Connect with us

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (3 March 2026)

Availability is good in Zhoushan; South Korean ports may face weather disruptions; Middle East ports continue operations despite escalating regional crisis.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • Availability is good in Zhoushan
  • South Korean ports may face weather disruptions
  • Middle East ports continue operations despite escalating regional crisis

Singapore and Malaysia

In Singapore, VLSFO requires lead times of about 7–11 days, slightly extended compared with last week’s 6–10 days. LSMGO suppliers are typically advising 4–11 days, slightly wider than the 4–9 days seen previously. HSFO lead times are indicated at 8–11 days, versus 6–12 days a week earlier.

Over the weekend, US and Israeli forces conducted a joint strike on Iran that killed the Islamic Republic’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iran retaliated with direct attacks on Gulf states, including the UAE and Saudi Arabia, and caused disruptions to traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

While supply conditions in Singapore remain unaffected, the geopolitical escalation has driven a sharp rally in Brent crude, lifting bunker prices in its wake.

“Across the grades, premiums are up,” a Singapore-based trader said.

Singapore’s VLSFO price jumped by nearly $80/mt over the weekend, to reach $589/mt.

Elsewhere in the region, Port Klang reports generally sufficient availability of VLSFO and LSMGO—particularly for smaller prompt stems—though HSFO supply remains constrained and more difficult to secure.

East Asia

Bunker availability across all grades in Zhoushan remains solid, a source said. Lead times for VLSFO and LSMGO are steady at 3–5 days, unchanged from last week. HSFO supply has improved, with lead times tightening to 3–5 days from 5–7 days previously.

As in Singapore, the Middle East crisis has not yet disrupted physical supply in Zhoushan. However, one source cautioned that prices “will be higher” at the port. Zhoushan’s VLSFO price jumped by $78/mt over the weekend, to $592/mt.

Across northern China, supply conditions are uneven. Dalian and Qingdao report sufficient volumes of VLSFO and LSMGO, though HSFO remains constrained in Qingdao. Tianjin is seeing tight availability across all grades. In Shanghai, VLSFO HSFO supplies are limited, while LSMGO availability is comparatively stable.

In the south, Fuzhou is experiencing tight supply of both VLSFO and LSMGO. Xiamen has adequate VLSFO stocks, but LSMGO remains restricted. Delivery schedules in Yangpu and Guangzhou are also constrained for both grades.

In Hong Kong, bunker lead times remain around seven days for all grades, broadly unchanged in recent weeks.

In Taiwan, a trader reported “no significant impact” on supply. However, the Brent surge triggered by the Middle East escalation has “influenced” pricing considerably over the weekend. Kaohsiung’s VLSFO price rose by $48/mt, to $575/mt.

Lead times for VLSFO and LSMGO in Keelung and Hualien are about two days, while Kaohsiung and Taichung continue to recommend slightly longer lead times of around three days.

In South Korea, most suppliers are advising lead times of 5–7 days across all bunker grades, compared with a broader 3–8-day range last week.

Seasonal winter conditions continue to raise the risk of operational disruptions. Weather-related delays could affect Busan and Ulsan between 3–8 March, Yeosu from 6–8 March, and Daesan over 6–8 March.

Suppliers in the country are “carefully monitoring the situation. Premiums jumped a lot, but their producing schedule will not be affected because they have enough reserves at the moment. However, for sure it will cause problem if the war goes on,” one supplier said.

In Japan, VLSFO supply remains comfortable at major hubs such as Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama and Kawasaki. Availability is comparatively tighter in Nagoya, Yokkaichi, Mizushima and Tokuyama, where recommended lead times remain at 7–10 days. LSMGO supply is generally consistent nationwide, while B24-VLSFO is available on request in Tokyo, Chiba and Yokohama.

HSFO inventories are largely steady across several ports. Oita reports adequate availability of all three grades, and Kashima has sufficient volumes of both VLSFO and HSFO.

Bunkering demand in Japan is expected to ease on 20 March due to the Vernal Equinox Day holiday.

In Indonesia, VLSFO supply continues to be stable at Jakarta, Surabaya, Balikpapan and Cigading, with suppliers typically quoting lead times of 2–3 days. LSMGO availability is also steady in Jakarta, Benoa, Surabaya and Batam. HSFO stocks are said to be well supplied in Jakarta, Surabaya and Balikpapan, according to a trader.

Oceania

Bunker availability across Australia remains generally steady. VLSFO and LSMGO are widely accessible nationwide, with typical lead times of about seven days.

In Western Australia, suppliers in Kwinana and Fremantle are asking for roughly one week’s notice. Deliveries are primarily carried out by barge through a single provider, while LSMGO can also be moved by truck. Strong afternoon winds continue to cause intermittent scheduling disruptions.

In New South Wales, VLSFO deliveries at Port Kembla can be arranged by truck or pipeline. Sydney maintains healthy stocks of VLSFO and LSMGO, though HSFO remains tight, with suppliers usually requiring around seven days’ notice.

Queensland’s ports, Brisbane and Gladstone, are supplying VLSFO and LSMGO with lead times close to seven days. HSFO is available on request in Brisbane. Two barges operated by separate suppliers are active there, delivering VLSFO and LSMGO, while HSFO is provided on enquiry.

In Victoria, Melbourne and Geelong report strong inventories of VLSFO and LSMGO. HSFO availability is tight for prompt stems, although Melbourne currently holds adequate volumes. Both ports depend on a single barge, and lead times are near seven days. LSMGO can also be delivered by truck to smaller ports, such as Portland and Port Welshpool, within 2–3 days.

Weather risks are building. Multiple tropical cyclones could develop in Australian waters this week, heightening the likelihood of severe conditions in Western Australia, the Northern Territory and Queensland, according to a source.

So far, the Middle East crisis has not disrupted supply in the region, but “yet is the key word… we’ll see in the next few days,” a trader said.

Overall, Australia’s bunker market appears balanced. With comfortable stock levels, many deliveries can be arranged within three to four days. Even at pipeline-equipped ports like Darwin and Dampier, trucks remain an essential part of the supply chain.

In New Zealand, market conditions are stable. VLSFO is readily available in Tauranga and Auckland, with pipeline connections at certain Tauranga berths. Marsden Point can supply both VLSFO and LSMGO via pipeline to cargo vessels, though truck-based deliveries across South Island ports remain constrained.

South Asia

Adverse weather is forecast to affect operations at India’s Sikka on 5–6 March, with the potential to disrupt bunkering activities at the port during that period.

In Sri Lanka, supply fundamentals remain steady. A supplier, active in Colombo and Hambantota, is quoting lead times of around five days for all fuel grades, largely in line with the previous week.

Middle East

The Fujairah Government Media Office said authorities in the Emirate responded to a fire that broke out this morning at the Fujairah Petroleum Industrial Estate (FOIZ). The blaze was triggered by falling debris after air defenses successfully intercepted a drone. No injuries were reported, the fire was brought under control, and operations have since resumed.

In Fujairah and Khor Fakkan, many bunker suppliers have halted deliveries due to uncertainty around loadings, as some terminals remain closed. Prices in Fujairah have climbed sharply, with only a limited number of suppliers still quoting.

At Jebel Ali, certain container terminals resumed operations this morning. However, bunkering inside the port has been suspended for safety reasons, while deliveries at Dubai Anchorage continue as normal. Availability is extremely tight as suppliers work through a backlog of vessels that were unable to stem fuel at Jebel Ali, a source said.

Adverse weather is forecast in Fujairah on 6 March, which could further disrupt bunkering at the port.

In Iraq’s Basrah, VLSFO and LSMGO remain readily available, though HSFO supply continues to be constrained. The Iraqi ports of Umm Qasr and Khor Al Zubair are fully operational. Basrah Oil Terminal (BOT) is also operating without disruption to crude loadings or marine traffic, according to GAC Hot Port News.

Port operations across Kuwait — including Mina Al Ahmadi, Mina Abdulla and Mina Al Zour — are proceeding normally. Inchcape Shipping reported that vessels originally bound for Shuaiba Port must divert to Shuwaikh Port to discharge cargo.

In Bahrain, all port movements, including pilotage services, have been temporarily suspended, shipping agency added.

Jeddah reports solid availability of both VLSFO and LSMGO. In Yanbu, however, adverse weather is expected to interrupt bunkering between 4–5 March.

Elsewhere, operations remain steady. Egyptian ports and the Suez Canal are fully functional. Jordan’s Aqaba Port continues normal activity. Ports in Pakistan remain open. Lebanon’s Beirut and Tripoli ports are operating as usual. There have been no official cancellations of vessel calls in Cyprus, and Israeli ports are functioning normally, Inchcape Shipping said.

In Qatar, ports are operating as usual, although significant GPS signal degradation has been reported at Mesaieed Port. At Ras Laffan, LSMGO supply is tight, while VLSFO is available only by barge and exclusively at anchorage.

Djibouti is facing tight VLSFO supply, and LSMGO stocks are nearly depleted.

In Oman, operations are partially restricted. Activities are suspended at the Port of Duqm, Asyad Drydock – Duqm, and the Port of Salalah’s General Cargo Terminal (GCT) until further notice. Meanwhile, Port Sultan Qaboos in Muscat, Mina Al Fahal, the Port of Sohar, Port of Salalah’s container terminal, Qalhat LNG Terminal in Sur, and the OMIFCO Terminal in Sur are operating normally, according to Inchcape Shipping.

“Ship movements through the Strait of Hormuz and adjacent waters have dropped sharply, with reports suggesting up to a 70% decline in vessel transits, reflecting adjustments by shipping companies in response to heightened risks. The situation has also affected ports in the region, including Oman, with operational and logistical considerations requiring careful management. Major marine insurers have reviewed or limited coverage in surrounding waters, impacting shipping costs and operational planning,” a regional trader said.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 3 March, 2026

Continue Reading

Methanol

World Fuel and partners complete first green methanol bunkering of car carrier in Shanghai

Operation involved the delivery of approximately 2,800 MT of green methanol to “Arctic Tern” via a ship-to-ship transfer using SIPG Energy’s dedicated methanol bunkering vessel “M/V Hai Gang Zhi Yuan”.

Admin

Published

on

By

World Fuel and partners complete first green methanol bunkering of car carrier in Shanghai

Marine fuel provider World Fuel on Tuesday (21 July) said it successfully completed the first green methanol bunkering of M/V Arctic Tern, with EUKOR Car Carriers and SIPG Energy at the Port of Shanghai. 

Arctic Tern is the first vessel in the new Shaper Class series of car carriers. 

The operation involved the delivery of approximately 2,800 MT of green methanol to Arctic Tern via a ship-to-ship transfer using SIPG Energy’s dedicated methanol bunkering vessel M/V Hai Gang Zhi Yuan, the largest vessel of its kind in operation. 

The bunkering operation was carried out at Haitong Terminal, Waigaoqiao Port Area, Shanghai Port, with cargo handling operations conducted simultaneously during bunkering.

This marks EUKOR Car Carriers’ first green methanol operation and the first time Arctic Tern has bunkered methanol since its delivery on 9 July. The operation marked the first bunkering at Shanghai Port of green methanol produced locally in Shanghai for an international PCTC operator. 

It also demonstrated the city’s integrated green methanol value chain, spanning local production, storage and bunkering, and established a replicable “Shanghai Model” for green methanol supply.

World Fuel arranged the supply and delivery of the fuel on behalf of EUKOR Car Carriers, working with SIPG Energy as the physical supplier at the Port of Shanghai.

The green methanol supplied was produced from municipal solid waste, ISCC-EU certified, and had a carbon intensity value below 25 gCO₂e/MJ.

Arctic Tern is the first of fourteen Shaper Class vessels ordered by Wallenius Wilhelmsen. With a capacity of 9,300 car equivalent units and methanol dual-fuel capability, the vessel will be operated by EUKOR Car Carriers, jointly owned by Wallenius Wilhelmsen and Hyundai Motor Group. Following her first green methanol bunkering, Arctic Tern will continue her maiden voyage from Asia to Europe.

Xavier Leroi, COO Shipping Services at Wallenius Wilhelmsen and CEO of EUKOR Car Carriers, said: “Completing Arctic Tern’s first green methanol bunkering shortly after delivery is a significant milestone towards our decarbonisation ambition for both EUKOR Car Carriers and Wallenius Wilhelmsen. It demonstrates how investments in next-generation vessel technology and fuel flexibility are being translated into real-world operations. 

“This achievement reflects the strong collaboration between all parties involved. Together, we have shown how partnerships across the maritime value chain can help make lower-emission fuels available and operationally viable at scale.”

Mark Tamsitt, SVP Global Marine Sales at World Fuel, said, “The first bunkering event with a new fuel is a significant moment for any shipowner, and our role is to make it as seamless as possible. By connecting EUKOR Car Carriers with SIPG Energy’s proven green methanol capability at the Port of Shanghai, we were able to deliver on reliable supply, fuel quality, and safe processes. As more of our customers bring methanol dual-fuel tonnage into service, we are committed to being the partner that makes these kinds of operations routine.”

Mr. Zhang Da, General Manager of SIPG Energy, said, “Welcoming Arctic Tern to the Port of Shanghai for her first green methanol bunkering demonstrates the strength and maturity of our supply capability. Building on our well-established methanol ship-to-ship bunkering services for container vessels, we have already extended such services to pure car and truck carriers (PCTCs). This bunkering sets a new record for the largest single SIMOPs green methanol bunkering for PCTCs in China, marking another step in building Shanghai’s position as a global green energy hub for international shipping.”

This operation follows Wallenius Wilhelmsen’s announcement on 9 July that Arctic Tern would complete her first methanol bunkering shortly after delivery. The vessel entered service on routes between Asia and Europe immediately following handover from China Merchants Jinling Shipyard in Nanjing.

 

Photo credit: World Fuel
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Ammonia

HPA and MB Energy develop safety concept for STS ammonia bunkering

HPA says the Port of Hamburg will become “bunker ready” for ammonia, laying the groundwork for safe and reliable ammonia bunkering in the future.

Admin

Published

on

By

HPA and MB Energy develop safety concept for STS ammonia bunkering

The Hamburg Port Authority (HPA) and integrated energy company MB Energy on Tuesday (21 July) said they have completed a comprehensive risk analysis and developed a dedicated safety concept for ship-to-ship ammonia bunkering.

MB Energy said the analysis lays the groundwork for the safe introduction of ammonia as a future marine fuel.

“With our planned ammonia import terminal in Hamburg-Blumensand, MB Energy intends to provide the reliable land side supply infrastructure needed to support this transition across northern German ports,” it said in a social media post. 

Mabanaft Group was renamed to MB Energy last year and merged over 50 existing brands under one identity. 

Separately, HPA said the Port of Hamburg will become “bunker ready” for ammonia, laying the groundwork for safe and reliable ammonia bunkering in the future.

“The focus is in particular on container ships, cruise ships as well as RoRo and ConRo (Container/RoRo) ships,” it said. 

“We expect ammonia to establish itself as an alternative marine marine fuel in the coming years. With our preparatory work, we are already creating the conditions to welcome the first ammonia-powered ships in Hamburg and to bunker them safely.:

HPA added that the import terminal for ammonia planned by MB Energy from 2029 will make a decisive contribution to ensuring the reliable availability of ammonia as a bunker fuel in northern German ports in the long term. 

“The use of an ammonia bunker barge is considered a possible addition to the landside infrastructure to enable ship bunkering in the port and beyond in the future,” it said.

Related: Mabanaft Group renames as MB Energy, merging over 50 brands under one identity

 

Photo credit: Hamburg Port Authority
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel

Alkagesta highlights key insights of Malta bunkering market in 2026

Darren Lee Axisa discusses the key trends influencing Malta’s bunkering market and the factors that will determine Malta’s long-term competitiveness as a regional bunkering hub.

Admin

Published

on

By

Alkagesta highlights key insights of Malta bunkering market in 2026

In an article published on Alkagesta Market Insights, Darren Lee Axisa, Malta Country Manager of Alkagesta, on Monday (20 July) discussed the key trends influencing Malta’s bunkering market and the factors that will determine Malta’s long-term competitiveness as a regional bunkering hub: 

Malta’s bunkering and energy market is moving through a period of structural adjustment. The disruptions that defined the first half of 2026 have accelerated shifts in product demand, terminal strategy, and the competitive dynamics of one of the Mediterranean’s most strategically positioned bunkering hubs. For Alkagesta, whose storage footprint on the island approaches 300,000 cubic metres, the period has tested operational flexibility while reinforcing the value of diversified infrastructure access.

A Market Shifting in Two Directions

Malta’s broader economy has remained resilient — GDP growth reached 3.9% in Q1 2026 — but the bunkering market has undergone a significant product mix shift, the roots of which predate the current geopolitical disruption.

The Mediterranean Emission Control Area, which came into force on 1 May 2025, triggered an immediate and measurable realignment in fuel demand across the region. VPS data covering the first six months post-ECA implementation shows that across the top ten Mediterranean bunkering ports, VLSFO volumes fell 23%, MGO more than doubled, ULSFO quadrupled, and biofuels increased fivefold. In Valletta specifically, the shift was even more pronounced: VLSFO dropped 57% from 111,641 mt to 47,732 mt, while MGO volumes more than tripled from 33,299 mt to 103,445 mt, and ULSFO rose from 2,821 mt to 34,535 mt over the same period.

This structural rotation has been further accelerated by the broader regulatory environment. FuelEU Maritime and EU ETS requirements are pushing shipowners toward cleaner, verifiable fuel options at every port call — a direction Alkagesta had already positioned itself ahead of, having been among the first movers in the Mediterranean to support the transition to 0.1% sulphur fuel oil following the ECA’s introduction.

Layered on top of this regulatory shift has been a period of reduced terminal capacity affecting bunkering market availability across the island. Fuel oil volumes dropped roughly 35% year-on-year between January and May 2026, falling from approximately 382,000 mt in 2025 to 247,000 mt. DMA demand moved sharply in the opposite direction, rising from around 150,000 mt in January to April 2025 to 247,000 mt over the same period in 2026 — a trend consistent with both the ECA-driven product mix shift and the disruption to heavier fuel availability during the constrained period.

Note: The full article can be read here

 

Photo credit: Alkagesta
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending