The following article was published by Cristina Saenz de Santa Maria, Regional Manager South East Asia, Pacific & India, Maritime at DNV, on Monday (10 October) through the social media platform LinkedIn; it has been reproduced on Manifold Times with permission from DNV:
Before there is a viable business case for alternative maritime fuels like ammonia and hydrogen, there’s a lot of work to do, according to a SIBCON panel of industry experts, I was happy to moderate last week.
My panellists Murali Srinivasan, Peter Liew, Raghav Gulati and Takahiro Rokuroda shared about the various ammonia and hydrogen projects their companies Yara International, Eaglestar, Anglo American and NYK Line are currently conducting, and drew attention to five main points in the discussion:
Many companies might know how to ship ammonia, but all stakeholders must make sure safety measures are in place for ammonia to be widely used as a bunkering fuel.
It was also pointed out that the industry must expedite the introduction of alternative fuels, like ammonia and hydrogen, but we cannot take as many years as was the case with LNG.
We all agreed that the industry must come together – collaborate and partners – to meet our collective commitments to decarbonise. Caution was expressed about concentrating on just one fuel. There must be a multi-fuel solution and vessels must be equipped accordingly.
Having the infrastructure in place to support a mix of fuels and making sure it is in the places where it’s needed, was a strong point raised by our panel.
Panellists sited many examples around the world where industry collaboration was taking place, but we need to see IMO stepping up to put in place the necessary regulations and standards for new bunkering fuels like ammonia and hydrogen.
We know that a number of maritime companies are clearly looking at all options when it comes to alternative fuels, but ammonia was coming up as one of the more realistic solutions.
For ship owners and operators, one of the biggest challenges is the toxicity of ammonia. Therefore, much needs to be done to ensure safety measures, technology and regulations are in place, and we in DNV will play our part in this process.
My esteemed panellists stressed the need to make sure crews are trained to handle ammonia, at ports and at sea. It was of utmost importance to start training crews and bunkering staff in time, not wait until the first ammonia and hydrogen fuelled vessels hit the water.
When I asked the panellists – “Like all other alternative fuels, ammonia and hydrogen will be much more expensive and according to DNV projections, at least two times more than current fuels. Is there a business case yet – and if not, what is needed?” – there was general agreement that “the business case is not yet there” for the adoption of ammonia and hydrogen as bunkering fuels.
An effective workable carbon price/tax on fossil fuels would help provide “a level playing field” for a transition to alternative clean fuels. One panellist also called for more incentives to drive the transition to cleaner fuels like ammonia and hydrogen.
Already there is considerable investment in renewable fuels, as well as in adapting ship and engine design to accommodate fuels like hydrogen and ammonia. However, more infrastructure and regulation are necessary, along with a greater degree of collaboration and co-operation involving all maritime stakeholders.
As the world’s biggest bunkering hub, Singapore is already playing an important leadership role, joining forces with ports and other stakeholders around the world to advance maritime decarbonisation.
The Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) is an excellent example of public-private partnership, seeing collaboration at work between government authorities and industry. I’m very excited that we in DNV are leading the GCMD-commissioned ammonia bunkering safety study and I look forward to its results in Q1 2023.
In conclusion, my panellists agreed that Singapore was providing many good initiatives of industry collaboration and partnerships for decarbonisation and adoption of alternative fuels, so the local cluster has every reason to be optimistic while helping the shipping industry accelerating on its Net Zero pathway.
Photo credit: DNV
Published: 12 October, 2022
Glander International Bunkering (Norway) AS seeking payment of USD 115,963.52 (not including contractual compensation and interests) from the vessel’s demise charterer, according to court documents.
“In TotalEnergies, we already have projects along the e-Fuel value chain, from green electricity and green / blue hydrogen to e-Fuel production that will be integrated along the marine fuels value chain in time to come,” shares Louise Tricoire.
Buyers can nominate deliveries on platform and plan operations together with suppliers following ‘one single truth’ concept with all players aware of what has been agreed when and by whom, says DNV spokesman.
Rotterdam’s intention to mandate the usage of MFMs goes down well with licensed bunker supplier VT Group; MFM providers supportive of move but stressed continuous monitoring is needed for optimum performance.
Cost of alternative bunker fuels, bunker operations and technology advancement are some considerations to be examined by the maritime industry, says Neo, director of SDE International Pte Ltd.
Kim Hyung Joon and Han Donghoon were planning to join the Singapore entities of Hartree Group - either Hartree Partners Singapore Pte Ltd or Hartree Marine Fuels - in October, discovered management.