News
Business
Aegean Chapter 11: Bondholders object Mercuria’s $532 million DIP Facility

Aegean Chapter 11: Bondholders object Mercuria’s $532 million DIP Facility

09 Nov 2018

An Ad Hoc Group of bondholders with investments in troubled New York-listed bunkering firm Aegean Marine Petroleum Network (Aegean, or, Debtors) on Thursday filed an objection at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court over a debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing facility offered by Mercuria to bail out Aegean.

“The Mercuria DIP Facility should not be approved because it is an insider transaction designed solely to benefit Mercuria and is not in the best interests of the Debtors’ estates,” they alleged in a court document seen by Manifold Times.

“Mercuria’s onerous insider DIP financing facility which, among other things, is designed to syphon value from the Debtors’ unsecured creditors for Mercuria’s benefit and facilitate Mercuria’s acquisition of all of the Debtors’ assets via an insider credit bid under Bankruptcy Code section 363.”

Mercuria has earlier agreed to provide more than $532 million in postpetition financing to fund the chapter 11 process and Aegean’s working capital needs.

“Nominally, the Mercuria DIP Facility provides the Debtors with approximately $532 million in DIP financing,” claims the Ad Hoc Group.

“In reality, however, Mercuria will provide the Debtors with, at most, only an incremental $152 million of financing through revolving postpetition credit facilities and a new delayed draw term loan. The remaining $380 million of “DIP financing” is in the form of a roll up of Mercuria’s prepetition debt.

“Mercuria seeks to implement this roll up in an accelerated manner, with 50% of Mercuria’s prepetition debt to be rolled up automatically upon interim approval of the Mercuria DIP Facility and the remaining 50% of Mercuria’s prepetition debt to be transformed into postpetition debt through a ‘creeping roll up’ as prepetition receivables are collected during the early stages of these chapter 11 cases.

“If approved, the roll up would not only convert all of Mercuria’s prepetition debt into superpriority administrative expense claims, it would provide Mercuria with substantial credit enhancement.”

The group further alleges the Mercuria DIP Facility, and the path proposed by Mercuria in Aegean’s chapter 11 cases, “is a prime example of an insider transaction that should be subjected to heightened scrutiny to ensure a value-maximizing reorganization for all of the Debtors’ stakeholders.”

“Yet, since Mercuria entered into the MOU with the Debtors, Mercuria has sought to execute on its self-serving loan-to-own scheme.”

The Ad Hoc Group explained it had delivered a term sheet on July 6, 2018 to Aegean to provide up to $50 million in secured financing to address the November 1 maturity of the 2018 Notes.

However, Mercuria entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Aegean a day before on July 5, 2018 for a US$1 billion trade finance facility.

“From that point forward, Mercuria improperly exercised control of the Debtors to block any meaningful negotiation with other potential financing parties, refusing to consider restructuring proposals that would have avoided the need for the commencement of these cases,” they say.

“The MOU that was executed between Mercuria and the Debtors on July 4, 2018 was an overreaching agreement representing the first step in Mercuria’s scheme to take control of the Debtors.

“Pursuant to the MOU, Mercuria agreed to acquire the Debtors’ U.S. and global revolving credit facilities and, upon acquisition of the facilities, Mercuria would receive 30% of the Debtors’ common stock and the right to appoint a representative to the Debtors’ board of directors.

“From this initial agreement with Mercuria, it was clear that Mercuria was not interested in a traditional lender-borrower relationship but, rather, desired to—and started acting like—a controlling stakeholder of the Debtors.”

A timeline organised list of events preceding the current development have been recorded by Manifold Times below:

Published: 9 November, 2018

Related News

EastGate: Record low bunker fuel spread and slide in scrubber premium in Q1

Bunker fuel prices have been unstable since the implementation of IMO 2020 and with it, the premium for scrubber-fitted bulk carriers, says shipbroking firm.

China Classification Society issues type approval for Wartsila EGC system

Dalian Shipbuilding Industry awaits for installation of Wartsila EGC system onboard the New Treasure.

Electric powered cargo ship completes water trials on the Yangtze River

Battery capacity of 1,458 kWh (equivalent to 40 electric cars) allows the vessel to sail for up to 50km with 2.5 hours of charging; saving 20.16 mt of bunker fuel annually.

Thun Tankers first ‘NAABSA’ product tanker enters long-term agreement with Geos Group

The development focus has been to maximize cargo intake and increase in-port performance; a second vessel has been ordered to be delivered in spring 2022.