Bunker Holding subsidiary Dan-Bunkering on Wednesday (11 November) issued an official response to Singapore bunker publication Manifold Times in regard to legal action taken by Danish state prosecutor (SØIK) against the company over alleged EU sanction breaches:
The statement in its entirety is as follows:
Bunker Holding’s and Dan-Bunkering’s response to charges concerning alleged sanction breaches
Today the Danish state prosecutor (SØIK) chose to bring charges against Dan- Bunkering and Bunker Holding. We take note of these charges and look forward to having the matter fully investigated and concluded at a potential trial.
However, we are surprised that SØIK has chosen to bring these charges forward. Our own thorough internal investigations have revealed no signs that anyone within Bunker Holding or Dan-Bunkering had any knowledge of the alleged breaches of EU sanctions. We have not supplied fuel to companies included in the EU sanctions list at the time of our business dealings with them.
We have readily answered all questions from the authorities, including the Danish Business Authority’s initial inquiry on the matter. However, we have not been able to enter into a proper dialogue with the authorities. Among other things, we would have liked to discuss the fact that no authorities at the time of the trades or afterwards have raised any red flags or provided any response to the trades in question.
Since the case came up nearly four years ago, it has generated considerable attention from both the media and the politicians which has led many people to adopt an opinion on the matter without having the full overview of the facts.
We strongly denounce any breach of sanctions and any attempt to breach sanctions is, of course, unacceptable. Bunker Holding has one of the industry’s most comprehensive and advanced systems checking all of the group’s more than 100,000 annual trades against around 2,000 international sanction lists.
We have no further comment on the matter at this point in time.
Related: Bunker Holding & Dan Bunkering allegedly charged over EU sanctions violations
Related : Dan-Bunkering: Everything has been investigated – the case should be closed
Related : Name ban on parties involved with Dan-Bunkering Syrian jet fuel deal lifted
Related : Dan-Bunkering Middelfart office searched by commercial crimes police
Related : Firm linked to alleged Dan-Bunkering Syrian war activities under sanction
Related : Update: Dan-Bunkering Syria jet fuel supply ops allegedly longer than thought
Related : Dan-Bunkering faces preliminary charges by SOIK with violation of EU Syria sanctions
Related : Investigations on Dan-Bunkering over alleged Syrian jet fuel deal start
Related : Danske Bank casts doubts on Dan-Bunkering reason for Syria investigation
Related : Danske Bank reported Dan-Bunkering to police in EU sanctions case
Related : Bunker company acknowledges flawed statement in EU sanctions case
Related : Unioil Supply dragged into Dan-Bunkering sanctions allegations
Related : Dan-Bunkering has not violated EU’s sanctions against Syria, it insists
Related : Nordea highlights stance on compliance after Dan-Bunkering discovery
Related : Danish media alleges Dan-Bunkering jet fuel deliveries during Syria war
Photo credit: Dan-Bunkering
Published: 13 November, 2020
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.
‘We [Consort Bunkers] have the opinion that the bunker business in Singapore is not related to the widely reported earlier cargo commodity trading mishaps,’ company source tells Manifold Times.