Connect with us

Business

Rotterdam keen to improve its bunkering sector, is hot on the heels of Singapore’s MFM mandatory adoption

Rotterdam’s intention to mandate the usage of MFMs goes down well with licensed bunker supplier VT Group; MFM providers supportive of move but stressed continuous monitoring is needed for optimum performance.

Admin

Published

on

Rotterdam aerial view

All eyes are on the Port of Rotterdam Authority after news in late October broke of it planning to mandate the use of mass flow meters (MFMs) at Rotterdam port, planning to become the second global maritime facility to do so after Singapore. 

The use of MFM technology for bunkering has been a topic of interest in the maritime industry. The International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA), with support from BIMCO, launched an extensive online survey in February 2022 to enquire on the wider adoption of bunker licensing schemes, MFM and transparency to improve market conditions.

Looking at the case of Singapore, marine industry stakeholders seemed to agree the introduction of a Bunker Licensing Program (74.5%) and mandatory use of MFMs (76%) have had a positive impact on the republic’s bunkering sector.

So it came with no surprise when IBIA released a statement a day later welcoming news of Rotterdam port mandating the use of MFMs for bunker deliveries.

When contacted, Rotterdam port Press Officer Tie Schellekens told Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times: “The Port of Rotterdam Authority intends to make the use of mass flow meters mandatory in Rotterdam on behalf of bunkering fuel for the maritime industry.”

“The Port of Rotterdam Authority has indeed conducted research into quantity issues in the Rotterdam bunker port.”

He said a MFM bunker system measures the exact amount of bunker oil that is supplied as fuel to seagoing vessels.

“In this way, the Port Authority wants to make the market more transparent, efficient and reliable,” Schellekens added while elaborating the Port Authority believes in the process that has been initiated for this purpose. 

“However, it still requires a lot of preparation, but is well aware that such a measure has a major impact on the bunker market. That is why preparation time is still needed before the harbour master actually makes the commitment. The Port Authority expects to be able to communicate more about the intention by the end of the year.”

According to the Port of Rotterdam Authority, there are 32 barge operators active in the Dutch marine refuelling market to date; out of 170 bunkering vessels, approximately 30 of them are equipped with a MFM bunkering system.

VT Group Vorstenbosch MFM

 ‘First mover’ advantage for Rotterdam licensed bunker supplier VT Group

The plan bodes well for licensed bunker suppliers at Rotterdam port including VT Group (Verenigde Tankrederij BV) who comes across as huge advocates for the system. 

Interestingly, Claudia Beumer, Global Account Manager for VT Group, said the company was the “first worldwide, who installed and certified a MFM system on barge Vlaardingen back in 2010 in Rotterdam”.

“Ever since then, we have been advocating the use of MFM for bunkering. Not only with our customers, but definitely also with the Port of Rotterdam. The use of MFM is not only offering a transparent and direct method of measuring the amount of fuel bunkered, but with the correct use of the Certified System, it also offers a huge efficiency improvement of the bunkering process,” she told Manifold Times.

Beumer believes MFMs will create a level playing field for Rotterdam market players. 

“It is however essential to take this initiative wider and include the full ARA region. Using MFM will have a price increase of bunker services as a result, so to ensure this level playing field, it needs to be embedded in Antwerp and Amsterdam as well.”

With carbon taxes and emission trading schemes (ETS) approaching, Beumer said it becomes even more important for fuel users to have reliable data and the use of MFMs contribute to that.

As for challenges, she foresaw possible issues with lead times when all 170 barges in the Dutch market decide to install MFMs at the same time. 

“And we should not forget that there is a cost involved. Independent barge operators offer maritime transport, not fuel. So the cost of the MFM and the installation needs to be carried by the barge operator, the fuel user and the fuel supplier together. And for the barge operators that have no experience with the MFM, there needs to be a thorough training program of the crew so they understand the different way of working,” she explains. 

“With all the challenges the maritime industry already has, like decarbonisation and the use of alternative fuels, we should eliminate all uncertainties in measurements and deliveries. MFM’s offer a reliable, time efficient measurement method that works for all new fuels and traditional marine fuels.  

“And last but not least, MFM’s have been around for more than 12 years in the maritime industry already. Let’s learn from the early adapters and the experiences gained in Singapore over time and ensure we make our industry not only future proof but also relevant.”

After Singapore first made MFMs mandatory in 2017, Manifold Times conducted a survey with various industry and company sources estimating the annual bunker sales volume for the republic’s top 10 Singapore bunker suppliers in 2018. 

Based on the survey, Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) accredited marine fuel suppliers believed the introduction of MFM technology for bunkering has given them, and Singapore port, a competitive edge over other ports in the region.

With that, MFM providers have hailed the initiative by Port of Rotterdam saying it was a step in the right direction.

Metcore MFM

Metcore International: ‘Very positive’ step in the right direction

Singapore-based mass flow metering system measurement solutions provider Metcore International Pte Ltd (Metcore), amongst key players in the introduction of MFM bunkering practices at the Singapore market, was supportive of the development.

“Singapore’s maritime sector has invested tremendous effort to create the reputation of transparency and trust in the use of MFMs for bunkering that it now enjoys,” states Darrick Pang, Managing Director of Metcore.

“Hence, the decision by Port of Rotterdam Authority to mandate the use of MFMs for bunkering to build a level playing field for its local marine fuels sector is a very positive direction.”

However, Mr Pang stressed MFMs are not simply a “plug ‘n’ play” solution where measurement equipment can simply be forgotten after installation onto bunkering vessels.

“From our experience in the Singapore market as well as other international ports, the main factors about MFMs’ successful use for marine refuelling comprises of the entire ecosystem’s integrity as well as continuous monitoring and competency of key personnel in order to ensure the consistency of performance,” he elaborates. 

“In addition to the correct application of pipeline sealing, bunkering standards and the competency of crew, having an effective and comprehensive framework for continuous monitoring is also of paramount importance.”

Singapore’s success story on MFMs for bunkering was only made possible by an industry-wide initiative backed by regulatory enforcement – an area where the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore shines – to ensure measurement consistency, believes Mr Pang.

However, the onus of securing a successful implementation of the MFM bunkering mandate should not be placed solely upon port authorities because transparency and trust-building needs to be a collaborative effort supported by all key bunkering stakeholders, he states.

EH MFMs

Endress+Hauser ‘committed’ to support MFM installation transitional period

MFMs, a matured technology which have been used with much positive feedback for bunkering operations at Singapore port, can only enhance similar marine refuelling activities at Rotterdam port, confirms Mohamed Abdenbi, Business Process Consultant – Bunkering & Fuel Supply Chain, and Costas Arvanitis, Global Solutions Manager at MFM manufacturer Endress+Hauser.

In addition to providing a higher level of trust for buyers and a faster turnaround times, MFM technology enables bunkering operations to be fully transparent with detailed logs and safe data storage of activities, says Mohamed and Costas.

The development increases transparency which will increase the attractiveness of Rotterdam for buyers of marine fuels. Furthermore, the time to bunker can be reduced, enabling bunker service providers to utilise their fleet to a greater degree of efficiency. 

“To sum up, the benefit of MFM bunkering systems will increase the attractiveness of the Rotterdam bunkering sector due to increased transparency, trust, and bunkering time, leading to increased demand, less disputes, and greater fleet utilisation,” they state.

However, the duo was quick to point out widespread implementation of the technology at Rotterdam port to bring about certain challenges.

“Bunker service providers will need to make sure they are compliant within the timeframe allotted by the Port of Rotterdam. The challenge herein lies with issues related to global supply chains, and the limited amount of wharfs that can refit the barges with MFM bunkering systems,” they said.

“We expect there will be a peak in required activities from all parties, with potential bottlenecks in wharfs as many barges will want to refit within the same timeframe. Bunkering service providers should take care to plan accordingly, and get in touch with wharfs and MFM bunker system providers in a timely manner. 

“Another challenge is redesigning the bunker barges to accommodate the MFM bunkering system, as those can take up a lot of space on board. The Endress+Hauser Promass F coriolis mass flow meter is compact compared to alternatives, which reduces the complexity of redesigning the bunker barges piping system.”

Moving forward, on behalf of Endress+Hauser, both Mohamed and Costas affirm the company’s commitment in assisting Rotterdam barge operators to implement MFM bunkering systems within the transition period “with the highest level of quality”.

“This includes, managing supply chains to ensure timely delivery, MFM system commissioning and testing and support in the certification of the system,” they said.

“The experience E+H has gained over the past decade with the installation of Bunker metering system onboard bunker barges and vessels will be beneficial not only to the bunker operators in Rotterdam that needs to install MFMs but also to the port authority. 

“We are committed to work closely with all the bunkering industry stake holders to make this new development and its implementation a success.”

Related: IBIA welcomes news of Rotterdam’s plans to mandate MFMs
Related: Exclusive: Estimated annual sales volume for Singapore top bunker suppliers

 

Photo credit: Port of Rotterdam Authority/Danny Cornelissen; VT Group; Metcore International; Manifold Times
Published: 25 November, 2022

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

Admin

Published

on

By

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Taiwanese shipping firm Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation (Yang Ming) and South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean on Wednesday (2 September) signed a shipbuilding contract for six 13,000 TEU class LNG dual-fuel container vessels. 

The contract was signed by Dr. Chuck Tsai, Chairman of Yang Ming, and Mr. Charles Kim, CEO of Hanwha Ocean. The vessels are scheduled for delivery between 2028 and 2029. 

They will complement Yang Ming’s existing fleet of 10,000+ TEU vessels and serve as key vessels on East-West services, with deployment flexibility across trade lanes connecting Asia with the East and West Coasts of North America, South America, and the Mediterranean. 

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

“As Yang Ming transitions toward net-zero emissions, LNG provides a relatively mature and economically viable alternative fuel solution, capable of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 20%,” the company said. 

“At the same time, ammonia can serve as a carbon-free fuel by utilising converted LNG storage facilities, while offering relatively lower conversion costs and comparatively well-developed supply chains and infrastructure. The Ammonia Fuel Ready design will therefore provide Yang Ming with greater flexibility in responding to increasingly stringent international regulations on greenhouse gas emissions.”

In addition, the vessels will be equipped with Type B LNG fuel tanks with a design pressure of 1.0 bar to enhance the safety and efficiency of LNG operations, together with a range of energy-saving technologies, including Wind Shields, Rudder Bulbs, Pre-Swirl Stators, and Shore Power Systems. Smart ship technologies and cybersecurity protection features will also be incorporated to enhance operational efficiency, safety, and reliability while effectively reducing fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

Deliveries under Yang Ming’s next-generation fleet optimization plan commenced earlier this year. By 2030, a total of 24 new vessels are expected to enter service. 

This includes 18 LNG dual-fuel vessels—comprising five 15,500 TEU, seven 16,000 TEU, and the six 13,000 TEU vessels under this contract—alongside six 8,000 TEU methanol dual-fuel-ready ships. 

 

Photo credit: Yang Ming Marine Transport
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Both secured AiP for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Admin

Published

on

By

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Lloyd’s Register (LR) and the Marine Design and Research Institute of China (MARIC) on Thursday (3 September) have secured Approval in Principle (AiP) for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Announced at SMM 2026, the concept addresses one of the biggest investment challenges facing shipping today: the need to develop vessels and capabilities that can support a range of alternative fuel options and pathways as technologies, infrastructure and regulations evolve.

While LNG is already a mature fuel pathway, methanol and ammonia remain at an earlier stage of development, with questions around global fuel availability, infrastructure development, economics and long-term adoption.

The 114,000 DWT tanker concept has been designed as a product and crude oil carrier that can accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia as technologies, regulations and fuel supply chains mature. By incorporating conversion readiness at the design stage, the concept aims to reduce future retrofit complexity and provide owners with greater confidence when planning long-term fleet investments.

The design concept was reviewed against LR’s July 2026 class rules and regulations, including requirements relating to ships using gases and other low-flashpoint fuels, alongside relevant IACS Common Structural Rules for oil tankers. Final classification and statutory approval remain subject to full compliance with all applicable rules and regulations.

Theo Kourmpelis, Global Business Director for Tankers, Lloyd’s Register, said: “Shipowners are being asked to make major investment decisions today despite continued uncertainty around which fuels will dominate in the decades ahead. Alternative fuel solutions each offer potential pathways to compliance, but fuel infrastructure, regulation and economics continue to evolve at different speeds around the world.

“Designs that preserve flexibility will be critical in helping owners manage risk while preparing for multiple future scenarios.”

Si Nan, Marine & Offshore Marketing Department Vice Director, MARIC, said: “As the industry explores different decarbonisation pathways, shipowners need vessel designs that can adapt alongside technological and regulatory developments. This concept was developed specifically to provide greater fuel flexibility and long-term resilience, allowing owners to respond to changing market requirements without being locked into a single fuel strategy.

“Receiving Approval in Principle from Lloyd’s Register is an important milestone that validates the design concept and supports its future development.”

 

Photo credit: Lloyd’s Register
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity while the strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year.

Admin

Published

on

By

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

Latest data from classification society DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight (AFI) platform alternative-fuelled vessel ordering was strong in August, with 52 new vessels added to the platform.

This is the highest monthly total since October 2024 and follows another active month in July, when 47 vessels were added to the database.

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity, with 46 orders recorded. The container segment led the way with 30 orders, while the car carrier segment contributed a further 12 LNG-fuelled vessels. In addition, four ethanol-fuelled bulk carriers and two hydrogen-powered bulk carriers were added during the month, as well as one LNG bunker vessel.

The strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year. In total, 242 alternative-fuelled vessel orders have been placed in the first eight months of 2026, representing a 27% increase compared with the same period in 2025.

LNG remains the dominant fuel choice, accounting for 63% of all alternative-fuelled vessel orders registered so far this year. Container vessels represent the largest share of these LNG orders (59%), followed by car carriers (30%).

Jason Stefanatos, Global Decarbonization Director at DNV Maritime, said: “The past two months have been particularly strong for alternative-fuelled vessel ordering, with August recording the highest monthly total we’ve seen since October 2024. This has helped lift year-to-date orders to a level well above the same period last year.

“LNG remains the leading fuel choice, driven largely by activity in the container and car carrier segments. These sectors have been among the earliest adopters of alternative fuels, supported by predictable liner operations and increasing demand from cargo owners to reduce emissions across supply chains. 

“For many owners, LNG offers a combination of emissions reductions, fuel availability and future flexibility while the longer-term fuel landscape continues to evolve. 

“At the same time, the latest figures include orders for ethanol- and hydrogen-fuelled vessels, highlighting that owners continue to explore a range of decarbonization pathways. Different segments are making different fuel choices, but the overall level of activity demonstrates continued investment in lower-emission shipping.”

Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.26 PM Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.36 PM

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS



Trending