Connect with us

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (13 Jan 2026)

Bunker demand low in Zhoushan; VLSFO and LSMGO availability good in Taiwanese ports; VLSFO availability tight across several Japanese ports.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • Bunker demand low in Zhoushan
  • VLSFO and LSMGO availability good in Taiwanese ports
  • VLSFO availability tight across several Japanese ports

Singapore and Malaysia

In Singapore, VLSFO availability has tightened significantly, with most suppliers now quoting lead times of 7–11 days, up sharply from 2–7 days last week.

LSMGO remains readily available, with lead times holding steady at 3–6 days. HSFO supply continues to be tight, typically requiring 7–12 days of advance notice, largely unchanged from last week’s 7–11 days.

Singapore’s residual fuel oil stocks have averaged 2% lower so far this month compared to December, according to the latest data from Enterprise Singapore. Despite this, total fuel oil inventories have remained above 25 million bbls, supported by a 14% increase in net fuel oil imports so far in January. That said, both inflows and outflows have declined: imports are down by 814,000 bbls, while exports have fallen by a larger 1.24 million bbls.

Middle distillate inventories at the port have also drawn down, slipping by 3% this month to 8.05 million bbls, touching multi-year lows.

At Port Klang, VLSFO and LSMGO are generally well supplied, particularly for smaller prompt stems, while HSFO availability remains restricted and more difficult to secure.

East Asia

In Zhoushan, most suppliers are currently indicating lead times of about 5–7 days for all grades amid subdued demand, broadly unchanged from the 5–8 days quoted last week.

Across northern China, fuel availability remains patchy. Dalian and Qingdao have adequate supplies of VLSFO and LSMGO, though HSFO continues to be tight in Qingdao. In Tianjin, all grades remain in short supply.

In Shanghai, availability of VLSFO and HSFO is still limited, while LSMGO supply remains stable. Further south, both VLSFO and LSMGO are tight in Fuzhou. In Xiamen, VLSFO supply is sufficient, but LSMGO availability is restricted. Delivery options for both grades continue to be constrained in Yangpu and Guangzhou.

In Hong Kong, bunker lead times are holding steady at around seven days for all grades, broadly in line with recent weeks.

In Taiwan, lead times at Keelung, Kaohsiung and Hualien remain unchanged at two days, the same as last week, while suppliers in Taichung are advising slightly longer lead times of around three days.

Bunker demand across South Korea has been subdued over the past week, largely due to adverse weather conditions. Several ports operated under weather-related restrictions between 10–12 January; while these have since been lifted, further bad weather is forecast in the days ahead.

Most suppliers are currently advising lead times of around 6–10 days for all grades, though some are quoting longer lead times after having sold most of their January cargoes. This marks a clear shift from last week, when VLSFO and LSMGO were available with shorter lead times of 2–5 days, while HSFO was offered on an enquiry basis.

Ongoing winter conditions continue to pose a risk of operational disruptions. Busan, Ulsan and Daesan may face weather-related interruptions between 13–18 January, while bunker operations at Yeosu could be impacted on 13 January and again during 15–18 January.

In Japan, prompt VLSFO availability continues to be constrained at major ports such as Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama and Kawasaki, where most suppliers are advising lead times of around 5–6 days. Tight supply conditions are also persisting at Osaka, Kobe, Sakai, Mizushima, Nagoya and Yokkaichi, and are expected to continue through the end of January. LSMGO supply, by contrast, remains generally stable across the country.

B24-VLSFO is being supplied only on request at Tokyo, Chiba, Kawasaki and Yokohama. HSFO availability has also tightened at Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama and Kawasaki, with lead times extending to about 8–9 days, while supply remains stable at most other Japanese ports.

At Tokuyama, suppliers are currently short of VLSFO, though both LSMGO and HSFO availability there remains adequate.

Oceania

Across Australia, bunker supply remains broadly stable. VLSFO and LSMGO are readily available nationwide, with seven-day lead times continuing to be the market standard.

In Western Australia, suppliers are recommending lead times of around seven days for deliveries at Kwinana and Fremantle. Most stems are supplied by barge from a single supplier, though LSMGO can also be delivered by truck. Strong afternoon winds continue to trigger occasional scheduling disruptions.

In New South Wales, VLSFO can be delivered by both truck and pipeline at Port Kembla, with pipeline parcels starting at around 70 mt and smaller volumes supplied by truck. Sydney currently has one operational barge and also offers truck deliveries and, at select berths, pipeline supply. Delivery schedules there are frequently adjusted to accommodate naval vessels and cruise ships. While VLSFO and LSMGO inventories remain healthy, HSFO availability is tight, with suppliers typically seeking about seven days’ advance notice. Seasonal cruise traffic in Sydney, Cairns and Darwin between December and February is expected to place additional pressure on delivery schedules.

In Brisbane and Gladstone, VLSFO and LSMGO continue to be supplied with similar seven-day lead times. HSFO is available on request in Brisbane, while Gladstone may still face intermittent weather-related delays. Access constraints remain at Brisbane’s AAT terminal. Two barges—operated by different suppliers—are now active in Brisbane, supplying VLSFO and LSMGO, with HSFO offered only on enquiry.

In Victoria, suppliers in Melbourne and Geelong hold strong inventories of VLSFO and LSMGO. HSFO remains tight for prompt delivery, although Melbourne currently has adequate supply. Both ports rely on a single barge. Lead times are holding steady around seven days, while LSMGO can be delivered by truck to smaller ports such as Portland and Port Welshpool within 2–3 days.

Overall, Australia’s bunker market remains steady, with deliveries within 3–4 days often achievable due to solid inventory levels. Even at ports with pipeline infrastructure, including Darwin and Dampier, suppliers continue to rely heavily on truck deliveries to support distribution.

In New Zealand, bunker supply remains stable. VLSFO is widely available at Tauranga and Auckland, with pipeline access at certain berths in Tauranga. Both VLSFO and LSMGO can be delivered by pipeline to cargo vessels at Marsden Point, while truck availability across South Island ports remains limited.

Meanwhile, cyclone season in northern Australia, which runs from November to April, is expected to cause intermittent disruptions, with 9–11 cyclones forecast this year.

Notably, vessel movements have resumed at North Queensland ports following the passage of Tropical Cyclone Koji over the weekend. Townsville, Mourilyan and Lucinda have been open since Sunday, while Abbot Point remains at red alert, with anchorages and pilotage areas still closed, according to GAC Hot Port News.

South Asia

In Sri Lanka, one supplier is currently quoting lead times of about six days across all fuel grades at both Colombo and Hambantota.

Middle East

Prompt bunker availability remains constrained in Fujairah across all grades, with several suppliers operating on tight delivery schedules. Most are continuing to quote lead times of 5–7 days, though a few can still arrange urgent stems at a premium, according to a source. Similar supply conditions are being reported in Khor Fakkan.

Adverse weather is forecast in both Fujairah and Khor Fakkan between 16–17 January, which is expected to disrupt bunker deliveries.

In Basrah, VLSFO and LSMGO remain readily available, while HSFO supply continues to be limited. At Jeddah, availability of VLSFO and LSMGO has improved, but ongoing port congestion is still slowing bunker delivery operations. Weather-related bunkering disruptions are also expected at Yanbu on 14 January.

Port Suez is facing contrasting conditions, with stocks of VLSFO, LSMGO and HSFO close to exhaustion. Adverse weather is forecast in Port Said between 13–14 January, which could hamper operations. In Ras Laffan, both VLSFO and LSMGO supplies remain tight. VLSFO is available in Djibouti, but LSMGO inventories are nearly depleted.

Across Oman’s ports—Sohar, Salalah, Muscat and Duqm—bunker supply remains stable, with suppliers consistently offering LSMGO on prompt delivery windows.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 14 January, 2026 

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

Admin

Published

on

By

Yang Ming orders six LNG dual-fuel, ammonia-ready containerships from Hanwha Ocean

Taiwanese shipping firm Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation (Yang Ming) and South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean on Wednesday (2 September) signed a shipbuilding contract for six 13,000 TEU class LNG dual-fuel container vessels. 

The contract was signed by Dr. Chuck Tsai, Chairman of Yang Ming, and Mr. Charles Kim, CEO of Hanwha Ocean. The vessels are scheduled for delivery between 2028 and 2029. 

They will complement Yang Ming’s existing fleet of 10,000+ TEU vessels and serve as key vessels on East-West services, with deployment flexibility across trade lanes connecting Asia with the East and West Coasts of North America, South America, and the Mediterranean. 

Each of the six new vessels will have a capacity of up to 13,650 TEU and feature LNG dual-fuel propulsion and Ammonia Fuel Ready specifications.

“As Yang Ming transitions toward net-zero emissions, LNG provides a relatively mature and economically viable alternative fuel solution, capable of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 20%,” the company said. 

“At the same time, ammonia can serve as a carbon-free fuel by utilising converted LNG storage facilities, while offering relatively lower conversion costs and comparatively well-developed supply chains and infrastructure. The Ammonia Fuel Ready design will therefore provide Yang Ming with greater flexibility in responding to increasingly stringent international regulations on greenhouse gas emissions.”

In addition, the vessels will be equipped with Type B LNG fuel tanks with a design pressure of 1.0 bar to enhance the safety and efficiency of LNG operations, together with a range of energy-saving technologies, including Wind Shields, Rudder Bulbs, Pre-Swirl Stators, and Shore Power Systems. Smart ship technologies and cybersecurity protection features will also be incorporated to enhance operational efficiency, safety, and reliability while effectively reducing fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

Deliveries under Yang Ming’s next-generation fleet optimization plan commenced earlier this year. By 2030, a total of 24 new vessels are expected to enter service. 

This includes 18 LNG dual-fuel vessels—comprising five 15,500 TEU, seven 16,000 TEU, and the six 13,000 TEU vessels under this contract—alongside six 8,000 TEU methanol dual-fuel-ready ships. 

 

Photo credit: Yang Ming Marine Transport
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Both secured AiP for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Admin

Published

on

By

LR, China’s MARIC unveil tanker concept ready for three future bunker fuels

Lloyd’s Register (LR) and the Marine Design and Research Institute of China (MARIC) on Thursday (3 September) have secured Approval in Principle (AiP) for a new 114,000 DWT product and crude oil tanker designed to accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia.

Announced at SMM 2026, the concept addresses one of the biggest investment challenges facing shipping today: the need to develop vessels and capabilities that can support a range of alternative fuel options and pathways as technologies, infrastructure and regulations evolve.

While LNG is already a mature fuel pathway, methanol and ammonia remain at an earlier stage of development, with questions around global fuel availability, infrastructure development, economics and long-term adoption.

The 114,000 DWT tanker concept has been designed as a product and crude oil carrier that can accommodate future conversion to LNG, methanol or ammonia as technologies, regulations and fuel supply chains mature. By incorporating conversion readiness at the design stage, the concept aims to reduce future retrofit complexity and provide owners with greater confidence when planning long-term fleet investments.

The design concept was reviewed against LR’s July 2026 class rules and regulations, including requirements relating to ships using gases and other low-flashpoint fuels, alongside relevant IACS Common Structural Rules for oil tankers. Final classification and statutory approval remain subject to full compliance with all applicable rules and regulations.

Theo Kourmpelis, Global Business Director for Tankers, Lloyd’s Register, said: “Shipowners are being asked to make major investment decisions today despite continued uncertainty around which fuels will dominate in the decades ahead. Alternative fuel solutions each offer potential pathways to compliance, but fuel infrastructure, regulation and economics continue to evolve at different speeds around the world.

“Designs that preserve flexibility will be critical in helping owners manage risk while preparing for multiple future scenarios.”

Si Nan, Marine & Offshore Marketing Department Vice Director, MARIC, said: “As the industry explores different decarbonisation pathways, shipowners need vessel designs that can adapt alongside technological and regulatory developments. This concept was developed specifically to provide greater fuel flexibility and long-term resilience, allowing owners to respond to changing market requirements without being locked into a single fuel strategy.

“Receiving Approval in Principle from Lloyd’s Register is an important milestone that validates the design concept and supports its future development.”

 

Photo credit: Lloyd’s Register
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity while the strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year.

Admin

Published

on

By

DNV: Alternative-fuelled vessel orders hit highest monthly level since October 2024

Latest data from classification society DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight (AFI) platform alternative-fuelled vessel ordering was strong in August, with 52 new vessels added to the platform.

This is the highest monthly total since October 2024 and follows another active month in July, when 47 vessels were added to the database.

LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for the vast majority of August activity, with 46 orders recorded. The container segment led the way with 30 orders, while the car carrier segment contributed a further 12 LNG-fuelled vessels. In addition, four ethanol-fuelled bulk carriers and two hydrogen-powered bulk carriers were added during the month, as well as one LNG bunker vessel.

The strong summer performance marked a significant acceleration in ordering activity after a relatively slow start to the year. In total, 242 alternative-fuelled vessel orders have been placed in the first eight months of 2026, representing a 27% increase compared with the same period in 2025.

LNG remains the dominant fuel choice, accounting for 63% of all alternative-fuelled vessel orders registered so far this year. Container vessels represent the largest share of these LNG orders (59%), followed by car carriers (30%).

Jason Stefanatos, Global Decarbonization Director at DNV Maritime, said: “The past two months have been particularly strong for alternative-fuelled vessel ordering, with August recording the highest monthly total we’ve seen since October 2024. This has helped lift year-to-date orders to a level well above the same period last year.

“LNG remains the leading fuel choice, driven largely by activity in the container and car carrier segments. These sectors have been among the earliest adopters of alternative fuels, supported by predictable liner operations and increasing demand from cargo owners to reduce emissions across supply chains. 

“For many owners, LNG offers a combination of emissions reductions, fuel availability and future flexibility while the longer-term fuel landscape continues to evolve. 

“At the same time, the latest figures include orders for ethanol- and hydrogen-fuelled vessels, highlighting that owners continue to explore a range of decarbonization pathways. Different segments are making different fuel choices, but the overall level of activity demonstrates continued investment in lower-emission shipping.”

Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.26 PM Screenshot 2026 09 04 at 12.29.36 PM

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 4 September, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS



Trending