Connect with us

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (27 Jan 2026)

Bunker demand slow in several South Korean ports; VLSFO and LSMGO availability good in Taiwanese ports; bunker supply good in several Sri Lankan ports.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • Bunker demand slow in several South Korean ports
  • VLSFO and LSMGO availability good in Taiwanese ports
  • Bunker supply good in several Sri Lankan ports

Singapore and Malaysia

In Singapore, VLSFO supply has tightened further as terminal loading delays affect several suppliers, lifting recommended lead times to 12–14 days from 10–14 days last week. HSFO availability remains constrained, typically requiring 9–12 days of advance notice, broadly unchanged from last week’s 8–12 days.

LSMGO supply has also tightened sharply, with lead times now at 7–9 days, up from 2–5 days last week.

Singapore’s residual fuel oil stocks have averaged 1% lower so far in January compared with December, according to the latest data from Enterprise Singapore. The port’s fuel oil inventories have remained above 25 million bbls, amid a 35% increase in net fuel oil imports into the port so far this month. Fuel oil imports have risen by 373,000 bbls, while exports have fallen by 660,000 bbls. Middle distillate inventories have also averaged 1% lower over the same period.

At Port Klang, VLSFO and LSMGO are generally well supplied, particularly for smaller prompt stems, while HSFO availability remains tight and more challenging to secure.

East Asia

VLSFO supply in Zhoushan remains under pressure due to ongoing constraints, with several suppliers now advising lead times extending into early February. HSFO availability has also tightened, with lead times lengthening from about 5–6 days last week, to early February at present. In contrast, LSMGO supply has improved, with lead times narrowing from 5–7 days last week to around 3–5 days currently.

Across northern China, bunker availability continues to be mixed. Dalian and Qingdao have adequate supplies of both VLSFO and LSMGO, though HSFO remains tight in Qingdao. Tianjin continues to face shortages across all fuel grades. In Shanghai, both VLSFO and HSFO remain in limited supply, while LSMGO availability is stable.

Further south, supply remains tight for both VLSFO and LSMGO in Fuzhou. Xiamen has sufficient VLSFO, but LSMGO availability is restricted. In Yangpu and Guangzhou, delivery options for both grades remain limited.

In Hong Kong, bunker lead times are steady at around seven days for all grades, broadly unchanged from recent weeks.

Across Taiwan, lead times for VLSFO and LSMGO remain largely stable. Deliveries at Keelung, Taichung and Hualien continue to require about two days of advance notice, in line with last week, while slightly longer lead times of around three days are still recommended at Kaohsiung.

In South Korea, most suppliers are quoting lead times of approximately 4–6 days for all grades amid low demand, similar to last week. However, persistent winter conditions continue to raise the risk of operational disruptions. Weather-related interruptions may affect Busan and Ulsan between 27, 29–30 January and 2–3 February; Yeosu between 27–30 January and 1–2 February; and Daesan between 27–30 January and 1–2 February.

In Japan, prompt VLSFO availability remains tight at major ports such as Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama and Kawasaki, with recommended lead times of 9–10 days. Tight supply conditions are also being reported at Osaka, Kobe, Sakai, Mizushima, Nagoya and Yokkaichi, and are expected to persist into early February. By contrast, LSMGO availability remains generally stable nationwide. B24-VLSFO is being supplied only on request at Tokyo, Chiba, Kawasaki and Yokohama.

HSFO supply has also tightened at Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama and Kawasaki, where lead times are around 8–9 days, while availability remains stable at most other Japanese ports. At Tokuyama, suppliers are currently short of VLSFO, though both LSMGO and HSFO remain readily available. At Oita, all fuel grades are available, subject to enquiry.

Oceania

Bunker availability across Australia remains generally stable. VLSFO and LSMGO are readily available nationwide, with seven-day lead times continuing to be standard.

In Western Australia, suppliers are advising lead times of about seven days at both Kwinana and Fremantle. Most deliveries are made by barge from a single supplier, although LSMGO can also be supplied by truck. Strong afternoon winds are still causing occasional scheduling disruptions.

In New South Wales, VLSFO deliveries at Port Kembla are possible by both truck and pipeline, with pipeline parcels starting at around 70 mt, and smaller volumes supplied by truck. Sydney currently operates with one barge and also offers truck deliveries and pipeline supply at selected berths. Delivery schedules in Sydney are frequently adjusted to accommodate naval and cruise vessels. While VLSFO and LSMGO stocks remain healthy, HSFO availability is tight, with suppliers generally requiring around seven days’ notice. Seasonal cruise traffic in Sydney, Cairns and Darwin between December and February is expected to place additional strain on delivery schedules.

In Brisbane and Gladstone, VLSFO and LSMGO continue to be supplied with similar seven-day lead times. HSFO is available on request in Brisbane, while Gladstone may still face intermittent weather-related delays. Access constraints persist at Brisbane’s AAT terminal. Two barges, operated by different suppliers, are currently active in Brisbane, supplying VLSFO and LSMGO, with HSFO offered only on enquiry.

In Victoria, suppliers in Melbourne and Geelong maintain strong inventories of VLSFO and LSMGO. HSFO remains tight for prompt delivery, although Melbourne currently has adequate supply. Both ports rely on a single barge, and lead times remain steady at around seven days. LSMGO can also be delivered by truck to smaller ports such as Portland and Port Welshpool within 2–3 days.

Overall, Australia’s bunker market remains steady, with deliveries often achievable within 3–4 days due to healthy inventory levels. Even at ports with pipeline infrastructure, including Darwin and Dampier, suppliers continue to rely heavily on truck deliveries to support distribution.

In New Zealand, bunker supply is also stable. VLSFO is widely available at Tauranga and Auckland, with pipeline access at certain berths in Tauranga. At Marsden Point, both VLSFO and LSMGO can be delivered by pipeline to cargo vessels, while truck availability across South Island ports remains limited.

Meanwhile, the northern Australian cyclone season, which runs from November to April, is expected to cause intermittent disruptions, with 9–11 cyclones forecast this year, a source says.

South Asia

In Sri Lanka, a supplier in both Colombo and Hambantota is now recommending lead times of about two days for all fuel grades, a marked improvement from roughly six days last week. However, rough weather is forecast in Colombo on 27 January, which may temporarily disrupt bunkering operations.

Middle East

Prompt bunker supply in Fujairah remains tight across all fuel grades, with several suppliers running on constrained delivery schedules. Most are still quoting lead times of 5–7 days, although a limited number can arrange urgent stems at a premium, according to a source. Similar supply pressures are also being reported at Khor Fakkan.

In Basrah, VLSFO and LSMGO continue to be readily available, while HSFO supply remains limited. At Jeddah, availability of both VLSFO and LSMGO has improved, but persistent port congestion is continuing to slow bunker delivery operations. Port Suez presents a contrasting picture, with stocks of VLSFO, LSMGO and HSFO close to being exhausted.

In Ras Laffan, supplies of VLSFO and LSMGO remain tight. Djibouti currently has VLSFO available, though LSMGO inventories are nearly depleted.

Across Oman’s ports—Sohar, Salalah, Muscat and Duqm—bunker availability remains stable, with suppliers consistently able to offer LSMGO for prompt delivery windows.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 28 January, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

Admin

Published

on

By

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Taiwanese shipping firm Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation (Yang Ming) and South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean on Wednesday (2 September) signed a shipbuilding contract for six 13,000 TEU class LNG dual-fuel container vessels. 

The contract was signed by Dr. Chuck Tsai, Chairman of Yang Ming, and Mr. Charles Kim, CEO of Hanwha Ocean. The vessels are scheduled for delivery between 2028 and 2029. 

They will complement Yang Ming’s existing fleet of 10,000+ TEU vessels and serve as key vessels on East-West services, with deployment flexibility across trade lanes connecting Asia with the East and West Coasts of North America, South America, and the Mediterranean. 

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

“As Yang Ming transitions toward net-zero emissions, LNG provides a relatively mature and economically viable alternative fuel solution, capable of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 20%,” the company said. 

“At the same time, ammonia can serve as a carbon-free fuel by utilising converted LNG storage facilities, while offering relatively lower conversion costs and comparatively well-developed supply chains and infrastructure. The Ammonia Fuel Ready design will therefore provide Yang Ming with greater flexibility in responding to increasingly stringent international regulations on greenhouse gas emissions.”

In addition, the vessels will be equipped with Type B LNG fuel tanks with a design pressure of 1.0 bar to enhance the safety and efficiency of LNG operations, together with a range of energy-saving technologies, including Wind Shields, Rudder Bulbs, Pre-Swirl Stators, and Shore Power Systems. Smart ship technologies and cybersecurity protection features will also be incorporated to enhance operational efficiency, safety, and reliability while effectively reducing fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

Deliveries under Yang Ming’s next-generation fleet optimization plan commenced earlier this year. By 2030, a total of 24 new vessels are expected to enter service. 

This includes 18 LNG dual-fuel vessels—comprising five 15,500 TEU, seven 16,000 TEU, and the six 13,000 TEU vessels under this contract—alongside six 8,000 TEU methanol dual-fuel-ready ships. 

 

Photo credit: Yang Ming Marine Transport
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Both secured AiP for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Admin

Published

on

By

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Lloyd’s Register (LR) and the Marine Design and Research Institute of China (MARIC) on Thursday (3 September) have secured Approval in Principle (AiP) for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Announced at SMM 2026, the concept addresses one of the biggest investment challenges facing shipping today: the need to develop vessels and capabilities that can support a range of alternative fuel options and pathways as technologies, infrastructure and regulations evolve.

While LNG is already a mature fuel pathway, methanol and ammonia remain at an earlier stage of development, with questions around global fuel availability, infrastructure development, economics and long-term adoption.

The 114,000 DWT tanker concept has been designed as a product and crude oil carrier that can accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia as technologies, regulations and fuel supply chains mature. By incorporating conversion readiness at the design stage, the concept aims to reduce future retrofit complexity and provide owners with greater confidence when planning long-term fleet investments.

The design concept was reviewed against LR’s July 2026 class rules and regulations, including requirements relating to ships using gases and other low-flashpoint fuels, alongside relevant IACS Common Structural Rules for oil tankers. Final classification and statutory approval remain subject to full compliance with all applicable rules and regulations.

Theo Kourmpelis, Global Business Director for Tankers, Lloyd’s Register, said: “Shipowners are being asked to make major investment decisions today despite continued uncertainty around which fuels will dominate in the decades ahead. Alternative fuel solutions each offer potential pathways to compliance, but fuel infrastructure, regulation and economics continue to evolve at different speeds around the world.

“Designs that preserve flexibility will be critical in helping owners manage risk while preparing for multiple future scenarios.”

Si Nan, Marine & Offshore Marketing Department Vice Director, MARIC, said: “As the industry explores different decarbonisation pathways, shipowners need vessel designs that can adapt alongside technological and regulatory developments. This concept was developed specifically to provide greater fuel flexibility and long-term resilience, allowing owners to respond to changing market requirements without being locked into a single fuel strategy.

“Receiving Approval in Principle from Lloyd’s Register is an important milestone that validates the design concept and supports its future development.”

 

Photo credit: Lloyd’s Register
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity while the strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year.

Admin

Published

on

By

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

Latest data from classification society DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight (AFI) platform alternative-fuelled vessel ordering was strong in August, with 52 new vessels added to the platform.

This is the highest monthly total since October 2024 and follows another active month in July, when 47 vessels were added to the database.

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity, with 46 orders recorded. The container segment led the way with 30 orders, while the car carrier segment contributed a further 12 LNG-fuelled vessels. In addition, four ethanol-fuelled bulk carriers and two hydrogen-powered bulk carriers were added during the month, as well as one LNG bunker vessel.

The strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year. In total, 242 alternative-fuelled vessel orders have been placed in the first eight months of 2026, representing a 27% increase compared with the same period in 2025.

LNG remains the dominant fuel choice, accounting for 63% of all alternative-fuelled vessel orders registered so far this year. Container vessels represent the largest share of these LNG orders (59%), followed by car carriers (30%).

Jason Stefanatos, Global Decarbonization Director at DNV Maritime, said: “The past two months have been particularly strong for alternative-fuelled vessel ordering, with August recording the highest monthly total we’ve seen since October 2024. This has helped lift year-to-date orders to a level well above the same period last year.

“LNG remains the leading fuel choice, driven largely by activity in the container and car carrier segments. These sectors have been among the earliest adopters of alternative fuels, supported by predictable liner operations and increasing demand from cargo owners to reduce emissions across supply chains. 

“For many owners, LNG offers a combination of emissions reductions, fuel availability and future flexibility while the longer-term fuel landscape continues to evolve. 

“At the same time, the latest figures include orders for ethanol- and hydrogen-fuelled vessels, highlighting that owners continue to explore a range of decarbonization pathways. Different segments are making different fuel choices, but the overall level of activity demonstrates continued investment in lower-emission shipping.”

Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.26 PM Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.36 PM

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS



Trending