Physical fuel suppliers need to fundamentally transform the traditional models of supply in order to survive, said Adrian Tolson, Senior Partner from 20|20 Marine Energy, a leading maritime consultancy.
Speaking ahead of SIBCON 2018, the industry’s largest bunkering conference, Tolson believes that as margins continue to dwindle suppliers need to look ahead to not only a post 2020 world, but also beyond as the industry’s fuel requirements to deliver sulphur compliance converges with regulatory pressure and targets to reduce GHG emissions from shipping. And in conjunction with this, they must utilize developments in technology, and access to data and intelligence to create sophisticated, and relevant models for the future marine energy supply chain.
“Physical suppliers need to break out from the traditional model of solely delivering huge quantities of commodity in traditional large bunkering hubs with small margins as a means of hopefully staying in business and making a living; it is a negative downward spiral that will lead to insolvency. Even the current trend of looking for niche higher margin markets will be challenged and are not solutions to even medium-term sustainability. And any windfall profits for physical suppliers post 2020 will be short-lived, with the main beneficiaries being the large commodity players, which will lead to a quick return to declining margins. They must understand that the marine energy supply chain is fundamentally transforming, and they need to not just stay ahead of the curve, but show leadership by driving it, as there are opportunities for those that can lift their heads and be visionary,” said Tolson.
Tolson stated that in a pre-2020 world bunkering companies firstly need to position themselves as more than just basic suppliers, looking at every opportunity within the physical supply chain to add value, beyond the typical storage, distribution and supply process.
“Right now, some ship owners and operators still require guidance on what compliance solution they are going to adopt, which we know will be mainly distillates and blended VLSFO’s, interspersed with scrubbers. However, what they really need is help in structuring their purchasing habits, utilizing technology, data and intelligence so that their procurement and buying process is fully optimized. This can yield 1% to 2% in fuel cost savings, which is significant when we consider the dramatic increase in prices post 2020. Suppliers, as well as bunker traders need to be able to provide this level of consultancy, which takes their value-add way beyond price per ton, and also creates the foundation from which they can evolve their positioning and offering in a post 2020 world.”
Specifically, Tolson believes suppliers need to look to the future, five to ten years beyond 2020, where the regulatory challenges in meeting low sulphur targets converges with the requirement for the industry to reduce its GHG emissions and appropriately contribute to the 1.5% to 2-degree global warming targets, defined in the Paris Agreement.
“The reality is that to meet 50% GHG reduction targets by 2050, the industry will have to move to clean energy sources, from hydrogen-based fuels, biofuels, wind, to battery power and so forth; distillates and hybrid products just won’t exist. There will clearly be an evolution to this over time, but physical suppliers need to consider what their role and position in this new world looks like now, and begin the process of building a business model and brand that can deliver it and is fit for purpose.”
“There is a real opportunity for the creation of a future fuels company that combines a strategic consultancy offering with a physical supply of products to meet 2020 sulphur compliance needs, underpinned by investment in new sources of clean energy that delivers against the shipping industry’s future sustainability challenges. And on top of this they need to understand and identify technology and other advanced solutions, such as blockchain, that we’re already seeing come into the market, which can be integrated into the energy supply and procurement process to improve efficiencies and ensure transparency and ethical practices. Ultimately, fuel suppliers have an important role to play, but they need to be bold and adapt now, and implement the obvious changes to business models that are required.”
Published: 2 October, 2018
Garren Hay will be responsible for sales of the PANOLIN range of Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants for the Singapore sole distributor agent Gealubes Consulting & Trading Pte Ltd.
Universal Alliance, BMS United, Digiland International, Goodwood Associates, Southernpec (Singapore), and Taigu Energy were involved in alleged circular fictitious trades of fuel oil during July 2015.
Bunker orders of ISO 8217:2010 spec LS 380 cSt 0.5% for Nord Gemini, Nord Titan, Ocean Rosemary, and Luzern were placed through global commodities trading and logistics house Trafigura Pte Ltd.
While Covid-19 concerns are important, Captain Rahul Choudhuri was quick to note this does not mean bunker fuel related issues have indeed disappeared from the shipping sector.
‘Therefore, representing the players of the Malaysian bunker industry, we sincerely hope that this matter can be refined and reconsidered immediately so that all parties benefit together,’ says communication.
Maureen Poh, a Director of Helmsman LLC, offers plain practical tips on the differences between US and EU Sanctions and shares some thoughts on what companies could do if they are potentially exposed to sanctioned entities.