Updated (18 March): A Petro Inspect representative has since clarified with Manifold Times that it did report the matter of magnets being allegedly use to influence the readings of mass flowmeters to the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) “from the very first day of the investigation.”
The following article is a response to a recent media report from Ship&Bunker titled: ‘Singapore: Evidence emerges of attempts to use magnets to influence MFM bunker volume readings’ which provided evidence that suggest Singapore bunker players could be using magnets to influence MFM readings.
The use of magnets to influence mass flowmeter (MFM) readings during bunkering operations at Singapore port is a breach of the Singapore Technical Reference for Bunker Mass Flow Metering (TR 48:2015), it states.
Clause 7.5 ‘Operational Security’ of TR 48:2015 states:
“The Cargo Officer shall be responsible to ensure that the MFM system integrity is not compromised for the purpose of bunker delivery. Cargo officer shall check for any critical alarms on the MFM system and shall not proceed if a critical alarm is found to be activated. The implementing authority shall be notified immediately of a breach of system integrity.”
“Bunker surveyor (if engaged) shall check for breach of system integrity and status of critical alarm.”
An industry player, meanwhile, told Manifold Times he was puzzled why a professional marine surveying and cargo inspection firm went to the media to report such activity, when the proper procedure is to inform the Singapore port authority.
“The TR 48 clearly states the Cargo Officer to be responsible for operational security of the MFM while the bunker surveyor should simply report any suspicious activity to MPA,” he told Manifold Times.
“It is strange why this was reported to the media to expose this when the correct procedure is already laid out in black and white.”
The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) on Friday (15 March) provided a statement to Manifold Times in response to the media report in question.
“The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) conducts regular industry engagement to gather feedback on bunkering operations, including illegal bunkering practices. We also work with the industry to conduct checks to identify irregular bunkering practices,” it told Manifold Times.
“As part of our industry engagement, we receive information on irregular bunkering practices from time to time, and will look into the feedback.
“MPA takes a serious view of any attempt to jeopardise the integrity of the MFM and will not hesitate to take immediate and firm action against those who do so.”
Photo credit: Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore
Published: 15 March, 2019
Garren Hay will be responsible for sales of the PANOLIN range of Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants for the Singapore sole distributor agent Gealubes Consulting & Trading Pte Ltd.
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.