Connect with us

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (11 Nov 2025)

VLSFO and LSMGO availability good in Port Klang; bunkering remains suspended in some Zhoushan anchorages; bunker demand low in Fujairah.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • VLSFO and LSMGO availability good in Port Klang
  • Bunkering remains suspended in some Zhoushan anchorages
  • Bunker demand low in Fujairah

Singapore and Malaysia

Despite subdued bunker demand in Singapore, VLSFO delivery times now show a wide disparity among suppliers — some can supply within three days, while others need up to 12 days. Last week, most suppliers quoted lead times of 5–10 days.

HSFO supply has tightened slightly, with lead times stretching from 5–10 days last week to 7–12 days now. In contrast, LSMGO availability has improved, with current lead times of 3–10 days, down from 5–17 days previously.

Residual fuel oil inventories at the port have averaged 1% higher in the first week of November compared to October levels, remaining above 24 million bbls. This comes despite a 1% fall in net fuel oil imports, which have dropped by 1.22 million bbls, while exports have also decreased by 1.19 million bbls, according to Enterprise Singapore.

Meanwhile, middle distillate stocks have averaged 3% lower over the same period.

At Malaysia’s Port Klang, VLSFO and LSMGO remain readily available, with prompt deliveries possible for smaller parcels, though HSFO supply continues to be tight.

East Asia

Bunker demand in Zhoushan remains muted, with most suppliers now advising lead times of 4–6 days for VLSFO, slightly shorter than last week’s 5–8 days. HSFO lead times have also narrowed to 4–6 days, while LSMGO remains steady within the same range.

However, bunker deliveries at Zhoushan’s Xiushandong anchorage were suspended on Monday due to severe weather linked to Tropical Storm Fung-wong, according to a source. Operations at the outer Tiaozhoumen and Xiazhimen anchorages have been halted since the weekend, though bunkering at the inner Mazhi anchorage continues uninterrupted.

Most suppliers remain unsure regarding when full operations will resume, as the storm tracks north-northeast toward Taiwan.

Fuel availability varies widely across northern China. Dalian and Qingdao have adequate VLSFO and LSMGO stocks, though HSFO remains tight in Qingdao. Tianjin, meanwhile, continues to experience shortages across all grades. In Shanghai, supplies of VLSFO and HSFO are limited, while LSMGO remains relatively stable.

Further south, Fuzhou is facing shortages in both VLSFO and LSMGO, while Xiamen has sufficient VLSFO but restricted LSMGO availability. Delivery options for both fuels remain limited in Yangpu and Guangzhou.

In Hong Kong, lead times across all grades are around seven days, consistent with recent weeks.

Meanwhile, Taiwan’s Central Weather Administration (CWA) has issued a land warning for Tropical Storm Fung-wong, whose center was located 370 km southwest of Eluanbi. The warning applies to Kaohsiung, Tainan, Taitung County, and Pingtung County, while a sea warning remains in effect for the Bashi Channel, Dongsha Island, southeast Taiwan waters, and the Taiwan Strait.

As a result, bunkering at Kaohsiung has been suspended today, and Taichung deliveries were temporarily halted this morning. Operations at Keelung and Hualien are still running smoothly, though traders caution that disruptions could follow.

At present, VLSFO and LSMGO can typically be delivered within three days at Keelung, Taichung, Hualien, and Kaohsiung, with little change from last week.

Bunker demand in South Korea remains low, with lead times across all fuel grades holding at around 2–9 days, nearly unchanged from 3–8 days last week. However, adverse weather is expected to disrupt operations — between 17–18 November in Busan and Ulsan, and from 16–18 and 20 November in Yeosu and Daesan, a trader said.

In Japan, prompt VLSFO supply remains tight across key ports including Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama, Kawasaki, Osaka, Kobe, Sakai, Mizushima, Nagoya, and Yokkaichi. LSMGO stocks are generally adequate nationwide, though immediate deliveries are proving difficult in Mizushima.

B24-VLSFO is available only on request in Tokyo, Chiba, Kawasaki, and Yokohama. Meanwhile, HSFO availability has tightened across most Japanese ports, and Oita has shortages of all fuel grades, including VLSFO, LSMGO, and HSFO.

Oceania

In Western Australia, VLSFO and LSMGO remain readily available at Kwinana and Fremantle, with most suppliers quoting lead times of around seven days. Deliveries are primarily handled by barge from a single supplier, while LSMGO can also be delivered by truck. However, strong afternoon winds occasionally cause bunkering delays, a source noted.

In New South Wales, VLSFO is available at Port Kembla through both truck and pipeline, with a minimum pipeline delivery of 70 mt and smaller volumes supplied by truck.

In Sydney, a single barge operates alongside truck and pipeline options at selected berths, though its schedule can be affected by naval and cruise liner movements. VLSFO and LSMGO stocks remain ample, while HSFO supply is limited. Suppliers typically recommend lead times of about seven days.

The expected increase in cruise activity between December and February in Sydney, Cairns, and Darwin could further affect vessel schedules.

In Queensland, VLSFO and LSMGO are easily accessible at Brisbane and Gladstone, both with lead times of around seven days. HSFO in Brisbane is available only on request, while Gladstone may experience occasional weather-related delays. Access to Brisbane’s AAT terminal remains challenging. The port now operates two barges under separate suppliers, both supplying VLSFO and LSMGO, with HSFO available upon enquiry.

In Victoria, the ports of Melbourne and Geelong continue to maintain strong VLSFO and LSMGO inventories, though HSFO remains tight, especially for prompt deliveries. Melbourne, however, currently holds adequate HSFO reserves. Both ports are served by a single barge, and adverse weather in the Bass Strait can cause occasional delays. A seven-day lead time is generally advised. LSMGO can also be trucked to smaller ports such as Portland and Port Welshpool, with deliveries taking 2–3 days.

Overall, bunker supply across Australian ports remains stable, typically requiring around seven days’ notice. Thanks to ample inventories, deliveries within 3–4 days are often possible. Ports equipped with pipeline infrastructure, including Darwin and Dampier, still partly depend on truck deliveries.

In New Zealand, bunker availability remains steady, with VLSFO widely supplied at Tauranga and Auckland. Tauranga offers pipeline access at select berths, while Marsden Point can deliver both VLSFO and LSMGO via pipeline to cargo vessels. 

Yesterday, strong winds in Wellington caused temporary bunkering delays. Looking ahead, the cyclone season in northern Australia — from 1 November to 30 April — is expected to periodically disrupt bunkering schedules, a source cautioned.

South Asia

In Sri Lanka, a supplier is advising prompt lead times of 1–2 days for all grades at both Colombo and Hambantota, slightly shorter than the three days quoted last week.

Middle East

Prompt bunker supply remains tight across all fuel grades in Fujairah, as several suppliers continue to grapple with low inventories and loading delays, despite muted demand. Lead times of 5–7 days are generally recommended, mirroring conditions at the nearby Khor Fakkan port. Some suppliers can still arrange urgent deliveries, though typically at a premium, a source said.

In Iraq’s Basrah, VLSFO and LSMGO remain readily available, while HSFO continues to be in short supply.

Saudi Arabia’s Jeddah has seen improved availability of both VLSFO and LSMGO, though port congestion continues to slow operations.

In stark contrast, Egypt’s Port Suez is facing severe shortages, with VLSFO, LSMGO, and HSFO stocks nearly depleted. Similarly, Qatar’s Ras Laffan is reporting tight VLSFO and LSMGO availability, while Djibouti is under acute supply pressure, with VLSFO and HSFO almost exhausted and LSMGO running critically low.

Meanwhile, Oman’s ports — Sohar, Salalah, Muscat, and Duqm — continue to maintain a steady LSMGO supply, with prompt dates available.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 12 November, 2025

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

Admin

Published

on

By

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Taiwanese shipping firm Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation (Yang Ming) and South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean on Wednesday (2 September) signed a shipbuilding contract for six 13,000 TEU class LNG dual-fuel container vessels. 

The contract was signed by Dr. Chuck Tsai, Chairman of Yang Ming, and Mr. Charles Kim, CEO of Hanwha Ocean. The vessels are scheduled for delivery between 2028 and 2029. 

They will complement Yang Ming’s existing fleet of 10,000+ TEU vessels and serve as key vessels on East-West services, with deployment flexibility across trade lanes connecting Asia with the East and West Coasts of North America, South America, and the Mediterranean. 

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

“As Yang Ming transitions toward net-zero emissions, LNG provides a relatively mature and economically viable alternative fuel solution, capable of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 20%,” the company said. 

“At the same time, ammonia can serve as a carbon-free fuel by utilising converted LNG storage facilities, while offering relatively lower conversion costs and comparatively well-developed supply chains and infrastructure. The Ammonia Fuel Ready design will therefore provide Yang Ming with greater flexibility in responding to increasingly stringent international regulations on greenhouse gas emissions.”

In addition, the vessels will be equipped with Type B LNG fuel tanks with a design pressure of 1.0 bar to enhance the safety and efficiency of LNG operations, together with a range of energy-saving technologies, including Wind Shields, Rudder Bulbs, Pre-Swirl Stators, and Shore Power Systems. Smart ship technologies and cybersecurity protection features will also be incorporated to enhance operational efficiency, safety, and reliability while effectively reducing fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

Deliveries under Yang Ming’s next-generation fleet optimization plan commenced earlier this year. By 2030, a total of 24 new vessels are expected to enter service. 

This includes 18 LNG dual-fuel vessels—comprising five 15,500 TEU, seven 16,000 TEU, and the six 13,000 TEU vessels under this contract—alongside six 8,000 TEU methanol dual-fuel-ready ships. 

 

Photo credit: Yang Ming Marine Transport
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Both secured AiP for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Admin

Published

on

By

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Lloyd’s Register (LR) and the Marine Design and Research Institute of China (MARIC) on Thursday (3 September) have secured Approval in Principle (AiP) for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Announced at SMM 2026, the concept addresses one of the biggest investment challenges facing shipping today: the need to develop vessels and capabilities that can support a range of alternative fuel options and pathways as technologies, infrastructure and regulations evolve.

While LNG is already a mature fuel pathway, methanol and ammonia remain at an earlier stage of development, with questions around global fuel availability, infrastructure development, economics and long-term adoption.

The 114,000 DWT tanker concept has been designed as a product and crude oil carrier that can accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia as technologies, regulations and fuel supply chains mature. By incorporating conversion readiness at the design stage, the concept aims to reduce future retrofit complexity and provide owners with greater confidence when planning long-term fleet investments.

The design concept was reviewed against LR’s July 2026 class rules and regulations, including requirements relating to ships using gases and other low-flashpoint fuels, alongside relevant IACS Common Structural Rules for oil tankers. Final classification and statutory approval remain subject to full compliance with all applicable rules and regulations.

Theo Kourmpelis, Global Business Director for Tankers, Lloyd’s Register, said: “Shipowners are being asked to make major investment decisions today despite continued uncertainty around which fuels will dominate in the decades ahead. Alternative fuel solutions each offer potential pathways to compliance, but fuel infrastructure, regulation and economics continue to evolve at different speeds around the world.

“Designs that preserve flexibility will be critical in helping owners manage risk while preparing for multiple future scenarios.”

Si Nan, Marine & Offshore Marketing Department Vice Director, MARIC, said: “As the industry explores different decarbonisation pathways, shipowners need vessel designs that can adapt alongside technological and regulatory developments. This concept was developed specifically to provide greater fuel flexibility and long-term resilience, allowing owners to respond to changing market requirements without being locked into a single fuel strategy.

“Receiving Approval in Principle from Lloyd’s Register is an important milestone that validates the design concept and supports its future development.”

 

Photo credit: Lloyd’s Register
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity while the strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year.

Admin

Published

on

By

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

Latest data from classification society DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight (AFI) platform alternative-fuelled vessel ordering was strong in August, with 52 new vessels added to the platform.

This is the highest monthly total since October 2024 and follows another active month in July, when 47 vessels were added to the database.

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity, with 46 orders recorded. The container segment led the way with 30 orders, while the car carrier segment contributed a further 12 LNG-fuelled vessels. In addition, four ethanol-fuelled bulk carriers and two hydrogen-powered bulk carriers were added during the month, as well as one LNG bunker vessel.

The strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year. In total, 242 alternative-fuelled vessel orders have been placed in the first eight months of 2026, representing a 27% increase compared with the same period in 2025.

LNG remains the dominant fuel choice, accounting for 63% of all alternative-fuelled vessel orders registered so far this year. Container vessels represent the largest share of these LNG orders (59%), followed by car carriers (30%).

Jason Stefanatos, Global Decarbonization Director at DNV Maritime, said: “The past two months have been particularly strong for alternative-fuelled vessel ordering, with August recording the highest monthly total we’ve seen since October 2024. This has helped lift year-to-date orders to a level well above the same period last year.

“LNG remains the leading fuel choice, driven largely by activity in the container and car carrier segments. These sectors have been among the earliest adopters of alternative fuels, supported by predictable liner operations and increasing demand from cargo owners to reduce emissions across supply chains. 

“For many owners, LNG offers a combination of emissions reductions, fuel availability and future flexibility while the longer-term fuel landscape continues to evolve. 

“At the same time, the latest figures include orders for ethanol- and hydrogen-fuelled vessels, highlighting that owners continue to explore a range of decarbonization pathways. Different segments are making different fuel choices, but the overall level of activity demonstrates continued investment in lower-emission shipping.”

Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.26 PM Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.36 PM

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS



Trending