Connect with us

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability (12 March 2024)

Average bunker demand in Singapore; availability good across all grades in Zhoushan; LSMGO availability good in Omani ports.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • Average bunker demand in Singapore
  • Availability good across all grades in Zhoushan
  • LSMGO availability good in Omani ports

Singapore and Southeast Asia

In Singapore, the availability of VLSFO for immediate delivery (0-2 days) remains constrained. Despite average demand, most suppliers in Singapore are recommending lead times varying between 5-12 days for the grade. Prompt HSFO supply is also tight, with lead times ranging from 7-13 days, consistent with the previous week. Meanwhile, LSMGO lead times range from 2-8 days, similar to last week.

According to Enterprise Singapore’s latest data, Singapore’s residual fuel oil stocks in the first week of March were 11% lower than in February. The port’s residual stocks have dipped below 20 million bbls despite a 41% increase in net fuel imports.

Both imports and exports have risen this month, with fuel oil imports surpassing exports by 2.80 million bbls. In contrast, middle distillate stocks in Singapore have increased by 12% this month.

In Malaysia’s Port Klang, VLSFO and LSMGO availability remain adequate amidst average demand. Overall, bunker demand has been low in the port compared to last month, when severe congestion in Singapore prompted several bunker buyers to lift bunkers in Port Klang and other nearby ports. Lead times of 3-5 days are recommended for both VLSFO and LSMGO, with some suppliers able to deliver even more quickly depending on stem sizes. HSFO supply remains strained in Port Klang.

China and East Asia

Bunker fuel availability remains good amid subdued demand in Zhoushan. Several suppliers are recommending lead times of 2-5 days, unchanged from last week. Bunker operations were suspended across all anchorages in Zhoushan on Tuesday. Operations are expected to resume on Wednesday with a forecast of calmer weather.

VLSFO and LSMGO availability is restricted in Dalian, while Tianjin encounters tightness across all fuel types. Qingdao experiences limitations in promptly delivering VLSFO and LSMGO, with HSFO supply based on enquiry. In Shanghai and Guangzhou, VLSFO and LSMGO supply is short, while Shanghai faces constraints in HSFO availability. In contrast, Fuzhou, Yangpu and Xiamen report abundant availability of both low-sulphur fuel grades.

In Hong Kong, bunker fuel supply remains robust amid average demand. Majority of suppliers are recommending lead times of around seven days, in line with the previous week. Some can accommodate deliveries more swiftly, depending on stem sizes. But wind gusts of 21-24 knots and swells of over a meter are forecast between Wednesday and Friday, which could potentially disrupt bunker operations at the port.

In South Korean ports, bunker demand remains subdued because of higher bunker prices in comparison to nearby Chinese ports. Busan’s VLSFO premium over Zhoushan stood at $35/mt on Tuesday. VLSFO and HSFO availability remains good, with most suppliers recommending lead times varying between 3-9 days for both grades, virtually unchanged from last week. HSFO requires lead times of around 3-7 days. However, rough weather is forecasted throughout this week, which could potentially impact bunkering in ports including Ulsan, Onsan, Busan, Daesan, Taean, and Yeosu.

In Japan, bunker demand remains sluggish due to elevated prices and restricted cargo availability. Tokyo’s VLSFO price was about $64/mt higher than Zhoushan’s on Tuesday and was $55/mt higher than Singapore’s. Lead times differ across key Japanese ports, spanning from 5-8 days in Tokyo, Chiba, Osaka, and Kobe, to longer durations of 11-15 days in Nagoya, Yokkaichi, Mizushima, and Oita.

Adverse weather conditions are forecast in Subic Bay (Philippines) on 13 March and intermittently in Ho Chi Minh (Vietnam) between 14-18 March, posing potential challenges for bunker deliveries.

South Asia

Numerous ports across India, such as Kandla, Chennai, Visakhapatnam, and Haldia, are encountering difficulties due to shortages of VLSFO and LSMGO. Cochin and Paradip are notably affected, with certain suppliers nearing depletion of their VLSFO and LSMGO stocks.

Additionally, Tuticorin and Mumbai are experiencing dwindling supplies of VLSFO.

Adverse weather conditions are forecast on Wednesday at Indian ports, including Sikka, Kandla and Visakhapatnam, and could potentially disrupt bunkering operations.

Middle East

Many shipping companies continue to steer clear of transiting through the Red Sea due to rising attacks by Houthis on commercial vessels. Instead, more ships are opting for the longer route around Africa, bypassing the shorter Suez Canal route. This shift in shipping routes is gradually impacting bunker fuel demand in Fujairah.

Prompt availability of all bunker fuel grades remains tight in Fujairah due to ongoing weather-related disruptions and bunker backlogs there. Suppliers are projecting lead times of 7-10 days. Supply constraints are also present in the UAE port of Khor Fakkan, where most suppliers are recommending lead times of 7-10 days.

In the Saudi Arabian port of Jeddah, both VLSFO and LSMGO are readily available. On the contrary, certain suppliers in Djibouti are facing VLSFO shortages, though LSMGO remains available.

Meanwhile, Omani ports including Sohar, Salalah, Muscat, and Duqm boast ample LSMGO supply, with prompt supply available.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 13 March 2024

Continue Reading

Methanol

World Fuel and partners complete first green methanol bunkering of car carrier in Shanghai

Operation involved the delivery of approximately 2,800 MT of green methanol to “Arctic Tern” via a ship-to-ship transfer using SIPG Energy’s dedicated methanol bunkering vessel “M/V Hai Gang Zhi Yuan”.

Admin

Published

on

By

World Fuel and partners complete first green methanol bunkering of car carrier in Shanghai

Marine fuel provider World Fuel on Tuesday (21 July) said it successfully completed the first green methanol bunkering of M/V Arctic Tern, with EUKOR Car Carriers and SIPG Energy at the Port of Shanghai. 

Arctic Tern is the first vessel in the new Shaper Class series of car carriers. 

The operation involved the delivery of approximately 2,800 MT of green methanol to Arctic Tern via a ship-to-ship transfer using SIPG Energy’s dedicated methanol bunkering vessel M/V Hai Gang Zhi Yuan, the largest vessel of its kind in operation. 

The bunkering operation was carried out at Haitong Terminal, Waigaoqiao Port Area, Shanghai Port, with cargo handling operations conducted simultaneously during bunkering.

This marks EUKOR Car Carriers’ first green methanol operation and the first time Arctic Tern has bunkered methanol since its delivery on 9 July. The operation marked the first bunkering at Shanghai Port of green methanol produced locally in Shanghai for an international PCTC operator. 

It also demonstrated the city’s integrated green methanol value chain, spanning local production, storage and bunkering, and established a replicable “Shanghai Model” for green methanol supply.

World Fuel arranged the supply and delivery of the fuel on behalf of EUKOR Car Carriers, working with SIPG Energy as the physical supplier at the Port of Shanghai.

The green methanol supplied was produced from municipal solid waste, ISCC-EU certified, and had a carbon intensity value below 25 gCO₂e/MJ.

Arctic Tern is the first of fourteen Shaper Class vessels ordered by Wallenius Wilhelmsen. With a capacity of 9,300 car equivalent units and methanol dual-fuel capability, the vessel will be operated by EUKOR Car Carriers, jointly owned by Wallenius Wilhelmsen and Hyundai Motor Group. Following her first green methanol bunkering, Arctic Tern will continue her maiden voyage from Asia to Europe.

Xavier Leroi, COO Shipping Services at Wallenius Wilhelmsen and CEO of EUKOR Car Carriers, said: “Completing Arctic Tern’s first green methanol bunkering shortly after delivery is a significant milestone towards our decarbonisation ambition for both EUKOR Car Carriers and Wallenius Wilhelmsen. It demonstrates how investments in next-generation vessel technology and fuel flexibility are being translated into real-world operations. 

“This achievement reflects the strong collaboration between all parties involved. Together, we have shown how partnerships across the maritime value chain can help make lower-emission fuels available and operationally viable at scale.”

Mark Tamsitt, SVP Global Marine Sales at World Fuel, said, “The first bunkering event with a new fuel is a significant moment for any shipowner, and our role is to make it as seamless as possible. By connecting EUKOR Car Carriers with SIPG Energy’s proven green methanol capability at the Port of Shanghai, we were able to deliver on reliable supply, fuel quality, and safe processes. As more of our customers bring methanol dual-fuel tonnage into service, we are committed to being the partner that makes these kinds of operations routine.”

Mr. Zhang Da, General Manager of SIPG Energy, said, “Welcoming Arctic Tern to the Port of Shanghai for her first green methanol bunkering demonstrates the strength and maturity of our supply capability. Building on our well-established methanol ship-to-ship bunkering services for container vessels, we have already extended such services to pure car and truck carriers (PCTCs). This bunkering sets a new record for the largest single SIMOPs green methanol bunkering for PCTCs in China, marking another step in building Shanghai’s position as a global green energy hub for international shipping.”

This operation follows Wallenius Wilhelmsen’s announcement on 9 July that Arctic Tern would complete her first methanol bunkering shortly after delivery. The vessel entered service on routes between Asia and Europe immediately following handover from China Merchants Jinling Shipyard in Nanjing.

 

Photo credit: World Fuel
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Ammonia

HPA and MB Energy develop safety concept for STS ammonia bunkering

HPA says the Port of Hamburg will become “bunker ready” for ammonia, laying the groundwork for safe and reliable ammonia bunkering in the future.

Admin

Published

on

By

HPA and MB Energy develop safety concept for STS ammonia bunkering

The Hamburg Port Authority (HPA) and integrated energy company MB Energy on Tuesday (21 July) said they have completed a comprehensive risk analysis and developed a dedicated safety concept for ship-to-ship ammonia bunkering.

MB Energy said the analysis lays the groundwork for the safe introduction of ammonia as a future marine fuel.

“With our planned ammonia import terminal in Hamburg-Blumensand, MB Energy intends to provide the reliable land side supply infrastructure needed to support this transition across northern German ports,” it said in a social media post. 

Mabanaft Group was renamed to MB Energy last year and merged over 50 existing brands under one identity. 

Separately, HPA said the Port of Hamburg will become “bunker ready” for ammonia, laying the groundwork for safe and reliable ammonia bunkering in the future.

“The focus is in particular on container ships, cruise ships as well as RoRo and ConRo (Container/RoRo) ships,” it said. 

“We expect ammonia to establish itself as an alternative marine marine fuel in the coming years. With our preparatory work, we are already creating the conditions to welcome the first ammonia-powered ships in Hamburg and to bunker them safely.:

HPA added that the import terminal for ammonia planned by MB Energy from 2029 will make a decisive contribution to ensuring the reliable availability of ammonia as a bunker fuel in northern German ports in the long term. 

“The use of an ammonia bunker barge is considered a possible addition to the landside infrastructure to enable ship bunkering in the port and beyond in the future,” it said.

Related: Mabanaft Group renames as MB Energy, merging over 50 brands under one identity

 

Photo credit: Hamburg Port Authority
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel

Alkagesta highlights key insights of Malta bunkering market in 2026

Darren Lee Axisa discusses the key trends influencing Malta’s bunkering market and the factors that will determine Malta’s long-term competitiveness as a regional bunkering hub.

Admin

Published

on

By

Alkagesta highlights key insights of Malta bunkering market in 2026

In an article published on Alkagesta Market Insights, Darren Lee Axisa, Malta Country Manager of Alkagesta, on Monday (20 July) discussed the key trends influencing Malta’s bunkering market and the factors that will determine Malta’s long-term competitiveness as a regional bunkering hub: 

Malta’s bunkering and energy market is moving through a period of structural adjustment. The disruptions that defined the first half of 2026 have accelerated shifts in product demand, terminal strategy, and the competitive dynamics of one of the Mediterranean’s most strategically positioned bunkering hubs. For Alkagesta, whose storage footprint on the island approaches 300,000 cubic metres, the period has tested operational flexibility while reinforcing the value of diversified infrastructure access.

A Market Shifting in Two Directions

Malta’s broader economy has remained resilient — GDP growth reached 3.9% in Q1 2026 — but the bunkering market has undergone a significant product mix shift, the roots of which predate the current geopolitical disruption.

The Mediterranean Emission Control Area, which came into force on 1 May 2025, triggered an immediate and measurable realignment in fuel demand across the region. VPS data covering the first six months post-ECA implementation shows that across the top ten Mediterranean bunkering ports, VLSFO volumes fell 23%, MGO more than doubled, ULSFO quadrupled, and biofuels increased fivefold. In Valletta specifically, the shift was even more pronounced: VLSFO dropped 57% from 111,641 mt to 47,732 mt, while MGO volumes more than tripled from 33,299 mt to 103,445 mt, and ULSFO rose from 2,821 mt to 34,535 mt over the same period.

This structural rotation has been further accelerated by the broader regulatory environment. FuelEU Maritime and EU ETS requirements are pushing shipowners toward cleaner, verifiable fuel options at every port call — a direction Alkagesta had already positioned itself ahead of, having been among the first movers in the Mediterranean to support the transition to 0.1% sulphur fuel oil following the ECA’s introduction.

Layered on top of this regulatory shift has been a period of reduced terminal capacity affecting bunkering market availability across the island. Fuel oil volumes dropped roughly 35% year-on-year between January and May 2026, falling from approximately 382,000 mt in 2025 to 247,000 mt. DMA demand moved sharply in the opposite direction, rising from around 150,000 mt in January to April 2025 to 247,000 mt over the same period in 2026 — a trend consistent with both the ECA-driven product mix shift and the disruption to heavier fuel availability during the constrained period.

Note: The full article can be read here

 

Photo credit: Alkagesta
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending