Yana Sheremetyeva of global energy and commodity price reporting agency Argus Media on Friday (13 August) published a report highlighting bunker fuel sales volume at Russian ports:
Russian marine fuel sales declined by 20pc to about 2.4mn t in the first half of the year, from 3.1mn t during the same period last year, but demand was mixed at the different coasts.
Overall Russian demand fell amid strong price competition from other international ports, tighter product availabilities and adverse weather at some ports. Low vessel traffic because of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic also cut into sales.
Russian far east ports bunker sales declined by 40pc to about 700,000t. The Russian far east very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) discount to the competing port of Singapore narrowed to an average of $5.50/t in March, according to Argus’ assessments, compared with a discount of $23/t in March 2020, on limited supply. Two refiners and their subsidiaries, major bunker suppliers in the region, Rosneft and NNK-Primornefteproduct, conducted seasonal maintenance at the same time in March, instead of a typical staggered schedule to avoid deficits.
In the Russian far east ports suppliers sold about 415,000t of VLSFO and about 130,000t of marine gasoil (MGO) in the first half of the year.
In ports on the Russian Black Sea bunker sales were down by 25pc to about 600,000t in the first half of the year as frequent storms in the region dampened local demand.
By contrast Russian Baltic Sea ports bunker sales were up by 6pc to about 850,000t, driven by higher demand for high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) from vessels with scrubbers installed.
Market participants estimated HSFO demand in the region at about 160,000t in the first half of the year. Suppliers also noted higher demand for residual fuel oil with 0.1pc sulphur, or ultra low-sulphur fuel oil (ULSFO), which can be burned in lieu of 0.1pc sulphur MGO in the Baltic Sea. The Baltic Sea is designated as Emission Control Area (ECA) where the marine fuel sulphur limit is capped at 0.1pc by the EU.
Argus assessed the ULSFO to MGO discount at an average of -$32.9/t and -$33.0/t in the Russian Baltic Sea ports of St Petersburg and Ust-Luga, respectively, in the first half of the year.
Russian sales in the northern ports of Arkhangelsk on the White Sea and Murmansk on the Barents Sea were flat at about 290,000t. MGO demand there was lower but VLSFO demand made up for it. Bunkering companies were not willing to reduce their MGO indications citing tight MGO stocks and high transportation costs from local refineries to the ports.
Photo credit and source: Argus Media
Published: 16 August, 2021
MGO fuels are more susceptible than HFO/VLSFO fuels to microbial contamination as well as bunker fuel containing FAME and other bio-products.
Winding up application will be heard before the Court sitting at 10:00 a.m. on 22 October, any creditor of the company may appear at the time of hearing.
PDS employee engaged in unauthorised derivatives transactions and disguised them to look like hedge transactions since January this year, said Mitsubishi Corporation.
5,000 kWh energy storage system will enable ships to operate with zero emissions while in port- meeting RINA Green Plus class notation.
Collaboration aims to confirm the feasibility and performance of hydrogen for use as a commercially viable alternative fuel for line-haul rail and marine vessels.
IUMI believes that guidance is needed for the education and training of crew onboard, and to address safe and environmentally sound operations.
Discussions around the need to develop methanol bunkering operations are taking place at numerous ports ahead of estimated demand of above 7M mtpa by 2030, says Chris Chatterton of Methanol Institute.
‘Economics of the shipping market will be the key driver enabling methanol to be adopted at a higher pace going forth over next couple years as market begins to return to more normal rates,’ states COO.
Integr8 Fuel injunction varied by Singapore Court to allow former employees to start work at Hartree Group in December 2022 following failure to produce evidence on biofuels development plans.
Variability of sources can affect the stability and performance of biofuel bunkers produced from these feedstocks, in turn leading to difficulties in meeting regulations and industry standards, shares Bryan Quek.
Top three positive movers in 2022 were Bunker House Petroleum Pte Ltd (+7), Eastpoint International Marketing Pte Ltd (+5), and Eng Hua Company (Pte) Ltd (+6); newcomer Sinopec Fuel Oil (Singapore) gets 19th spot.
Livestock carrier also involved in earlier bunker claim with Glander International Bunkering due to remaining unpaid fuel bill of approximately USD 116,000, according to court documents obtained by Manifold Times.
