Connect with us

Business

SGX launch of LSFO derivative contracts to increase bunker market liquidity

SGX contract will suit commercial traders who prefer to execute bigger sizes via brokers, says Argus spokesman.

Admin

Published

on

5dca2d3950005 1573530937

The launch of the Singapore Exchange (SGX) Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (LSFO) derivative contracts on 18 November 2019 will provide increased market liquidity for players within the marine fuels industry, believes the Head of Asian Business Development at global energy and commodity price reporting agency Argus Media.

Alan Bannister notes the new SGX Argus LSFO 0.5%S Singapore Bunker Index Future contracts will be based on a bunker index calculated by Argus Media; it will be traded in lots of 100 metric tonnes (mt).

“This is the same contract already listed on APEX and now trading about 1,000 lots per day,” he told Manifold Times.

The APEX Argus Bunker Index (ABI) Singapore LSFO 0.5%S Futures Contract, a product traded as LFA (Low Sulphur Fuel Oil Argus) on the APEX platform, is transacted through lots of 10 mt each.

“Hopefully these two contracts together will increase overall liquidity as the APEX screen provides good visibility of market prices and the SGX contract will suit commercial traders who prefer to execute bigger sizes via brokers,” says Bannister.

“Both these contracts financially settle on the monthly average of Argus Bunker Index Singapore LSFO spot market assessments, which are bases on delivered to ship bunker deals submitted to Argus by 7pm each day.”

The new environmental regulations starting in 2020 will have a significant impact on the global fuel oil and bunker market, according to SGX.

In the volatile environment which is likely to ensue, the new SGX Low Sulphur Fuel Oil contracts will allow market participants to risk manage their cargo and bunker exposure.

Related: SGX to launch low sulphur fuel oil derivative contracts on 18 November 2019
Related: Argus ‘pleased’ on successful debut of APEX ABI Singapore LSFO Futures
RelatedAPEX enters agreement to use Argus’ prices in proposed LSFO futures contract
RelatedArgus ABI Singapore LSFO futures contract starts trading on APEX
RelatedAPEX ABI Singapore LSFO Futures now ready to start trading ops
RelatedAPEX ABI LSFO Futures completes Singapore regulatory process

Photo credit: Argus Media
Published: 12 November, 2019

 

Continue Reading

Port & Regulatory

UCL on ISWG-GHG 22: Majority back GHG pricing, centralised fund in IMO NZF talks

A significant majority of IMO member states backed a centralised system for collecting revenues to reward early adopters and support a just transition, according to UCL.

Admin

Published

on

By

34

UCL Shipping and Oceans Research Group on Friday (4 September) said the IMO’s 22nd Intersessional Working Group on GHG emissions has concluded with significant majority of member states supporting a centralised system for collecting revenues, operationalised through a GHG price (RU price), and disbursing it for rewards for early adopters and supporting a just and equitable transition. 

The group of member states focused on a technical-only solution and abandonment of GHG pricing, remained small and consistently composed of strongly fossil fuel aligned governments.

Just as at MEPC 84, the political dynamics observed at MEPC.ES2 did not occur in this meeting. 

The discussions were more representative of the ISWG-GHG 19 and MEPC 83 negotiating dynamics, but this does not rule out the potential for the dynamics that occurred at MEPC.ES2 returning in future meetings. That said, there was reassuring evidence from the week that reduces that risk, including in the contrast between strong public (press) positions taken against the IMO’s NZF, and the substance of how delegations negotiated in the meeting.

Dr Tristan Smith, Professor of Energy and Transport at UCL Shipping and Oceans Research Group, said: “Whilst there are many positives to take away – there is clear potential for a return to a strong policy solution and decision making this December, there remains high uncertainty in the extent that both industry’s transition and low-income countries’ transitions will be supported. 

“There remains high risk that in the effort to find a creative way forwards, the equilibrium between these two aspects, that enabled the NZF in the first place, is lost to the detriment of the outcome overall.”

In addition to the discussion on centralised system for revenue collection and disbursement, the meeting discussed a number of other items as guided by the chair, discussed in detail with member state positions in the readout. Some of these included:

  • GFI (Global Fuel Intensity) reduction pathway: GFI is likely to be softened initially (around 2030), but then steeper in the period to 2040. 
  • ZNZ rewards: ZNZ reward still broadly supported and a priority to many member states, but the broad support for a multiplier, despite it being taken off the table at the last meeting, could yet lead this to be incorporated to provide incentivisation. 
  • Compliance approaches
  • Most interventions confirmed support for the compliance mechanisms as setup in NZF ‘as is’. The strongest support was for the two least controversial options common to all proposals: reducing GHG intensity and pooling/transfer of SU. 
  • Direct contributions: Japan’s proposal to replace GHG pricing with shipowner-directed contributions was robustly rejected, particularly by the member states that would need to ‘swing’ to support it for this to start to build momentum. 
  • SU (Surplus Units) trading: Majority of member states opposed the inclusion of energy efficiency SU credits and the concept of printing SU’s to manage an SU price shock, citing various reasons, primarily a concern that this would destabilise the SU market and undermine investment predictability. 
  • Netting: China’s proposal to balance of RU and reward payments that could be netted to form a single transaction received broad support. However, the details of the concept will now need to be set out in guidelines and there remain a number of issues regarding this approach, as raised by several delegations.

Note: The full article can be read here

 

Photo credit: UCL Shipping and Oceans Research Group
Published: 7 September, 2026

Continue Reading

LNG Bunkering

LR awards AiP to CSSC Huangpu Wenchong for 12,500 m³ LNG bunker vessel design

Vessel design incorporates Type C LNG cargo tanks and has been evaluated against a range of class notations covering gas operations, automation, environmental performance and cyber resilience.

Admin

Published

on

By

33

Classification society Lloyd’s Register (LR) on Thursday (3 September) said it has awarded Approval in Principle (AiP) to CSSC Huangpu Wenchong Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. for a new 12,500 m³ LNG bunkering vessel design.

The AiP was signed at SMM 2026 in Hamburg and confirms that the vessel concept has successfully completed an independent design assessment against LR’s latest classification requirements.

The new 12,500 m³ vessel design incorporates Type C LNG cargo tanks and has been evaluated against a comprehensive range of class notations covering gas operations, automation, environmental performance and cyber resilience.

LR’s assessment was carried out in accordance with its Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships and Rules and Regulations for the Construction and Classification of Ships for the Carriage of Liquefied Gas in Bulk.

Constantinos Chaelis, LR’s Global Gas Segment Director, said: “This project demonstrates the continued market confidence in LNG and the importance of building the supporting infrastructure that enables owners to make practical emissions reductions today, while maintaining flexibility for the future. Through early engagement between shipyard and class, we can accelerate the delivery of robust designs that meet both operational and regulatory requirements.”

A Huangpu Wenchong spokesperson, said: “This Approval in Principle from Lloyd’s Register validates the technical approach and provides a strong foundation for future development. We believe vessels of this type will play an increasingly important role in supporting the energy transition by helping ensure LNG is available where shipowners need it most.”

 

Photo credit: Lloyd’s Register
Published: 7 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV at SMM: Chinese shipbuilders, European owners seek closer ties on alternative bunker fuels

Chinese shipbuilders and European shipowners called for closer collaboration on vessel development, alternative fuels and digitalization during the inaugural China-Europe Maritime Summit at SMM 2026.

Admin

Published

on

By

32 1

Chinese shipbuilders and European shipowners called for closer collaboration on vessel development, alternative fuels and digitalization during the inaugural China-Europe Maritime Summit at SMM 2026, according to classification society DNV on Friday (4 September). 

The summit, jointly organized by the China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry (CANSI), the German Shipowners’ Association (VDR) and DNV, brought together leaders from two maritime sectors that collectively shape a significant share of the global fleet. 

Energy efficiency, operational flexibility and digital innovation were highlighted as key areas for the industry as it navigates decarbonization targets, evolving regulation and uncertainty around future fuel pathways.

Knut Ørbeck-Nilssen, Group President and CEO at DNV, said: “Gathering leaders from across Chinese shipbuilding, European shipping and the wider maritime value chain in one room is both timely and important. The decisions being made across our industry today will shape shipping for decades to come, and this summit demonstrates a shared commitment to shaping the future of our industry together.”

Xu Peng, Chairman of China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC), said: “China and Europe’s maritime sectors share aligned missions, complementary strengths and promising prospects. This summit can serve as a starting point for deeper cooperation between China’s shipbuilding industry and Europe’s shipping community, and help broaden the boundaries of full‑chain collaboration and build an interconnected ecosystem.”

Dr. Gaby Bornheim, President of the German Shipowners’ Association (VDR), said: “For shipowners, a new vessel is never an investment for the next quarter. It is a commitment for decades. Long-term investments require trusted partnerships, and many of the world’s most advanced commercial vessels are the result of cooperation between European shipowners and Chinese shipbuilders. Excellence is rarely achieved in isolation.”

China’s shipbuilding industry accounts for around 70% of the global orderbook, while European shipowners operate more than one-third of the world’s fleet capacity. As the global shipping industry faces increased uncertainty, finding solutions that provide flexibility is essential. 

The summit featured two high-level panel discussions moderated by Dr. Martin Kröger, CEO of VDR, and Li Yanqing, Vice Chairman and Secretary General of CANSI, bringing together senior executives from leading Chinese shipbuilders, including China Merchants Industry (CMI), Guangzhou Shipyard International (GSI), Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding (SWS), and Shanghai Merchant Ship Design & Research Institute (SDARI), alongside European shipowners and operators such as Vogemann Reederei, Briese Schiffahrt, Bernhard Schulte, MPC Containerships, and Grieg Edge, as well as DNV. 

Discussions further highlighted the importance of close China-Europe collaboration to support shipping’s transformation.

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 7 September, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS



Trending