Midstream oil storage and service provider; Brooge Energy Ltd. wholly owned subsidiary, Brooge Petroleum and Gas Investment Company FZE (BPGIC), on Friday (9 July) signed a Refinery Agreement with an oil trading company for a 25,000 barrel per day (bpd) modular refinery.
BPGIC will sublease land to the oil trading company, which will be responsible for constructing the refinery including bearing the full cost of construction.
When construction is complete, BPGIC will be responsible for operating the refinery, earning revenue from tolling fees on a take-or-pay basis.
The agreement between BPGIC and the oil trading company includes a tolling contract for a tenure of 20 years, consisting of a five-year contract to commence upon completion of the construction of the refinery, and three renewal periods of five years each.
Nicolaas L. Paardenkooper, CEO of Brooge Energy and BPGIC, said, “The modular refinery will be focused on producing Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (VLSFO) and will be fully compliant with the new IMO 2020 very low sulphur rule. With the UAE adding to its oil production capacity, which we anticipate will drive demand for refining services for both the domestic and export market, we believe this is an opportune time to enter this segment of the oil industry.”
“This agreement is a low-risk approach to advancing these plans as the oil trading partner will own the asset and take on the cost of construction and any oil price risk, while our focus remains in our area of expertise as the operator of the facility. This is expected to drive additional revenue to Brooge Energy, at favorable EBITDA margins.”
Webinar will offer delegates insights on the prevention of operational issues when using VLSFOs, along with an update on biofuels and bunker fuel quality trends for 2021 and its forecast for the current year.
Heating VLSFOs to prevent cold flow issues causes issues related to distillate ageing, and there is a gentle balance to be maintained when handling the product.
Research into n-paraffin distribution of VLSFOs has shown that they not only differ from MGO, but significantly differ from each other as well, states bulletin.
Bunker Holding and Dan-Bunkering have decided not to appeal the city court ruling in the case where the companies were on trial for breaching EU sanctions against Syria, states USTC.
Poll shows market participants think Singapore’s future as a bunkering hub in the near term will be impacted most by growth in alternative bunker fuels and intensifying competition from other ports in Asia.
‘We will now take the necessary time to consider and evaluate the verdict and the premises of the verdict thoroughly before making any decision of whether to appeal to a higher court,’ informs company.