Editor: The article was edited on 26 February to correctly reflect the Marine insurer being the correct entity responsible for handling fuel contract disputes, not the P&I club.
The lack of definition over marine fuel contaminants has left shipowners most vulnerable to damage claims, states the Technical Sales Manager of international laboratory testing services agency Eurofins.
“The ship’s crew who is the end fuel user is voiceless and left at high sea to deal with the dangers of machinery breakdown, loss of propulsion, grounding, collisions, loss of life and environmental damage,” Nijas Schemnad told Manifold Times.
Quality issues such as elevated Total Acid Number (TAN) and Total Sediment Potential (TSP) have recently came into the limelight due to the new generation of IMO 2020 compliant bunker fuels.
However, the shipping industry should not forget about the issue of “mysterious” chemical contaminants that affected several vessels in 2018, he says.
“To date, the root cause has not been identified and the perpetrators penalised. Chemical contaminants from mysterious cutter stocks are still a major risk affecting shipowners today,” Schemnad notes.
“While issues with TAN and TSP are arguably easier to manage due to well defined limits, the case has been different with contaminants and foreign components found in marine fuels.
“To date, there is still no consensus as to what chemical contaminant, or its combinations, can lead to operational issues when consumed in marine engines.
“No conclusive scientific evidence exists and the marine fuels testing industry only relies on empirical evidence to suggest issues which may take place when consuming these type of fuels.
“Further complications arise when some ships manage to consume contaminated fuel and escape without issues, whereas others are not so lucky.”
ISO 8217:2017 Clause 5 Annex B on Deleterious Materials is ambiguous in identifying and determining the concentration of a material causing marine fuel to be unacceptable, he notes.
Annex B states: “The marine industry continues to build on its understanding of the impact of specific chemical species and the respective critical concentrations at which detrimental effects are observed on the operational characteristics of marine fuels in use.”
“It is this difficult task of proving what contaminants and foreign components are classed by ISO 8217 as ‘Deleterious Materials’ that is the headache for shipowners which rely on ISO 8217:2017 Clause 5 for protection,” Schemnad points out.
He further offers the below hypothetical scenario to explain:
“In reality, debunkering is the least favoured and most expensive option. What constitutes as unfavourable results or contaminants is a major point of contention,” says Schemnad.
“The question is if the machinery breaks down, the P&I Marine insurer will ask: ‘If you knew there might be a problem why did you still burn the fuel?’ Hence, the Shipowner risks non-coverage of his damage claims by the P&I club.
“It is a situation where the Shipowner is tugged having to choose between either the commercial or safety interests of his vessel; it’s damned if you do, and damned if you don’t – a deadly imbroglio.
“Ultimately, there is no solution on the horizon until a statistical study and scientific consensus is reached clearly about Deleterious Materials.
“Until then, more public awareness needs to be created about the inherent risks of mysterious and deadly chemical contaminants,” he concludes.
Food for Thought: If you found out your food to have potential harmful ingredients, would you want to reject it or would you want to be forced to consume and fall sick to prove the harmfulness? Bunker fuel is the food and lifeline of a vessel.
Photo credit: Manifold Times
Published: 21 February, 2020
Facility at Port of Tanjung Pelepas will be the ‘world’s largest storage and supply hub’ reports The Edge.
Several international partners including Siemens Energy , Alfa Laval Carbon Clean , Haldor Topsoe , Worley and Uniper contributing to design of the plant.
3.94 million mt of various marine fuels were sold at the world’s largest bunkering port in September, a decrease from 4.22 million mt recorded in the same period last year.
Attached table summarises North’s insight on the stands taken by ports that have or will prohibit the use of scrubbers, or have placed conditions on their use.
CCIC discuss the progression of MFM technology for bunkering at Singapore port with Manifold Times; and possible development of a primary facility for MFM calibration.
Gains ‘competitive advantage’ ahead of IMO 2020 with 20% acquisition of Feen Marine Scrubbers Inc.
Between November 2016 and October 2017, Mr Tan falsified at least 20 invoices and submitted these invoices to UOB and OCBC, according to court documents obtained by bunkering publication Manifold Times.
‘CSM Taurus arrived in Singapore during mid-September and is currently undergoing final preparations before starting commercial operations,’ General Manager of CSM tells Manifold Times.
Criminal syndicate’s tampering with MFMs on bunker tankers Southernpec 6 and Southernpec 7 conceptualised by three masterminds and carried out by cargo officers on board, according to joint statement.
Seeks information connected to SGS COQs of Gas Oil and Marine Diesel Oil cargoes loaded on board Vinalines Glory from the Vopak Banyan Terminal in Singapore between January and February 2013.
Additional topics of bunker contamination and OCM services discussed at VPS’ Fuel Management Challenges – The Year of 2021 & Beyond webinar on 23 September; Manifold Times summarises the session.
‘The JMs have failed to discharge their duties by blindly helping the Banks mount a false case against the Defendant,’ wrote defence lawyers representing former IPP Director Dr Goh Jian Hian in court statement.
