Connect with us

Business

WFW: Suspension and amendments to US and China port fees – current status

WFW New York Partner Daniel Pilarski, reviewed the United States and China’s decision to each suspend their port fees on Chinese- and US- linked vessels.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED Chris Pagan

International law firm Watson Farley & Williams (WFW) on Friday (21 November) published an article by WFW New York Partner Daniel Pilarski, reviewing the United States and China’s decision to each suspend their port fees on Chinese- and US- linked vessels: 

Following the trade summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, the United States and China have each suspended their port fees on Chinese- and US-linked vessels, respectively, for a one-year period beginning November 10, 2025. The port fees took effect on October 14, 2025. See our earlier summaries of the United States and Chinese port fee regimes.

USTR Port Fees – Timeline and Amendments

The USTR port fees were initially enacted pursuant to an April 17, 2025 notice (the “April Notice”).

In a June 6, 2025 notice (the “June Notice”), the USTR proposed changes to Annex III (fees on non-US car carriers) and Annex IV (restrictions on US LNG exported on non-US vessels). Among the proposed changes were:

  • the Annex III fees on non-US built car carriers were proposed to be changed from $150 per Car Equivalent Unit to $14 per net ton; and
  • the Annex IV restriction on LNG exports for failure to comply with the requirement that a certain percentage of US LNG be exported on a US-built vessel was proposed to be eliminated.

In an October 10, 2025 notice (the “October Notice”), the USTR made further changes to the port fees and restrictions. Among the changes implemented were:

  • the Annex III fees on non-US built car carriers were changed from $150 per Car Equivalent Unit to $46 per net ton (far greater than the $14 per net ton that was proposed in the June Notice);
  • the Annex IV restriction on LNG exports for failure to comply with the requirement that a certain percentage of US LNG be exported on a US-built vessel was eliminated, as per the June Notice.

The October Notice also proposed additional amendments to the port fees. These changes remain under review and have not yet been finalized. Among the proposed amendments are:

  • an LPG tanker that was “ordered before April 17, 2025, and is in service and entered into a long-term time charter agreement (that is, of 20 years or more) prior to December 31, 2027,” would be considered owned and operated by the time charterer for purposes of Annex I. As a result, an LPG tanker with a Chinese registered owner and/or disponent owner under a bareboat charter would not be subject to the fees on Chinese owned or operated vessels, as long as the long-term time charterer from the disponent owner is not a Chinese or Chinese-owned entity; and
  • the Annex III fees on non-US built car carriers would not apply to US-flagged vessels of up to 10,000 deadweight tons. This exception will expire on April 18, 2029 unless renewed.

To alleviate uncertainty regarding the proposed amendments, the October Notice permitted port fees on vessels that would be subject to the proposed amendments (i.e. LPG tankers and car carriers falling within the scope of the amendments) to defer payment until December 10, 2025. It is unclear whether the payment would still be owed if the proposed amendments are not adopted.

USTR Port Fees – Clarifications and Questions

The subsequent USTR notices and guidance have attempted to clarify some of the open questions regarding the port fees. However, several questions remain.

  1. For purposes of Annex I port fees on vessels owned by a Chinese entity in the case of a Chinese lease financing, is the ‘owner’ the registered owner/lessor or the disponent owner/lessee?

While the USTR notices have provided no further guidance as to the identity of the ‘owner’, guidance released by the US Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) port operators for the ports of New Orleans and Houston state that “[t]he vessel owner(s) will be determined by the vessel’s Registry (REG).” While this guidance applies only to the ports of New Orleans and Houston and not other ports, the guidance suggests that in the case of a sale-leaseback financing with a Chinese lessor, the port fees would be imposed, notwithstanding that the beneficial owner of the vessel may have no Chinese nexus. The guidance further suggests that in the reverse case, where the registered owner is not a Chinese entity but the beneficial owner is a Chinese company, the port fees on Chinese owners would not apply (although the fees may still be owed if the Chinese company is the ‘operator’). 

  1. For purposes of Annex II port fees on Chinese-built vessels, does the small vessel exception apply to tankers?

The April Notice exempted small vessels from the port fees on Chinese-built ships. For this purpose, a small vessel was defined as a “vessel with a capacity of equal to or less than: 4,000 Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units, 55,000 deadweight tons, or an individual bulk capacity of 80,000 deadweight tons.” This led to some uncertainty, since the meaning of “individual bulk capacity” is unclear. The reference to ‘bulk’ may have suggested dry bulk vessels, although tankers carry liquid cargo in ‘bulk’.

“Unless the suspension is lifted or modified, no such port fees will be owed during this period.”

The October Notice ‘clarified’ that the small vessel exception for vessels with individual bulk capacity of 80,000 deadweight tons may apply to both liquid bulk and dry bulk vessels. The notice listed several examples of both dry bulk vessels and vessels that can carry both dry bulk and liquid bulk cargo, but no pure tankers. The notice also did not clarify the meaning of ‘individual bulk capacity’. The reference to liquid cargo seems to suggest that the 80,000 deadweight ton limit applies to tankers as well, although the lack of examples and omission of the term ‘tanker’, as well as the lack of a definition of ‘individual bulk capacity’, may continue to result in uncertainty.

Summary of the Suspensions

Both the USTR port fees and the Chinese port fees are suspended pursuant to USTR and Chinese Ministry of Transport notices, with the suspension scheduled to last from November 10, 2025 through November 9, 2026. Accordingly, unless the suspension is lifted or modified, no such port fees will be owed during this period. The suspension of US port fees applies to fees on non-US car carriers under Annex III, notwithstanding that Annex III fees apply to all non-US car carriers equally, regardless of whether they have a Chinese nexus. Barring further extension or amendment, both sets of port fees will once again be owed for US and Chinese port calls beginning November 10, 2026. There is no provision for refund of fees incurred for port calls between October 14 and November 9, 2025.

Related: Law firm WFW on USTR 301 and retaliatory measures in China

 

Photo credit: Chris Pagan on Unsplash
Published: 24 November, 2025

Continue Reading

Biofuel

BHP and GCMD trial multi-feedstock B100 bio bunker fuel on bulk carrier

Bio-blend in the BHP and GCMD pilot is being used on a BHP-chartered bulk carrier “Berge Lyngor”, which was bunkered in Singapore in early May.

Admin

Published

on

By

BHP and GCMD trial multi-feedstock B100 bio bunker fuel on bulk carrier

BHP and the Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) on Wednesday (3 June) said they have blended biofuels from two distinct feedstocks—used cooking oil and waste animal fats —and introduced the lower-emissions marine fuel into a BHP-chartered bulk carrier as part of a pilot project.

The bio-blend in the BHP and GCMD pilot is being used on a BHP-chartered bulk carrier Berge Lyngor, owned and operated by Berge Bulk, transporting BHP iron ore from Western Australia to China. When run on bio-blend, the vessel has the potential to reduce well-to-wake greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 79 per cent per voyage compared to sailing on very low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO).

The vessel bunkered in Singapore in early May with a B100 bio-blend comprising 50 percent tallow-derived biodiesel, sourced and supplied by HAMR Energy, and 50 per cent used cooking oil (UCOME) supplied by Mitsui & Co Energy Trading Singapore (METS).

Mitsui also blended the fuel and Dan-Bunkering coordinated and executed the bunkering operation, which was performed by Global Energy’s barge MT Maple.

The BHP and GCMD pilot will assess how biofuels from multiple feedstocks can be blended, handled, and introduced under real-world operating conditions using existing used cooking oil bunkering infrastructure.

At the same time, insights from this pilot will help identify solutions to challenges related to fuel quality, handling, traceability, and onboard vessel performance.

Biofuels for global shipping today rely heavily on used cooking oil – a feedstock whose availability is approaching its projected limits. Biofuel from waste animal fats presents a promising option to expand the supply of lower-emissions marine fuels.

The outcomes of the pilot are expected to shed light on the practical steps to integrate biofuel blends from different feedstocks into existing supply chains. The diversity of biofuels will provide shipowners and operators with greater flexibility to optimise fuel procurement based on cost, availability, and lifecycle emissions performance.

Biofuels derived from different feedstocks can exhibit varying properties that may impact operations, including potential corrosion from oxidation, fuel system clogging caused by wax formation, which this pilot aims to assess.

The pilot will trace and verify the biofuel blend’s integrity aimed at bolstering confidence in emissions reductions reporting. The pilot will also provide insights into how robust tracing can support future marine fuel supply chains where biofuels from multiple feedstocks with varying lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions footprints are blended together.

This project is co-funded by the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore under the Maritime Innovation and Technology Fund (MINT).

 

Photo credit: Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation
Published: 3 June, 2026

Continue Reading

Biofuel

NYK starts one-year B100 bio bunker fuel trial on car carrier

In this trial, NYK will operate a car carrier continuously on B100 for one year to evaluate the impact on engines, fuel supply systems, and operational practices.

Admin

Published

on

By

NYK starts one-year B100 bio bunker fuel trial on car carrier

Japanese shipping firm NYK on Tuesday (2 June) said it has commenced a one-year long-term trial involving the continuous use of 100% biofuel (B100) on an NYK-operated car carrier. 

In this trial, NYK will operate a car carrier continuously on B100 for one year to evaluate the impact on engines, fuel supply systems, and operational practices. High-purity biofuels such as B100 are known to be susceptible to degradation from oxygen, light, and heat, raising concerns about the stability of such fuels during long-term use.

In this trial, the biofuel primarily comprises FAME (Fatty Acid Methyl Ester) derived from used cooking oil and similar feedstocks.

The initiative is designed to evaluate the fuel’s effects on the vessel’s equipment and verify operational safety under real-world conditions. 

Through this effort, NYK seeks to accumulate technical expertise that will support the broader use of high-purity biofuels and further accelerate efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

NYK has been advancing the use of biofuels through various initiatives. In 2024, the company conducted a trial using biofuel blend B24 and subsequently expanded practical usage to B30. However, the company said there remains limited global experience with the long-term continuous use of B100.

“By collecting long-term operational data through this trial, NYK aims to accumulate valuable technical insights to support both the safe operation of vessels and the wider adoption of high-purity biofuels,” it said. 

 

Photo credit: NYK
Published: 3 June, 2026

Continue Reading

Ammonia

AM Green plans to build green ammonia plant at Indian port

Initiative also includes development of green ammonia handling, storage and bunkering infrastructure, pilot bunkering operations, safety procedures and training programmes, says VOC Port Authority.

Admin

Published

on

By

india flag

VO Chidambaranar (VOC) Port Authority on Friday (29 May) said it has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with India’s ammonia producer AM Green Ammonia to collaborate in the development of a green ammonia production plant.

The plant will have a capacity of one million tonnes per annum (MTPA) at Tuticorin.

The initiative also includes development of green ammonia handling, storage and bunkering infrastructure, pilot bunkering operations, safety procedures and training programmes. 

The project is expected to support the development of green fuel corridors connecting VOC Port with major ports in Europe and Asia, thereby strengthening India’s position in the global green fuels value chain.

VOC Port also signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Bureau Veritas (India) Pvt. Ltd., to collaborate on Green Port certification, emissions accounting, ESG reporting, safety validation, development of green bunkering practices, and establishment of a Centre of Excellence for green fuels and sustainability.

The port also plans for an upcoming 750 m³ green methanol bunkering facility.

 

Photo credit: Naveed Ahmed on Unsplash
Published: 3 June, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending