Connect with us

Bunker Fuel

ENGINE: East of Suez Bunker Fuel Availability Outlook (7 April 2026)

HSFO and LSMGO availability tight in Port Klang; bunker supply severely tight across several Japanese ports; availability tight across all grades in Fujairah.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED ENGINE East of Suez

The following article regarding regional bunker fuel availability outlook for the East of Suez region has been provided by online marine fuels procurement platform ENGINE for publication on Singapore bunkering publication Manifold Times:

  • HSFO and LSMGO availability tight in Port Klang
  • Bunker supply severely tight across several Japanese ports
  • Availability tight across all grades in Fujairah

Singapore and Malaysia

“Prices are still affected by Middle East crisis,” a Singapore-based trader said.

Bunker prices in Singapore have remained firm, largely supported by ongoing tensions in the Middle East. These tensions have buoyed Brent crude prices and disrupted flows through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global oil trade.

In the prompt market, VLSFO continues to face pressure, with recommended lead times now at 6–11 days, compared to 10–12 days last week. HSFO availability remains constrained within a 7–10-day range, down from 9–13 days previously.

LSMGO lead times have eased slightly to around 2–6 days, compared with 5–8 days last week.

At Port Klang, VLSFO availability is relatively stable, particularly for smaller prompt stems. However, LSMGO supply has tightened, while HSFO availability remains limited, making both grades increasingly difficult to secure.

East Asia

In Zhoushan, availability across all fuel grades has tightened, with most suppliers running low on stocks due to cargo delays, a source said. Lead times have lengthened to 7–10 days for VLSFO and 5–10 days for both LSMGO and HSFO, up sharply from last week’s typical 3–5 days across all grades.

Across northern China, supply conditions vary. Dalian and Qingdao have adequate VLSFO and LSMGO availability, although HSFO remains limited in Qingdao. Tianjin is facing tight supply across all grades, while in Shanghai, VLSFO and HSFO stocks are constrained, with LSMGO availability relatively steady.

Further south, tighter conditions continue. Fuzhou is experiencing limited availability of both VLSFO and LSMGO. Xiamen has sufficient VLSFO supply but restricted LSMGO volumes. In Yangpu and Guangzhou, both grades remain under pressure.

In Hong Kong, bunker supply is largely stable, with lead times for all grades holding at around seven days in recent weeks.

In Taiwan, supply remains mostly unaffected by Middle East tensions, though prices have reacted sharply. Volatility in Brent crude, driven by regional tensions, has significantly influenced bunker markets, a Taiwan-based trader noted.

Recommended lead times for VLSFO and MGO in Keelung, Taichung, Kaohsiung and Hualien are currently around two days.

In South Korea’s southern ports—including Busan, Ulsan, Masan, Onsan, Yeosu and Kwangyang—lead times for all fuel grades have extended to around 4–5 days, up from 2–3 days the previous week.

At western ports such as Incheon, Daesan, Dangjin, Pyeongtaek and Taean, lead times stand at about four days, compared to 2–4 days last week. HSFO had been subject to availability during the previous week.

Elevated bunker prices have weakened buying interest across South Korean ports, resulting in softer demand, a trader noted. The ongoing Middle East crisis is expected to affect most South Korean suppliers, although one supplier may be less impacted due to its affiliation with a Saudi Arabian oil major, the source added.

Weather conditions continue to disrupt operations. Potential delays are expected to affect Busan and Ulsan between 9–11 April, and Yeosu and Daesan on 9 April.

In Japan, the bunker market remains extremely tight amid Middle East tensions and shifts in crude procurement, with spot supply west of Hanshin virtually unavailable. However, temporary refinery issues have slightly eased HSFO availability, according to a Japan-based trader.

Suppliers are quoting discreetly, with successful deals relying on private, one-on-one negotiations rather than broad market inquiries. One supplier is offering up to 2,000 mt of HSFO only for exclusive, targeted discussions, while others are supplying smaller VLSFO parcels of 100–300 mt. MGO remains extremely tight and heavily schedule-dependent, the source added.

As a result, availability of all fuel grades across major Japanese hubs—including Tokyo, Chiba, Yokohama, Kawasaki, Nagoya, Yokkaichi, Mizushima, Kashima, Tokuyama and Oita—is now being assessed strictly on a case-by-case basis.

Oceania

Bunker prices across several Australian ports remain elevated, largely driven by the ongoing Middle East crisis, an Australia-based trader said.

In response, the Australian Government has reduced fuel excise on petrol and diesel by half for a three-month period starting 1 April.

Supply pressures are becoming evident, with ports such as Dampier, Darwin, Kwinana and Melbourne nearing depletion of LSMGO stocks, the trader added.

In Western Australia, VLSFO supply at Kwinana and Fremantle typically requires about a week’s notice, with deliveries carried out by barge through a single supplier.

In New South Wales, VLSFO deliveries at Port Kembla can be arranged via truck or pipeline. Suppliers in Sydney maintain ample inventories of VLSFO and LSMGO, although HSFO remains tight, with lead times of around seven days.

In Queensland, ports including Brisbane and Gladstone are offering VLSFO and LSMGO with lead times of roughly seven days. HSFO in Brisbane is available on request. Deliveries of VLSFO and LSMGO are handled by two barges operated by separate suppliers, while HSFO is strictly offered on an enquiry basis.

In Victoria, VLSFO stocks are strong in both Melbourne and Geelong, but HSFO availability remains limited for prompt supply. Bunkering operations in these ports rely on a single barge, with lead times close to seven days.

In New Zealand, bunker supply conditions remain stable. VLSFO is readily available in Tauranga and Auckland, with some Tauranga berths connected by pipeline. At Marsden Point, both VLSFO and LSMGO can be supplied via pipeline to cargo vessels, although truck-based deliveries across South Island ports continue to face constraints.

South Asia

Supply of VLSFO and LSMGO remains constrained across several Indian ports. In Kandla, prompt availability of both grades is tight, with lead times of 7–8 days, while HSFO stocks in Mumbai are nearly exhausted. At Tuticorin and Mormugao, availability is also limited, with all fuel grades close to depletion, a source said.

In Sri Lanka’s Port of Colombo, supply conditions remain healthy across all grades, with one supplier indicating lead times of around three days.

Bunker demand at the port initially rose amid the Middle East crisis, as disruptions and uncertainty at key hubs such as Port of Fujairah diverted enquiries toward alternative locations. However, demand has since stabilised, according to a Sri Lanka-based source.

Middle East

Bunkering operations at the Port of Fujairah remain uninterrupted despite the ongoing regional crisis, although supply conditions are tight.

In the Port of Fujairah, bunkering is progressing, but prompt fuel availability remains tight amid “limited supply, strict scheduling, firm nominations, and possible delays in barge availability,’” a Middle East-based trader said.

Authorities in Fujairah and Khor Fakkan Port have issued navigational warnings following reports of intermittent GPS spoofing and signal jamming offshore. Such disruptions can result in inaccurate positioning, erratic vessel movements and misleading navigation data, prompting mariners to treat the area as high risk, according to Inchcape Shipping.

Most terminals and anchorages continue to operate fully or partially without disruption. However, fuel availability in Fujairah remains tight across all grades, with offers subject to firm enquiry.

Elsewhere in the UAE, operations at Jebel Ali Port, Hamriyah Port and Sharjah Port are proceeding normally. Petroleum terminals in Abu Dhabi, including Ruwais Port, are also functioning without interruption.

Ports in Ras Al Khaimah remain fully operational. However, earlier this month, RAK Ports Group introduced a marine risk surcharge for all vessels calling at its ports, harbours, anchorages and approaches, according to the shipping agency.

“Prompt operations are difficult and challenging across the region,” and “last-minute requests usually come with premiums and higher risk of delays or non-availability,” a trader warned.

“Plan 5–7 days ahead, confirm early, and avoid changes to ensure smooth bunkering,” the trader advised.

In Kuwait, both Shuaiba Port and Shuwaikh Port continue to operate normally.

In Saudi Arabia, no formal alerts have been issued, although bunker availability remains tight in Jeddah Port, particularly for VLSFO and LSMGO. “Port operations going smoothly,” another source said.

In Qatar, port operations and vessel movements remain steady at Hamad Port, Doha Port and Al Ruwais Port, with activity also continuing at Mesaieed Port and Ras Laffan Port. However, VLSFO and LSMGO supply is tight in Ras Laffan, while Al Ruwais Port is limited to smaller vessels such as dhows and barges.

In Oman, ports such as Sohar and Duqm are seeing smoother operations, with “better barge availability and more flexibility,” an Oman-based source said. Bunkering, including LSMGO, remains good in Muscat, Duqm and Sohar, with prompt lead times, the source added.

In Bahrain, vessel movements are gradually resuming, although operations remain limited under current conditions. The Suez Canal and all Egyptian ports continue to function normally, while conditions remain stable in Jordan. Ports in Iraq, Cyprus, Pakistan and Lebanon are also operating as usual.

Meanwhile, Israeli ports—including Eilat Port, Ashkelon Port, Ashdod Port, Hadera Port and Haifa Port—are operating at full capacity, the shipping agency added.

By Tuhin Roy

 

Photo credit and source: ENGINE
Published: 8 April, 2026

Continue Reading

LNG Bunkering

Singapore-based EPS takes delivery of three LNG dual-fuel bulk carriers

Three vessels are the third, fourth and fifth in the company’s series of 14 Newcastlemaxes being built at the yard, and were delivered five months ahead of their contracted delivery dates.

Admin

Published

on

By

35

Singapore-based Eastern Pacific Shipping (EPS) on Friday (4 September) announced the naming and delivery of three new LNG dual-fuel Newcastlemax bulk carriers from China’s Qingdao Beihai Shipbuilding. 

Cyril Ducau, CEO of EPS, said the vessels were named Mount Victoria, Mount Yulong and Mount Wuyi

The three vessels are the third, fourth and fifth in the company’s series of 14 Newcastlemaxes being built at the yard, and were delivered five months ahead of their contracted delivery dates.

“A big thank you to CSSC Group and Qingdao Beihai Shipbuilding, working alongside our EPS team, for the tremendous collaboration and commitment behind this achievement,” Ducau said in a social media post.  

 

Photo credit: Eastern Pacific Shipping
Published: 7 September, 2026

Continue Reading

Port & Regulatory

UCL on ISWG-GHG 22: Majority back GHG pricing, centralised fund in IMO NZF talks

A significant majority of IMO member states backed a centralised system for collecting revenues to reward early adopters and support a just transition, according to UCL.

Admin

Published

on

By

34

UCL Shipping and Oceans Research Group on Friday (4 September) said the IMO’s 22nd Intersessional Working Group on GHG emissions has concluded with significant majority of member states supporting a centralised system for collecting revenues, operationalised through a GHG price (RU price), and disbursing it for rewards for early adopters and supporting a just and equitable transition. 

The group of member states focused on a technical-only solution and abandonment of GHG pricing, remained small and consistently composed of strongly fossil fuel aligned governments.

Just as at MEPC 84, the political dynamics observed at MEPC.ES2 did not occur in this meeting. 

The discussions were more representative of the ISWG-GHG 19 and MEPC 83 negotiating dynamics, but this does not rule out the potential for the dynamics that occurred at MEPC.ES2 returning in future meetings. That said, there was reassuring evidence from the week that reduces that risk, including in the contrast between strong public (press) positions taken against the IMO’s NZF, and the substance of how delegations negotiated in the meeting.

Dr Tristan Smith, Professor of Energy and Transport at UCL Shipping and Oceans Research Group, said: “Whilst there are many positives to take away – there is clear potential for a return to a strong policy solution and decision making this December, there remains high uncertainty in the extent that both industry’s transition and low-income countries’ transitions will be supported. 

“There remains high risk that in the effort to find a creative way forwards, the equilibrium between these two aspects, that enabled the NZF in the first place, is lost to the detriment of the outcome overall.”

In addition to the discussion on centralised system for revenue collection and disbursement, the meeting discussed a number of other items as guided by the chair, discussed in detail with member state positions in the readout. Some of these included:

  • GFI (Global Fuel Intensity) reduction pathway: GFI is likely to be softened initially (around 2030), but then steeper in the period to 2040. 
  • ZNZ rewards: ZNZ reward still broadly supported and a priority to many member states, but the broad support for a multiplier, despite it being taken off the table at the last meeting, could yet lead this to be incorporated to provide incentivisation. 
  • Compliance approaches
  • Most interventions confirmed support for the compliance mechanisms as setup in NZF ‘as is’. The strongest support was for the two least controversial options common to all proposals: reducing GHG intensity and pooling/transfer of SU. 
  • Direct contributions: Japan’s proposal to replace GHG pricing with shipowner-directed contributions was robustly rejected, particularly by the member states that would need to ‘swing’ to support it for this to start to build momentum. 
  • SU (Surplus Units) trading: Majority of member states opposed the inclusion of energy efficiency SU credits and the concept of printing SU’s to manage an SU price shock, citing various reasons, primarily a concern that this would destabilise the SU market and undermine investment predictability. 
  • Netting: China’s proposal to balance of RU and reward payments that could be netted to form a single transaction received broad support. However, the details of the concept will now need to be set out in guidelines and there remain a number of issues regarding this approach, as raised by several delegations.

Note: The full article can be read here

 

Photo credit: UCL Shipping and Oceans Research Group
Published: 7 September, 2026

Continue Reading

LNG Bunkering

LR awards AiP to CSSC Huangpu Wenchong for 12,500 m³ LNG bunker vessel design

Vessel design incorporates Type C LNG cargo tanks and has been evaluated against a range of class notations covering gas operations, automation, environmental performance and cyber resilience.

Admin

Published

on

By

33

Classification society Lloyd’s Register (LR) on Thursday (3 September) said it has awarded Approval in Principle (AiP) to CSSC Huangpu Wenchong Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. for a new 12,500 m³ LNG bunkering vessel design.

The AiP was signed at SMM 2026 in Hamburg and confirms that the vessel concept has successfully completed an independent design assessment against LR’s latest classification requirements.

The new 12,500 m³ vessel design incorporates Type C LNG cargo tanks and has been evaluated against a comprehensive range of class notations covering gas operations, automation, environmental performance and cyber resilience.

LR’s assessment was carried out in accordance with its Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships and Rules and Regulations for the Construction and Classification of Ships for the Carriage of Liquefied Gas in Bulk.

Constantinos Chaelis, LR’s Global Gas Segment Director, said: “This project demonstrates the continued market confidence in LNG and the importance of building the supporting infrastructure that enables owners to make practical emissions reductions today, while maintaining flexibility for the future. Through early engagement between shipyard and class, we can accelerate the delivery of robust designs that meet both operational and regulatory requirements.”

A Huangpu Wenchong spokesperson, said: “This Approval in Principle from Lloyd’s Register validates the technical approach and provides a strong foundation for future development. We believe vessels of this type will play an increasingly important role in supporting the energy transition by helping ensure LNG is available where shipowners need it most.”

 

Photo credit: Lloyd’s Register
Published: 7 September, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS



Trending