Connect with us

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (13 Jan 2026)

Bunker demand low in Zhoushan; VLSFO and LSMGO availability good in Taiwanese ports; VLSFO availability tight across several Japanese ports.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • Bunker demand low in Zhoushan
  • VLSFO and LSMGO availability good in Taiwanese ports
  • VLSFO availability tight across several Japanese ports

Singapore and Malaysia

In Singapore, VLSFO availability has tightened significantly, with most suppliers now quoting lead times of 7–11 days, up sharply from 2–7 days last week.

LSMGO remains readily available, with lead times holding steady at 3–6 days. HSFO supply continues to be tight, typically requiring 7–12 days of advance notice, largely unchanged from last week’s 7–11 days.

Singapore’s residual fuel oil stocks have averaged 2% lower so far this month compared to December, according to the latest data from Enterprise Singapore. Despite this, total fuel oil inventories have remained above 25 million bbls, supported by a 14% increase in net fuel oil imports so far in January. That said, both inflows and outflows have declined: imports are down by 814,000 bbls, while exports have fallen by a larger 1.24 million bbls.

Middle distillate inventories at the port have also drawn down, slipping by 3% this month to 8.05 million bbls, touching multi-year lows.

At Port Klang, VLSFO and LSMGO are generally well supplied, particularly for smaller prompt stems, while HSFO availability remains restricted and more difficult to secure.

East Asia

In Zhoushan, most suppliers are currently indicating lead times of about 5–7 days for all grades amid subdued demand, broadly unchanged from the 5–8 days quoted last week.

Across northern China, fuel availability remains patchy. Dalian and Qingdao have adequate supplies of VLSFO and LSMGO, though HSFO continues to be tight in Qingdao. In Tianjin, all grades remain in short supply.

In Shanghai, availability of VLSFO and HSFO is still limited, while LSMGO supply remains stable. Further south, both VLSFO and LSMGO are tight in Fuzhou. In Xiamen, VLSFO supply is sufficient, but LSMGO availability is restricted. Delivery options for both grades continue to be constrained in Yangpu and Guangzhou.

In Hong Kong, bunker lead times are holding steady at around seven days for all grades, broadly in line with recent weeks.

In Taiwan, lead times at Keelung, Kaohsiung and Hualien remain unchanged at two days, the same as last week, while suppliers in Taichung are advising slightly longer lead times of around three days.

Bunker demand across South Korea has been subdued over the past week, largely due to adverse weather conditions. Several ports operated under weather-related restrictions between 10–12 January; while these have since been lifted, further bad weather is forecast in the days ahead.

Most suppliers are currently advising lead times of around 6–10 days for all grades, though some are quoting longer lead times after having sold most of their January cargoes. This marks a clear shift from last week, when VLSFO and LSMGO were available with shorter lead times of 2–5 days, while HSFO was offered on an enquiry basis.

Ongoing winter conditions continue to pose a risk of operational disruptions. Busan, Ulsan and Daesan may face weather-related interruptions between 13–18 January, while bunker operations at Yeosu could be impacted on 13 January and again during 15–18 January.

In Japan, prompt VLSFO availability continues to be constrained at major ports such as Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama and Kawasaki, where most suppliers are advising lead times of around 5–6 days. Tight supply conditions are also persisting at Osaka, Kobe, Sakai, Mizushima, Nagoya and Yokkaichi, and are expected to continue through the end of January. LSMGO supply, by contrast, remains generally stable across the country.

B24-VLSFO is being supplied only on request at Tokyo, Chiba, Kawasaki and Yokohama. HSFO availability has also tightened at Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama and Kawasaki, with lead times extending to about 8–9 days, while supply remains stable at most other Japanese ports.

At Tokuyama, suppliers are currently short of VLSFO, though both LSMGO and HSFO availability there remains adequate.

Oceania

Across Australia, bunker supply remains broadly stable. VLSFO and LSMGO are readily available nationwide, with seven-day lead times continuing to be the market standard.

In Western Australia, suppliers are recommending lead times of around seven days for deliveries at Kwinana and Fremantle. Most stems are supplied by barge from a single supplier, though LSMGO can also be delivered by truck. Strong afternoon winds continue to trigger occasional scheduling disruptions.

In New South Wales, VLSFO can be delivered by both truck and pipeline at Port Kembla, with pipeline parcels starting at around 70 mt and smaller volumes supplied by truck. Sydney currently has one operational barge and also offers truck deliveries and, at select berths, pipeline supply. Delivery schedules there are frequently adjusted to accommodate naval vessels and cruise ships. While VLSFO and LSMGO inventories remain healthy, HSFO availability is tight, with suppliers typically seeking about seven days’ advance notice. Seasonal cruise traffic in Sydney, Cairns and Darwin between December and February is expected to place additional pressure on delivery schedules.

In Brisbane and Gladstone, VLSFO and LSMGO continue to be supplied with similar seven-day lead times. HSFO is available on request in Brisbane, while Gladstone may still face intermittent weather-related delays. Access constraints remain at Brisbane’s AAT terminal. Two barges—operated by different suppliers—are now active in Brisbane, supplying VLSFO and LSMGO, with HSFO offered only on enquiry.

In Victoria, suppliers in Melbourne and Geelong hold strong inventories of VLSFO and LSMGO. HSFO remains tight for prompt delivery, although Melbourne currently has adequate supply. Both ports rely on a single barge. Lead times are holding steady around seven days, while LSMGO can be delivered by truck to smaller ports such as Portland and Port Welshpool within 2–3 days.

Overall, Australia’s bunker market remains steady, with deliveries within 3–4 days often achievable due to solid inventory levels. Even at ports with pipeline infrastructure, including Darwin and Dampier, suppliers continue to rely heavily on truck deliveries to support distribution.

In New Zealand, bunker supply remains stable. VLSFO is widely available at Tauranga and Auckland, with pipeline access at certain berths in Tauranga. Both VLSFO and LSMGO can be delivered by pipeline to cargo vessels at Marsden Point, while truck availability across South Island ports remains limited.

Meanwhile, cyclone season in northern Australia, which runs from November to April, is expected to cause intermittent disruptions, with 9–11 cyclones forecast this year.

Notably, vessel movements have resumed at North Queensland ports following the passage of Tropical Cyclone Koji over the weekend. Townsville, Mourilyan and Lucinda have been open since Sunday, while Abbot Point remains at red alert, with anchorages and pilotage areas still closed, according to GAC Hot Port News.

South Asia

In Sri Lanka, one supplier is currently quoting lead times of about six days across all fuel grades at both Colombo and Hambantota.

Middle East

Prompt bunker availability remains constrained in Fujairah across all grades, with several suppliers operating on tight delivery schedules. Most are continuing to quote lead times of 5–7 days, though a few can still arrange urgent stems at a premium, according to a source. Similar supply conditions are being reported in Khor Fakkan.

Adverse weather is forecast in both Fujairah and Khor Fakkan between 16–17 January, which is expected to disrupt bunker deliveries.

In Basrah, VLSFO and LSMGO remain readily available, while HSFO supply continues to be limited. At Jeddah, availability of VLSFO and LSMGO has improved, but ongoing port congestion is still slowing bunker delivery operations. Weather-related bunkering disruptions are also expected at Yanbu on 14 January.

Port Suez is facing contrasting conditions, with stocks of VLSFO, LSMGO and HSFO close to exhaustion. Adverse weather is forecast in Port Said between 13–14 January, which could hamper operations. In Ras Laffan, both VLSFO and LSMGO supplies remain tight. VLSFO is available in Djibouti, but LSMGO inventories are nearly depleted.

Across Oman’s ports—Sohar, Salalah, Muscat and Duqm—bunker supply remains stable, with suppliers consistently offering LSMGO on prompt delivery windows.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 14 January, 2026 

Continue Reading

Methanol

World Fuel and partners complete first green methanol bunkering of car carrier in Shanghai

Operation involved the delivery of approximately 2,800 MT of green methanol to “Arctic Tern” via a ship-to-ship transfer using SIPG Energy’s dedicated methanol bunkering vessel “M/V Hai Gang Zhi Yuan”.

Admin

Published

on

By

World Fuel and partners complete first green methanol bunkering of car carrier in Shanghai

Marine fuel provider World Fuel on Tuesday (21 July) said it successfully completed the first green methanol bunkering of M/V Arctic Tern, with EUKOR Car Carriers and SIPG Energy at the Port of Shanghai. 

Arctic Tern is the first vessel in the new Shaper Class series of car carriers. 

The operation involved the delivery of approximately 2,800 MT of green methanol to Arctic Tern via a ship-to-ship transfer using SIPG Energy’s dedicated methanol bunkering vessel M/V Hai Gang Zhi Yuan, the largest vessel of its kind in operation. 

The bunkering operation was carried out at Haitong Terminal, Waigaoqiao Port Area, Shanghai Port, with cargo handling operations conducted simultaneously during bunkering.

This marks EUKOR Car Carriers’ first green methanol operation and the first time Arctic Tern has bunkered methanol since its delivery on 9 July. The operation marked the first bunkering at Shanghai Port of green methanol produced locally in Shanghai for an international PCTC operator. 

It also demonstrated the city’s integrated green methanol value chain, spanning local production, storage and bunkering, and established a replicable “Shanghai Model” for green methanol supply.

World Fuel arranged the supply and delivery of the fuel on behalf of EUKOR Car Carriers, working with SIPG Energy as the physical supplier at the Port of Shanghai.

The green methanol supplied was produced from municipal solid waste, ISCC-EU certified, and had a carbon intensity value below 25 gCO₂e/MJ.

Arctic Tern is the first of fourteen Shaper Class vessels ordered by Wallenius Wilhelmsen. With a capacity of 9,300 car equivalent units and methanol dual-fuel capability, the vessel will be operated by EUKOR Car Carriers, jointly owned by Wallenius Wilhelmsen and Hyundai Motor Group. Following her first green methanol bunkering, Arctic Tern will continue her maiden voyage from Asia to Europe.

Xavier Leroi, COO Shipping Services at Wallenius Wilhelmsen and CEO of EUKOR Car Carriers, said: “Completing Arctic Tern’s first green methanol bunkering shortly after delivery is a significant milestone towards our decarbonisation ambition for both EUKOR Car Carriers and Wallenius Wilhelmsen. It demonstrates how investments in next-generation vessel technology and fuel flexibility are being translated into real-world operations. 

“This achievement reflects the strong collaboration between all parties involved. Together, we have shown how partnerships across the maritime value chain can help make lower-emission fuels available and operationally viable at scale.”

Mark Tamsitt, SVP Global Marine Sales at World Fuel, said, “The first bunkering event with a new fuel is a significant moment for any shipowner, and our role is to make it as seamless as possible. By connecting EUKOR Car Carriers with SIPG Energy’s proven green methanol capability at the Port of Shanghai, we were able to deliver on reliable supply, fuel quality, and safe processes. As more of our customers bring methanol dual-fuel tonnage into service, we are committed to being the partner that makes these kinds of operations routine.”

Mr. Zhang Da, General Manager of SIPG Energy, said, “Welcoming Arctic Tern to the Port of Shanghai for her first green methanol bunkering demonstrates the strength and maturity of our supply capability. Building on our well-established methanol ship-to-ship bunkering services for container vessels, we have already extended such services to pure car and truck carriers (PCTCs). This bunkering sets a new record for the largest single SIMOPs green methanol bunkering for PCTCs in China, marking another step in building Shanghai’s position as a global green energy hub for international shipping.”

This operation follows Wallenius Wilhelmsen’s announcement on 9 July that Arctic Tern would complete her first methanol bunkering shortly after delivery. The vessel entered service on routes between Asia and Europe immediately following handover from China Merchants Jinling Shipyard in Nanjing.

 

Photo credit: World Fuel
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Ammonia

HPA and MB Energy develop safety concept for STS ammonia bunkering

HPA says the Port of Hamburg will become “bunker ready” for ammonia, laying the groundwork for safe and reliable ammonia bunkering in the future.

Admin

Published

on

By

HPA and MB Energy develop safety concept for STS ammonia bunkering

The Hamburg Port Authority (HPA) and integrated energy company MB Energy on Tuesday (21 July) said they have completed a comprehensive risk analysis and developed a dedicated safety concept for ship-to-ship ammonia bunkering.

MB Energy said the analysis lays the groundwork for the safe introduction of ammonia as a future marine fuel.

“With our planned ammonia import terminal in Hamburg-Blumensand, MB Energy intends to provide the reliable land side supply infrastructure needed to support this transition across northern German ports,” it said in a social media post. 

Mabanaft Group was renamed to MB Energy last year and merged over 50 existing brands under one identity. 

Separately, HPA said the Port of Hamburg will become “bunker ready” for ammonia, laying the groundwork for safe and reliable ammonia bunkering in the future.

“The focus is in particular on container ships, cruise ships as well as RoRo and ConRo (Container/RoRo) ships,” it said. 

“We expect ammonia to establish itself as an alternative marine marine fuel in the coming years. With our preparatory work, we are already creating the conditions to welcome the first ammonia-powered ships in Hamburg and to bunker them safely.:

HPA added that the import terminal for ammonia planned by MB Energy from 2029 will make a decisive contribution to ensuring the reliable availability of ammonia as a bunker fuel in northern German ports in the long term. 

“The use of an ammonia bunker barge is considered a possible addition to the landside infrastructure to enable ship bunkering in the port and beyond in the future,” it said.

Related: Mabanaft Group renames as MB Energy, merging over 50 brands under one identity

 

Photo credit: Hamburg Port Authority
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel

Alkagesta highlights key insights of Malta bunkering market in 2026

Darren Lee Axisa discusses the key trends influencing Malta’s bunkering market and the factors that will determine Malta’s long-term competitiveness as a regional bunkering hub.

Admin

Published

on

By

Alkagesta highlights key insights of Malta bunkering market in 2026

In an article published on Alkagesta Market Insights, Darren Lee Axisa, Malta Country Manager of Alkagesta, on Monday (20 July) discussed the key trends influencing Malta’s bunkering market and the factors that will determine Malta’s long-term competitiveness as a regional bunkering hub: 

Malta’s bunkering and energy market is moving through a period of structural adjustment. The disruptions that defined the first half of 2026 have accelerated shifts in product demand, terminal strategy, and the competitive dynamics of one of the Mediterranean’s most strategically positioned bunkering hubs. For Alkagesta, whose storage footprint on the island approaches 300,000 cubic metres, the period has tested operational flexibility while reinforcing the value of diversified infrastructure access.

A Market Shifting in Two Directions

Malta’s broader economy has remained resilient — GDP growth reached 3.9% in Q1 2026 — but the bunkering market has undergone a significant product mix shift, the roots of which predate the current geopolitical disruption.

The Mediterranean Emission Control Area, which came into force on 1 May 2025, triggered an immediate and measurable realignment in fuel demand across the region. VPS data covering the first six months post-ECA implementation shows that across the top ten Mediterranean bunkering ports, VLSFO volumes fell 23%, MGO more than doubled, ULSFO quadrupled, and biofuels increased fivefold. In Valletta specifically, the shift was even more pronounced: VLSFO dropped 57% from 111,641 mt to 47,732 mt, while MGO volumes more than tripled from 33,299 mt to 103,445 mt, and ULSFO rose from 2,821 mt to 34,535 mt over the same period.

This structural rotation has been further accelerated by the broader regulatory environment. FuelEU Maritime and EU ETS requirements are pushing shipowners toward cleaner, verifiable fuel options at every port call — a direction Alkagesta had already positioned itself ahead of, having been among the first movers in the Mediterranean to support the transition to 0.1% sulphur fuel oil following the ECA’s introduction.

Layered on top of this regulatory shift has been a period of reduced terminal capacity affecting bunkering market availability across the island. Fuel oil volumes dropped roughly 35% year-on-year between January and May 2026, falling from approximately 382,000 mt in 2025 to 247,000 mt. DMA demand moved sharply in the opposite direction, rising from around 150,000 mt in January to April 2025 to 247,000 mt over the same period in 2026 — a trend consistent with both the ECA-driven product mix shift and the disruption to heavier fuel availability during the constrained period.

Note: The full article can be read here

 

Photo credit: Alkagesta
Published: 22 July, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending