The Managing Director of Switzerland-based fuel treatment manufacturer Aderco expects the shipping industry to witness an increase of off-spec marine fuel cases leading up to 2020.
“Fuel laboratories are expecting more problems on the path to 2020 and beyond, and the estimated global demand of 320 million metric tonnes (mt) of 0.5% sulphur fuels will, in turn, bring new risks to the shipping market,” Philippe Lecloux told Manifold Times in an exclusive interview.
“Taking alternative solutions such as the use of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as bunker fuel and the installation of scrubbers out of the picture, the majority of shipowners are left with little choice but to consume either distillate, hybrid fuels, or low sulphur fuel oil (LSFO) to meet compliance.”
The unassured availability of blending components by 2020 and the use of questionable material in bunker blends could further affect fuel compatibility and stability, leading up to higher cat fine content together with an increased risk of off-spec fuels, he adds.
To date, refineries are able to produce a wide variety of hybrid fuels and LSFO material to meet the International Maritime Organization (IMO)’s 0.5% sulphur cap through three typical methods.
These are the employment of hydro-desulphurisation technologies, blending of low-sulphur crudes, and re-blending of oil product with low sulphur components; refineries incur respective extra production cost of $60-100 per mt (pmt), $40-60 pmt, and $15-20 pmt with these options.
“Refineries will often choose the most profitable option to produce 0.5% bunker fuel which is to re-blend the oil,” explains Lecloux who adds “the low sulphur component selection is driven by availability and cost; not necessary quality.”
To illustrate, he further showed Manifold Times refining calculations indicating a lower quality 0.5% sulphur limit bunker blend (using low sulphur slurry) which can be produced at 26% extra profit when compared to a higher quality cat fine-free bunker sample without using slurry.
“Adding another layer of complication are the different formulas used by regional refineries in North America, Asia and Europe to produce compliant fuel by 2020 which affects fuel compatibility and stability when mixed,” he notes.
“Therefore, it does not take much to see why we are already seeing off-spec cases at Houston and Singapore and expect more of these to come as we approach the IMO deadline.
“At the end of the day, it is a question of availability, quality and cost.”
Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 14 June, 2018
‘Economics of the shipping market will be the key driver enabling methanol to be adopted at a higher pace going forth over next couple years as market begins to return to more normal rates,’ states COO.
Integr8 Fuel injunction varied by Singapore Court to allow former employees to start work at Hartree Group in December 2022 following failure to produce evidence on biofuels development plans.
Variability of sources can affect the stability and performance of biofuel bunkers produced from these feedstocks, in turn leading to difficulties in meeting regulations and industry standards, shares Bryan Quek.
Top three positive movers in 2022 were Bunker House Petroleum Pte Ltd (+7), Eastpoint International Marketing Pte Ltd (+5), and Eng Hua Company (Pte) Ltd (+6); newcomer Sinopec Fuel Oil (Singapore) gets 19th spot.
Livestock carrier also involved in earlier bunker claim with Glander International Bunkering due to remaining unpaid fuel bill of approximately USD 116,000, according to court documents obtained by Manifold Times.
A blend of standard MGO and biodiesel, MGO B20 is distributed at the company’s floating kiosk CNC 5 which is located off the buoy of West Coast Pier; PS Energy has been stamped with globally recognised ISCC.