Connect with us

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (10 Feb 2026)

VLSFO and HSFO availability remains tight in Singapore; availability tight across all grades is Zhoushan; LSMGO supply good across Omani ports.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • VLSFO and HSFO availability remains tight in Singapore
  • Availability tight across all grades is Zhoushan
  • LSMGO supply good across Omani ports

Singapore and Malaysia

In Singapore, VLSFO availability remains tight, with recommended lead times of 9–13 days, slightly lower than last week’s 10–18 days. HSFO supply is also constrained, with advised lead times of 7–18 days. LSMGO availability is more uneven, with lead times ranging from 2–10 days, versus 3–5 days last week.

The ongoing supply tightness reflects several overlapping factors: uneven lead times across suppliers, high premiums for prompt stems, very tight loading schedules, and advance buying ahead of the Chinese New Year holidays, which has pulled demand forward.

Singapore’s residual fuel oil stocks have averaged 3% higher so far in February than in January, according to data from Enterprise Singapore. Fuel oil inventories have climbed above 24 million bbls, even as the port’s net fuel oil imports have declined by 8% so far this month. During this period, imports rose by 789,000 bbls, while exports increased by a larger 1.07 million bbls.

Middle distillate inventories have also strengthened, rising 6% so far this month to 8.93 million bbls—their highest level since November.

At Port Klang, VLSFO and LSMGO are generally well supplied, particularly for smaller prompt stems, while HSFO supply remains tight and harder to secure.

East Asia

VLSFO supply in Zhoushan has tightened despite muted demand, with several suppliers now quoting lead times of around 7–10 days, up from roughly five days last week. LSMGO availability has also deteriorated, with lead times widening from 3–5 days to 7–10 days. HSFO deliveries require 7–10 days, compared with about seven days previously.

The tightening is largely linked to loading delays faced by multiple suppliers following adverse weather. Weather-related disruption led to temporary anchorage suspensions in Zhoushan last Friday, though operations resumed from Monday morning.

Across northern China, bunker supply conditions remain uneven. Dalian and Qingdao have adequate availability of both VLSFO and LSMGO, although HSFO remains tight in Qingdao. In Tianjin, bunker supply is constrained across all fuel grades. At Shanghai, VLSFO and HSFO availability remains limited, while LSMGO supply is stable.

Further south, tight conditions persist for both VLSFO and LSMGO in Fuzhou. Suppliers in Xiamen report sufficient VLSFO stocks, but LSMGO supply remains limited. In Yangpu and Guangzhou, delivery options for both grades continue to be restricted.

Bunkering activity across China is expected to slow during the Chinese New Year holiday period from 15–23 February, as several suppliers are planning to halt operations. The final booking date for stems to be delivered during this window is 11 February, according to a source.

In Hong Kong, bunker supply operations will continue throughout the holiday period, although suppliers are applying holiday surcharges to bookings. Lead times there remain steady at around seven days for all grades, largely unchanged from recent weeks.

Across Taiwan, lead times for VLSFO and LSMGO remain broadly stable. Deliveries at Keelung and Hualien continue to require about two days’ advance notice, while slightly longer lead times of around three days are still advised at Kaohsiung and Taichung.

Meanwhile, the delivery of fresh bunker stems at several ports in Taiwan will be temporarily suspended during the Chinese New Year holiday period.

In South Korea, most suppliers are now quoting lead times of about 7–8 days for all bunker grades, compared with a wider range of 3–8 days last week. Persistent harsh winter conditions continue to raise the risk of operational disruption. Weather-related interruptions may affect bunkering in Busan, Ulsan and Yeosu between 13–15 February, while Daesan could face disruptions from 15–16 February.

Bunkering activity is expected to remain subdued during the Lunar New Year (Seollal) holiday period from 16–18 February, as barge operations are likely to be suspended, although this may vary by supplier, according to a trader.

In Japan, VLSFO supply is good at major ports including Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama, Kawasaki and Oita. In contrast, VLSFO availability is tight at Nagoya, Yokkaichi, Mizushima and Tokuyama, where recommended lead times stand at 7–10 days, largely unchanged from last week.

LSMGO availability remains broadly stable across Japan. B24-VLSFO is offered only on request at Tokyo, Chiba and Yokohama. HSFO supply is generally stable at several ports. At Oita, suppliers report adequate availability of all three grades, while Kahima has good supplies of both VLSFO and HSFO.

Bunkering activity in South Korea is expected to remain subdued on 11 February, which marks National Foundation Day, and again on 23 February, observed as Emperor’s Birthday Day.

In Indonesia, VLSFO availability remains steady at Jakarta, Surabaya, Balikpapan and Cigading, with suppliers typically quoting lead times of 2–3 days. LSMGO supply is also stable in Jakarta, Benoa, Surabaya and Batam. HSFO is reported to be well stocked in Jakarta, Surabaya and Balikpapan, a trader said.

Oceania

Bunker supply across Australia remains broadly stable, with VLSFO and LSMGO readily available nationwide and seven-day lead times still typical. In Western Australia, suppliers are advising lead times of around seven days at Kwinana and Fremantle. Most deliveries are handled by barge from a single supplier, while LSMGO can also be delivered by truck. Strong afternoon winds continue to cause occasional scheduling disruptions.

In New South Wales, VLSFO deliveries at Port Kembla are possible by both truck and pipeline, with pipeline parcels starting at around 70 mt and smaller volumes supplied by truck. Sydney is currently operating with one barge and also offers truck deliveries and pipeline supply at selected berths. Delivery schedules there are frequently adjusted to accommodate naval and cruise vessels. While VLSFO and 

LSMGO inventories remain healthy, HSFO availability is tight, with suppliers generally requiring about seven days’ notice. Seasonal cruise traffic in Sydney, Cairns and Darwin between December and February is expected to place additional pressure on delivery schedules. A supplier in Sydney noted that heavy vessel traffic during the peak cruise season is stretching port operations, though overall availability remains steady.

In Brisbane and Gladstone, VLSFO and LSMGO continue to be supplied with lead times of around seven days. HSFO is available on request in Brisbane, while Gladstone may still face intermittent weather-related delays. Access constraints persist at Brisbane’s AAT terminal. Two barges, operated by different suppliers, are active in Brisbane supplying VLSFO and LSMGO, with HSFO offered only on enquiry.

In Victoria, suppliers in Melbourne and Geelong hold strong inventories of VLSFO and LSMGO. HSFO remains tight for prompt delivery, although Melbourne currently has adequate supply. Both ports rely on a single barge, and lead times remain steady at around seven days. LSMGO can also be delivered by truck to smaller ports such as Portland and Port Welshpool within 2–3 days.

Overall, Australia’s bunker market remains stable, with deliveries often achievable within 3–4 days due to healthy inventory levels. Even at ports with pipeline infrastructure, including Darwin and Dampier, suppliers continue to rely heavily on truck deliveries to support distribution.

In New Zealand, bunker supply is stable. VLSFO is widely available at Tauranga and Auckland, with pipeline access available at certain berths in Tauranga. At Marsden Point, both VLSFO and LSMGO can be delivered by pipeline to cargo vessels, while truck availability across South Island ports remains limited.

Meanwhile, the northern Australian cyclone season, which runs from November to April, is expected to cause intermittent disruptions, with 9–11 cyclones forecast this year, according to a source.

Ports in Western Australia have reopened after Tropical Cyclone Mitchell weakened to a Category 1 system offshore Coral Bay. The ports of Ashburton, Barrow Island, Cape Preston, Dampier, Onslow, Port Walcott and Varanus Island all resumed operations on Monday, according to GAC Hot Port News.

South Asia

In Sri Lanka, bunker supply is good. A supplier operating in both Colombo and Hambantota is advising lead times of approximately five days for all grades.

Middle East

Prompt bunker supply in Fujairah remains tight across all fuel grades, with several suppliers recommending lead times of 5–7 days, although some can arrange urgent stems at a premium, according to a source. Similar supply conditions are also reported at Khor Fakkan.

In Basrah, VLSFO and LSMGO remain readily available, while HSFO supply continues to be limited. At Jeddah, availability of both VLSFO and LSMGO has improved, but port congestion is still slowing bunker delivery operations.

VLSFO, LSMGO and HSFO stocks are close to depletion at Port Suez. Weather-related disruptions are expected to affect bunkering at both Port Suez and Port Said on 13 February.

In Ras Laffan, supplies of VLSFO and LSMGO remain tight. VLSFO availability is stable in Djibouti, although LSMGO inventories there are nearly exhausted.

Across Oman—including Sohar, Salalah, Muscat and Duqm—bunker supply remains stable, with suppliers consistently offering LSMGO within prompt delivery windows.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 11 February, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

Admin

Published

on

By

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Taiwanese shipping firm Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation (Yang Ming) and South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean on Wednesday (2 September) signed a shipbuilding contract for six 13,000 TEU class LNG dual-fuel container vessels. 

The contract was signed by Dr. Chuck Tsai, Chairman of Yang Ming, and Mr. Charles Kim, CEO of Hanwha Ocean. The vessels are scheduled for delivery between 2028 and 2029. 

They will complement Yang Ming’s existing fleet of 10,000+ TEU vessels and serve as key vessels on East-West services, with deployment flexibility across trade lanes connecting Asia with the East and West Coasts of North America, South America, and the Mediterranean. 

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

“As Yang Ming transitions toward net-zero emissions, LNG provides a relatively mature and economically viable alternative fuel solution, capable of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 20%,” the company said. 

“At the same time, ammonia can serve as a carbon-free fuel by utilising converted LNG storage facilities, while offering relatively lower conversion costs and comparatively well-developed supply chains and infrastructure. The Ammonia Fuel Ready design will therefore provide Yang Ming with greater flexibility in responding to increasingly stringent international regulations on greenhouse gas emissions.”

In addition, the vessels will be equipped with Type B LNG fuel tanks with a design pressure of 1.0 bar to enhance the safety and efficiency of LNG operations, together with a range of energy-saving technologies, including Wind Shields, Rudder Bulbs, Pre-Swirl Stators, and Shore Power Systems. Smart ship technologies and cybersecurity protection features will also be incorporated to enhance operational efficiency, safety, and reliability while effectively reducing fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

Deliveries under Yang Ming’s next-generation fleet optimization plan commenced earlier this year. By 2030, a total of 24 new vessels are expected to enter service. 

This includes 18 LNG dual-fuel vessels—comprising five 15,500 TEU, seven 16,000 TEU, and the six 13,000 TEU vessels under this contract—alongside six 8,000 TEU methanol dual-fuel-ready ships. 

 

Photo credit: Yang Ming Marine Transport
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Both secured AiP for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Admin

Published

on

By

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Lloyd’s Register (LR) and the Marine Design and Research Institute of China (MARIC) on Thursday (3 September) have secured Approval in Principle (AiP) for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Announced at SMM 2026, the concept addresses one of the biggest investment challenges facing shipping today: the need to develop vessels and capabilities that can support a range of alternative fuel options and pathways as technologies, infrastructure and regulations evolve.

While LNG is already a mature fuel pathway, methanol and ammonia remain at an earlier stage of development, with questions around global fuel availability, infrastructure development, economics and long-term adoption.

The 114,000 DWT tanker concept has been designed as a product and crude oil carrier that can accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia as technologies, regulations and fuel supply chains mature. By incorporating conversion readiness at the design stage, the concept aims to reduce future retrofit complexity and provide owners with greater confidence when planning long-term fleet investments.

The design concept was reviewed against LR’s July 2026 class rules and regulations, including requirements relating to ships using gases and other low-flashpoint fuels, alongside relevant IACS Common Structural Rules for oil tankers. Final classification and statutory approval remain subject to full compliance with all applicable rules and regulations.

Theo Kourmpelis, Global Business Director for Tankers, Lloyd’s Register, said: “Shipowners are being asked to make major investment decisions today despite continued uncertainty around which fuels will dominate in the decades ahead. Alternative fuel solutions each offer potential pathways to compliance, but fuel infrastructure, regulation and economics continue to evolve at different speeds around the world.

“Designs that preserve flexibility will be critical in helping owners manage risk while preparing for multiple future scenarios.”

Si Nan, Marine & Offshore Marketing Department Vice Director, MARIC, said: “As the industry explores different decarbonisation pathways, shipowners need vessel designs that can adapt alongside technological and regulatory developments. This concept was developed specifically to provide greater fuel flexibility and long-term resilience, allowing owners to respond to changing market requirements without being locked into a single fuel strategy.

“Receiving Approval in Principle from Lloyd’s Register is an important milestone that validates the design concept and supports its future development.”

 

Photo credit: Lloyd’s Register
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity while the strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year.

Admin

Published

on

By

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

Latest data from classification society DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight (AFI) platform alternative-fuelled vessel ordering was strong in August, with 52 new vessels added to the platform.

This is the highest monthly total since October 2024 and follows another active month in July, when 47 vessels were added to the database.

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity, with 46 orders recorded. The container segment led the way with 30 orders, while the car carrier segment contributed a further 12 LNG-fuelled vessels. In addition, four ethanol-fuelled bulk carriers and two hydrogen-powered bulk carriers were added during the month, as well as one LNG bunker vessel.

The strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year. In total, 242 alternative-fuelled vessel orders have been placed in the first eight months of 2026, representing a 27% increase compared with the same period in 2025.

LNG remains the dominant fuel choice, accounting for 63% of all alternative-fuelled vessel orders registered so far this year. Container vessels represent the largest share of these LNG orders (59%), followed by car carriers (30%).

Jason Stefanatos, Global Decarbonization Director at DNV Maritime, said: “The past two months have been particularly strong for alternative-fuelled vessel ordering, with August recording the highest monthly total we’ve seen since October 2024. This has helped lift year-to-date orders to a level well above the same period last year.

“LNG remains the leading fuel choice, driven largely by activity in the container and car carrier segments. These sectors have been among the earliest adopters of alternative fuels, supported by predictable liner operations and increasing demand from cargo owners to reduce emissions across supply chains. 

“For many owners, LNG offers a combination of emissions reductions, fuel availability and future flexibility while the longer-term fuel landscape continues to evolve. 

“At the same time, the latest figures include orders for ethanol- and hydrogen-fuelled vessels, highlighting that owners continue to explore a range of decarbonization pathways. Different segments are making different fuel choices, but the overall level of activity demonstrates continued investment in lower-emission shipping.”

Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.26 PM Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.36 PM

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending