Connect with us
DNV Decarbonization Insight Series August 2026 - What maritime professionals should know about AI Training

Bunker Fuel Quality

VPS: Importance of fast turnaround times for bunker fuel analysis in today’s market

Thomas Schmidt stressed the growing importance of rapid bunker fuel analysis amid the evolving marine fuels landscape, highlighting how VPS is meeting demand with fast, reliable testing services.

Admin

Published

on

RESIZED VPS logo

Thomas Schmidt, Customer Account Manager of marine fuels testing company VPS, on Monday (18 May) highlighted how the company’s rapid, high quality marine fuel quality testing service continue to support the global shipping fleet, through a global network of strategically positioned laboratories, on-line logistics service and over 45 years of experience:

In today’s rapidly evolving marine fuel landscape, fast turnaround times for bunker fuel analysis have never been more critical.

Stricter environmental regulations and wider use of alternative fuels has generated increasingly complex marine fuel types and chemistries. In combination with volatile global supply chains and ongoing geopolitical instability, the need for ship operators and technical managers to have rapid and reliable fuel quality intelligence is increasingly important to protect their vessels, crew, operations, and commercial interests.

Following the introduction of IMO 2020, followed by further global and regional environmental legislation geared towards IMO2030/50, there has been a continuous development of lower-sulphur and low-carbon marine fuels, resulting in fuel quality variability across the global bunker market. Different blend components, cutter stocks, additives and bio-components can result in highly variable fuel behaviour and operational compatibility challenges.

At the same time, geopolitical developments continue to reshape global energy and bunker supply chains. Traditional product flows and refinery sourcing routes are changing, creating additional uncertainty around bunker fuel composition and quality consistency. Notably in 2026, the off-specification rate of fuels to relevant ISO8217 standards increased to 8.5%, from 6.8% during 2025.

Against this backdrop, timely fuel quality testing by an accredited laboratory is essential and remains one of the most effective tools available to ship operators, as advised by all major P&I Clubs. This helps to mitigate operational and financial risk by validating against ISO8217 specifications and providing operational guidance to onboard crew for effective handing and use.

Importance of Speedy Results

Fast turnaround time is critical for several reasons:

  • To assess fuel quality before the fuel is fully consumed onboard. Current fuel off-specification levels are 8.5% i.e. one in every twelve fuels has at least one off-specification parameter.
  • To identify potentially problematic fuels at an early stage.
  • Support fuel segregation, purification, compatibility and handling decisions.
  • Preserve contractual and claim-related rights, including applicable notification and potential time-bar requirements.
  • To reduce the risk of machinery damage, operational interruptions, delays, off-hire situations and costly troubleshooting cases. The Swedish P&I Club stated the average cost of a single marine fuel-related issue is >$330K.

The total turnaround time of a bunker sample is driven by a number of processes beginning with fuel delivery to the vessel and involves multiple critical stages:

  1.   Ensuring the taking of a representative fuel sample, (via a VPS manual drip sampler fitted at the vessel manifold).
  2.   Transfer of the sample to the local agent.
  3.   Sample Transfer via Courier to the laboratory.
  4.   Sample registration and laboratory analysis according to ISO8217 and additional testing requirements.
  5.   Technical review, interpretation and operational advice.
  6.   Report test results and advisory comments.

 

In many cases, the transportation phase alone may consume several days before the sample even arrives at the laboratory. 

How VPS Ensures Faster Turnaround Times

VPS has developed a fully integrated global fuel testing and advisory infrastructure, which currently boasts 93% of samples are reported within one working day from receipt in the laboratory.

SampLogic – Accelerating Sample Logistics to speed up transfer of sample to Lab

The VPS SampLogic platform is an online logistics and tracking solution designed specifically for marine fuel sample transportation, which is free for VPS customers and can save at least one full day on sample transportation. VPS Samplogic

SampLogic enables:

  • Online booking of bunker sample collection.
  • Automated generation of shipping documentation.
  • Shipment tracking and milestone visibility.
  • Faster coordination between vessel, agent, courier and laboratory.
  • By reducing manual processes and improving shipment transparency, SampLogic helps minimise transportation delays and accelerates the overall testing process.

Strategic Global Laboratory Network

VPS operates a global network of wholly-owned, ISO17025 accredited, marine fuel testing laboratories strategically located across the world’s major bunkering hubs in order to support the needs of our shipping customers.

The laboratories positioning further reduces sample transfer times whilst also providing important operational resilience and redundancy. During periods of geopolitical disruption, natural disasters, strikes or unexpected regional events, samples can be redirected within the VPS laboratory network to maintain continuity and avoid delays.

Technical Advisory Support

Analytical results alone are not sufficient in terms of assessing fuel-related operational requirements, fuel management and handling, or environmental compliance. It is the expert and experienced interpretation and advisory guidance which is where the major added-value is delivered to vessels from any fuel testing service.

VPS technical advisors and marine engineers located across the global laboratory network support customers with:

  • Troubleshooting.
  • Fuel management recommendations.
  • Risk assessments.
  • Operational guidance.
  • Dispute and claims support.

Where urgent fuel quality concerns are identified, VPS technical teams proactively contact customers to support immediate operational decision-making, with samples and results able to be progressed at pace, with VPS having supported numerous vessels in providing urgent results in the same working day to meet operational needs.

24/7 Digital Access Through VeriSphere

Through the VPS VeriSphere digital ecosystem, customers have continuous access to:

  • Analytical reports
  • Fuel quality trends
  • Historical fuel data
  • Market intelligence
  • Digital fuel management tools
  • Operational insights

This provides technical managers and vessel operators with rapid access to critical information anytime and anywhere.

In addition, the unique VPS PortStats, MyFuels and MySeparators, on-line applications within Verisphere, can provide deeper insights into global and regional fuel quality and key procurement indicators, plus operational and purifier performance improvements.

Conclusion

In the current climate, bunker fuel analysis is no longer simply a compliance exercise – it is an essential operational and procurement risk management tool.

As marine fuels continue to evolve and global supply chains become increasingly dynamic and unpredictable, rapid and reliable fuel quality intelligence is critical to protecting vessels, machinery, operations and commercial performance.

Minimising the total turnaround time from bunker sampling through to technical advisory support is therefore essential. Through its integrated logistics systems, strategic laboratory network, technical expertise and digital solutions, VPS continues to support the industry with fast, resilient and operationally focused fuel quality services.

 

Photo credit: VPS
Published: 19 May, 2026

Continue Reading

Bunker Alerts

Low flashpoint found in Indonesia bunker fuels, alerts Maritec-Naias

Firm tested eight bunker samples representing LSMDO and B40 fuel grade from vessels that took fuel oil /bunkered in Indonesia ports, which indicated flashpoints as low as 39.5°C.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Shaah Shahidh on Unsplash

Bunker fuel testing and marine surveying business Maritec-Naias on Wednesday (12 August) issued an alert regarding bunker samples from vessels that took fuel oil/bunkered in Indonesia showing flashpoints as low as 39.5°C:

During the period of 21 July to 04 August 2026, Maritec-Naias tested eight bunker samples representing Low Sulfur Marine Distillate Oil (LSMDO) and B40 fuel grade from vessels that took fuel oil /bunkered in Indonesia ports, which indicated Flashpoints as low as 39.5°C.

All eight fuel samples tested were sourced from a single supplier.

Regulatory Implications:

Based on the results of the eight samples tested, the fuels do not comply with the minimum flashpoint requirement of 60 °C set by SOLAS and ISO 8217.

As per SOLAS requirements, the minimum flashpoint of any fuel carried in the tanks of a ship should be not less than 60 °C (with exception of fuel for lifeboats, which can be grade DMX with a flash point min of 43 °C).

ISO 4259 interpretation for tested flashpoint temperature is not taken into consideration here as the safety of onboard crew and vessel is of higher precedence.

Since 01 May 2024, it has been a MARPOL Annex VI requirement that the Bunker Delivery Note (BDN) includes either the actual flashpoint of a fuel as supplied or a declaration that its flashpoint has been determined as being at or above 70°C.

From 1 January 2026, SOLAS amendments clarified that the flashpoint requirement applies to fuels, which were specifically intended to have a flashpoint not less than 60°C as required under SOLAS II‑2/2.1.1 These amendments now align with MARPOL by requiring flashpoint details to be recorded on the BDN. Additionally, prior to bunkering, suppliers must provide the ship’s representative with a signed declaration confirming that the fuel meets the SOLAS flashpoint standard.

MARITEC-NAIAS RECOMMENDATIONS

When ordering fuels from Indonesia it is advised to insist on getting the actual flash point values from the supplier. If your vessel has bunkered a low flashpoint fuel it is prudent to observe/implement the precautions below:

  • Flame screens on tank vents should be maintained in good condition and there should be no sources of ignition in the vicinity of the vents. This will assist in safe natural ventilation of volatile components in the fuel.
  • No Smoking, no naked flame and no hot work must be allowed at any areas near to tank air vents.
  • Send additional tank(s) samples upon arrival in port to check the fuel properties and flash point results especially if there has been co-mingling of fuels in bunker tanks
  • If the vessel is out at sea, it may be possible to obtain dispensation from your Flag State Administration up to the next arrival port.
  • Put the supplier on notice promptly and notify your P&I club.

 

Photo credit: Shaah Shahidh on Unsplash
Published: 13 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Bunker Alerts

Maritec-Naias: High levels of Phenolic compounds in China bunker fuels

Firm tested multiple fuel oil bunker samples from vessels that took fuel/bunkered in China ports from 7 June to 28 July, which indicated the presence of high levels of Phenolic compounds.

Admin

Published

on

By

Louis Reed from Unsplash

Bunker fuel testing and marine surveying business Maritec-Naias on Friday (7 August) issued an alert regarding high levels of Phenolic compounds found after conducting testing on multiple fuel oil bunker samples from China ports:

During the period of 07 June to 28 July 2026 Maritec-Naias tested multiple fuel oil bunker samples from vessels that took fuel/bunkered in China ports, which indicated the presence of high levels Phenolic compounds.

Ten cases were found to have Phenolic compounds, and its derivatives, in the range of 5200 – 15750 PPM. Out of ten cases, the fuel samples tested were sourced as follows: four from Tianjin port, two from Qinhuangdao port, two from Rizhao port, one from Zhoushan port, and one from Shandong port.

The fuel samples containing Phenolic compounds in excess of 5000 PPM returned a marginally stable classification (P-value 1.00 to <1.30) under the SMS 1600 stability reserve test. Prolonged storage of these fuels carries the risk of reduced fuel stability and resulting operational issues. Operational issues like excessive sludge formation in purifiers, filter choking and fuel pump wear-and-tear have been observed and reported when similar levels of phenolic compounds were present in a vessel’s bunker fuel.

Phenolic compounds in the bunker fuel samples were precisely identified using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) with both Direct Liquid Injection (DLI) and Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) methods, ensuring robust detection. The detected chemical compounds may have originated from the following sources:

1) liquid fuels derived from coal-tar
2) shale-derived oil

Regulatory Implications:

Due to the high levels of these chemical compounds the fuels render unacceptable under the section of general requirement in the standard ISO8217:2010 and MARPOL Annex VI regulation 18, irrespective of Table 2 compliance.

General requirements as per para 5 of ISO8217:2010 states below:

“5.2 The fuel shall be homogeneous blends of hydrocarbons derived from petroleum refining. This shall not preclude the incorporation of small amounts of additives intended to improve some aspects of fuel characteristics and performance. The fuels shall be free from inorganic acids and from used lubricating oils.

5.3 The fuel shall be free from any material that renders the fuel unacceptable for use in marine applications.

5.5 The fuel shall not contain any additive at the concentration used in the fuel, or any added substance or chemical waste that

  1. a) jeopardizes the safety of ships or adversely affects the performance of the machinery; or
  2. b) is harmful to personnel; or
  3. c) contributes overall to additional air pollution.”

MARITEC-NAIAS RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Closely observe the vessel fuel system/s for signs of filter clogging and purifier sludging and additionally, increase vigilance on the centrifuges to monitor overloading.
  • Increase frequency of their de-sludging cycle depending on the accumulated sludge.
  • Possibly reduce the mean time between bowl cleaning of the purifier and fuel system filters.
  • Avoid blending with other fuels, in particular marine diesel and gas oil and also other fuel oil as such mixing may well increase the sediment problem.

 

Photo credit: Louis Reed from Unsplash
Published: 12 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Bunker Fuel Quality

Bunker flash: High levels of chemical compounds found in Malaysia, alerts Maritec-Naias

During the period of 15 April to 15 July 2026, Maritec-Naias tested multiple fuel oil bunker samples from vessels that took fuel/bunkered in Malaysia ports.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED Hans Reniers on Unsplash

Bunker fuel testing and marine surveying business Maritec-Naias on Monday (10 August) issued an alert regarding high levels of chemical compounds found in multiple fuel oil bunker samples from vessels that have taken fuel/bunkered in Malaysia ports:

During the period of 15 April to 15 July 2026, Maritec-Naias tested multiple fuel oil bunker samples from vessels that took fuel/bunkered in Malaysia ports, which indicated the presence of high levels chemical compounds.

Five cases were found to have Phenolic compounds and Alkylresorcinols in the range of 1070 – 9994 PPM and three cases were found to have reactive hydrocarbons in the range of 4500 – 20000 PPM. Operational issues like excessive sludge formation in purifier and wear-and-tear of the fuel pump were reported.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) testing using the Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) method confirmed the presence of Alkylresorcinols in samples tested. In addition, GC-MS ASTM D7845 analysis identified a range of phenolic compounds and reactive hydrocarbons – including styrene and its derivatives, dicyclopentadiene, dihydro-dicyclopentadiene, and indene – providing comprehensive evidence of contamination.

The presence of Alkylresorcinols may originate from non-petroleum cutter stocks, such as Estonian shale oil, while the detected reactive hydrocarbons could stem from ethylene cracker by-products. In addition, the fuels appear to have been blended with low-quality marine fuels, a practice likely driven by sharply rising bunker prices amid the war in the Middle East.

Regulatory Implications:

Due to the high levels of these chemical compounds the fuel does not meet the general requirement and is considered as off-spec fuel as per clause 5 of ISO8217 and MARPOL Annex VI regulation 18, which states:

“The fuels shall be homogeneous blends of hydrocarbons derived from petroleum refining. This shall not preclude the incorporation of small amounts of additives intended to improve some aspects of performance. The fuels shall be free from inorganic acids and from used lubricating oils. The fuel should not include any added substance or chemical waste which,

  1. a) jeopardizes the safety of ships or adversely affects the performance of the machinery; or
  2. b) is harmful to personnel; or
  3. c) contributes overall to additional air pollution.”

MARITEC-NAIAS RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Closely observe the vessel fuel system/s for signs of filter clogging and purifier sludging and additionally, increase vigilance on the centrifuges to monitor overloading.
  • Increase frequency of their de-sludging cycle depending on the accumulated sludge.
  • Possibly reduce the mean time between bowl cleaning of the purifier and fuel system filters.
  • Avoid blending with other fuels, in particular marine diesel and gas oil and also other fuel oil as such mixing may well increase the sediment problem.
  • Opt for Maritec-Naias’s highly cost-effective Marine Fuel Testing Programme (MFTP) PLUS testing for all residual bunker fuel. This package includes routine ISO 8217 Testing, targeted GC-MS screening for 38 high-risk compounds relevant to ship operations & P-value Stability Testing – providing crucial pre-burn protection against fouled purifiers, blocked injectors & engine failure.

 

Photo credit: Hans Reniers on Unsplash
Published: 11 August, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending