The Independent non-executive Directors of Hong Kong-listed Brightoil Petroleum (Holdings) Limited (Brightoil) has left the company over issues with its audit process, it said on Friday (28 June).
Brightoil is in the process of reviewing its accounts in preparation for the release of its financial statements; the company’s shares have been suspended since 3 October 2017 pending release of its annual results for the year ended 30 June 2017.
“The Resigned Directors came to a view that they were unable to discharge their function and duties as independent non-executive Directors and their duties as requested by the Board to conduct the independent review of matters leading to the delay in provision of information or documentation to the auditor and/or completion of the audit, which was commenced in September 2017 (the “Review”),” said a statement from Brightoil.
“They formed the view that the management of the Company has not taken positive steps to comply with their request for documents and/or information and has not provided sufficient funding to pay for professional fees in relation to the Review.
“In addition, the Resigned Directors held the view that material information about the Company was not provided to them in a timely manner, including that they were only informed of the winding-up petition filed against the Company on 17 May 2019 (as disclosed in the Company’s announcement dated 11 June 2019) on 6 June 2019.”
The Board of Brightoil, meanwhile, replied it does not agree with the view held by the Resigned Directors, including their criticism of the management of the company.
“The Board acknowledges that the Company is currently facing a number of internal and external challenges, including change in directorship, litigation, financial restructuring, insufficient manpower to handle all information requests, but the Company will continue to adapt to the changing environment and create value to shareholders,” it states.
“The Board believes that the Company has complied with the requirements of the Listing Rules and Corporate Governance Code, and that the management of the Company provides information to all Directors to enable them to discharge their duties to the best of their ability.”
Brightoil is facing issues regarding winding-up petitions at Hong Kong and Singapore, and the sale of vessels by creditors.
A chronologically organised list of articles concerning Brightoil’s potential debt reorganization is below:
Related: Dr Sit Kwong Lam returns to Brightoil as Strategic Adviser
Related: Brightoil Petroleum announces new Chairman and acting CEO
Related: Brightoil former Chairman undertook $1.4 billion in personal guarantees
Related: Official: Dr Sit Kwong Lam leaves Brightoil Petroleum Holdings
Related: Hong Kong High Court issues bankruptcy order against Brightoil Chairman
Related: Brightoil aggregate debt has reached approximately $1.9 billion, it updates
Related: Brightoil creditor claims amount to US $250 million, potential debt reorganisation
Related: Brightoil to defend against winding up petition at Hong Kong court
Related: Singapore: Brightoil to apply for six-month moratorium order at High Court
Related: Brightoil oilfield project secures USD $700 million CNOOC funding
Related: Brightoil: Plans to sell Zhoushan oil storage terminal, 15 vessels
Related: Shell to offload crude oil cargo from arrested “Brightoil Lion” tanker
Related: Brightoil VLCC and Aframax tanker arrested at Singapore port
Related: Singapore: Players to get fuel oil cargoes back from Brightoil bunker tankers
Related: Singapore: Petrolimex v Brightoil case progresses to Pre Trial Conference
Related: Singapore: Brightoil bunker creditor list growing with new firms
Related: Singapore: Petrolimex owed over USD $30 million by Brightoil
Related: Brightoil signals return to the shipping sector, starts reorganisation of debt
Related: Singapore: Brightoil bunker tanker fleet placed under Sheriff’s arrest
Related: Singapore: Toyota Tsusho Corporation seeking $21 million from Brightoil
Related: Qatar National Bank seeks USD $21.59 million debt from Brightoil
Published: 1 July, 2019
The newly launched Code of Best Practices – Commodity Financing guidelines will be the new ‘reference point’ taken by banks when considering to give trade finance to trading houses, believes Ian Teo.
Captain Daknash Ganasen, Senior Director (Operations & Marine Services), MPA, provides direction on what should players do when providing bunker fuel to a COVID-19 infected ship, and more.
Garren Hay will be responsible for sales of the PANOLIN range of Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants for the Singapore sole distributor agent Gealubes Consulting & Trading Pte Ltd.
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.