Connect with us

Alternative Fuels

Argus Media: EU must ensure adequate green bunker supply, says WCS

WCS suggests that the EU’s FuelEU Maritime plan would be more successful if fuel use obligations were linked to the availability of green fuels.

Admin

Published

on

5e16c2fc7aa8e 1578550012 1

George Collard of global energy and commodity price reporting agency Argus Media on Wednesday (27 October) published a report of the World Shipping Council (WCS) focusing on EU’s availability of alternative marine fuels in achieving decarbonisation.

The World Shipping Council (WCS) has warned the EU that alternative marine fuel supply must be widely available for its decarbonisation policies to work.

The WCS whose members operate 90pc of the world’s container liner capacity and 60pc of total seaborne trade said it is concerned that the EU’s Renewable Energy Directive may not provide enough supply to meet demand after 2030. And it suggests that the EU’s FuelEU Maritime plan would be more successful if fuel use obligations were linked to the availability of green fuels.

The FuelEU Maritime plan is part of the EU’s wider ‘Fit for 55′ package to reduce net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the bloc by at least 55pc by 2030, compared with 1990 levels. The aim is to increase the use of green marine fuels in the EU.

Under the plan, there will be mandatory standards on the carbon content of bunker fuels, including on fuels that were bunkered outside of the bloc before a voyage into EU waters. Applying these rules to ships originating outside of the EU could be difficult and would cause an overlap between different regional and global policies, the WCS said.

The European Community Shipowners’ Association (ECSA) has also warned that ships originating outside the EU may have significant difficulties in sourcing bunker fuel compliant with the FuelEU Maritime plan, particularly biofuels, compared with intra-EU shipping.

The WCS believes FuelEU Maritime would be more effective if it applied solely to intra-EU shipping. Both the WCS and ECSA have said EU efforts to regulate shipping originating outside of the EU would be difficult to enforce and could undermine the International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) efforts to decarbonise global shipping.

The WCS also wants the FuelEU Maritime plan to adopt 2019 as its baseline for reducing GHG emissions rather than 2020, which would harmonise the plan with IMO targets. The group expressed strong support for FuelEU Maritime’s use of lifecycle GHG emissions and also its aim to ensure shipowners and charterers are responsible for cutting emissions.

 

Photo credit and source: Argus Media
Published: 2 November, 2021

Continue Reading

LNG Bunkering

Chinese firms form pact for 20,000 cbm LNG bunkering vessel project

CM Energy Tech, Seacon Shipping Group and China Merchants Heavy Industry (Jiangsu) signed a joint venture agreement for 1+1 20,000 cubic meter LNG bunkering vessels.

Admin

Published

on

By

China Flag

CM Energy Tech Co Ltd, Seacon Shipping Group Holdings Limited and China Merchants Heavy Industry (Jiangsu) Co Ltd on Tuesday (26 May) signed a joint venture agreement for the construction of 1+1 20,000 cubic meter liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering vessels. 

The parties also signed a shipbuilding contract for the first vessel, which will be constructed by China Merchants Heavy Industry.

The project combines CM Energy Tech’s access to the China Merchants Group ecosystem, Seacon Shipping Group’s expertise in ship management and operations, and China Merchants Heavy Industry’s shipbuilding capabilities. The partners said the initiative is intended to address the shortage of large-capacity LNG bunkering vessels in the Chinese market.

The newbuild LNG bunkering vessel will feature dual C-type independent cargo tanks and is designed with a boil-off rate of just 0.16% per day. It will also be capable of delivering LNG at a bunkering rate of up to 2,000 cbm per hour, enabling efficient refuelling of large LNG-fuelled vessels.

The vessel will be powered by Wärtsilä dual-fuel engines and will comply with IMO Tier III emissions requirements. The first vessel is scheduled for delivery in 2028.

The three companies said they plan to further expand cooperation across the LNG value chain, strengthen their presence in the marine energy sector and provide customers with integrated LNG bunkering services focused on safety, operational efficiency and lower carbon emissions.

 

Photo credit: David Yu from Pixabay
Published: 5 June, 2026

Continue Reading

Methanol

India’s Agastya inks green methanol offtake agreement with SAR Group

Agastya Green Fuels and SAR Group will work together to enable green methanol storage, bunkering, and marine fuel infrastructure across Sri Lanka.

Admin

Published

on

By

RESIZED CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash

India’s clean energy conglomerate Agastya Group on Wednesday (3 June) said Agastya Green Fuels signed a long-term green methanol offtake agreement with Sri Lankan bunker supplier SAR Maritime Agencies, a SAR Group company, for the supply of 250,000 metric tonnes (mt) per annum of EU RFNBO RED III Compliant green methanol.

Agastya said the agreement establishes one of the largest green methanol supply partnerships in the Indian Ocean Region and marked a major step toward creating a new green maritime energy corridor connecting India and Sri Lanka.

The green methanol will be supplied from the Agastya Green Fuels Hub at Mulapeta Port, Andhra Pradesh, India, where Agastya is developing a green methanol export-oriented facility with a planned investment of USD 6 billion over the next six years. The facility is expected to produce 1 million mt per annum. 

“Through this partnership, Agastya Green Fuels and SAR Group will work together to enable green methanol storage, bunkering, and marine fuel infrastructure across Sri Lanka, positioning Colombo, Hambantota, and Trincomalee as future clean-fuel hubs for global shipping,” the company said in a social media post. 

“The Indian Ocean is emerging as the world’s next green fuel corridor. Agastya Green Fuels intends to be at its center,” said Shashi K Reddy Arjula, Founder and Group CEO of Agastya. 

 

Photo credit: CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Published: 25 May, 2026

Continue Reading

Alternative Fuels

DNV data shows shift in alternative-fuelled vessel ordering patterns

DNV says shipowners are adopting more varied fuel strategies, reflecting a growing emphasis on optionality, regulatory compliance and risk management in long-life vessel investments.

Admin

Published

on

By

DNV data shows shift in alternative-fuelled vessel ordering patterns

Latest data from classification society DNV’s Alternative Fuels Insight (AFI) platform showed a total of 36 new orders for alternative-fuelled vessels were placed in May 2026.

Activity was primarily driven by LPG/ethane carriers, which accounted for 26 of the orders. A further eight LNG-fuelled vessels were ordered, including six container vessels and two car carriers, alongside two ethanol-fuelled bulk carriers.

So far in 2026, a total of 119 orders have been placed for alternative-fuelled vessels. Of these, LNG-fuelled vessels (60) account for the largest share of the orderbook, with the majority of these (42) coming from the container segment, and a smaller share (12) from car carriers.  

A further 50 orders have been placed for LPG/ethane carriers, while activity in other fuel types remains limited, with orders for methanol/ethanol (4), ammonia (4), and hydrogen (1).  

By the end of May, the share of alternative-fuelled vessels in total tonnage was notably lower than over the same period in 2025.

DNV data shows shift in alternative-fuelled vessel ordering patterns

Jason Stefanatos, Global Decarbonization Director at DNV Maritime, said: “While the pace of alternative-fuelled contracting has varied compared to 2025, the industry continues to move forward in its transition, with owners advancing fuel and technology decisions against a backdrop of evolving regulatory and market conditions.  

“As in previous years, ordering of alternative-fuelled vessels has been led by the container segment, but dynamics are shifting. While activity remains strong, the focus has moved towards smaller vessels, with fewer very large container ships, which are historically more likely to adopt alternative fuels, being ordered. At the same time, we are seeing increased activity in tanker and bulker segments.  

“What is also becoming clearer is that fuel choice is no longer approached as a single bet. Owners are increasingly treating it as a portfolio decision, managing fuel optionality, timing of investment, and exposure to future regulation as they navigate long-life asset decisions.

“This is reflected in more varied ordering patterns, reinforcing that the transition is not progressing in a straight line.”

 

Photo credit: DNV
Published: 25 May, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending