking LNG supply along major shipping routes.

Admin

Published

on

By

Shell expands LNG bunkering footprint in Spain with Valencia

British oil giant Shell on Thursday (13 August) said Valencia has joined its growing network of bunkering locations, making LNG available as a marine fuel.

The successful completion of the first LNG bunkering operation in Valencia marked an important milestone for Spain and further strengthened Shell’s LNG supply capabilities across the Mediterranean. 

In a video shared by the company, bunkering vessel Alice Consulich was shown supplying an undisclosed volume of LNG to the container ship MSC Sabrina.

“As one of the region’s key maritime hubs, Valencia expands the options available to shipowners seeking LNG supply along major shipping routes,” Shell said in a social media post. 

Shell said the achievement reflected the strong collaboration across the maritime value chain, including MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company, the Port of Valencia and Fratelli Cosulich Group.

“We look forward to making more LNG bunker deliveries in Valencia and across the Mediterranean as LNG infrastructure and capabilities continue to expand,” the company said. 

 

Photo credit: Shell
Published: 14 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending