The Royal Belgian Shipowners’ Association (RBSA) on Wednesday (24 November) released a statement reiterating the significance of IMO’s MEPC 77 in delivering a concrete proposal for action to decarbonise shipping:
Shipping is an international sector. To decarbonise shipping, we require an unprecedented level of cooperation at the international level. The best place to achieve that is at the IMO.
The viewpoint was recently shared by the Belgian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for the North Sea, Vincent Van Quickborne, at a webinar on alternative fuels in support of Belgian candidacy to IMO Council:
“World trade needs international regulations to make sure the necessary fuels are available. A lot of preconditions will need to be fulfilled outside of the shipping sector. The time to act is now. Together we can shape the future of shipping.”
Climate Change is a Global Challenge and Shipping is a Global Sector
Belgian shipowners are fully supportive of the strengthening of the IMO’s Initial GHG strategy adopted in 2018, which is at the heart of the discussion at this week’s MEPC.
“Climate change is a global challenge that will impact our industry heavily in the coming years. As a small player, we are ready to accept the challenge and fulfil our role to meet decarbonisation goals,” said Vincent Durot, Managing Director, Boeckmans.
The Challenges are both Downstream and Upstream
Belgian shipowners have for the past few years been heavily involved in the investment and research in new technologies that would one day help the sector fully decarbonise.
The RBSA is part of the EU-funded STEERER (Structuring Towards Zero Emission Waterborne Transport) project and the Waterborne Technology Platform, and a founding member of the Maritime Industry Decarbonisation Council (MIDC) think-tank.
On behalf of all its members, the RBSA has signed the Call to Action for Shipping Decarbonization launched at COP26 calling on governments and the global shipping industry leaders to commit to decarbonising the sector by 2050.
“We need global regulations to be fit for purpose in order for them to work. The reason why it is so difficult to decarbonise a global sector like shipping is because the problem lies both downstream and upstream,” comments Wilfried Lemmens, Managing Director, RBSA.
“New technologies are being developed rapidly, but they need to be scaled up. Much of the issues lay outside shipping itself, such as the transparency of fuel supply chains and the building of new infrastructures to supply the new fuels. As our recent analysis of the proposed FuelEU Maritime Regulation has shown, regulations need to target the right people in order to incentivise change.”
Alternative Fuels and power systems are the Holy Grail
On the other hand, fit-for-purpose international regulations help to ensure a global level-playing field. On the other hand, technologies such as alternative fuels and power systems need to be incentivised and scaled up. Some Belgian shipowners are already preparing themselves with transitional technologies:
“As a leading player in the gas shipping industry, EXMAR is well-positioned with innovative vessels reducing CO2 emissions. We will use our expertise in dual fuel vessels to continue to develop this technology into ammonia-as-a-fuel and CO2-fuelled shipping. We are happy to play an important role in our industry’s global decarbonisation efforts,” said Jens Ismar, Executive Director Shipping, Exmar.
The reliance of dual fuel as the transitional phase into the use of alternative fuel is likewise echoed by Alexander Saverys, CEO, CMB:
“For the next ten years, we do believe that dual fuel is the only possibility for clean shipping. The alternative of fuel cells has not reached market maturity and they are still too costly to be economical.
“Furthermore, we believe that dual fuel technology can also solve the ‘chicken and egg’ problem. Now you can’t bunker the clean fuel due to a lack of consumers. Dual fuel will help to create the infrastructure and will minimise the investments onboard the ship as we can limit the storage of the clean fuel to what we typically use.
“We don’t have to store the redundant fuel in case we have to deviate, or meet strong adverse currents or extreme bad weather, as we can always fall back on the proven diesel supply. Storage of the clean fuel is the most expensive added costs for a clean ship.”
Indeed, as RBSA’s Hélène Smidt, Specialist in Maritime Innovation and Finance explained: “To make this fuel switch work, there are five critical pillars: Fuel availability, Fuel quality, Life cycle assessment, Safety, Price tag.”
Concrete Actions Now
Following the Shaping the Future of Shipping conference organised on 6 November during the COP26 in Glasgow, Hugo De Stoop, CEO of Euronav made very concrete proposals for actions which can already be taken:
“Shipping can fully decarbonise by 2050 if we have a set of rules that are clear and stable for the long term:
This urgency is best summed up by Gudrun Janssens, Head of environmental & technical affairs at the RBSA: “We do not need another MEPC to agree on agreeing to work together. We need this MEPC to agree on a course of concrete actions and set it in motion.”
Related: MEPC 77: Governments to decide on ICS USD 5 billion R&D fund to accelerate decarbonisation goals
Related: MEPC 77: IMO must rapidly cut emissions of black carbon from shipping, says Clean Arctic Alliance
Related: IMO schedules remote session of Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 77)
Photo credit: Royal Belgian Shipowners’ Association
Published: 25 November, 2021
DMA 0.001%S [Ultra Low Sulphur Marine Diesel] and DMB 0.01%S [Low Sulphur Marine Diesel] available at Port of Tauranga, New Zealand.
Bunkering and development of coastal infrastructure for cruise sector under study by shipping firms.
Mitsubishi Shipbuilding, “K” Line, and ClassNK installs small scale CO2 capture system onboard the Corona Utility for testing during actual navigation.
‘Although those services are being provided right now, we need to develop them,’ says spokesman.
A range of specialists deliver expertise in alternative bunker fuels at Houston while Copenhagen is a center of excellence in vessel innovations and fuel technologies.
Customers will be able to start using this information to generate actionable insights on speed and bunker planning immediately.
Cash of SGD 4.43 million and USD 243,100, and one piece of 100-gram gold-coloured bar recovered in safe belonging to Abdul Latif Bin Ibrahim kept at Extra Space warehouse storage facility, show court documents.
Program introduces periodic assessments, mass flow metering data analysis, and regular training for relevant key personnel to better handle the MFMS to ensure a high level of continuous operational competency.
U.S. Claims Register Summary recorded a total USD 833 million claim from a total 180 creditors against O.W. Bunker USA, according to the creditor list seen by Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times.
Glencore purchased fuel through Straits Pinnacle which contracted supply from Unicious Energy. Contaminated HSFO was loaded at Khor Fakkan port and shipped to a FSU in Tanjong Pelepas, Malaysia to be further blended.
Individuals were employees of surveying companies engaged by Shell to inspect the volume of oil loaded onto the vessels which Shell supplied oil to; they allegedly accepted bribes totalling at least USD 213,000.
MPA preliminary investigations revealed that the affected marine fuel was supplied by Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd who later sold part of the same cargo to PetroChina International (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
