Connect with us

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (14 April 2026)

Zhoushan facing weather-related disruptions; availability good across several Sri Lankan ports; operations continue despite war in most Middle East ports.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • Zhoushan facing weather-related disruptions
  • Availability good across several Sri Lankan ports
  • Operations continue despite war in most Middle East ports

Singapore and Malaysia

Bunker prices in Singapore have remained firm despite muted demand and been supported by the war in the Middle East. The war has choked off most oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, a key artery for global oil trade.

In Singapore, VLSFO lead times now range widely between 4–13 days, compared to 6–11 days last week. HSFO lead times have widened to a 3–12-day range, versus 7–10 days previously.

The wide spread in lead times is a sign that some suppliers are still able to offer prompt delivery dates, a source said.

Recommended lead times for LSMGO stand at 2–7 days, broadly unchanged from last week.

Singapore’s residual fuel oil stocks have averaged 9% lower so far in April compared to March, according to data from Enterprise Singapore. Total fuel oil inventories have fallen below 22 million bbls, following a sharp 57% decline in net fuel oil imports so far this month. Imports have dropped by 2.73 million bbls, while exports have edged lower by 34,000 bbls.

Meanwhile, the port’s middle distillate inventories have averaged 7% higher so far this month, reaching their highest level since November.

At Port Klang, VLSFO availability remains relatively stable, especially for smaller prompt stems. However, LSMGO supply has tightened, while HSFO availability remains constrained, making both grades increasingly difficult to secure.

East Asia

Bunkering at Zhoushan’s Tiaozhoumen and Xiazhimen outer anchorages was halted for nearly a week due to rough weather, before resuming on Tuesday, a source said. In contrast, operations continued without interruption at the more sheltered Xiushandong anchorage and the inner anchorage at Mazhi.

The disruption has created a backlog of 50–60 vessels waiting to refuel, a trader noted. Suppliers are now recommending lead times of 5–7 days for all grades as they work through the congestion, compared to last week’s 7–10 days for VLSFO and 5–10 days for both LSMGO and HSFO.

However, bunkering could be suspended again by thick fog across all anchorages later on Tuesday, another source added.

Across northern China, supply conditions remain mixed. Dalian and Qingdao have sufficient VLSFO and LSMGO availability, although HSFO remains limited in Qingdao. Tianjin is experiencing tight supply across all grades, while in Shanghai, VLSFO and HSFO stocks are constrained, with LSMGO availability relatively steady.

Further south, tighter conditions persist. Fuzhou is facing limited availability of both VLSFO and LSMGO. Xiamen has adequate VLSFO supply but restricted LSMGO volumes. In Yangpu and Guangzhou, both grades remain under pressure.

In Hong Kong, bunker supply is largely stable, with lead times for all grades holding at around seven days in recent weeks.

In Taiwan, supply has to some extent been impacted by the Middle East war, although price volatility has been more pronounced. Fluctuations in crude prices have significantly influenced bunker markets, a Taiwan-based trader said.

Recommended lead times remain around two days for VLSFO and LSMGO in Keelung, Taichung and Hualien, while Kaohsiung requires about three days.

In South Korea’s southern ports – including Busan, Ulsan, Masan, Onsan, Yeosu and Kwangyang – advised lead times for all fuel grades have been extended to around 4–6 days, largely unchanged from 4–5 days the previous week.

At western ports such as Incheon, Daesan, Dangjin, Pyeongtaek and Taean, lead times stand at about 2–7 days, compared to around four days last week. However, availability across both coasts remains dependent on cargo availability.

Weather conditions continue to disrupt operations, with potential delays expected in Busan and Ulsan between 14–17 April, and in Yeosu between 16–19 April.

In Japan, tight conditions for bonded bunkers persist, driven by ongoing crude procurement constraints and the Middle East war. Spot supply remains virtually unavailable.

For HSFO, limited availability continues to emerge due to refinery operations and isolated issues. VLSFO supply is restricted to small spot parcels of 100–300 mt, while MGO availability remains critically tight.

Most Japanese suppliers are quoting discreetly, with transactions requiring private, one-on-one negotiations rather than open market inquiries, according to a Japan-based trader.

All confirmed offers are limited to small parcels of under 300 mt. One supplier can offer HSFO volumes of up to 2,000 mt, but only for exclusive, targeted inquiries. Small spot VLSFO parcels (100–300 mt) are still available through some suppliers, the source added.

As a result, availability across all fuel grades in major Japanese hubs – including Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama, Kawasaki, Nagoya, Yokkaichi, Mizushima, Kashima, Tokuyama and Oita – is now being assessed strictly on a case-by-case basis.

Oceania

Bunker prices across several Australian ports remain elevated, largely underpinned by the ongoing Middle East war, an Australia-based trader said.

In response, the Australian government halved fuel excise duties on petrol and diesel for a three-month period from 1 April.

Supply pressures are beginning to surface, with ports such as Dampier, Darwin, Kwinana and Melbourne nearing depletion of LSMGO stocks, the trader added.

In Western Australia, VLSFO supply at Kwinana and Fremantle typically requires about one week’s notice, with deliveries carried out by barge through a single supplier.

In New South Wales, VLSFO deliveries at Port Kembla can be arranged via truck or pipeline. Suppliers in Sydney hold ample VLSFO and LSMGO inventories, although HSFO remains tight, with lead times of around seven days advised.

In Queensland, ports including Brisbane and Gladstone are offering VLSFO and LSMGO with lead times of roughly seven days. HSFO in Brisbane is available on request. Deliveries of VLSFO and LSMGO are handled by two barges operated by separate suppliers, while HSFO availability is only given depending on the enquiry.

In Victoria, VLSFO stocks remain strong in both Melbourne and Geelong, while HSFO availability is limited for prompt supply. Bunkering in these ports relies on a single barge, with recommended lead times of close to seven days.

In New Zealand, bunker supply conditions are stable. VLSFO is readily available in Tauranga and Auckland, with some Tauranga berths connected by pipeline. At Marsden Point, both VLSFO and LSMGO can be supplied via pipeline to vessels.

South Asia

Supply of VLSFO and LSMGO remains constrained across several Indian ports. In Mumbai and New Mangalore, availability of both grades is tight and subject to firm enquiry, a source said.

In Sri Lanka, supply conditions at Colombo and Hambantota remain healthy across all grades, with one supplier quoting lead times of around five days, slightly up from three days last week.

Middle East

“Things are starting to improve slightly [in the Middle East] following recent news after the temporary ceasefire in the Middle East, oil flows have partially resumed and market pressure has eased,” a local trader said.

Bunkering at the Port of Fujairah continues without interruption despite ongoing regional tensions, though supply remains tight.

Last month, authorities in Fujairah and Khor Fakkan issued navigational warnings following reports of intermittent GPS spoofing and signal jamming offshore. According to Inchcape Shipping, such disruptions can result in inaccurate positioning, erratic vessel movements and misleading navigation data, prompting mariners to treat the area as high risk.

Nevertheless, most terminals and anchorages remain operational.

“Avails [are] ok as off now, all offers are subject to firm inquiry,” another trader said.

Bunkering is ongoing, but some suppliers are loading barges only in line with actual demand rather than at full capacity. Demand in Fujairah remains subdued, the trader added.

Elsewhere in the UAE, operations at Jebel Ali, Hamriyah and Sharjah continue as normal. Petroleum terminals in Abu Dhabi, including Ruwais, are also functioning without disruption.

Ship-to-ship (STS) operations at the Dubai anchorage have resumed with tug assistance. Each operation is being assessed on a case-by-case basis, Inchcape Shipping agency said.

“However, the situation is still fragile, as the recent conflict and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz had previously tightened supply and pushed prices up sharply, so the market remains sensitive to any new developments,” a Middle East-based trader warned.

Ports in Ras Al Khaimah remain fully operational. However, in March, RAK Ports introduced a marine risk surcharge for all vessels calling at its ports, harbours, anchorages and approaches, according to Inchcape Shipping.

In Kuwait, both Shuaiba and Shuwaikh continue to operate normally.

In Saudi Arabia, no formal alerts have been issued, although bunker availability remains tight in Jeddah, particularly for VLSFO and LSMGO.

In Qatar, port operations and vessel movements remain steady at Hamad, Doha and Al Ruwais, with activity also continuing at Mesaieed and Ras Laffan. However, VLSFO and LSMGO supply is tight in Ras Laffan, while in Al Ruwais it is limited to smaller vessels such as dhows and barges.

In Oman, all ports remain fully operational. Availability, including LSMGO, is good in Muscat, Duqm and Sohar, with prompt lead times, the source added.

In Bahrain, vessel movements are gradually resuming, although operations remain limited under current conditions. The Suez Canal and all Egyptian ports continue to function normally, while conditions remain stable in Jordan. Ports in Iraq, Cyprus, Pakistan and Lebanon are also operating as usual.

Meanwhile, Israeli ports – including Eilat, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Hadera and Haifa – are operating at full capacity, Inchcape Shipping said.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 15 April, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

Admin

Published

on

By

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Taiwanese shipping firm Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation (Yang Ming) and South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean on Wednesday (2 September) signed a shipbuilding contract for six 13,000 TEU class LNG dual-fuel container vessels. 

The contract was signed by Dr. Chuck Tsai, Chairman of Yang Ming, and Mr. Charles Kim, CEO of Hanwha Ocean. The vessels are scheduled for delivery between 2028 and 2029. 

They will complement Yang Ming’s existing fleet of 10,000+ TEU vessels and serve as key vessels on East-West services, with deployment flexibility across trade lanes connecting Asia with the East and West Coasts of North America, South America, and the Mediterranean. 

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

“As Yang Ming transitions toward net-zero emissions, LNG provides a relatively mature and economically viable alternative fuel solution, capable of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 20%,” the company said. 

“At the same time, ammonia can serve as a carbon-free fuel by utilising converted LNG storage facilities, while offering relatively lower conversion costs and comparatively well-developed supply chains and infrastructure. The Ammonia Fuel Ready design will therefore provide Yang Ming with greater flexibility in responding to increasingly stringent international regulations on greenhouse gas emissions.”

In addition, the vessels will be equipped with Type B LNG fuel tanks with a design pressure of 1.0 bar to enhance the safety and efficiency of LNG operations, together with a range of energy-saving technologies, including Wind Shields, Rudder Bulbs, Pre-Swirl Stators, and Shore Power Systems. Smart ship technologies and cybersecurity protection features will also be incorporated to enhance operational efficiency, safety, and reliability while effectively reducing fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

Deliveries under Yang Ming’s next-generation fleet optimization plan commenced earlier this year. By 2030, a total of 24 new vessels are expected to enter service. 

This includes 18 LNG dual-fuel vessels—comprising five 15,500 TEU, seven 16,000 TEU, and the six 13,000 TEU vessels under this contract—alongside six 8,000 TEU methanol dual-fuel-ready ships. 

 

Photo credit: Yang Ming Marine Transport
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Both secured AiP for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Admin

Published

on

By

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Lloyd’s Register (LR) and the Marine Design and Research Institute of China (MARIC) on Thursday (3 September) have secured Approval in Principle (AiP) for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Announced at SMM 2026, the concept addresses one of the biggest investment challenges facing shipping today: the need to develop vessels and capabilities that can support a range of alternative fuel options and pathways as technologies, infrastructure and regulations evolve.

While LNG is already a mature fuel pathway, methanol and ammonia remain at an earlier stage of development, with questions around global fuel availability, infrastructure development, economics and long-term adoption.

The 114,000 DWT tanker concept has been designed as a product and crude oil carrier that can accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia as technologies, regulations and fuel supply chains mature. By incorporating conversion readiness at the design stage, the concept aims to reduce future retrofit complexity and provide owners with greater confidence when planning long-term fleet investments.

The design concept was reviewed against LR’s July 2026 class rules and regulations, including requirements relating to ships using gases and other low-flashpoint fuels, alongside relevant IACS Common Structural Rules for oil tankers. Final classification and statutory approval remain subject to full compliance with all applicable rules and regulations.

Theo Kourmpelis, Global Business Director for Tankers, Lloyd’s Register, said: “Shipowners are being asked to make major investment decisions today despite continued uncertainty around which fuels will dominate in the decades ahead. Alternative fuel solutions each offer potential pathways to compliance, but fuel infrastructure, regulation and economics continue to evolve at different speeds around the world.

“Designs that preserve flexibility will be critical in helping owners manage risk while preparing for multiple future scenarios.”

Si Nan, Marine & Offshore Marketing Department Vice Director, MARIC, said: “As the industry explores different decarbonisation pathways, shipowners need vessel designs that can adapt alongside technological and regulatory developments. This concept was developed specifically to provide greater fuel flexibility and long-term resilience, allowing owners to respond to changing market requirements without being locked into a single fuel strategy.

“Receiving Approval in Principle from Lloyd’s Register is an important milestone that validates the design concept and supports its future development.”

 

Photo credit: Lloyd’s Register
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity while the strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year.

Admin

Published

on

By

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

Latest data from classification society DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight (AFI) platform alternative-fuelled vessel ordering was strong in August, with 52 new vessels added to the platform.

This is the highest monthly total since October 2024 and follows another active month in July, when 47 vessels were added to the database.

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity, with 46 orders recorded. The container segment led the way with 30 orders, while the car carrier segment contributed a further 12 LNG-fuelled vessels. In addition, four ethanol-fuelled bulk carriers and two hydrogen-powered bulk carriers were added during the month, as well as one LNG bunker vessel.

The strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year. In total, 242 alternative-fuelled vessel orders have been placed in the first eight months of 2026, representing a 27% increase compared with the same period in 2025.

LNG remains the dominant fuel choice, accounting for 63% of all alternative-fuelled vessel orders registered so far this year. Container vessels represent the largest share of these LNG orders (59%), followed by car carriers (30%).

Jason Stefanatos, Global Decarbonization Director at DNV Maritime, said: “The past two months have been particularly strong for alternative-fuelled vessel ordering, with August recording the highest monthly total we’ve seen since October 2024. This has helped lift year-to-date orders to a level well above the same period last year.

“LNG remains the leading fuel choice, driven largely by activity in the container and car carrier segments. These sectors have been among the earliest adopters of alternative fuels, supported by predictable liner operations and increasing demand from cargo owners to reduce emissions across supply chains. 

“For many owners, LNG offers a combination of emissions reductions, fuel availability and future flexibility while the longer-term fuel landscape continues to evolve. 

“At the same time, the latest figures include orders for ethanol- and hydrogen-fuelled vessels, highlighting that owners continue to explore a range of decarbonization pathways. Different segments are making different fuel choices, but the overall level of activity demonstrates continued investment in lower-emission shipping.”

Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.26 PM Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.36 PM

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS



Trending