Connect with us

Mass Flowmeter

MFM bunker value chain question TR48 compliance findings of VPS

Lloyd’s Register FOBAS, Endress+Hauser, Fratelli Cosulich, Metcore International and more comment on 28% non-compliance of TR48 for Singapore MFM bunker deliveries.

Admin

Published

on

5a813ffad2b35 1518419962

A group of stakeholders representing various aspects of the bunker supply value chain in Singapore have risen to comment on a recent find by fuel testing and inspection firm Veritas Petroleum Services (VPS) regarding TR 48 compliance on mass flowmeter (MFM) bunkering.

A VPS circular recently said the company’s MFM Quick Screen service found 28% of MFM bunker deliveries at Singapore not in compliance to TR 48 standards when taking into account 23 parameters.

It also pointed out the average discrepancy to be a shortage of 67 metric tonnes (mt) per investigation, following further checks.

“VPS' findings seem to suggest the situation now is worse than before MFM was mandated in Singapore when we used to carry out manual tank gauging for bunker measurements, which is a misleading statement to make,” says Douglas Raitt, the regional consultancy manager at bunker fuel analysis and advisory service firm Lloyd’s Register FOBAS, Singapore.

“The 28% non-compliance rating of TR48 can cover all manner of sins. It is unclear whether the figure includes lack of compliant paperwork on tankers, short deliveries, incorrect meter readings, or others. The 28% statistic should be meaningfully broken down for a clearer explanation to the industry at large.”

Raitt also pointed an issue in VPS’ findings of an average 67mt fuel shortage after investigations.

“What was the basis to claim the short loadings? Were these calculated using manually sounded figures from the receiving vessel’s bunker tanks and compared to meter readings? This is not clear in the VPS circular. In any case, comparing vessel sounding figures with meter reading delivery figures is not in line with TR48. It is common knowledge [in the bunkering industry] that a receiving vessel’s fuel tanks are not necessarily reliable reference points.

“If we are calculating the 67mt difference from the receiving ship’s fuel tanks you are actually comparing arbitrary and manually obtained measurements against the true measurement obtained by mass flowmeters.”

Darrick Pang, Managing Director of MFM consultancy firm Metcore International and bunker surveying firm Metcore Inspection Services was curious about VPS’ figures.

“It will be interesting to understand how the shortage quantity [67mt] mentioned from VPS’ investigations are established including the criteria to determine a 28% failure to comply with TR48," he says.

“As we know, all MFM systems installed on bunker tankers in Singapore have undergone a very comprehensive and rigorous testing process in accordance with TR48:2015 in order to obtain approval for custody transfer operations by MPA.

“What is happening in the field might not be visible to an analyst, therefore it is critical to have bunker surveyors with the trained knowledge  in order to secure the measurement integrity of the whole operation. This is something that Metcore Inspection Services place a lot of emphasis on from the beginning.”

The findings, meanwhile, did not deter Singapore bunker supplier Fratelli Cosulich in using MFM technology for bunkering operations, says the CEO and Board Member of the Fratelli Cosulich Group of Companies.

“We [Fratelli Cosulich] have full trust on the accuracy of MFM and we regularly verify the accuracy of our equipment to make sure that our clients receive the correct quantity,” he told Manifold Times.

“I cannot comment on VPS claims specifically because very rarely we have had a VPS surveyor on board our vessels.

“In order to correctly interpret VPS’s findings it is absolutely necessary to know what irregularities they specifically talk about.

“It is very important for example to differentiate between substantial irregularities [e.g. inaccurate quantity supplied] from ‘formal’ irregularities [e.g. a missing signature or a procedure not 100% followed].”

The Business Process consultant for bunkering and fuel supply chain at MFM manufacturer Endress+Hauser (E+H), meanwhile, believes VPS’ report can be further improved.

“From a meter vendor point of view, we encourage professional initiatives from surveying companies who have decided to move ahead with the MFM technology to support the bunkering industry,” says Mohamed Abdenbi.

“In fact, in today’s fast pace tech world, the early adopters can be the leaders of tomorrow. VPS is one of those companies that have identified this opportunity and started offering their MFM evaluation service offerings to their customers.

“However, we have several times been asked for help to look at VPS quick screening reports and found out that they lacked clarity and understanding of the MFM system as well as the bunker operation procedures. The report quality has to be improved and maintained over time.

“We also would like to emphasize that at the end only manufacturer specialists who understand the MFM system can correctly interpret the signals and the reaction of the system in details.

“After all we could imagine that third party specialists are trained and certified by the manufacturer themselves for analysing recorded MFM data.”

Seah Khen Hee, a Singapore industry pioneer who led the MFM project and is instrumental in developing the principles, requirements and procedures of TR48:2015, believes relevant industry stakeholders should meet VPS for "further dialogue".

"I have been very encouraged by the positive feedbacks and comments from across the shipping and bunkering communities on TR48:2015 since its recent implementation," he says.

"After the VPS Circular came out, the industry would like to understand how VPS arrived at their findings on non-compliance and discrepancies. 

"Relevant experts should meet VPS for further dialogue and assist with positive progress.

"Bunker surveyors have an important role to play in providing vigilance to the MFM bunkering process, especially on metrology and security requirements and metering procedures.

"Indeed, all industry users of TR48 need to correctly understand and properly apply TR48 for best outcomes. 

"More can be done to reach out to the shipping and bunkering industries worldwide on training and education."

Related: VPS, CMA CGM collaboration evaluates Singapore MFM compliance

Published: 12 February, 2018
 

Continue Reading

Technology

Malaysia: Maharani Freeport to implement MFM and e-BDN technologies for enhanced bunkering transparency

Initiatives reflect the Freeport’s commitment to delivering transparency, operational integrity and international best practices across its bunkering ecosystem, says MEG spokesperson.

Admin

Published

on

By

MEG 1145 cropped MT

Maharani Freeport, a National Project officially launched by His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, King of Malaysia, in November 2025, will be introducing mass flowmeter (MFM) and electronic bunker delivery note (e-BDN) technologies to its bunkering operations, learns Manifold Times.

These strategic initiatives underscore the port’s commitment in establishing a highly transparent, efficient and trustworthy bunkering environment, aligned with global best practices and addressing critical industry demands, according to a Maharani Energy Gateway (MEG) spokesperson.

MEG is the Master Developer of Maharani Freeport and seeks to position the Freeport as a strategic nexus for shipment, storage and trading operations on a global scale. MEG Synergy is the trading division and a wholly owned entity of MEG; it seeks to position Maharani Freeport as a strategic nexus for shipment, storage, and trading operations on a global scale.

As part of its long-term bunkering strategy, the Freeport is currently in the process of acquiring bunker vessels of various sizes to support marine fuel deliveries and accommodate the evolving requirements of regional and international customers. These vessels will be equipped with MFM technology to ensure accurate, transparent and efficient fuel transfer operations.

Including bunkering and ship-to-ship (STS) trading operations from its High Sulphur Fuel Oil (HSFO) Floating Storage Unit (FSU), MEG Synergy already oversees a healthy volume of Bunker cargo deliveries to regional players each month.

MFM for Trust, Transparency and Traceability

MEG highlighted the custody transfer of bunker fuels at the Freeport will be handled by MFM-equipped bunker tankers.

“The adoption of MFM technology to support bunkering operations is a direct response to persistent industry challenges such as quantity discrepancies and delivery disputes,” explained the spokesperson.

“By equipping our bunker vessels with certified mass flowmeters, we aim to ensure precise and verifiable fuel delivery measurements.

“This initiative is pivotal in fostering trust among customers and strengthening the Freeport’s reputation as a professionally managed zone where businesses can operate with confidence. The overarching goal is to create a secure and well-governed environment for commercial activities, reducing operational risks and uncertainties while supporting efficient and transparent trade.”

e-BDN to Digitalise Documentation Workflow

The implementation of electronic bunker delivery notes (e-BDN), together with MFM technology, further aligns with the Freeport’s focus on creating comprehensive digital custody transfer records and robust data retention systems, added the spokesperson.

This digital approach, integrated with MFM technology, will streamline operational workflows, reduce administrative burdens and provide an immutable record of transactions to enhance transparency, minimising potential friction and expediting dispute resolution

MEG emphasised that the Freeport’s commitment extends beyond technological enhancements to encompass a comprehensive governance framework.

The port aims to adhere to stringent international standards, including those established by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), while offering dispute resolution mechanisms under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to ensure the swift and fair handling of disagreements.

This holistic approach to operational integrity and governance is designed to address perceived transparency gaps, positioning the Freeport as a reliable and commercially attractive hub for the maritime and commodities sectors.

Note: For enquiries in respect of Maharani Freeport, readers may reach out to:

[email protected]

Related: Interview: Maharani Energy Gateway – Forging a new energy nexus in the Straits of Malacca
Related: New Johor bunkering hub: Maharani debuts as Malaysia’s first duty-exempted energy freeport

 

Photo credit: Maharani Energy Gateway
Published: 15 July 2026

Continue Reading

Mass Flowmeter

NorthStandard: No switching off when bunker mass flow meters are switched on

While Mass Flow Meters have significantly improved transparency and accuracy in bunker deliveries, experience shows that they are not immune to misuse, says Alvin Forster.

Admin

Published

on

By

NorthStandard: No switching off when bunker mass flow meters are switched on

While Mass Flow Meters have significantly improved transparency and accuracy in bunker deliveries, experience shows that they are not immune to misuse, writes Alvin Forster, Senior Loss Prevention Executive – Americas & UK of global marine insurer NorthStandard:

Bunker quantity disputes remain one of the most frequent and contentious causes of claims and charterparty disputes. Traditional measurement methods based on tank soundings, ullage measurements and calibration/sounding tables have long been criticised for susceptibility to error and manipulation. In response, some of the major bunkering ports have mandated the use of Mass Flow Meters (MFMs) as the primary means of measuring the quantity transferred.

MFMs have significantly improved transparency and accuracy, but experience has shown that they are not immune to misuse or deliberate manipulation. Recent enforcement actions, most notably in Singapore, demonstrate that unscrupulous suppliers may attempt to defeat even sophisticated measurement systems.

Singapore pioneered the mandatory use of MFMs. Since 1 January 2017, MFMs have been compulsory for the delivery of marine fuel oil in the Port of Singapore, with the delivered quantity on the Bunker Delivery Note (BDN) derived exclusively from the MFM totaliser.

The regime has continued to evolve. From 1 April 2025, Singapore mandates compliance with SS 648:2024, which tightens requirements around data security, system integrity, piping arrangements, certification, and the use of data loggers and edge devices, reflecting lessons learned from earlier enforcement cases.

Mass appeal for MFMs

From 1 January 2026, MFMs have also been made mandatory on bunker vessels delivering fuel oil, diesel and biofuels at the ports of Rotterdam and Antwerp‑Bruges. The systems must be certified and broadly aligned with ISO 22192, mirroring the Singapore model. The use of MFMs is mandatory across port terminals in Türkiye and at the Port of Ceuta in the Gibraltar Strait, while they are also used in Gibraltar by yacht bunker supplier CEPSA, and others.    

These developments signal a significant shift in the European bunker market, which has traditionally been reliant on shore tank measurements and barge gauging.

Elsewhere, Sohar Port and Freezone have introduced measures that effectively mandate the use of MFMs for bunker supplies. Hong Kong is also looking to introduce regulations that mandate their use, but only for methanol.

Further afield, an increasing number of suppliers are adopting the use of MFMs in ports and hubs where there is no mandate.

Locations where MFMs are currently used on a non-mandatory basis include Fujairah, Zhoushan, Busan, Houston and Prince Rupert (Canada).

Manipulation against the flow

Despite the broadening appeal, and the tamper‑resistant design work that has gone into MFM solutions, there have been instances that show they can still be manipulated through physical or operational interference.

The most well‑known example concerns the bunker tankers Southernpec 6 and Southernpec 7 in Singapore. Between 2016 and 2019, industrial‑strength magnets were placed on the MFM sensors to distort measurement signals, causing the meters to record more fuel than was actually delivered. The fraud resulted in buyers being cheated of over US$300,000 worth of marine fuel oil.

Another recurring manipulation method involves irregular piping arrangements between the MFM and the ship’s manifold. Investigations in Singapore revealed cases where bunker barges had connections allowing fuel to be siphoned back to barge tanks during delivery, inflating MFM readings without the receiving vessel receiving the corresponding quantity.

Such arrangements directly contravene certification requirements but may be difficult for ship crews to detect without detailed inspection.

MFMs have defined operational limits, calibrated for liquid at constant flow. When removing the final amounts from a tank, flow rates may fall outside these parameters, and risk producing unreliable readings.

Guidance for Shipowners and Operators

Despite the increased use of MFMs and the introduction of mandates in some ports, the crew of the receiving vessel should remain vigilant with respect to the way these systems can be manipulated and take measures to protect their position. As a matter of routine, crew should:

  • Always take ship’s bunker tank soundings and witness barge measurements before and after bunkering, even where MFM figures are contractually binding, and retain records.
  • Inspect visible sections of MFM systems, including seals, cabling, and piping.
  • Request to see the MFM bunker system certificate and confirm the unit’s serial number.
  • Engage reputable, experienced bunker surveyors.  
  • Issue letters of protest promptly where discrepancies arise between ship calculations and MFM figures, even if suppliers refuse to countersign.
  • Ensure crews are familiar with bunkering procedures and aware of common manipulation indicators.

Crew should also be aware of the limitations in accuracy when comparing tank measurements with MFM readings. Even when both measurement technologies are accurate, differences can still exist between them.

 

Photo credit: NorthStandard
Published: 3 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Mass Flowmeter

MFM-equipped CPN barge first listed under Hong Kong quality bunker scheme

Chimbusco Pan Nation’s bunker barge “Zhong Ran 23” has become the first vessel in Hong Kong listed on Marine Department’s official List of Quality Bunker Vessels, under a newly-launched scheme.

Admin

Published

on

By

MFM-equipped CPN barge first listed under Hong Kong quality bunker scheme

Hong Kong-based marine fuel supplier Chimbusco Pan Nation (CPN) on Tuesday (16 June) announced that its bunker barge Zhong Ran 23 has become the first vessel in Hong Kong listed on the Marine Department’s official List of Quality Bunker Vessels.

The list under the Quality Bunker Operator Scheme launched on 3 June.

“The Scheme is a voluntary initiative designed to raise the standard of bunkering accuracy, transparency, and service quality in Hong Kong,” CPN said in a social media post.

“To be listed, a bunker vessel must have its Mass Flow Meter (MFM) system independently certified under ISO 22192, the international benchmark for mass flow metering in bunkering operations.”

CPN added it has operated the MFM system across our fleet of fuel oil barges since 2015. 

Manifold Times previously reported Hong Kong’s Marine Department (MD) launching the Quality Bunker Operator Scheme to encourage bunker operators to install and use mass flow meter systems (MFM systems) on their bunker vessels.

MD said the scheme aims to enhance Hong Kong’s bunkering service quality and the competitiveness of Hong Kong ports, thereby further consolidating Hong Kong’s position as an international maritime centre and a major bunkering port.

Under the Scheme, bunker operators of traditional maritime fuel and biodiesel that install and use MFM systems on their bunker vessels, with the MFM systems inspected and certified by an accredited body in accordance with the International Organization for Standardization’s ISO 22192 Standard or equivalent requirements, can apply to the MD for inclusion in the scheme’s “List of Quality Bunker Vessels”, provided they meet the relevant technical and operational requirements. 

Related: Hong Kong backs MFM adoption with voluntary scheme to boost bunkering competitiveness

 

Photo credit: Chimbusco Pan Nation
Published: 17 June, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending