UPDATE: A spokesperson from Kairos Oil Trading has clarified with Manifold Times the company does not have any accounts receivables with IPP.
Singapore bunker supplier Inter-Pacific Petroleum Pte Ltd (IPP) and its parent company Inter-Pacific Group Pte Ltd (IPG) on Friday (16 August) filed an application for interim judicial management at the High Court of the Republic of Singapore.
An affidavit filed by Zoe Cheung, the current director of IPP and IPG, on Tuesday (20 August) provided more details of developments leading up to the company’s decision to come under interim judicial management.
It noted that IPG originally had two shareholders, namely Zoe Cheung (85%) and Dr Goh Jin Hian (15%); Dr Goh was a director of IPG and IPP until 20 August 2019 when his resignation took effect. An individual of Pek Chong Beng is the current nominee local director in IPG and IPP, in place of Dr Goh.
The document alleged that IPP posted total accounts receivables of USD 21.07 million from 21 trading counterparties to date; notably, the majority at USD 14.73 million, or 69.9%, of the total figure was from Minerva Bunkering Pte Ltd.
Inter-company receivables of USD 248.36 million from five related firms of Chuang Xin (China) Group Limited, Inter-Pacific Group Pte Ltd, Inter-Pacific Petroleum Trading Pte Ltd, Pacific Energy 8 Pte Ltd and Pacific Ship Management Pte Ltd were declared.
Chuang Xin (China) Group Limited, currently insolvent, undertook USD 237.36 million, or 95%, of the total inter-company receivables.
Significant and verifiable liabilities totalling USD 181.63 million consisted of trade financing from SocGen with an outstanding amount of USD 96.3 million, MayBank banking facilities of USD 69.8 million, and account payables of USD 2.43 million to 10 players; the highest outstanding amount stands at around USD 1.16 million, or 48%, which is owed to Kairos Oil Trading Pte Ltd.
The purported affidavit highlighted IPP, “has been struggling to put its books and accounts into good order. However, as the business was still able to maintain its cashflow to meet its mature liabilities, the company was able to continue its trading flow.”
“However, on 14 June 2019, the Maritime Port Authority (MPA) issued a Port Marine Circular No. 14 of 2019 stating that arising (sic) from an enforcement check on a bunker tanker operated by IPP, the MPA had temporarily suspended IPP’s bunker craft operator license with effect from 27 June 2019 until further notice.
“The reason for the suspension is related to an incident involving an outsourced employee, and IPP is presently investigating the incident and cooperating with MPA in this regard to provide further information as relevant. However, the immediate effect of the suspension was to prevent IPP from operating as a bunker craft operator in Singapore.
“As a result of the suspension of the license, IPP’s business and operations were severely impacted.”
IPP noted the development caused the firm to incur “very significant expense and effort”, together with disruption to its business, as it had to arrange for other operators to take on contracts due to the license suspension.
The suspension also “significantly impacted counterparties’ confidence” in IPP as players which previously offered credit started asking for cash terms, “such that there is insufficient cash to sustain operations.”
Moving forward, the directors of IPG and IPP said they have received a letter from a confidential investor which is a publicly-listed company in Hong Kong who may, amongst other options, take on short term six-month charters of IPG’s vessels to allow for cash generation while providing other solutions pending the outcome of IPP’s licensing issues at Singapore.
Related: Inter-Pacific Group, Inter-Pacific Petroleum under judicial management
Related: Magnets on MFMs: “Consort Justice” crew pleads ‘not guilty’ to tampering charge
Related: IPP responds to temporary suspension of bunker craft operator licence
Related: MPA temporarily suspends IPP bunker craft operator licence
Related: Singapore: Bunker Cargo officer, crew face charges over alleged MFM tampering
Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 27 August, 2019
The unnamed 3,850 dwt and 520 dwt tankers were discovered floating suspiciously close together on Friday, 8.9 nautical miles off Tanjung Penawar, Kota Tinggi.
OCBC has lost all confidence in the companies’ management and is looking to recover payments for some loans including a “Jumbo Loan” of about USD 282 million.
Winding up order earlier initiated on 29 March will be held at Singapore court on Friday (26 April) morning.
Creditors have a deadline of until 9 June 2020 to prove debt or claim to Ernst & Young interim judicial managers of the Singapore energy transportation firm.
Deloitte & Touche JMs believe IPP has a viable claim against Dr Goh Jin Hian for breaches of his director’s duties to act with skill, care and diligence which he owned to IPP, states court document.
Meadway Shipping and Trading Singapore sues Integrity Bulk ApS over fuel lifted in July.
Additional topics of bunker contamination and OCM services discussed at VPS’ Fuel Management Challenges – The Year of 2021 & Beyond webinar on 23 September; Manifold Times summarises the session.
‘The JMs have failed to discharge their duties by blindly helping the Banks mount a false case against the Defendant,’ wrote defence lawyers representing former IPP Director Dr Goh Jian Hian in court statement.
Lead prosecutor Andreas Myllerup Laursen aims for a fine and a prison sentence in the so-called Syria case scheduled to commence in Odense, Denmark on 26 October, writes the Danish publication.
In a modern re-telling of the story of David versus Goliath, local bunker barge owners/charterers successfully resisted claims brought in the Singapore courts by Phillips 66 for misdelivery of bunkers.
Bunker barge owners and operators; traders and suppliers; banks, including players in other countries, will have to re-examine respective operations, advises Helmsman Associate Director Jonathan Tan.
Vopak BL was a non-essential document with no contractual force and had no effect as a contract of carriage or as a document of title, states written Judgement issued by Singapore Court of Appeal.
