Connect with us

Business

Rotterdam keen to improve its bunkering sector, is hot on the heels of Singapore’s MFM mandatory adoption

Rotterdam’s intention to mandate the usage of MFMs goes down well with licensed bunker supplier VT Group; MFM providers supportive of move but stressed continuous monitoring is needed for optimum performance.

Admin

Published

on

Rotterdam aerial view

All eyes are on the Port of Rotterdam Authority after news in late October broke of it planning to mandate the use of mass flow meters (MFMs) at Rotterdam port, planning to become the second global maritime facility to do so after Singapore. 

The use of MFM technology for bunkering has been a topic of interest in the maritime industry. The International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA), with support from BIMCO, launched an extensive online survey in February 2022 to enquire on the wider adoption of bunker licensing schemes, MFM and transparency to improve market conditions.

Looking at the case of Singapore, marine industry stakeholders seemed to agree the introduction of a Bunker Licensing Program (74.5%) and mandatory use of MFMs (76%) have had a positive impact on the republic’s bunkering sector.

So it came with no surprise when IBIA released a statement a day later welcoming news of Rotterdam port mandating the use of MFMs for bunker deliveries.

When contacted, Rotterdam port Press Officer Tie Schellekens told Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times: “The Port of Rotterdam Authority intends to make the use of mass flow meters mandatory in Rotterdam on behalf of bunkering fuel for the maritime industry.”

“The Port of Rotterdam Authority has indeed conducted research into quantity issues in the Rotterdam bunker port.”

He said a MFM bunker system measures the exact amount of bunker oil that is supplied as fuel to seagoing vessels.

“In this way, the Port Authority wants to make the market more transparent, efficient and reliable,” Schellekens added while elaborating the Port Authority believes in the process that has been initiated for this purpose. 

“However, it still requires a lot of preparation, but is well aware that such a measure has a major impact on the bunker market. That is why preparation time is still needed before the harbour master actually makes the commitment. The Port Authority expects to be able to communicate more about the intention by the end of the year.”

According to the Port of Rotterdam Authority, there are 32 barge operators active in the Dutch marine refuelling market to date; out of 170 bunkering vessels, approximately 30 of them are equipped with a MFM bunkering system.

VT Group Vorstenbosch MFM

 ‘First mover’ advantage for Rotterdam licensed bunker supplier VT Group

The plan bodes well for licensed bunker suppliers at Rotterdam port including VT Group (Verenigde Tankrederij BV) who comes across as huge advocates for the system. 

Interestingly, Claudia Beumer, Global Account Manager for VT Group, said the company was the “first worldwide, who installed and certified a MFM system on barge Vlaardingen back in 2010 in Rotterdam”.

“Ever since then, we have been advocating the use of MFM for bunkering. Not only with our customers, but definitely also with the Port of Rotterdam. The use of MFM is not only offering a transparent and direct method of measuring the amount of fuel bunkered, but with the correct use of the Certified System, it also offers a huge efficiency improvement of the bunkering process,” she told Manifold Times.

Beumer believes MFMs will create a level playing field for Rotterdam market players. 

“It is however essential to take this initiative wider and include the full ARA region. Using MFM will have a price increase of bunker services as a result, so to ensure this level playing field, it needs to be embedded in Antwerp and Amsterdam as well.”

With carbon taxes and emission trading schemes (ETS) approaching, Beumer said it becomes even more important for fuel users to have reliable data and the use of MFMs contribute to that.

As for challenges, she foresaw possible issues with lead times when all 170 barges in the Dutch market decide to install MFMs at the same time. 

“And we should not forget that there is a cost involved. Independent barge operators offer maritime transport, not fuel. So the cost of the MFM and the installation needs to be carried by the barge operator, the fuel user and the fuel supplier together. And for the barge operators that have no experience with the MFM, there needs to be a thorough training program of the crew so they understand the different way of working,” she explains. 

“With all the challenges the maritime industry already has, like decarbonisation and the use of alternative fuels, we should eliminate all uncertainties in measurements and deliveries. MFM’s offer a reliable, time efficient measurement method that works for all new fuels and traditional marine fuels.  

“And last but not least, MFM’s have been around for more than 12 years in the maritime industry already. Let’s learn from the early adapters and the experiences gained in Singapore over time and ensure we make our industry not only future proof but also relevant.”

After Singapore first made MFMs mandatory in 2017, Manifold Times conducted a survey with various industry and company sources estimating the annual bunker sales volume for the republic’s top 10 Singapore bunker suppliers in 2018. 

Based on the survey, Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) accredited marine fuel suppliers believed the introduction of MFM technology for bunkering has given them, and Singapore port, a competitive edge over other ports in the region.

With that, MFM providers have hailed the initiative by Port of Rotterdam saying it was a step in the right direction.

Metcore MFM

Metcore International: ‘Very positive’ step in the right direction

Singapore-based mass flow metering system measurement solutions provider Metcore International Pte Ltd (Metcore), amongst key players in the introduction of MFM bunkering practices at the Singapore market, was supportive of the development.

“Singapore’s maritime sector has invested tremendous effort to create the reputation of transparency and trust in the use of MFMs for bunkering that it now enjoys,” states Darrick Pang, Managing Director of Metcore.

“Hence, the decision by Port of Rotterdam Authority to mandate the use of MFMs for bunkering to build a level playing field for its local marine fuels sector is a very positive direction.”

However, Mr Pang stressed MFMs are not simply a “plug ‘n’ play” solution where measurement equipment can simply be forgotten after installation onto bunkering vessels.

“From our experience in the Singapore market as well as other international ports, the main factors about MFMs’ successful use for marine refuelling comprises of the entire ecosystem’s integrity as well as continuous monitoring and competency of key personnel in order to ensure the consistency of performance,” he elaborates. 

“In addition to the correct application of pipeline sealing, bunkering standards and the competency of crew, having an effective and comprehensive framework for continuous monitoring is also of paramount importance.”

Singapore’s success story on MFMs for bunkering was only made possible by an industry-wide initiative backed by regulatory enforcement – an area where the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore shines – to ensure measurement consistency, believes Mr Pang.

However, the onus of securing a successful implementation of the MFM bunkering mandate should not be placed solely upon port authorities because transparency and trust-building needs to be a collaborative effort supported by all key bunkering stakeholders, he states.

EH MFMs

Endress+Hauser ‘committed’ to support MFM installation transitional period

MFMs, a matured technology which have been used with much positive feedback for bunkering operations at Singapore port, can only enhance similar marine refuelling activities at Rotterdam port, confirms Mohamed Abdenbi, Business Process Consultant – Bunkering & Fuel Supply Chain, and Costas Arvanitis, Global Solutions Manager at MFM manufacturer Endress+Hauser.

In addition to providing a higher level of trust for buyers and a faster turnaround times, MFM technology enables bunkering operations to be fully transparent with detailed logs and safe data storage of activities, says Mohamed and Costas.

The development increases transparency which will increase the attractiveness of Rotterdam for buyers of marine fuels. Furthermore, the time to bunker can be reduced, enabling bunker service providers to utilise their fleet to a greater degree of efficiency. 

“To sum up, the benefit of MFM bunkering systems will increase the attractiveness of the Rotterdam bunkering sector due to increased transparency, trust, and bunkering time, leading to increased demand, less disputes, and greater fleet utilisation,” they state.

However, the duo was quick to point out widespread implementation of the technology at Rotterdam port to bring about certain challenges.

“Bunker service providers will need to make sure they are compliant within the timeframe allotted by the Port of Rotterdam. The challenge herein lies with issues related to global supply chains, and the limited amount of wharfs that can refit the barges with MFM bunkering systems,” they said.

“We expect there will be a peak in required activities from all parties, with potential bottlenecks in wharfs as many barges will want to refit within the same timeframe. Bunkering service providers should take care to plan accordingly, and get in touch with wharfs and MFM bunker system providers in a timely manner. 

“Another challenge is redesigning the bunker barges to accommodate the MFM bunkering system, as those can take up a lot of space on board. The Endress+Hauser Promass F coriolis mass flow meter is compact compared to alternatives, which reduces the complexity of redesigning the bunker barges piping system.”

Moving forward, on behalf of Endress+Hauser, both Mohamed and Costas affirm the company’s commitment in assisting Rotterdam barge operators to implement MFM bunkering systems within the transition period “with the highest level of quality”.

“This includes, managing supply chains to ensure timely delivery, MFM system commissioning and testing and support in the certification of the system,” they said.

“The experience E+H has gained over the past decade with the installation of Bunker metering system onboard bunker barges and vessels will be beneficial not only to the bunker operators in Rotterdam that needs to install MFMs but also to the port authority. 

“We are committed to work closely with all the bunkering industry stake holders to make this new development and its implementation a success.”

Related: IBIA welcomes news of Rotterdam’s plans to mandate MFMs
Related: Exclusive: Estimated annual sales volume for Singapore top bunker suppliers

 

Photo credit: Port of Rotterdam Authority/Danny Cornelissen; VT Group; Metcore International; Manifold Times
Published: 25 November, 2022

Continue Reading

Business

Singapore: Sing Fuels appoints Sanket Naik as Managing Director

Sanket joined Sing Fuels in 2016 as a Credit Manager and has ‘immersed himself’ in all departments; will drive company to expand into areas like sustainability and biofuels.

Admin

Published

on

By

Singapore: Sing Fuels appoints Sanket Naik as Managing Director

Singapore-based provider of marine fuel solutions Sing Fuels on Saturday (7 December) said Sanket Naik, was recently promoted to Managing Director of Sing Fuels. 

The firm said Sanket joined Sing Fuels in 2016 as a Credit Manager. 

“He immersed himself across all departments, ranging from investment to business development, gaining a 360-degree understanding of the business and serving as a key driver of growth and success at Sing Fuels,” Sing Fuels said in a social media post. 

“As Managing Director, Sanket is poised to drive Sing Fuels 3.0, expanding into areas like sustainability and biofuels, ensuring we stay at the forefront of industry innovation.”

 

Photo credit: Sing Fuels
Published: 9 December, 2024

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV: Use of ammonia as a bunker fuel among highlights in IMO MSC 109

Amendments to the IGC Code to enable the use of ammonia cargo as fuel were adopted and interim guidelines for the general use of ammonia as fuel were approved during session.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash

Classification society DNV on Saturday (7 December) shared a statutory news article that provides a summary of the 109th session of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 109) including adopted amendments to the IGC Code to enable the use of ammonia cargo as fuel and approved draft interim guidelines for ammonia as a marine fuel.

The following is an excerpt from the news update relating to bunker fuels:

The 109th session of the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 109) was held from 2 to 6 December 2024. Amendments to the IGC Code to enable the use of ammonia cargo as fuel were adopted, and interim guidelines for the general use of ammonia as fuel were approved. The IGF Code was amended to improve the safety of ships using natural gas as fuel. MSC 109 further approved draft SOLAS amendments to enhance the safety of pilot transfer arrangements and progress was made on the new safety code for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships.

Meeting highlights

  • Adopted amendments to the IGC Code to enable the use of ammonia cargo as fuel
  • Adopted amendments to the IGF Code for ships using natural gas as fuel
  • Approved draft interim guidelines for ammonia as fuel
  • Approved draft amendments to SOLAS Regulation V/23 and the related performance standards to improve the safety of pilot transfer arrangements
  • Advanced the non-mandatory Code on Maritime Autono- mous Surface Ships (MASS)

Amendments to mandatory instruments 

Ammonia cargo as fuel (IGC Code) MSC 109 adopted amendments to Paragraph 16.9.2 of the International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (IGC Code) to enable the use of ammonia as fuel on ammonia carriers.

An MSC circular to encourage the voluntary early implementation of the amendments to Chapter 16 was approved. 

The amendments will enter into force on 1 July 2026.

Safety of ships using natural gas as fuel (IGF Code)

MSC 109 adopted amendments to the International Code of Safety for Ships Using Gases or Other Low-flashpoint Fuels (IGF Code), based on experience with the code since its entry into force in 2017.

The amendments include:

  • Clarified application provisions
  • Alignment with the IGC Code on suction wells for fuel tanks extending below the lowermost boundary of the tank
  • Alignment with the IGC Code on discharge from pressure relief valves to discharge to tanks under certain conditions
  • Clarified requirements to fire insulation for deck structures in relation to fuel tanks on open deck
  • Clarified requirements for hazardous ducts through non-hazardous spaces and vice versa
  • Updated requirements for the hazardous zone radius for fuel tank vent mast outlets, increasing to 6 metres for zone 1 and 4 metres for zone 2

The amendments will enter into force on 1 January 2028.

Goal-based new ship construction standards

Goal-based standards (GBS) for the new construction of bulk carriers and oil tankers are, conceptually, the IMO’s rules for class rules. Under the GBS, IMO auditors use guidelines to verify the construction rules for bulk carriers and oil tankers of class societies acting as Recognized Organizations (Resolution MSC.454(100)).

Initial GBS verification of Biro Klasifikasi Indonesia (BKI) BKI has requested GBS verification of their ship construction rules for bulk carries and oil tankers. MSC 109 agreed that the BKI rules comply with the GBS, provided non-conformities and observations are rectified and verified in a new audit.

North Atlantic wave data (IACS Recommendation No. 34, Revision 2) MSC 109 noted that IACS is currently undertaking a review of its Common Structural Rules (CSR) for bulk carriers and oil

tankers to reflect advances in data, materials, technologies and calculation methodologies. The CSR are implemented in the individual class rules of the IACS members, which are subject to compliance with the GBS.

MSC 109 further noted that IACS has now issued a revision of the North Atlantic wave data to ensure more scientific data as a basis for the rule formulas in the CSR. The new scatter diagram in Revision 2 of IACS Recommendation No. 34 shows the probability of occurrence of different sea states and is based on wave data from advanced hindcast wave models combined with ships’ AIS data for all SOLAS vessels in the period from 2013 to 2020.

MSC 109 agreed that an observation from the initial CSR audit in 2015, that the scatter diagram in Revision 1 of IACS Recommendation No. 34 was based on past statistics, was now considered addressed.

MSC 109 further invited IACS to provide more information about the assumptions, modelling and technical background for Revision 2 of IACS Recommendation No. 34, and agreed that the GBS audit of the revision to follow should be carried out in conjunction with the consequential rule changes in the CSR.

New technologies and alternative fuels 

Identification of gaps in current IMO instruments MSC 109 continued its consideration of potential alternative fuels and new technologies to support the reduction of GHG emissions from ships from a safety perspective. The intention is to identify safety obstacles, barriers and gaps in the current IMO instruments that may impede the use of the various alter- native fuels and new technologies.

MSC 109 agreed to add “swappable traction lithium-ion battery containers” to the list of alternative fuels and new technologies. The list already includes fuels and technologies such as ammonia, hydrogen, fuel cell power installations, nuclear power, solar power, wind power, lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitor energy storage technology.

Recommendations to address each of the identified barriers and gaps in the IMO regulatory framework will be considered in a Correspondence Group until MSC 110 (June 2025). Application of the IGF Code

MSC 109 agreed on draft amendments to SOLAS to clarify that the IGF Code applies to ships using gaseous fuels, whether they are low-flashpoint or not. The term “gaseous fuels” was added to the definitions in SOLAS Regulation II-1/2 and to the application provisions of SOLAS Regulations II-1/56 and 57.

The draft amendments are expected to enter into force on 1 January 2027, subject to adoption by MSC 110 (June 2025).

Carriage of cargoes and containers

Ammonia as fuel

MSC 109 approved draft interim guidelines for the safety of ships using ammonia as fuel.

Ships carrying liquefied gases in bulk (IGC Code)

MSC approved draft amendments to the IGC Code to incorporate the large number of Unified Interpretations developed since the latest major review of the code, which entered into force in 2016. The primary objective of the draft amendments is to remove ambiguity and promote the consistent implementation of the IGC Code requirements.

 

Photo credit: CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Published: 9 December, 2024

Continue Reading

Methanol

Methanol Institute welcomes HIF Global as its newest member

HIF Global will collaborate with industry leaders, policymakers, and stakeholders to promote the adoption of methanol-based solutions and e-Fuels in the transition to a low-carbon future.

Admin

Published

on

By

HIF Global joins Methanol Institute as its newest member

The Methanol Institute (MI) on Thursday (5 December) welcomed HIF Global as its newest member. 

HIF Global is an innovator in the production of e-Fuels, offering sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels that are compatible with today’s transportation and industrial infrastructure.

As part of MI’s membership, HIF Global will collaborate with other industry leaders, policymakers, and stakeholders to promote the adoption of methanol-based solutions and e-Fuels in the transition to a low-carbon future.

MI said HIF Global’s pioneering approach combines renewable energy with technology to produce green hydrogen through electrolysis and capture CO₂ from atmospheric, biogenic, and industrial sources. 

These components are then synthesised to create e-Fuels, including e-Methanol for ships, e-SAF for planes, and e-Gasoline for cars, which are crucial to decarbonizing global transportation and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

At the heart of HIF Global’s operations is HIF Haru Oni in Magallanes, Chile, the world’s first operating e-Fuels facility, which was inaugurated in December 2022. The company is scaling its production globally, with projects underway in the United States, Chile, Australia, Uruguay and Brazil. Its most advanced commercial-scale project, the HIF Matagorda e-Fuels Facility in Texas, is designed to produce 1.4 million metric tons (466 million gallons/1.76 billing liters) of e-Methanol annually once fully operational.

“We are thrilled to welcome HIF Global to the Methanol Institute,” said CEO of MI Greg Dolan. 

“HIF Global’s work in e-Fuels, particularly e-Methanol, is a crucial contribution to the energy transition. Their innovative approach underscores methanol’s potential as a key solution for decarbonizing transportation and industry, and we look forward to collaborating to accelerate this transformation.”

Cesar Norton, President and CEO of HIF Global, said: “e-Fuels are essential to achieving a sustainable future. We applaud the Methanol Institute for their leadership in methanol markets and join them to drive forward the vision to expand e-Methanol based e-Fuels that support our global circular economy.”

“Together we will advance the energy transition by pioneering e-Methanol solutions that utilize existing infrastructure to inspire innovation and reduce costs.”

 

Photo credit: Methanol Institute
Published: 9 December, 2024

Continue Reading
Advertisement
  • EMF banner 400x330 slogan
  • v4Helmsman Gif Banner 01
  • SBF2
  • RE 05 Lighthouse GIF
  • Aderco advert 400x330 1
  • Consort advertisement v2

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS

  • Triton Bunkering advertisement v2
  • SEAOIL 3+5 GIF
  • 102Meth Logo GIF copy
  • Singfar advertisement final
  • HL 2022 adv v1


  • Auramarine 01
  • metcore
  • Mokara Final
  • MFA logo v2
  • PSP Marine logo
  • E Marine logo
  • Synergy Asia Bunkering logo MT
  • Central Star logo
  • Uni Fuels oct 2024 ad
  • Energe Logo
  • 400x330 v2 copy
  • Headway Manifold
  • Advert Shipping Manifold resized1
  • VPS 2021 advertisement

Trending