Vitol Marine Fuels Pte Ltd, a subsidiary of the Vitol Group, has acquired 100% of Singapore-based bunkering firm Sinanju Tankers Holdings Pte Ltd (Sinanju), it said on Wednesday (1 April).
The Singapore Bunkering license holding entity, namely Sinanju Marine Services Pte Ltd, has been renamed Vitol Bunkers (S) Pte Ltd and from 1 April 2020 all bunker deliveries will be carried out by Vitol Bunkers (S) Pte Ltd.
The transaction also comprises of Sinanju’s fleet of 15 modern Singapore-flagged bunker tankers, including Singapore’s first and currently only liquefied natural gas (LNG) powered dual fuel bunker tanker Marine Vicky.
“With the acquired entity’s valuable expertise in bunker tanker operations and Vitol’s existing strength on the bunker oil supply side, Vitol Bunkers will be in a strong position to provide a high quality, seamless ‘end to end’ delivered bunker supply service in Singapore and internationally,” said Dato’ Kho Hui Meng, President and CEO of Vitol Asia.
Vitol Bunkers and its related companies will continue to operate as before, but under the Vitol brand.
Sinanju was the 14th largest bunker supplier by volume at Singapore port in 2019.
Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 1 April, 2020
Sukumar Verma, Managing Director at Informa Connect Singapore, explains how the world’s largest bunkering event will be virtually carried out between 6 to 8 October 2020.
David John Kidd amassed losses of over SGD 1 million to Lukoil Asia Pacific Pte Ltd through multiple irregular trades with Transocean Oil over a four-month period in 2016.
Helmsman LLC lawyers discuss pausing of LC payment, what it means for parties buying ships from companies of a group affected by fraud allegations, and trafficking in spent bills of lading.
Beluga Asia has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with Sun Marine Corporation to acquire bunker tanker M.T. MA Veronica for USD 2.45 million.
Listing of Brightoil’s shares on the Stock Exchange was cancelled on 16 March 2020, according to a written Judgement of Russell Coleman, a Judge of the Court of First Instance.
‘To this end, the Bank has shown there are grounds for suspecting the CIA Contract may be a sham / fake contract and/or was not performed,’ said CMB’s submission to the Singapore court.